ACHIEVEMENT UNLOCKED
Direct Star Trek and Star Wars films. Nerd legacy complete.
Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
We made a thread specifically for Episode 8 now, let us head over to that one http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/entertainment/521373-star-wars-episode-viii-the-last-jedi | ||
Fake)Plants
United States373 Posts
ACHIEVEMENT UNLOCKED Direct Star Trek and Star Wars films. Nerd legacy complete. | ||
Doominator10
United States515 Posts
DONT MESS WITH MY THRAWN TRILOGY! | ||
SusaVile
Portugal32 Posts
DONT MESS WITH MY THRAWN TRILOGY! An enlightened being, welcome! (I know that part as well, damn Tie figther, for making me know this:D) | ||
Alpino
Brazil4390 Posts
On January 26 2013 03:34 YourGoodFriend wrote: Show nested quote + On January 26 2013 03:14 Aldehyde wrote: On January 26 2013 02:59 YourGoodFriend wrote: On January 26 2013 02:52 AnomalySC2 wrote: On January 25 2013 23:07 MilesTeg wrote: Abrahams is.. OK. Not great, not the best name being thrown around but definitely not the worst. I can't help but to be a bit disappointed that it's not Del Toro or Bird but it could've been worse. He did a great job with Star Trek, I think he is a really good, if not extremely obvious choice, to take on Star Wars. On January 26 2013 01:20 HeatEXTEND wrote: On January 26 2013 01:04 paralleluniverse wrote: This should be awesome. I love Abrams' works, especially Alias, Lost, and Cloverfield. Cloverfield was horrible :[, you have a giant monster running around, but decide to focus on the human drama involved in such a situation.........so creative and original.........*loud farting noise". Eh, I was little disappointed with Cloverfield as well but it definitely wasn't "horrible". Not the best creature feature around nor the worst. I agree with you. I loved the new Trek and though I didn't watch lost I think Abrams is great choice for the movie (would have loved to see Joss Whedon direct it though) I am excited for the new ones and anyone who isn't is just saying that to be a part of the **I only like the original three cause I am a hipster nerd** club. Saying I can't not look forward to the new ones is to be a little bit of an asshole. I'll take the title of hipster over asshole, really. I didn't say you can look forward to the new ones. I said if you are not looking forward to them its only to be a hipster So EVERY person IN THE WORLD that has not liked the second trilogy doesnt like it because that person wants to participate in some hipster club? You really think episode I is any good? Come the fuck on, stop creating rules to simplify how the world doesn't work the way you want it to. | ||
Aldehyde
Sweden939 Posts
On January 26 2013 03:34 YourGoodFriend wrote: Show nested quote + On January 26 2013 03:14 Aldehyde wrote: On January 26 2013 02:59 YourGoodFriend wrote: On January 26 2013 02:52 AnomalySC2 wrote: On January 25 2013 23:07 MilesTeg wrote: Abrahams is.. OK. Not great, not the best name being thrown around but definitely not the worst. I can't help but to be a bit disappointed that it's not Del Toro or Bird but it could've been worse. He did a great job with Star Trek, I think he is a really good, if not extremely obvious choice, to take on Star Wars. On January 26 2013 01:20 HeatEXTEND wrote: On January 26 2013 01:04 paralleluniverse wrote: This should be awesome. I love Abrams' works, especially Alias, Lost, and Cloverfield. Cloverfield was horrible :[, you have a giant monster running around, but decide to focus on the human drama involved in such a situation.........so creative and original.........*loud farting noise". Eh, I was little disappointed with Cloverfield as well but it definitely wasn't "horrible". Not the best creature feature around nor the worst. I agree with you. I loved the new Trek and though I didn't watch lost I think Abrams is great choice for the movie (would have loved to see Joss Whedon direct it though) I am excited for the new ones and anyone who isn't is just saying that to be a part of the **I only like the original three cause I am a hipster nerd** club. Saying I can't not look forward to the new ones is to be a little bit of an asshole. I'll take the title of hipster over asshole, really. I didn't say you can look forward to the new ones. I said if you are not looking forward to them its only to be a hipster I think you need to re-read what I wrote. | ||
AnomalySC2
United States2073 Posts
