Pick Their Power Mafia 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I was away for dinner before the day post came up. So what I've come to see is a whole bunch of "should we claim or not," "should vigs claim their shots or not," and people claiming and I don't actually understand that. I don't think it is in our best interests to have people claiming d1. It just feels off to me and it doesn't feel like it will help us accomplish anything today. Maybe tomorrow or the next day. On July 25 2011 10:50 Tackster wrote: I thought heist claimed potter... Also why are people claiming 2 hours into day 1? WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON? This basically summed up my thoughts on the matter. I honestly doubt we have a ton of HP-themed roles. Can you explain what you mean by reconsider? Do you mean you don't want a target claim at all, or do you not want it at the end of night? | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
First things first. On July 25 2011 13:39 Foolishness wrote: Can we please stop the mass role claiming now? I'm looking at the title of the game and it clearly has the word 'Mafia' in it, and nowhere are the words 'claim'. Has there ever been an instance where a mafia claimed day 1 in a game such as this? Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think there has. TL mafia players aren't ballsy enough to do something like that. You guys can yap all you want about these people being mafia, but while you do players like kitaman get a free ride as they make useless posts while pretending to be active. I agree with this 100%. There is very little reason for anyone to have claimed. It was wholly unnecessary for the progression of our game, seeing as we're not even 24 hours in. The early kill was a little unnecessary this early into the game as well. (Did it even say anywhere that youngmini's alignment was confirmed? If I read correctly, I saw someone say he was confirmed which cannot be true given there was nothing about alignment in that post.) On July 25 2011 14:35 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Could ON actually be mafia, but just flips green, thus the "disguised as town" from Jackal's PM? Like a GF that keeps working after death. Other than that, I'm drawing a blank, besides that Jackal's scum. I am really hoping this is not the case as it would be a major pain in the ass for all of us involved (except scum, probably). At this moment, I am unsure as to who scum is (which is pretty reasonable this early in the game). I mean, I have my suspicions, but there is definitely nothing to warrant a vote and I feel I will be unable to do so until I get up in like 9 hours. Personally, I don't think Jackal is scum. I think it was more or less a race to get items and retain them (unless I missed something about them having to kill each other). | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 26 2011 01:38 chaos13 wrote: -_- WHEN WILL YOU PEOPLE UNDERSTAND Role claims are not good. I really wish more people would listen. Chaos13 is completely correct here. On July 26 2011 04:19 Varpulis wrote: Alright I'm caught up. Correct me if I'm wrong, but an accurate summary of the proceedings today is: Jackal claims HP, ON claims voldy, ON dies, people say that Jackal is lying. YM kills ON, gets killed by tackster, supersoft kills tackster. Kitaman is lurking, Kurumi is trolling/soliciting votes. I'm uneasy about lynching Jackal based purely on role speculation. I'd rather keep an eye on him and keep him the hell away from the hallows. I'd be fine with lynching kitaman27 at the moment. Nobody vote for Kurumi, k? Kurumi is fairly confusing. I don't understand why he wants to be voted and I don't think I'm going to vote him. I don't think Jackal is scum and I don't think we should lynch him given the reasoning I've seen thus far. On July 26 2011 05:43 Curu wrote: Let's look at all the people flying under the radar too under disguise of this shitstorm and not contributing any opinions. Nisani201 Drazerk Mr. Wiggles ketomai Foolishness - actually here but being useless Mig Lanaia What are your thoughts about recent events? I think BC confuses the hell out of me. I think alignment checks should be done and not avoided as he appears to be trying. I don't think that dropbear should have come out with the role he gave someone. That bothers me a lot, as who knows what the penalty could be at this point. However, MR Wiggles brought up a good point that I'd thought of whilst reading. I had thought dropbear was town and was confused as to how he'd be able to do it unless mason. Actually, do we know if someone gets a penalty? Is it possible host/DB haven't been around to either give it or announce it? Still, I think it wasn't a good idea if he's ACTUALLY the creator of the role. Kurumi's role seems like it's a pain in the ass for him. I don't 100% understand what is going on with him. I've reread kita and he really doesn't seem to have contributed much more than a few questions. For some reason, that typically feels scummy to me. On the other hand, sandroba appears to be doing to kita exactly what he has accused kita of, in a way. On July 26 2011 06:29 Foolishness wrote: Wiggles is probably an SK. Lanaia does not seeM to be posting with a pro-town state of mind. May I ask why you think I am not posting with a pro-town state of mind? I don't follow you. It appears I've been combining Foolishness and BC into one entity. My bad. I don't think BC is a good lynch today. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
