|
CA10824 Posts
On October 21 2012 11:46 Sadist wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2012 11:43 Damiani wrote:On October 21 2012 11:31 LosingID8 wrote: watch UGA move ahead of us in the polls for a "tough SEC win" at kentucky I was just about to ask you that. But what do u think of Oregon's chance of making it into the NCG if let's say LSU, Oregon, Florida and Notre Dame all have one loss? If the scenario was like this : If USC beats Notre Dame then loses to Oregon but beats Oregon in the Pac-12 championship game. You think Oregon would get the nod over all other 1 loss teams? not if oregon lost in the pac12 cg. If they lost the first game but won the cg, they might have a shot. agreed with sadist. oregon's OOC schedule is just too terrible this year to give them the nod if they lose in the CCG. of course, if kansas state hadn't backed out of the game that was supposed to happen this season, this wouldn't be an issue.
|
On October 21 2012 11:20 Sadist wrote: You know who else looked good against ND? Tate Forcier, yea. I'll leave it at that.
This is true:
On September 13 2009 08:26 Jibba wrote: TATE FORCIER, I WILL BLOW YOU. PM ME!
|
Felt so good to see Matt Barkley show up today and play a hell of a game. Woods is also crazy good.
Hoping this means we've still got a chance against Oregon.
|
yeah I meant 10-2 that was my mistake lol.
|
CA10824 Posts
On October 21 2012 11:54 ShiroKaisen wrote: Felt so good to see Matt Barkley show up today and play a hell of a game. Woods is also crazy good.
Hoping this means we've still got a chance against Oregon. i think we will beat oregon if we can clean up our dumb 15 yd personal foul penalties, the false starts, offsides on kickoffs, and really late hits.
one thing that i get pissed off about is how we get called for holding EVERY SINGLE TIME for small things and if you watch the other team's o-line they are literally tackling our DL and no call.
i don't care if they are going to call a lot of holding calls against us as long as they call it on the other team too. consistency is all i ask for. but.... pac-12 refs. i just pray that we don't have jay stricherz reffing the game. that guy screws us over every time his crew is on the field.
|
Now FSU got away with a pretty obvious pass interference call that lead to a touchdown. Refs are baaaaaaaad.
|
On October 21 2012 11:20 Sadist wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2012 11:01 petered wrote:On October 21 2012 09:16 Sadist wrote:On October 21 2012 09:00 petered wrote:On October 21 2012 08:26 Sadist wrote:On October 21 2012 08:18 petered wrote:On October 21 2012 07:57 Sadist wrote:On October 21 2012 07:41 Ferrose wrote: Well, U of M about to kick the field goal to put the dagger in MSU's heart.
Knew it would end like this...
You can't give Denard Robinson the ball with 2 minutes left. God dammit. Denard sucks lol, msu screwed up when they tried to throw on 2nd down. I can't believe anyone who thinks he is remotely good. If you watched ESPN and the BTN you would think he was a man amongst boys, yet anyone who watches michigan play week in week out knows hes mediocre at best and the offense will look nothing like it does now when hes gone. Hes a fraud against good teams and just pads stats against others. Sure he can do things that other players can't and occasionally can win games, but with a better QB they probably wouldn't be in those positions to begin with if they had someone more capable. You are butthurt. Denard is a fantastic player playing in a system he was never meant to run. I'll grant you that he isn't a very good quarterback in a pro style offense, that much is true. In a spread option offense he is ridiculously good. Two years ago when he was a sophomore under rodriguez he put up gaudy numbers, which have dropped since Hoke took over. Granted that was a good move for the team, because he cleaned up our terrible defense, but that is the reason Denard isn't used to his full potential. I am a michigan fan..... He put up gaudy numbers against the bottom of the big 10 and western michigan because he was their entire offense. He also scored occasionally in garbage time when his team was already down by 3 touchdowns.....good job. Hes not a good qb at all. He throws behind his receivers and will play 500 out there like its no big deal to turn the ball over. Hes not good. Michigan is on its way to be a good program, but he is holding back the development of the offense (watch, next year the offense will look nothing like this). How did he do against Mississippi state in that last bowl game with Rich Rod? When RR was basically coaching for his job? Against any good team he has played he has blown ass and