|
United States20661 Posts
On December 20 2006 02:34 GoBOXERgogo wrote:Show nested quote +On December 20 2006 02:33 G.s)NarutO wrote: the REAL yellow would have handeled that Fakeyellow>Real
Blasphemer! You deserve to be burnt and tortured and boiled and skinned and decapitated. and... also de-testicle-ed.
On December 20 2006 02:36 GoBOXERgogo wrote: If either of you had to pick one of them to play for your life now, you'd pick the real one? :D
Yes.
|
I think if you look at some of the live reports about Savior owning Midas early on... He was... But if the VOD goes up on tracker, a big problem was like Midas was shown 1% of the time. The camera always followed Savior's army around and so it was hard to get a good sense of how much stuff Midas was working with. Really amazing game though. And I did horrible, 3/6 -_-
|
|
United States20661 Posts
On December 20 2006 03:31 SayGG wrote:Show nested quote +On December 20 2006 03:23 Manifesto7 wrote:On December 20 2006 03:21 SayGG wrote: T >> Z map, the only reason Midas stood a chance in the first half of the game, imo. umm,. the map was raping midas for the first half of the game. Midas clearly had the edge at this point. It was a typical Maestro game: 4base vs 2base, Muta harrass was quite successful (not overwhelming, but ok) and he then had an giant lurker ling army and defilers were ready. Normally Savior ends these kind of games within 5-10 mins by pure ownage. But somehow he didnt mange to transform his advantage into a win. And I didnt see That big micro mistakes from Savior. (After he didnt succed, there were some. He just threw troops at Midas army, correct.) So thats why I assume its a T>´Z map. I think any other zerg will have an even harder time on hitch hiker.
Your argument reads like this:
SaviOr's build is invincible unless a) he makes a mistake or b) the map sucks for him.
No build should be that strong, and I don't think SaviOr's build is. Midas played well to counter. It is a defeatable build if SaviOr's opponent knows what he's doing.
|
Thank you. Will be getting Midas vs Savior.
|
|
LOL shut up. Nada vs Xellos is not 3-0 bullshit. Nada did 3-0 GF but Xellos's TvT has changed a lot, as has Nada's. It's not that simple man...
And Midas won because Midas is made of solid Steel. You do not pass The Midas. You run into and splatter like Savior did.
|
|
Ahaha where's your douche bag savior now?
Fanboys piss me off.
|
|
On December 20 2006 10:42 Wasabi wrote: 3/4 Yooi lol
GJ Midas. I like you now.
An advice to the TvT games when it involves Nada, Xellos, and oov: In a bo1, anyone can beat whoever, though Oov > Nada > Xellos > oov still applies generally. In a bo3, nada > xellos 2-0, oov > nada 2-1, xellos > oov 2-1 more often than not. in a bo5, Nada > Xellos 3-0 (yes, Xellos just doesn't cope with Nada's TvT style at all), Oov > Nada 3-2, Xellos > oov 3-1
Where did these stats come from? A excel spreadsheet you made with those stats on it? -_-
|
On December 20 2006 11:26 cravy wrote:Show nested quote +On December 20 2006 10:42 Wasabi wrote: 3/4 Yooi lol
GJ Midas. I like you now.
An advice to the TvT games when it involves Nada, Xellos, and oov: In a bo1, anyone can beat whoever, though Oov > Nada > Xellos > oov still applies generally. In a bo3, nada > xellos 2-0, oov > nada 2-1, xellos > oov 2-1 more often than not. in a bo5, Nada > Xellos 3-0 (yes, Xellos just doesn't cope with Nada's TvT style at all), Oov > Nada 3-2, Xellos > oov 3-1 Where did these stats come from? A excel spreadsheet you made with those stats on it? -_-
guys its a general rule of thumb. nada has been known to beat oov occasionally but their historical record is skewed waaay in favor of oov. and xellos has been nada's punching bag since...forever.
|
this osl is going to blow ass, no protoss. zvz with a few tvz and a tvt here and there
and theres a thing called the on game net curse, nada will loose in groups
|
On December 20 2006 11:16 Wasabi wrote: Please, tell me one time Xellos has ever won a bo3/bo5 against Nada. WCG? Like anyone can beat everyone in there.
I know you're a Xellos fanboy but don't let it get in the way.
When did Nada 3-0 Xellos? I don't even think they played a Bo5. I can't even remember the last time they played. It's not as simple as XvY = A wins vs B Losses. That TvT cycle is pretty broken with emergences like people like GF, Casy, Midas, Iris etc.
|
|
actually nada has played xellos two times in last two years :
2005-10-01 XellOs[yG] > Nada (Neo Forte) 2006-09-14 XellOs[yG] > NaDa (Sin Peaks of Baekdu)
edit : in 2004 the record is : nada 5 > 3 xellos
|
|
just thought id share my 2 cents with regards to the midas and savior game. i was kinda annoyed at the reports where alot of posters were saying how good savior was doing, and that he was owning midas, he had the whole map etc, and that midas had no chance.... who won? end of story..not that im a big fan of midas nor savior
|
god ive been getting all the liquibets wrong lately, just dropped like 50 ranks cuz of these
|
On December 20 2006 12:42 GaG[SharKy] wrote: just thought id share my 2 cents with regards to the midas and savior game. i was kinda annoyed at the reports where alot of posters were saying how good savior was doing, and that he was owning midas, he had the whole map etc, and that midas had no chance.... who won? end of story..not that im a big fan of midas nor savior shut up, the reporters tell it how it looks, and it definitely looked like savior was dominating midas. don't bash the live reporters.
|
|
|
|