Although he's strange, I think he's town. It's gut, most likely, but I feel strongly he's just stubborn town. He's giving me townvibes. I really can't explain it more than that. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 26 2011 07:06 chaos13 wrote: Hmm, okay. Who do you think is a good lynch then? Kitaman or Drazerk. Drazerk is gut. Kita is a bit more. I read through his posts and found nothing that would make me think he is town at this point. Nothing appears more town-motivated than scum-motivated, if that makes sense. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I hate it when I see two people who are basically at each other's throats and I think they are both town. (EX. Wiggles and BC) I think BC should stop being so stubborn. I think we should all get off Jackal's wagon. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 26 2011 13:59 Amber[LighT] wrote: I think you're scum but that's for tomorrow. Tell me why. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I also don't understand why so many people are voting Jackal. I mean, is it solely because he's HP or did I miss something along the line? On July 26 2011 23:53 Jackal58 wrote: Get over yourself. Why don't you get checked by SS. Your only reason for calling me scum is ON flipped town. Show me anything anywhere that I have posted that pushes a scum agienda. Show me. Link it, quote it. Don't care just show me. You have nothing but what you perceive as a free lynch. You push it without any reason at all. You just say scum. That's how scum play. You get checked scummy. I felt this was unnecessarily hostile. I know Jackal plays that way, but I don't know if Amber does. On July 27 2011 00:58 BloodyC0bbler wrote: As just a general thought to all the people voting me. What is the general rule of thumb when someone is being voted for and only 1 person ever sticks up for them aside from the defendant? Usually bussed townie. Don't worry though, when I did and flip town, vigi's will have a list of people to sort out. Stress to all vigi's. EVERYONE who votes for me is on your shooting list. The mafia will use this as their chance to drop one of the few players that actually scares them shitless as such don't waste the opportunity. As for who should take a hit out of you before the others. Dropbear/redff/jackal all stand out extremely high on lists. Is it even safe for vigs to shoot the first night? On July 27 2011 02:01 sandroba wrote: Can people get behind this plan: We check Jackal58. If he turns up green we pimp him up with items. We lynch Drazerk who is useless and trolling. Oh, he's trolling? No wonder he hasn't made a memorable post yet. On July 27 2011 02:46 Kurumi wrote: I am saying things borderline modkill for my role. Think. This confuses me. I really don't understand what sort of things you could talk about about your role that are borderline modkill in any sense unless part of your role is not to claim... On July 27 2011 02:46 syllogism wrote: It's a bit strange as he is somewhat trying to get lynched, but kind of half-heartedly. Almost as if his role stipulates he has to attempt to get lynched day 1, but if he doesn't, something good happens This phrasing... something about it. It's like I was trying to put his behaviour in words but someone else said it. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 27 2011 03:14 Kurumi wrote: Vote on me , today equals 0 tomorrow equals 1+1 Are you saying you're a reflex motivator? | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 27 2011 03:18 sandroba wrote: We trade today's lynch for double lynch tomorrow. Apparently he wins aswel. There's no way in hell we'll end up lynching him though. I'm sure you see how unlikely it is we can swing votes that way. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I was fairly sure he was town, too. :/ changing vote. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 27 2011 05:26 Kurumi wrote: Lynch me tomorrow. I am a mole. Are you able to be killed? | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I'm wondering, is it typical to say what you've done before the night ends or do people only do that if they've already roleclaimed? | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 27 2011 06:25 GMarshal wrote: do we really need to call people "fuckers" to get the point across? This. This this and this again Now I'm going to do some thinking. