What makes stats not worth it
Forum Index > BW General |
thekill
United States47 Posts
| ||
Birdie
New Zealand4438 Posts
On November 19 2015 18:30 thekill wrote: the fact that you can get wins on your stats by beating computer makes the stats not worth it and bullshit in sc1. who is gonna care about stats when u can just put on like 1 comp on other team and put like 5 comps on ur team and just win like every game, or just do some cheesy crap on the enemy comp and win? Srsly the stats should count only if there is like another player on the opposite team, stats should accumulate only if there are people vs people. If you play on a server like iCCup then only wins against humans count. Competitive players don't play on Battle.net servers. | ||
iFU.pauline
France1386 Posts
| ||
thekill
United States47 Posts
| ||
thekill
United States47 Posts
On November 19 2015 18:32 Birdie wrote: If you play on a server like iCCup then only wins against humans count. Competitive players don't play on Battle.net servers. uhh yea what am i suppose to do sign up for that shit and then uhh like theyll always be judging me every time i play and giving me grades n shit? naw pass lol. you have to be like SUPER pro to join iccup whos to say regular average joe players dont have the right to have a decent good ranking system too huh? u see everyone always raving on about stats in 3v3 fastest games n stuff so lets fix stats | ||
Birdie
New Zealand4438 Posts
On November 19 2015 19:02 thekill wrote: uhh yea what am i suppose to do sign up for that shit and then uhh like theyll always be judging me every time i play and giving me grades n shit? naw pass lol. you have to be like SUPER pro to join iccup whos to say regular average joe players dont have the right to have a decent good ranking system too huh? u see everyone always raving on about stats in 3v3 fastest games n stuff so lets fix stats Stats on Battle.net only count number of games and percentage won, but they don't show any skill at all. You don't have to be super pro to join iCCup, lots of new and beginner players play there. You sign up at http://iccup.com/en/starcraft/, and use their launcher to play. As for changing Battle.net, there hasn't been an update to the game or official servers for years. I wouldn't hold out for it ever getting changed, so I would just not worry about someone's Battle.net stats at all. | ||
GeckoXp
Germany2013 Posts
On November 19 2015 19:02 thekill wrote: uhh yea what am i suppose to do sign up for that shit and then uhh like theyll always be judging me every time i play and giving me grades n shit? naw pass lol. you have to be like SUPER pro to join iccup whos to say regular average joe players dont have the right to have a decent good ranking system too huh? u see everyone always raving on about stats in 3v3 fastest games n stuff so lets fix stats Ex-ICCup Admin here. We expand our business and now also judge and grade posts... and shit. Content: 1.5 / 10 Your posts features little to no content, it basically is just one thought. Better than nothing, but only a 1.5 out of 10. Media Usage: 0.5/10 You do not use any media at all, there are no pictures, nothing. However, you refer to the classic and true battle.net over battle.net 2.0, which gives a 0.5. Design: 0/10 Related to the media usage, the format of your post is not nice to read. At all. No points from Berlin. Presentation: 0.5/10 Combined, content and design do not go well with the forum style. However, it could have been longer, so a 0.5 to not sound too cocky. Emotions: 8/10 The strong part of your posting is the credible rage against the system. You could be the voice of a revolution if you had something to say. Erotic: 0/10 Speaking of statistics, but no p-values. This makes me a sad panda. Humor: 10/10 Thanks to your emotions, we can totally relate to you. It's a very good satire approach in 2015. I like it. Keep it up. Feedback Presence: 3/10 You are somewhat present to respond to answers. Sadly, you quote single posts instead of writing longer answers. Could be better. Creativity: 5/10 Coming up with a thought so unrelated to reality in 2015 is worth a thumbs up. Yet, you do not bitch enough about the pirate servers, or promote Garena. Moderation Evading: 4/10 Perfect timing to open such a thread, hopeing most moderators would be gone. However, I sense the ban-yoshi approaching at full speed. Fear the ban-yoshi o/ Summary: 32.5 / 100 Good first attempt, but try to come up with something slightly more thought through next time. I suggest adding flip charts and smilies. Also, maybe expand on your stream of consciousness style and add a bit Kafka to it. Never hurts. | ||