been bailed out occasionally by lucky lobs. He single handedly lost michigan the ND game this year, with a servicable QB michigan beats ND, the team is actually pretty good this year. He has been a full time starter for two seasons. First season he was 7-5 with an absolutely horrendous defense and a team that had largely quit on its coach. Next season he leads an 11-2 team and single handedly wins the OSU game for us (look at his stats from that game). He single handedly won the Notre Dame game last year for us. He is on pace to have more rushing yards than any QB in NCAA history and his passing stats are pretty decent outside interceptions. What you lose in a slightly worse passer you more than gain back in the most dangerous runner in college football. Also, if he is so bad why is he starting? We have other quarterbacks, and yet the coaches have decided to keep him on the field and he has given them a fantastic record. hes starting because michigan's other QB's are obviously bad and Denard is the best choice at this time. that doesnt mean he doesnt suck lol. I am not arguing with you over Denard if you are going to try to bring up stats in meaningless games. Yea he did well against OSU last year (who was 6-7 btw) and I am incredibly happy/thankful for it because i hate the entire state of ohio more than anyone I have come into contact with. That being said, i can recognize him for what he is, sub sub par as a passer, a good runner once he gets going (hes actually pretty slow at accelerating in the backfield) but hes small so you have to worry about running him too much and having him leave the game injured. So he has more rushing yards than any QB in NCAA history.......who cares? Do you think hes a better QB than Tommy Frazier? or Pat White? I want wins and for him to play well. I really dont care if he rushes for a 70 yard touchdown when the team is down 45-10. Hes been horrible against all of the top competition hes played. And to say he single handedly beat ND is a joke, he threw the ball up for grabs a bunch of times and was lucky Junior Hemmingway was as good as he was (against ND and VT) or they would have been crushed both games. The Denard agenda is bordering on Tebowism. Ask any michigan fan what they feel about him, id bet 80% will be happy he was in Ann Arbor, but ready to see him leave next year. Michigan is going to take a big step forward in about 2-3 years but they kind of delayed their development by keeping him on as a QB. The Denard agenda? wtf do you even mean. And guessing from your other posts it seems you barely even watched the ND game. It was gallon who was wide open at the end of the game and roundtree who made the final catch, not hemingway. And the reason they were in range to win the game on that drive is because they unleashed denard in the run game in the 4th quarter. Yes he is a better quarterback than pat white and tommy frazier. If he had played on those teams he would have done even better than they did. He is faster than both and an equally good passer. Both those guys had entire systems built around their strengths while Denard has gone most of his career with a coordinator who has never run the spread, and still had more rushing yards. And he is not "delaying their development" when you admitted yourself the backups are terrible. I'll leave it to rest since you obviously can't be convinced, but honestly you either haven't payed very close attention to michigan football the last few years or are just plain dumb. Wow. Sorry we are done here. And I never said it was hemmingway who caught the final touchdown. It was hemmingway however that caught numerous of Denards 500 lobs. If you really think hes better than Frazier or Pat White though i don't know what to say to you. Being from Lansing and moving to Metro Detroit has made me start to really dislike my fellow Michigan fans...... you are unbelievably delusional. And sorry it was Gallon, big deal. I almost wish I wasn't a Michigan fan nowadays because of people like you FYI.... also, obviously if you are trying to win games in the here and now, the backsup aren't better. But if you are building the program for the long hall they would be, even if you sacrafice a game here or there a long the way. Denard sucks. get over it. You know who else looked good against ND? Tate Forcier, yea. I'll leave it at that. You are right, you should stop being a Michigan fan. You post like an uninformed scrub and your spelling/grammar is as laughable as a spartan's.
You suck at being a Michigan fan, get over it.
|
Well what a surprise, Washington SUCKS, South Carolina is brought back down to earth for good this time, and Georgia's ranking is still undeserved.