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 27 2011 21:33 Kurumi wrote: Lanaia if I die Your role is revealed. Just saying. And You, my sleeping bodyguard who-left-us-for-day-woke-up-during-the-night better get lucky and roll 1+3+2 ok? and give them 1+1 setting please. Okay, I don't fully understand. But I'm assuming you know I misread my role PM, at least this is what "And You, my sleeping bodyguard who-left-us-for-day-woke-up-during-the-night" feels like to me. I mean, in a way. But okay. I'm okay with this. OH! Unless you are talking about someone else in the second half of this post... If you are, you should let me know. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 28 2011 02:04 redFF wrote: I started tlpdizing my posts because it was fun and i never new you could just press the tlpd button and it would find player names in your post! I stopped now obviously, the nolvelty has worn off. This post was wholly unnecessary. I mean, seriously, red? What in the hell was going through your mind when you posted this? "Oh I need to increase my post count."? | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 28 2011 06:28 Varpulis wrote: Lanaia who did you target yesterday, and what do they think is going to happen? Day vig's please claim and let us discuss instead of shooting on a whim. Damn, I thought the cycle changed at a totally different time. good to know. Palmar how do you know that Mig shot Jackal? I'm very sorry, but Red thought he was going to live forever or something to that effect. He felt incredibly not-town to me. :/ I really didn't think that one of HP and Voldy would be scum. That's the only reason I'd defended Jackal. Sorry I was away for the daypost and all that. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 28 2011 07:31 Amber[LighT] wrote: I think were at 3 me dropbear and drazerk Varpulis said he's got one as well. So at least four. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 28 2011 07:36 sandroba wrote: @Lanaia Is that correct? Why exactly did you shot redFF? Yes, it's correct. And I did it because he was giving me scumvibes and just felt as though he wasn't town. Obviously, in retrospect it was not the best idea. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 28 2011 07:41 sandroba wrote: ... You shot someone on flimsy evidence? Great. Are you compulsive? No, I'm not, but I had a really strong feeling. Sorry. x.x It won't happen again. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
Just because I didn't explicitly state that I thought red was probably scum doesn't mean it was out of nowhere and that I hadn't thought it. I felt Drazerk was not a good kill. I'd submitted my kill by the time I'd ever mentioned Drazerk anyways. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 29 2011 02:17 sandroba wrote: Can we concentrate on one person at a time? For now I sugest we keep our targets limited to foolishness and chaos13. I really don't think foolishness is scum. He feels a lot like BC to me and as such, I don't think he is scum. If I had to, I'd consider voting chaos13, but I'm definitely not sure of his alignment and I'm not sure I personally can read him. I know I have lurked a little, but I'm not trying to. I know there are people in the game who have posted significantly less than I have. On July 28 2011 23:47 sandroba wrote: I really think we should ignore the penalties and claim whoever we made the roles for. This creates acountability and will make it easier to identify mafia acording to the actions so far. Is everyone in favor of this? I don't know if I'm in favour of it, but part of me thinks it could help a bit. I think we could find scum in a way, this way. I'm going to reread today and see if it's viable for me to risk penalty to say what's on my mind right now. Of course, I could be completely wrong. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 29 2011 03:04 sandroba wrote: @lanaia WTF? BC argued with the whole thread, while foolishness only sat on the side lines observing we mislynch. How can you compare both, when they were complete oposites? They felt the same to me. I can't explain it, but they really did feel similarly to me. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 29 2011 03:07 sandroba wrote: Do you even care who we lynch today? To whom were you addressing this? I have a hard time following you due to your manner of speaking without always being clear who you are addressing. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 29 2011 03:31 sandroba wrote: That was directed at you. Of course I care who we lynch. There's no reason for me not to care. It's just, everyone else seems to think people are scum and I don't think those people are scum. x.x | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
