|
Based on that and on current actual SC2 distributions (source http://sc2unmasked.com/Stats ):
A to A+ = Grandmaster (0.5%) top of B- to A- = Master (5.2%) top of C- to B- = Diamond (24.6%) C- = Platinum (21.5%) Top half of D+ = Gold (20.3%) Bottom half of D+ = Silver (20.9%) D- to D = Bronze/Unranked (7%)
|
On June 02 2017 13:22 oOOoOphidian wrote:Based on that and on current actual SC2 distributions (source http://sc2unmasked.com/Stats ): A to A+ = Grandmaster (0.5%) top of B- to A- = Master (5.2%) top of C- to B- = Diamond (24.6%) C- = Platinum (21.5%) Top half of D+ = Gold (20.3%) Bottom half of D+ = Silver (20.9%) D- to D = Bronze/Unranked (7%)
That I think is using the initial assumptions, which is basically looking only at D+ and above, but that's already a pretty selected group. D rank players certainly make up a sizeable portion of the playerbase.
From what he looked at about 50% of the D ranks had a 1/3 winning rate, suggestive of true D. About 50% did not. If we assume (and I suspect this would over-inflate skill) that of those 50% with a winning record they were distributed similar to the ladder; then you would add about 20k to D, and distrubte the rest to other groups.
So of the ignored 40k:
22,008 to D 11,004 to D+ 5,502 to C- 2,751 to C 1,376 to C+ 688 to B- 344 to B 178 to B+ approx 200 to A- and up
Which leaves:
22,008 D-/D 20,485 to D+ 10,438 to C- 4,849 to C 2,580 to C+ 1,562 to B- 652 to B 486 to B+ 336 A- or better
These yield an estimated breakdown of
34.7% D-/D 32.3% D+ 16.5% C- 7.7% C 4.1% C+ 2.5% B- 1% B .7% B+ .5% A- or better
From a top down perspective:
A- is top .5% B+ is top 1.3% B is top 2.3% B- is top 4.8% C+ is top 8.9% C is top 16% C- is top 32% D+ is top 65% D is top unknown percent (amount D vs D- is unknown)
Then from a percentile breakdown:
A- is top 99th percentile B+ is 98th percentile B is 97th percentile B- is 95th percentile C+ is 91st percentile C is 83rd percentile C- is 67th percentile D+ is 34th percentile D-/D spawn 1st to 33rd percentiles
|
feelsgood, aiming for A, there is no other option left again.
|
Pretty sure I could stroke it to those screens. Very slick and sexy.
|
looks awesome, can't wait for remastered
|
oh god. It is blizzard math time again 300-100 = 83% winrate
its like they arent able to display accurate stats in any of their games ^^ (SC2, OW and now SC:R)
|
konadora
Singapore66060 Posts
|
United Kingdom12009 Posts
On June 02 2017 21:58 404AlphaSquad wrote: oh god. It is blizzard math time again 300-100 = 83% winrate
its like they arent able to display accurate stats in any of their games ^^ (SC2, OW and now SC:R)
Ranks are never accurate imo. The only ranking system that comes close near to being accurate I'd argue is ELO from Chess. MMR is literally just a number and goes up when you win and down if you lose, it's entirely pointless because depending on who you play (see people B rank and above on iCCUP by just grinding games vs D players) then it's never going to be accurate.
