Group C - Page 13
Forum Index > FIFA World Cup 2018 |
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30538 Posts
| ||
Ghostcom
Denmark4776 Posts
| ||
sharkie
Austria18002 Posts
On June 22 2018 01:46 Ghostcom wrote: And this is why current VAR use is bullshit VAR is the best thing to happen thos WC | ||
Ghostcom
Denmark4776 Posts
EDIT: To qualify my statement a bit further, look at the previous post on the issue in this thread that I made. Add to that the fairly obvious randomness in what gets reviewed and what doesn’t- e.g lack of free kick to Poulensen 15 seconds prior to the handball and the lack of penalty to Cornelius. | ||
Mafe
Germany5917 Posts
| ||
sneirac
Germany3463 Posts
On June 22 2018 01:49 Ghostcom wrote: No it isn’t. Yeah outside of the british press you're not gonna find many people to agree with you on that one | ||
HolydaKing
21225 Posts
On June 22 2018 01:49 Ghostcom wrote: No it isn’t. Why? It's a massive improvement for sure. Sure, it's not perfect but it leads to more fair games and that's great. | ||
739
Bearded Elder29876 Posts
| ||
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30538 Posts
| ||
BigFan
TLADT24917 Posts
On June 22 2018 01:51 HolydaKing wrote: Why? It's a massive improvement for sure. Sure, it's not perfect but it leads to more fair games and that's great. My guess is that he wants refs to make more fair calls themselves instead of having to rely on the technology to do so. | ||
BigFan
TLADT24917 Posts
| ||
Topin
Peru9937 Posts
| ||
Ghostcom
Denmark4776 Posts
On June 22 2018 01:53 739 wrote: How can you say VAR is not improvement? LOL Read the thread. I already substantiated my opinion previously. Or don’t - “LOL” | ||
WillyWanker
France1915 Posts
| ||
ivancype
Brazil485 Posts
| ||
sneirac
Germany3463 Posts
On June 22 2018 01:49 Ghostcom wrote: No it isn’t. EDIT: To qualify my statement a bit further, look at the previous post on the issue in this thread that I made. Add to that the fairly obvious randomness in what gets reviewed and what doesn’t- e.g lack of free kick to Poulensen 15 seconds prior to the handball and the lack of penalty to Cornelius. There is no randomness on what gets reviewed, it is clearly and distinctly defined and applied to both teams. Fair enough if you think it should be more, it will eventually be more but it would never have been approved in the first place if it immediately went from no VAR to full VAR. You need to be aware of what you are actually arguing. Every time VAR is used a mistake is corrected in the game. In order for VAR to make the game worse not only does a call have to be missed, a call has to actually be changed from correct to wrong. Unless that happens or it takes far longer than it should, it will always be a net gain to the game. | ||
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30538 Posts
On June 22 2018 01:57 WillyWanker wrote: Losing possession almost 40/60 and wasting time from the 60th minute against Peru. Glorious French team. Yeah pretty BM level of time wasting | ||
739
Bearded Elder29876 Posts
Refs are only humans, so are we, we tend to do mistakes, VAR is here to correct the mistakes. | ||
Ghostcom
Denmark4776 Posts
On June 22 2018 01:51 HolydaKing wrote: Why? It's a massive improvement for sure. Sure, it's not perfect but it leads to more fair games and that's great. Not in its current implementation. It just makes other aspects unfair - e.g. which calls gets reviewed. See lack of penalty on Cornelius who didn’t dive after getting massively grabbed for one such instance. | ||
Ghostcom
Denmark4776 Posts
On June 22 2018 01:58 739 wrote: I don't need to. Stating that VAR is not an improvement is a false statement anyway. Refs are only humans, so are we, we tend to do mistakes, VAR is here to correct the mistakes. Please stay out of the discussion if you don’t want to have it. You are being fairly childish. | ||
| ||