At this moment, I'm not sure anymore. I'm rereading to try and find something, but I'm having trouble finding anything at this moment. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 28 2011 06:12 Kurumi wrote: I request a day vig hit on Amber[LighT]. Voting Lanaia I don't understand why Kurumi voted me so quickly into the day. It confuses me. :/ I don't think he's scum, but I don't comprehend the reasoning. [/b] I missed this. I submit my kill during the day. However, it doesn't occur until the following night. Do you still not believe me? I feel kita is scum at this point (after rereading) but I'm not entirely sure why. Admittedly, I haven't contributed too much myself. His last five posts lack anything significant in regards to the game other than a commentary on what had happened at night. Again, this is my first time playing with most of these people so I apologize that many of my reads have been off thus far. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I come back, read what's happened and I don't know what to think. Between Curu revealing what he did and chaos suggesting what he did... I've realized my reads have not been as accurate as they had been. On July 30 2011 00:57 Curu wrote: So Foolishness is apparently a really good player right. His day 1 contribution consisted of randomly offered lynch targets with no desire to push or analyze any of them. Two of these have flipped Town already: If he was actively Pro Town and those were his reads, he would be pushing for one of them to be lynched instead of appearing to contribute without actually contributing. Soft defense of Jackal. He didn't think BC was a good lynch but did nothing to try to stop the wagon. Taking a stand to save one of the more experienced and renowned players is the natural reaction from a Pro Town player that thinks BC is Town, but he was content to stay on the sidelines and post random stuff. Also his vote conveniently fell on a player that had no other votes rather than Jackal; he was content with the mislynch but didn't want to be a part of it, and also didn't want to vote Jackal in case the wagon managed to derail. Since then his contribution has consisted of nothing but walls of text defending himself and a FoS/vote onto Nisani. Nisani is the EASIEST target to attack in the world as either Town OR Mafia, and I can't believe Foolishness's contribution is a throwaway analysis/vote like that. Now sandroba, the information I said I could give: I was the Role Thief. I could steal someone's role, and I stole Foolishness's. His post restriction is complete and utter BS, there was no restriction. What's the motivation behind it? Likely so he could draw out his role creator to snipe him. That or derail the Town into discussing it. Either way it's not real. He doesn't have a history of purposeful trolling like Kurumi does. He also has not publicly claimed his role was stolen and I have no idea why a Town player would withhold that information. But I can see a reason Mafia would: he's the Godfather. My theory is that he made his role description the same as the power he originally held WITH the added caveat of a post restriction and a Townie alignment. But now he can't claim his power was stolen, because any role check on him would reveal that he still had his old role and out him as the Godfather. One final bit of evidence, Mafia clearly tried to snipe active/vet players last night. Wiggles, Mig, and likely Amber (based on Wiggles's role and him being double stacked) were the hits last night. redFF was Lanaia's Vig shot. Why not Foolishness? If what I've heard is correct, he's senior to all of them. ##Unvote ##Vote: Foolishness I like this theory. Now, if what you say is true, there is no reason for him to be town. Town has no reason to lie. Then, I suppose I was very wrong. Very wrong indeed. On July 29 2011 21:11 chaos13 wrote: I also still feel that we haven't pulled ourselves together enough. I'm still seeing a lot of random accusations that don't really have much force behind them. Yes, I'm aware that's what my post on Foolishness is like, but there have been enough people explaining why he is scummy that it would not do any good for me to repeat them again. So here is how all accusations must be made in the future, in order to make things clear and understandable. Player Name Verdict: Explanation and evidence. Quotes must be used here. Player Name is mafia/town. ##Vote: Player Name This will allow everyone to clearly see and understand what you are saying. This will provide us with stronger analysis and stronger reference after players flip. Of course this will only apply to the original accusation. If you're supporting someone else's, say so, but there is no need to go through this again. I don't like this. I really don't like this. This idea is not necessarily pro-town, but appears to be trying to look pro-town. I get the feeling it doesn't work. His vote on Foolishness also set a couple of alarm bells off. But ugh... Now they're both so scummy and I didn't think either of them were scum before. I know this change will probably cause people to cry out that I am also scum, but that's not the case. My vote is going on Foolishness. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