|
On May 27 2017 15:19 TT1 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2017 15:07 TibbersCute wrote:Speaking of illogical... "Ah so SC2 ranks today, MBS and smartcast tomorrow.. gotcha" is a straw-man. Seems a little silly to call others dumb coming from your position. On May 27 2017 14:53 TT1 wrote: The classics team already stated that they wouldnt touch anything gameplay related You mean like in-gameplay hotkeys? On May 27 2017 14:53 TT1 wrote: you're complaining about BW getting bonus features (and you're pretty much the only person doing so) They asked for feedback, that's my feedback. Look at yourself! Called my opinion dumb, illogical, and are trying to say I'm alone in my opinion? Yeah, my opinion looks completely alone. wait, you gave feedback.. did i read that right? feedback on what, exactly? you being paranoid about the dev team adding SC2 gameplay features like MBS and smartcast (by giving an inch!) has nothing to do with giving feedback on the new profiles, it's you being paranoid. also by gameplay changes i meant changing unit stats/the game's mechanics (they stated that they didn't add rebinds for f keys and control groups because they didn't want to touch the games mechanics). keep wearing that tin foil hat of yours tho, wouldn't want to ruin your fun. im hoping people like you will be able to relax once the launch happens and nothing ends up changing, god knows you need it. edit: and just to be clear i don't really have an issue with you wanting F - S ranks. what i have an issue with is your "give an inch, take a mile" statement, that's a terrible mindset to have.
120% agree, some people just cant stop crying
|
is there any need for % of players per rank?? it would be natural that there would be a number of people within a rank being the consequence of their win and losses with a given point system? I wonder about the point system, and if we will know about how it works. Is Fish going to keep their system?
On June 22 2017 15:03 Qikz wrote:Show nested quote +On June 02 2017 21:58 404AlphaSquad wrote: oh god. It is blizzard math time again 300-100 = 83% winrate
its like they arent able to display accurate stats in any of their games ^^ (SC2, OW and now SC:R) Ranks are never accurate imo. The only ranking system that comes close near to being accurate I'd argue is ELO from Chess. MMR is literally just a number and goes up when you win and down if you lose, it's entirely pointless because depending on who you play (see people B rank and above on iCCUP by just grinding games vs D players) then it's never going to be accurate. Exactly and I agree ELO from Chess seems good something similar or identical was used on old blizz ladder which seemed disfunctional for other reasons like hacks/bots and slow speed.
|
Is there any news on when SC:R gets released?
|
On June 23 2017 02:39 thezanursic wrote: Is there any news on when SC:R gets released?
Nope. No date. No date announcement. Nothing.
Blizzard themselves may not know the date yet with all the issues coming from 1.18 development.
|
It seems development is going slowly right now. I had a dream they released version 3.18, and had a shitload of features. Completely skipped 2.0. It was just a dream.
|
Does anyone know what happened to these features? The cloud replay thing sounds amazing. I just want to know my matchup stats since i play random.
Also is there a way to view bnet profiles via your browser? I am using starlog.gg now but i am sure they are getting their data from somewhere...
|
Forgotten maybe... I dunno... it kinda is getting embarrassing with the whole buggy/laggy UI
|
|
I think Blizzard wanted us to forget these previews
|
On October 19 2017 13:22 aLt)nirvana wrote: Does anyone know what happened to these features? The cloud replay thing sounds amazing. I just want to know my matchup stats since i play random.
Also is there a way to view bnet profiles via your browser? I am using starlog.gg now but i am sure they are getting their data from somewhere... or even viewing your stats through your phone. (Kind of like how Halo did with Halo Waypoint)
|
On October 19 2017 13:22 aLt)nirvana wrote: Does anyone know what happened to these features? The cloud replay thing sounds amazing. I just want to know my matchup stats since i play random.
Also is there a way to view bnet profiles via your browser? I am using starlog.gg now but i am sure they are getting their data from somewhere... Cloud replays are actually sort of in game. There is no official way to access them however. I found this out by going to https://starlog.gg/en/leaderboard then signing in and if you click on your profile and go to match history you can download all of your replays.
So replays are all currently being saved to the "cloud" it seems. But blizzard doesn't give us direct access to them yet.
|
On October 20 2017 07:06 jimminy_kriket wrote:Cloud replays are actually sort of in game. There is no official way to access them however. I found this out by going to https://starlog.gg/en/leaderboard then signing in and if you click on your profile and go to match history you can download all of your replays. So replays are all currently being saved to the "cloud" it seems. But blizzard doesn't give us direct access to them yet.
omg that really works! Thanks haha.
It's sad the third party site has more features than the official site.
|
|
|
|