|
1. iloveoov 916.0 - 2. Nada 670.5 +1 3. Xellos 661.0 -1 4. Julyzerg 616.0 - 5. Nal_Ra 501.0 - 6. Kingdom 425.0 +1 7. Reach 412.0 +1 8. Midas 365.5 +1 9. Boxer 365.0 -3 10. Yellow 324.0 +2 11. TheMarine 322.5 - 12. Goodfriend 315.5 -2 13. Chojja 295.0 - 14. Gorush 289.0 +4/Zeus 289.0 +1 16. Silent_Control 252.0 - 17. jju 235.0 +2 18. Sync 218.0 -4 19. ForU 205.5 +1 20. doggi 160.0 +2 21. ErosRage 22. Junwi 23. Mumyung 24. Intotherainbow/Cloud 26. Side 27. Oversky 28. Saferzerg 29. Mingu 30. Terato
|
United States37500 Posts
|
United States10774 Posts
Top 10 : 5 Terrans, 2 Zergs, 3 Protoss...
More Protoss than Zerg
Damn Iloveoov is a beast~o_O
Thanks for the info.
|
|
do progamers care about these rankings
|
On January 01 2005 20:53 randomKo_Orean wrote: Ugh, Ihateoov
You hate winning? oov = victory ^^;;
|
On January 01 2005 20:57 ItchReliever wrote: do progamers care about these rankings Nada said he wanted to reclaim the #1 ranking once.
|
United States37500 Posts
On January 01 2005 20:57 ItchReliever wrote: do progamers care about these rankings
Progamers care about winning. And winning directly affect their rankings, no? But I doubt they would care so much about ranking score as opposed to ranking position.
|
|
|
damn Iloveoov is FAR at the top o.o
|
Definitely sad watching 2 players like Yellow and boxer being so low in the ranking, comparing to what they normally do..
|
The kespa are gay mostly ;x no way should midas be over boxer and yellow =\
|
5 terrans in top 10, omg i hate them
|
thats what i cant understand boxer had JUST got a top2 in the OGN doesnt that count A LOT? what did midas do in the meanwhile that worths more than a top2 OGN? top1???
at least yellow won some position, but he was top4 ogn and top4 KT-KTF, he should win more
|
Apparently WCG counts as an astronomical amount of points, hence the reason for midas and xellos placing so highly
|
@raidern
Everyone knows the competition in a Starleague is 10000000x that of WCG, but I guess since winning WCG technically means you are the best in the world that they give it priority over starleagues in ranking points
|
Reach is like -100 points from Kang >< Oov is freakin' 300 points away from #2 spot, jeez! That's how Nada used to be, before the monster Oov. I heard Kang isn't doing his best and Reach is supposed to be the #1 Protoss. Yippy ^ ^ I like Kang n all, but Reach is Hero Protoss !!
More Protoss than Zerg in top 10, but overall more Zerg then Terran and Protoss combined? =b GL
|
What's this? Kingdom +1, Boxer -3 wtf???
|
Why the hell is NaDa number two? He stopped being the dominant player 2 years ago and hasn't won a single tournament for over a year now. These rankings are clearly wrong.
|
NaDa is ok... but wtf fuck is wrong with boxer\????? -3???? He's no2 in the last OSL.. when will that win reflect in the current ranking????
|
Baltimore, USA22222 Posts
Haha... I like every month someone posting the rankings, then 90221312138 people inevitably argue about how the rankings are wrong, or who should be where, like the fucking world is gonna end, without even understanding how it works~
|
Thx for ranking. Nada is 2nd again.
|
China3334 Posts
pretty sure Gorush will kick into top10 next month, hes much like what July was last July
|
Gorush will definitely disappear from the top-30 next month.
He won too many games. I predict -19.
|
kespa ranking is a 12month ranking right? so maybe boxer did better 12 months ago than now, or the guys that surpassed him had a very bad month erased and did much better this time.. still, giving wcg so many pts sucks
|
TT boxer. But hes still the man <3
|
....and kespa ranking system still suck
|
|
Germany / USA16648 Posts
On January 02 2005 04:13 PoP wrote: Gorush will definitely disappear from the top-30 next month.
