|
Sentenal vs Miss.Click Results: + Show Spoiler +Sentenal 2 : 0 Miss.Click.. On January 25 2013 12:00 Jealous wrote: Guys. Miss.click is going to DESTROY sentenal. Just sayin'. The white knight is strong with this one. However, I used to be Team Captain of the Internet White Knights, so it will not work on me
|
TheMarine[BG] and I agreed to postpone our games till 1630 CET / 1030 EST Wednesday, January 30th due to lag issues.
|
|
+ Show Spoiler +Damn im so angry , all my tactic was to get our games to lategame and i knew ill be allright , And believe me i was 100% sure ull 4 gate all in me with 3 gates being proxied if u lost first match , was looking for those proxies with 2 probes and goon and still couldnt find, gj placing them - that attack came so soon its unbelievable gg's man gl in rest of tourney... edit' i sent probe to that location but i turned it back by accident -.- ...
|
when will the games be casted?
|
On January 27 2013 05:56 George_the_man wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Damn im so angry , all my tactic was to get our games to lategame and i knew ill be allright , And believe me i was 100% sure ull 4 gate all in me with 3 gates being proxied if u lost first match , was looking for those proxies with 2 probes and goon and still couldnt find, gj placing them - that attack came so soon its unbelievable gg's man gl in rest of tourney...
check your pm
|
Canada4481 Posts
whenever we're given replays i suppose.
|
Canada4481 Posts
I'll be casting some of the ro16 games in ~20 minutes on www.twitch.tv/nagisama
arb vs proforward sentenal vs miss click and shuruken vs massssssss
|
Thanks to all the players for sending me reps smoothly and efficiently. Much appreciated.
My cast will likely be tomorrow after TLS, or Monday evening sometime.
|
Canada4481 Posts
|
Nagi, why are you so mean to me?
|
Watching my self get casted always makes me cringe i played so awful LOL
Also :
+ Show Spoiler +we actually played circuit breakers before jade lol so it wasnt a big deal
|
+ Show Spoiler +I really liked Nagi's "What the fuck What the fuck WHAT THE FUCK" during my push break, lol On a different note... Dear L_Master, wins/losses in BW aren't determined by how many minerals you are banking.
|
On January 27 2013 14:32 Sentenal wrote:+ Show Spoiler +I really liked Nagi's "What the fuck What the fuck WHAT THE FUCK" during my push break, lol On a different note... Dear L_Master, wins/losses in BW aren't determined by how many minerals you are banking.
I'm not sure I'm on record as saying they are. But it is one factor that CAN play a deciding role in the outcome of a game.
If you added the word "always" between aren't and determined then I would agree with you. There is a reason that newer players are told above all else to focus on macro. If you have 2x or 3x the stuff of the other player you're going to be able to win almost always, regardless of the strategy.
The timing of when a player ends up with lots of excess resources can also have a big effect. If someone banks 1.5k right before they were to get 8 gated in TvP that could have disastrous consequences. If it happened during the battle after they had primarily held and they causally added a few more facts and got that money back down it would probably have a negligible effect...even if it wouldn't be optimally efficient.
|
On January 27 2013 15:27 L_Master wrote:Show nested quote +On January 27 2013 14:32 Sentenal wrote:+ Show Spoiler +I really liked Nagi's "What the fuck What the fuck WHAT THE FUCK" during my push break, lol On a different note... Dear L_Master, wins/losses in BW aren't determined by how many minerals you are banking. I'm not sure I'm on record as saying they are. But it is one factor that CAN play a deciding role in the outcome of a game. If you added the word "always" between aren't and determined then I would agree with you. There is a reason that newer players are told above all else to focus on macro. If you have 2x or 3x the stuff of the other player you're going to be able to win almost always, regardless of the strategy. The timing of when a player ends up with lots of excess resources can also have a big effect. If someone banks 1.5k right before they were to get 8 gated in TvP that could have disastrous consequences. If it happened during the battle after they had primarily held and they causally added a few more facts and got that money back down it would probably have a negligible effect...even if it wouldn't be optimally efficient. Well, "Eric Morgan" is on record for talking shit, saying things like "I do not understand how Sentenal ever wins", because I'm always "banking crazy sums every game", and have "D- Macro". Just saying, how much you have in your bank doesn't determine who wins.