On January 26 2013 04:02 Alpino wrote: Show nested quote + On January 26 2013 03:34 YourGoodFriend wrote: On January 26 2013 03:14 Aldehyde wrote: On January 26 2013 02:59 YourGoodFriend wrote: On January 26 2013 02:52 AnomalySC2 wrote: On January 25 2013 23:07 MilesTeg wrote: Abrahams is.. OK. Not great, not the best name being thrown around but definitely not the worst. I can't help but to be a bit disappointed that it's not Del Toro or Bird but it could've been worse. He did a great job with Star Trek, I think he is a really good, if not extremely obvious choice, to take on Star Wars. On January 26 2013 01:20 HeatEXTEND wrote: On January 26 2013 01:04 paralleluniverse wrote: This should be awesome. I love Abrams' works, especially Alias, Lost, and Cloverfield. Cloverfield was horrible :[, you have a giant monster running around, but decide to focus on the human drama involved in such a situation.........so creative and original.........*loud farting noise". Eh, I was little disappointed with Cloverfield as well but it definitely wasn't "horrible". Not the best creature feature around nor the worst. I agree with you. I loved the new Trek and though I didn't watch lost I think Abrams is great choice for the movie (would have loved to see Joss Whedon direct it though) I am excited for the new ones and anyone who isn't is just saying that to be a part of the **I only like the original three cause I am a hipster nerd** club. Saying I can't not look forward to the new ones is to be a little bit of an asshole. I'll take the title of hipster over asshole, really. I didn't say you can look forward to the new ones. I said if you are not looking forward to them its only to be a hipster So EVERY person IN THE WORLD that has not liked the second trilogy doesnt like it because that person wants to participate in some hipster club? You really think episode I is any good? Come the fuck on, stop creating rules to simplify how the world doesn't work the way you want it to. Who said Episode 1 was good? No one liked it, I doubt even George Lucas liked it. But what does that have to do with the new Star Wars trilogy that will be directed by someone completely different. Also, Episode 3 was the 2nd best Star Wars film :D | ||
Gako
Canada22 Posts
On January 26 2013 04:11 AnomalySC2 wrote: Also, Episode 3 was the 2nd best Star Wars film :D Everything you said and ever will say was invalidated by that statement. | ||
Daniri
387 Posts
On January 26 2013 01:11 paralleluniverse wrote: Show nested quote + On January 25 2013 22:10 Waxangel wrote: isn't the writer just as important as the director, in the case of hardcore fans who are invested in the continuity/lore/universe? There was no doubt that Star Trek needed to be rebooted. With thousands of TV shows and movies, it would have been impossible to keep continuity. In this case, Abrams' made the right choice to free the new movie from all that convolution by starting afresh, but he didn't erase that history as he set the new continuity in an alternate universe. I don't think something so drastic is needed with Star Wars, since it's only 6 movies. Are all the miscellaneous expanded universe stuff, books, cartoons, games, etc, considered canon? I wouldn't be surprised if there's some distance from the old movies. That would be a good choice so that we get something new. The new Star Trek film wasn't a reboot, they did some weird time travel stuff instead. The EU is technically separated from the movies in canon, but the EU incorporates everything from the movies. The EU is what keeps Star Wars fandom going so that technicality will make no difference. And if they set the new trilogy post-RotJ I don't see how there's room for it. They're going to have to make some big decisions, it's a much bigger problem than ST. | ||
corumjhaelen
France6884 Posts
On January 26 2013 04:17 Gako wrote: Show nested quote + On January 26 2013 04:11 AnomalySC2 wrote: Also, Episode 3 was the 2nd best Star Wars film :D Everything you said and ever will say was invalidated by that statement. Seems like a perfectly reasonnable opinion. Anyway I haven't seen anything by JJ, but I hear he's decent. I'd like to remind everyone spitting on him that Irvin Kirchner, who directed the best Star Wars movie doesn't have a much more interesting filmography at first glance... | ||
albis
United States652 Posts
I thought it was fun at least | ||
AnomalySC2
United States2073 Posts