He won too many games. I predict -19.
golden
|
|
On January 02 2005 02:15 Splendid wrote: Why the hell is NaDa number two? He stopped being the dominant player 2 years ago and hasn't won a single tournament for over a year now. These rankings are clearly wrong.
could you stop flaming nada in every post you make? it's getting annoying >.<
|
And Ra before Reach is a joke
|
what's the picture? proagamer getting laid? O_O
|
GoRush should be top 5. 14 is unacceptable.
|
|
ahhh so KESPA ranks is like ATP ranking? i mean the last 52 weeks? this week replaces the "52 weeks ago" week?
|
ra and reach gogogo
btw iloove s got many points
|
On January 02 2005 08:08 thelucas wrote: OOv and Nada are best
so this is the reason god put u on earth.
|
On January 02 2005 11:23 raidern_br wrote:ahhh so KESPA ranks is like ATP ranking? i mean the last 52 weeks? this week replaces the "52 weeks ago" week?
well its monthly, so more like this past december replaces last december or something =o but yeah
and boxer down 3 is STILL bullshit no matter how bad he did in MSL/KT-KTF -_-
edit: poor sync T_T, after a possible comeback he just like fell off again and zeus is still top 15 x_X tied with gorush
nada going up to 2 is good.
and gorush is going to skyrocket soon XD
|
Haha, Doggi gained +2. Does winning a few games do that much?
|
|
When it has a PlayerNamer/PlayerName xxx.0 -/+x, does that mean they are two players tied for that spot, or that player has played under two different names in his career.
|
United States37500 Posts
GoRush and Zeus are both tied for rank 14, if that's what you're asking about. And yes, they are two different players. GoRush is Zerg and Zeus is Protoss.
|
K ty. I knew Gorush was a zerg, and I knew Zeus is a Protoss. It's just that Zeus hasn't played in a long time (not that I know of) and I thought that maybe Gorush used to be Zeus. But I understand now.
|
What is this ranking and who does it ?-|... Sorry for my ignorance.
|
what the fuck boxer -3????
|
kespa makes no sense. xellos didn't even qualify for next season of starleague, and he's supposed to be the third best in the world.
|
OSL is where they get most points, wtf boxer!!!!
|
what's this??? 3months delayed, way back when boxer was on a slump!!!!
|
United States37500 Posts
On January 02 2005 18:06 Tress wrote: kespa makes no sense. xellos didn't even qualify for next season of starleague, and he's supposed to be the third best in the world.
XellOs is so high up because he won WCG. And WCG give an insane amount of points on Kespa for some reason. Same goes for Midas and his 2nd place finish.
|
ahhh, boxer is almost out of top 10 .
|
On January 02 2005 11:43 TheGreenBeret wrote:so this is the reason god put u on earth.
that almost made me ROFL, i only did LOL
|
On January 02 2005 18:30 [G]Max_Power wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2005 11:43 TheGreenBeret wrote:On January 02 2005 08:08 thelucas wrote: OOv and Nada are best so this is the reason god put u on earth. that almost made me ROFL, i only did LOL
what? i don't get the joke...
|
Wtf Boxer....
Ra? Please get out of top10 until you show us some magic again, you're taking up Reach space.
Midas? Wow did well in WCG. I bet it feels nice going to bed at night knowing you are on top 10 above Yellow and Boxer because you won some tourney with foreigners. Newbies compared to the rest of the top 10.
Terato@30. Wtf dude, you have fucking Kingdom and Rainbow on your team, not to mention Boxer. Do something yo.