|
On January 27 2013 15:34 Sentenal wrote:Show nested quote +On January 27 2013 15:27 L_Master wrote:On January 27 2013 14:32 Sentenal wrote:+ Show Spoiler +I really liked Nagi's "What the fuck What the fuck WHAT THE FUCK" during my push break, lol On a different note... Dear L_Master, wins/losses in BW aren't determined by how many minerals you are banking. I'm not sure I'm on record as saying they are. But it is one factor that CAN play a deciding role in the outcome of a game. If you added the word "always" between aren't and determined then I would agree with you. There is a reason that newer players are told above all else to focus on macro. If you have 2x or 3x the stuff of the other player you're going to be able to win almost always, regardless of the strategy. The timing of when a player ends up with lots of excess resources can also have a big effect. If someone banks 1.5k right before they were to get 8 gated in TvP that could have disastrous consequences. If it happened during the battle after they had primarily held and they causally added a few more facts and got that money back down it would probably have a negligible effect...even if it wouldn't be optimally efficient. Well, "Eric Morgan" is on record for talking shit, saying things like "I do not understanding how Sentenal ever wins", because I'm always "banking crazy sums", and have "D- Macro". Just saying, how much you have in your bank doesn't determine who wins.
Some measure of context is important. I also said that "from the reps I have seen" (which isn't a ton) that these are observations I have made. In these games that I've paid closer attention to the macro wasn't good, and I stand by that. Banking 3k-4k minerals before maxing isn't good macro and most D+ players generally keep their money lower than this.
As far as the first statement, I should make it clear I am referring again to "these games", in particular the game against Kalk where you had 4 or 5k banked and still managed to circumvent his contain and win the game. You don't see that often, where a 2 base protoss has that much money and manages to take out the zerg player.
Maybe we differ a little on this point but if someone were to tell me that they someone took a midgame win over another player, without first acquiring a major advantage, while banking 5k, I would be inclined to say "wtf how did that happen let me see this game". That is damn near an entire maxed army, that in theory one should be down against their opponent in, and is what I am referring to with that commend.
I'm not sure if you're interpreting this as me trashing you, but I'm getting a little of that vibe.
I'm not. It's obvious you're a strong player, as evidenced by your results in previous leagues and the current tour, not to mention the fact that I'm something like 0-5 against you.
|
Lmaster can you cast them today? ^^
|
I can cocast some games if anyone wants me to.
|
I WANNA DO SOME CASTING ER MAH GERD.
MY SEXY SOUTHERN ACCENT IS OVERWHELMING.
|
On January 27 2013 15:34 Sentenal wrote:Show nested quote +On January 27 2013 15:27 L_Master wrote:On January 27 2013 14:32 Sentenal wrote:+ Show Spoiler +I really liked Nagi's "What the fuck What the fuck WHAT THE FUCK" during my push break, lol On a different note... Dear L_Master, wins/losses in BW aren't determined by how many minerals you are banking. I'm not sure I'm on record as saying they are. But it is one factor that CAN play a deciding role in the outcome of a game. If you added the word "always" between aren't and determined then I would agree with you. There is a reason that newer players are told above all else to focus on macro. If you have 2x or 3x the stuff of the other player you're going to be able to win almost always, regardless of the strategy. The timing of when a player ends up with lots of excess resources can also have a big effect. If someone banks 1.5k right before they were to get 8 gated in TvP that could have disastrous consequences. If it happened during the battle after they had primarily held and they causally added a few more facts and got that money back down it would probably have a negligible effect...even if it wouldn't be optimally efficient. Well, "Eric Morgan" is on record for talking shit, saying things like "I do not understand how Sentenal ever wins", because I'm always "banking craazy sums every game", and have "D- Macro". Just saying, how much you have in your bank doesn't determine who wins. It doesn't help your reputation that you are the king of 2 gate lol. I think that combined with the banking creates a pretty clear foundation for such presumptions.
|
|
|
|