On January 26 2013 04:17 Gako wrote: Show nested quote + On January 26 2013 04:11 AnomalySC2 wrote: Also, Episode 3 was the 2nd best Star Wars film :D Everything you said and ever will say was invalidated by that statement. Seriously though it was actually really good. Watch it again, it's infinitely better than episodes 1 and 2 and it holds it own with the original trilogy. The action was some of the best, plenty of genuine humor, and watching Anakan transform into Vader while knowing full well it had to happen was riveting. | ||
YourGoodFriend
United States2197 Posts
On January 26 2013 04:07 Aldehyde wrote: Show nested quote + On January 26 2013 03:34 YourGoodFriend wrote: On January 26 2013 03:14 Aldehyde wrote: On January 26 2013 02:59 YourGoodFriend wrote: On January 26 2013 02:52 AnomalySC2 wrote: On January 25 2013 23:07 MilesTeg wrote: Abrahams is.. OK. Not great, not the best name being thrown around but definitely not the worst. I can't help but to be a bit disappointed that it's not Del Toro or Bird but it could've been worse. He did a great job with Star Trek, I think he is a really good, if not extremely obvious choice, to take on Star Wars. On January 26 2013 01:20 HeatEXTEND wrote: On January 26 2013 01:04 paralleluniverse wrote: This should be awesome. I love Abrams' works, especially Alias, Lost, and Cloverfield. Cloverfield was horrible :[, you have a giant monster running around, but decide to focus on the human drama involved in such a situation.........so creative and original.........*loud farting noise". Eh, I was little disappointed with Cloverfield as well but it definitely wasn't "horrible". Not the best creature feature around nor the worst. I agree with you. I loved the new Trek and though I didn't watch lost I think Abrams is great choice for the movie (would have loved to see Joss Whedon direct it though) I am excited for the new ones and anyone who isn't is just saying that to be a part of the **I only like the original three cause I am a hipster nerd** club. Saying I can't not look forward to the new ones is to be a little bit of an asshole. I'll take the title of hipster over asshole, really. I didn't say you can't look forward to the new ones. I said if you are not looking forward to them its only to be a hipster I think you need to re-read what I wrote. Says the guy who used double negatives? I was saying that if we have movie X directed by JJ Abrams people would be excited about it (most of them) but since it is star wars people are saying it will be bad just because of this hipster I only liked the first three movies persona. | ||
YourGoodFriend
United States2197 Posts
On January 26 2013 04:02 Alpino wrote: Show nested quote + On January 26 2013 03:34 YourGoodFriend wrote: On January 26 2013 03:14 Aldehyde wrote: On January 26 2013 02:59 YourGoodFriend wrote: On January 26 2013 02:52 AnomalySC2 wrote: On January 25 2013 23:07 MilesTeg wrote: Abrahams is.. OK. Not great, not the best name being thrown around but definitely not the worst. I can't help but to be a bit disappointed that it's not Del Toro or Bird but it could've been worse. He did a great job with Star Trek, I think he is a really good, if not extremely obvious choice, to take on Star Wars. On January 26 2013 01:20 HeatEXTEND wrote: On January 26 2013 01:04 paralleluniverse wrote: This should be awesome. I love Abrams' works, especially Alias, Lost, and Cloverfield. Cloverfield was horrible :[, you have a giant monster running around, but decide to focus on the human drama involved in such a situation.........so creative and original.........*loud farting noise". Eh, I was little disappointed with Cloverfield as well but it definitely wasn't "horrible". Not the best creature feature around nor the worst. I agree with you. I loved the new Trek and though I didn't watch lost I think Abrams is great choice for the movie (would have loved to see Joss Whedon direct it though) I am excited for the new ones and anyone who isn't is just saying that to be a part of the **I only like the original three cause I am a hipster nerd** club. Saying I can't not look forward to the new ones is to be a little bit of an asshole. I'll take the title of hipster over asshole, really. I didn't say you can look forward to the new ones. I said if you are not looking forward to them its only to be a hipster So EVERY person IN THE WORLD that has not liked the second trilogy doesnt like it because that person wants to participate in some hipster club? You really think episode I is any good? Come the fuck on, stop creating rules to simplify how the world doesn't work the way you want it to. I never said anything about Episode 1,2,3 but I was generalizing that those who are not looking forward to the new ones (made by disney) also did not like episode 1,2,3. Thank you | ||