ramon
Germany4842 Posts
even if you are gold you won't be the worst on iccup (if you even play sc2), just give iccup a try imo | ||
Endymion
United States3701 Posts
| ||
Cele
Germany4012 Posts
On November 19 2015 19:29 GeckoXp wrote: Ex-ICCup Admin here. We expand our business and now also judge and grade posts... and shit. Content: 1.5 / 10 Your posts features little to no content, it basically is just one thought. Better than nothing, but only a 1.5 out of 10. Media Usage: 0.5/10 You do not use any media at all, there are no pictures, nothing. However, you refer to the classic and true battle.net over battle.net 2.0, which gives a 0.5. Design: 0/10 Related to the media usage, the format of your post is not nice to read. At all. No points from Berlin. Presentation: 0.5/10 Combined, content and design do not go well with the forum style. However, it could have been longer, so a 0.5 to not sound too cocky. Emotions: 8/10 The strong part of your posting is the credible rage against the system. You could be the voice of a revolution if you had something to say. Erotic: 0/10 Speaking of statistics, but no p-values. This makes me a sad panda. Humor: 10/10 Thanks to your emotions, we can totally relate to you. It's a very good satire approach in 2015. I like it. Keep it up. Feedback Presence: 3/10 You are somewhat present to respond to answers. Sadly, you quote single posts instead of writing longer answers. Could be better. Creativity: 5/10 Coming up with a thought so unrelated to reality in 2015 is worth a thumbs up. Yet, you do not bitch enough about the pirate servers, or promote Garena. Moderation Evading: 4/10 Perfect timing to open such a thread, hopeing most moderators would be gone. However, I sense the ban-yoshi approaching at full speed. Fear the ban-yoshi o/ Summary: 32.5 / 100 Good first attempt, but try to come up with something slightly more thought through next time. I suggest adding flip charts and smilies. Also, maybe expand on your stream of consciousness style and add a bit Kafka to it. Never hurts. hahaahaha oh Gecko promise me to never change ^^ | ||
DarkNetHunter
1224 Posts
On November 19 2015 19:29 GeckoXp wrote: Ex-ICCup Admin here. We expand our business and now also judge and grade posts... and shit. Content: 1.5 / 10 Your posts features little to no content, it basically is just one thought. Better than nothing, but only a 1.5 out of 10. Media Usage: 0.5/10 You do not use any media at all, there are no pictures, nothing. However, you refer to the classic and true battle.net over battle.net 2.0, which gives a 0.5. Design: 0/10 Related to the media usage, the format of your post is not nice to read. At all. No points from Berlin. Presentation: 0.5/10 Combined, content and design do not go well with the forum style. However, it could have been longer, so a 0.5 to not sound too cocky. Emotions: 8/10 The strong part of your posting is the credible rage against the system. You could be the voice of a revolution if you had something to say. Erotic: 0/10 Speaking of statistics, but no p-values. This makes me a sad panda. Humor: 10/10 Thanks to your emotions, we can totally relate to you. It's a very good satire approach in 2015. I like it. Keep it up. Feedback Presence: 3/10 You are somewhat present to respond to answers. Sadly, you quote single posts instead of writing longer answers. Could be better. Creativity: 5/10 Coming up with a thought so unrelated to reality in 2015 is worth a thumbs up. Yet, you do not bitch enough about the pirate servers, or promote Garena. Moderation Evading: 4/10 Perfect timing to open such a thread, hopeing most moderators would be gone. However, I sense the ban-yoshi approaching at full speed. Fear the ban-yoshi o/ Summary: 32.5 / 100 Good first attempt, but try to come up with something slightly more thought through next time. I suggest adding flip charts and smilies. Also, maybe expand on your stream of consciousness style and add a bit Kafka to it. Never hurts. Now this thread has content worth keeping it open for haha | ||
vOdToasT
Sweden2870 Posts
Don't close it. | ||
JieXian
Malaysia4677 Posts
| ||
chrisolo
Germany2604 Posts