Goddammit, Washington, your schedule was built for you to get a minimum of seven wins, and now I'm sure you won't even got to a bowl game by season's end. At least Wazzu still stinks.
|
Rushing FSU Miami 217 29
Sup Canes
|
On September 13 2009 08:26 Jibba wrote: TATE FORCIER, I WILL BLOW YOU. PM ME!
wow LOL this was the year when Michigan went 4-0 or 5-0 with Tate Forcier. Judging by the date, Jibba must have bought into his initial hype. Tate Forcier was such a lie haha.
|
CA10824 Posts
oregon st better be careful tonight. utah's offense is heating up.
|
On October 21 2012 11:48 LosingID8 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2012 11:46 Sadist wrote:On October 21 2012 11:43 Damiani wrote:On October 21 2012 11:31 LosingID8 wrote: watch UGA move ahead of us in the polls for a "tough SEC win" at kentucky I was just about to ask you that. But what do u think of Oregon's chance of making it into the NCG if let's say LSU, Oregon, Florida and Notre Dame all have one loss? If the scenario was like this : If USC beats Notre Dame then loses to Oregon but beats Oregon in the Pac-12 championship game. You think Oregon would get the nod over all other 1 loss teams? not if oregon lost in the pac12 cg. If they lost the first game but won the cg, they might have a shot. agreed with sadist. oregon's OOC schedule is just too terrible this year to give them the nod if they lose in the CCG. of course, if kansas state hadn't backed out of the game that was supposed to happen this season, this wouldn't be an issue. Damn, that might have been a good game too.
|
CA10824 Posts
wow unbelievable break for oregon state. the utah RB drops the pitch at the 5yd line, oregon st jumps on it.
|
I will be re evaluating my personal opinion of PAC-12 once the bowl season is over. I'll say that much. I'm probably not going to rank them over my traditional favorites but.. well, let's see where Ore St ends up after week 15. ACC Big 12 Big Ten SEC
PAC 12
Rest of the conferences.
|
CA10824 Posts
|
I'll see your opinion in the bowl season.
|
On October 21 2012 14:53 LosingID8 wrote: you've got to be joking It's only his opinion. Here's mines : Pac-12 SEC Big 12 MAC B1G12 ACC
Rest of conference.
I'm a huge buckeye fan and b1G 12 fan but i do have to admit they blow this year. My buckeyes is the ugliest undefeated team this year.
|
On October 21 2012 15:04 Damiani wrote:It's only his opinion. Here's mines : Pac-12 SEC Big 12 MAC B1G12 ACC Rest of conference. I'm a huge buckeye fan and b1G 12 fan but i do have to admit they blow this year. My buckeyes is the ugliest undefeated team this year.
Unless you consider ESPN/AP/Computer conference ranking as full of shit, this is pretty clear how conference rankings are: http://espn.go.com/blog/statsinfo/post/_/id/53567/conference-rankings
1. SEC (AP #1, Comp #2) 2. Big 12 (AP #2, Comp #1) 3. Pac 12 (AP #3, Comp #3) 4. Big East (AP #4, Com #5) 5. Big Ten (AP #6, Comp #4) 6. ACC (AP #5, Comp #6)
|
MURICA15980 Posts
On October 21 2012 14:37 Probe1 wrote: I will be re evaluating my personal opinion of PAC-12 once the bowl season is over. I'll say that much. I'm probably not going to rank them over my traditional favorites but.. well, let's see where Ore St ends up after week 15. ACC Big 12 Big Ten SEC
PAC 12
Rest of the conferences.
LOL at ACC and Big10 above both SEC and Pac12 this year. Have you even been watching this season? Big12 has def been playing very well this season though.
|
Everyone appears caught off guard by Oregon State, or is it just the Pac-12 hate? Beavers man, too good. Rileys ability to put teams together has paid off this year. I would like to have Mannion healthy and playing again next week.
|
|
|
|