You will note that I said G5 is not trustworthy and that it's likely someone else could have been on that account. I didn't say the SS was forged. But once again you are demonstrating your complete inability to comprehend what you read, process it, form a logical opinion, and put that opinion into a worded response.
Also, I don't know the details of the estro thing, I just know he was "caught hacking" at some point in the last year or so and was not allowed to play in TSL as a result, and has admitted to hacking. I can't help but say that I feel like posting FPVODs of yourself is pretty compelling proof you aren't using a hack in the games in question. So even if one were to assume G5 posted a screenshot of Dino himself on that account, it proves he had a working ICCup hack, but not that he used it in WCG.
If the consensus based on his behavior would be that he shouldn't have been allowed to play, is it fair to ban him now that he DID play, and qualified legitimately (not on a smurf, but on his real ID)? Is it even sensible to ask this question knowing that your response will be fitting for a Bill O'Reilly talking point?
The entirity of your "ability" to argue is based on hyperbole and creating straw men. Do they not teach you about logical fallacies at the school at which you are a champion debater? Because the posts you make on this forum could be used as textbook examples on the subject.