On November 19 2015 19:51 ramon wrote: don't know how iccup looks nowadays, but a couple of months before hots came out i just looked up 1 build order for pvt and one for pvz and went even with c players as a plat wol player. even if you are gold you won't be the worst on iccup (if you even play sc2), just give iccup a try imo Lol. I have never seen a post like this. Its always like "I was D in BW and am roflstomp Masters in SC2 ez get rekt!". Seriously though, in my SC2 time (2010-2011), I was like shitty D+ (more like mid D tbh) and got to Diamond easily and then also Masters and even could hold up against the high Masters / low Grandmaster players of my clan. I really cannot see a platinum player from SC2 getting anywhere near C players in BW. | ||
BisuDagger
Bisutopia18980 Posts
On November 19 2015 19:29 GeckoXp wrote: Ex-ICCup Admin here. We expand our business and now also judge and grade posts... and shit. Content: 1.5 / 10 Your posts features little to no content, it basically is just one thought. Better than nothing, but only a 1.5 out of 10. Media Usage: 0.5/10 You do not use any media at all, there are no pictures, nothing. However, you refer to the classic and true battle.net over battle.net 2.0, which gives a 0.5. Design: 0/10 Related to the media usage, the format of your post is not nice to read. At all. No points from Berlin. Presentation: 0.5/10 Combined, content and design do not go well with the forum style. However, it could have been longer, so a 0.5 to not sound too cocky. Emotions: 8/10 The strong part of your posting is the credible rage against the system. You could be the voice of a revolution if you had something to say. Erotic: 0/10 Speaking of statistics, but no p-values. This makes me a sad panda. Humor: 10/10 Thanks to your emotions, we can totally relate to you. It's a very good satire approach in 2015. I like it. Keep it up. Feedback Presence: 3/10 You are somewhat present to respond to answers. Sadly, you quote single posts instead of writing longer answers. Could be better. Creativity: 5/10 Coming up with a thought so unrelated to reality in 2015 is worth a thumbs up. Yet, you do not bitch enough about the pirate servers, or promote Garena. Moderation Evading: 4/10 Perfect timing to open such a thread, hopeing most moderators would be gone. However, I sense the ban-yoshi approaching at full speed. Fear the ban-yoshi o/ Summary: 32.5 / 100 Good first attempt, but try to come up with something slightly more thought through next time. I suggest adding flip charts and smilies. Also, maybe expand on your stream of consciousness style and add a bit Kafka to it. Never hurts. Do me next please! | ||
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
On November 20 2015 03:07 chrisolo wrote: Lol. I have never seen a post like this. Its always like "I was D in BW and am roflstomp Masters in SC2 ez get rekt!". Seriously though, in my SC2 time (2010-2011), I was like shitty D+ (more like mid D tbh) and got to Diamond easily and then also Masters and even could hold up against the high Masters / low Grandmaster players of my clan. I really cannot see a platinum player from SC2 getting anywhere near C players in BW. Sc2 ladder is harder now than in 2011 for sure, don't know about iccup though. | ||
Naracs_Duc
746 Posts
On November 19 2015 18:30 thekill wrote: the fact that you can get wins on your stats by beating computer makes the stats not worth it and bullshit in sc1. who is gonna care about stats when u can just put on like 1 comp on other team and put like 5 comps on ur team and just win like every game, or just do some cheesy crap on the enemy comp and win? Srsly the stats should count only if there is like another player on the opposite team, stats should accumulate only if there are people vs people. You mean my 7v1 comp stomps don't count? And that my 7v1 comp stomps where I turn off Allied Victory doesn't count either? | ||
13Julia
Canada231 Posts
| ||
ramon
Germany4842 Posts
On November 20 2015 03:07 chrisolo wrote: Lol. I have never seen a post like this. Its always like "I was D in BW and am roflstomp Masters in SC2 ez get rekt!". Seriously though, in my SC2 time (2010-2011), I was like shitty D+ (more like mid D tbh) and got to Diamond easily and then also Masters and even could hold up against the high Masters / low Grandmaster players of my clan. I really cannot see a platinum player from SC2 getting anywhere near C players in BW. Would make a lot of sense to lie about some ranks i had years ago... I played BW before SC2, not sure how many people went from SC2 to BW or returned at the time. Felt like I was playing against not so good players (in both games). Surely there are a billion reasons and even more outlier possibilities. Maybe I'm the next bonjwa. | ||
Waxangel
United States32419 Posts
keep up the good work, guys | ||
| ||