On January 02 2005 10:35 FrozenArbiter wrote: Btw, if you check the old ranks from when boxer dominated he was actually even further ahead than Oov I believe :O
THAT'S MY BOY~!
|
this is all wrong!!!
boxer, yellow, gorush are way don't the list while kingdom and ra who aren't doing anything is doing well in this stupid ranking.... OSL runner up = zero points!!!!
|
This judges by accomplishment, not by who is the best moment. Especially not at this moment.
|
i.e. Grrr has accomplished a lot more than , say, Goodfriend. But he has never been as good as Goodfriend has been this last year.
|
I disagree with midas going up all those ranks because he placed 2nd in WCG and boxer losing 3 spots even though he was 2nd place behind OOv. I think boxer should have gotten more points for placing 2nd in his tourney than Midas did in his tourney. Cmon, It was a pretty much a breeze to second place for Midas. The hardest part for Midas was qualifying in the first place back in Korea.
|
United States37500 Posts
On January 02 2005 19:06 Ack1027 wrote:Wtf Boxer.... Ra? Please get out of top10 until you show us some magic again, you're taking up Reach space. Midas? Wow did well in WCG. I bet it feels nice going to bed at night knowing you are on top 10 above Yellow and Boxer because you won some tourney with foreigners. Newbies compared to the rest of the top 10. Terato@30. Wtf dude, you have fucking Kingdom and Rainbow on your team, not to mention Boxer. Do something yo. Show nested quote +On January 02 2005 10:35 FrozenArbiter wrote: Btw, if you check the old ranks from when boxer dominated he was actually even further ahead than Oov I believe :O THAT'S MY BOY~!
I'm a BoxeR fan just like you, Abyss. But don't go around scrutinizing rA, Midas, and Terato. As if any of them have any control over how Kespa ranks progamers. It's one thing not to like a particular ranking system, but it's a completely different thing for bashing on people who are trying very hard and not yet performing to other people's or their own standards.
|
|
Due to the fact that Boxer only got 2nd at OGN, this is utterly unacceptable and is signs of him deproving. Therefore, we are moving him down 3 ranks.
|
France1270 Posts
On January 02 2005 21:24 TeRRan`UseR wrote: I disagree with midas going up all those ranks because he placed 2nd in WCG and boxer losing 3 spots even though he was 2nd place behind OOv. I think boxer should have gotten more points for placing 2nd in his tourney than Midas did in his tourney. Cmon, It was a pretty much a breeze to second place for Midas.
...
The hardest part for Midas was qualifying in the first place back in Korea.
At last,and at least, you got something right. The same goes with ForU: he didn't get the point for his ranking at WCG, but rather for qualifying at Korea's WCG prelim.
|
France1270 Posts
On January 02 2005 00:30 SiS wrote: Everyone knows the competition in a Starleague is 10000000x that of WCG, but I guess since winning WCG technically means you are the best in the world that they give it priority over starleagues in ranking points Everyone knows the competition at WCG Korea is exactly the same as in an OSL. No need to put 7 zeros up there, you won't make your point more valid, only show your incompetence at using numbers. You could argue on the fact it is only a 2 days tournement, you don't like the maps (are OGN maps more balanced? not sure), you don't approve direct eliminitation, best of 1, whatever, but don't argue the competetion is not as tough, because it is just the same guys.
|
Overall, OGN allows players of lesser skill levels to get a higher possibility of beating players of higher skill levels
1. The quality of the players were not up to par (guys like oov, ra, reach never participated)
2. The players of higher skills were practicing for their leagues and had very little time to practice on WCG maps, as most even admitted. This means that underdog players had a much better chance of defeating higher skilled players since they actually had lots of time to practice for these maps.
3. The luck factor was much higher, as pointed out.
4. The WCG maps were just bad. Quite frankly, the previous OGN league lineup of maps weren't that much better anyway.
|
three terrans at top...
|
On January 03 2005 05:02 X)Benny wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2005 21:24 TeRRan`UseR wrote: I disagree with midas going up all those ranks because he placed 2nd in WCG and boxer losing 3 spots even though he was 2nd place behind OOv. I think boxer should have gotten more points for placing 2nd in his tourney than Midas did in his tourney. Cmon, It was a pretty much a breeze to second place for Midas.
...
The hardest part for Midas was qualifying in the first place back in Korea. At last,and at least, you got something right. The same goes with ForU: he didn't get the point for his ranking at WCG, but rather for qualifying at Korea's WCG prelim.
What else have I said on these forums that was wrong?
|
|
|
|