Ryuu314
United States12679 Posts
| ||
Gako
Canada22 Posts
I entrust you to the caring hands of Mr. Plinkett. | ||
Grumbels
Netherlands7028 Posts
Star Wars is a lot different, it's more like a fantasy or comic book movie set in a space with a slightly more mature tone, so presumably JJ Abrams would do well since that's the kind of things he's good at. | ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On January 26 2013 04:42 Gako wrote: Anyone who doesn't despise star wars episodes 1 - 3 with their entire body and soul needs to be enlightened here: http://redlettermedia.com/plinkett/star-wars/ I entrust you to the caring hands of Mr. Plinkett. You mean people that don't hate on the prequels have to? What? lol. You mean since you hate them a lot we all should? I think that's stupid. The prequels get a lot more hate then they should they aren't that awful (only one I might give you is episode 1, I don't really enjoy that one at all). | ||
farvacola
United States18768 Posts
On January 26 2013 04:42 Gako wrote: Anyone who doesn't despise star wars episodes 1 - 3 with their entire body and soul needs to be enlightened here: http://redlettermedia.com/plinkett/star-wars/ I entrust you to the caring hands of Mr. Plinkett. I saw that and still enjoy episodes 1-3. Will the world fucking explode into a tiny million pieces of Death Star-inspired hipsterism? How many licks does it take to get to the center of a tootsie pop? Find out next week on Dragonball H: The You Better Not Like Something I hate Saga. | ||
AnomalySC2
United States2073 Posts
On January 26 2013 04:46 Grumbels wrote: The JJ Abrams Star Trek movie wasn't particularly interesting - as far as I know Star Trek fans didn't like it, but it did have genuinely fun moments and good pacing. But to be honest, Star Trek is mostly technobabble with slow pacing, boring world building and bad dialogue. I think people like it just because they find space travel concepts fascinating. Star Wars is a lot different, it's more like a fantasy or comic book movie set in a space with a slightly more mature tone, so presumably JJ Abrams would do well since that's the kind of things he's good at. I always thought of Star Trek as the more mature of the two, not really sure where you're coming from with that. It doesn't draw people in with flashy light saber battles or anything like that, just good old fashioned story telling and plots. | ||
kwizach
3658 Posts
On January 26 2013 04:57 AnomalySC2 wrote: Show nested quote + On January 26 2013 04:46 Grumbels wrote: The JJ Abrams Star Trek movie wasn't particularly interesting - as far as I know Star Trek fans didn't like it, but it did have genuinely fun moments and good pacing. But to be honest, Star Trek is mostly technobabble with slow pacing, boring world building and bad dialogue. I think people like it just because they find space travel concepts fascinating. Star Wars is a lot different, it's more like a fantasy or comic book movie set in a space with a slightly more mature tone, so presumably JJ Abrams would do well since that's the kind of things he's good at. I always thought of Star Trek as the more mature of the two, not really sure where you're coming from with that. It doesn't draw people in with flashy light saber battles or anything like that, just good old fashioned story telling and plots. The original Star Wars trilogy is a masterpiece in terms of character development, story telling and plot in an adventure movie. | ||
| ||
Next event in 4h 38m
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft: Brood War BeSt 1378 Dota 2ggaemo 782 Larva 480 Leta 290 Pusan 279 Aegong 98 Light 50 Terrorterran 47 Sharp 45 Free 39 [ Show more ] League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games Livibee929 WinterStarcraft797 shahzam738 Tasteless397 Mew2King228 NuckleDu150 amsayoshi42 StateSC238 Liquid`Ken11 PiGStarcraft8 Organizations StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH167 StarCraft: Brood War• aXEnki • intothetv • Gussbus • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamez Trovo • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel • Poblha League of Legends |
Kung Fu Cup
ESL Pro Tour
OSC
ESL Pro Tour
PassionCraft
ESL Pro Tour
World Team League
ESL Pro Tour
Korean StarCraft League
Afreeca Starleague
hero vs Soulkey
[ Show More ] AfreecaTV Pro Series
Reynor vs Cure
ESL Pro Tour
World Team League
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
CSO Cup
Sparkling Tuna Cup
ESL Pro Tour
World Team League
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
|
|