Why am I so stupid. Seriously. Up until it was revealed he lied, I'd thought he was town. On July 30 2011 04:33 Kurumi wrote: 1) To kick role-maker's ass. 2) To punch role-maker in the face 3) To date Lanaia 4) It might not work now. Anyway, I am neither vet or good player. They wouldn't shoot me unless I had good role. It bothers me a little that he keeps saying stuff about dating me. :/ Is it possible for you to update the list of people who are dead? I keep trying to refer to it and then realize "oh this person's dead." | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 30 2011 06:46 Kurumi wrote: Lanaia, sorry.. I was just joking (I tend to do that when everything goes wrong) I hope You're not scared/creeped I thought it was a crumb and I was confused to all hell as to what it would mean. May I ask, do we think Foolishness was being honest about him being roleblocked? | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 30 2011 07:09 Curu wrote: Yes, he was honest. I know this for a fact because of the state his role was in when I received it. Okay. Logically, the person who blocked him was town/third party. At least, that makes sense to me. Am I incorrect in my logic thus far? | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 30 2011 07:10 heist wrote: Remember that I might have been the target and it transferred onto Foolishness. Or he could be lying. Or someone not-scum did actually target him. Oh right. I forgot about the puppet. My bad. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 30 2011 07:12 bumatlarge wrote: Regardless of what you planned, there is very little doubt in my mind that you are town. Good work. To whom are you referring? | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:06 Palmar wrote: Deconduo fucked up. Chaos13 tried to kill Sandroba. This confuses me a bit. Oh, also I think we have another roleblocker unless someone manipulated DBs action. Seeing as Palmar got that chaos actioned and DB claimed to have blocked chaos, I think the latter is more likely. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:41 sandroba wrote: Lanaia, did you get role blocked? Who did you target with your night action? As I've said before, I action during the day, but the ability happens at night. I was roleblocked. However, it didn't matter as I'd forgotten to action yesterday nor was I sure who to action. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:40 Palmar wrote: didn't dropbear say he roleblocked chaos13? You saw chaos actioning, yes? Would it still be shown if he'd been blocked fully? I don't 100% understand how roleblocks work with trackers/watchers in this forum. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:48 Palmar wrote: read my ability, I see any action they perform initially decon just said chaos13 visited sandroba, but I sent him a pm, and he said I also saw chaos tried to kill sandroba Okay. I think I understand now. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:52 sandroba wrote: @Lanaia Can I get some more clarification in regards to your role? You choose to perform an action on a player during the day, but actually perform it during the night? If so to which player have you chosen to perform any sort of action? I only chose a person d1. This person was redff1. I forgot to choose yesterday. I have no yet chosen today. I cannot use the same ability two days in a row, though. Do you need anything more than this? Varpulis confirmed that this is how my role works the first time I mentioned it. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 31 2011 07:23 Lanaia wrote: I only chose a person d1. This person was redff1. I forgot to choose yesterday. I have no yet chosen today. I cannot use the same ability two days in a row, though. Do you need anything more than this? Varpulis confirmed that this is how my role works the first time I mentioned it. It's more or less a delayed action. I can submit at any time during the day and have it complete at the end of the following night. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 31 2011 07:35 sandroba wrote: Lanaia, there are 3 options here: 1) You are sk or mafia (leaning sk since mafia wouldn't shoot drazerk imo) and shot drazerk at night and thus got roleblocked. 2) Mafia has a roleblocker. In that case palmar is mafia since he didn't get roleblocked and you did instead. 3) Some random townie roleblocked you, which I find unlikely since I see no reason a townie would RB you. If that's the case such townie should claim. 1. I never shot Drazerk. I wouldn't've been able to shoot anyways because I cannot use the same ability two days in a row. Can you tell me why I'm any sort of scum, please? 2. Why would Palmar be roleblocked? | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I'm glad there are a lot of people who I'm feeling are town still around and active. I'm torn between who to action today, though. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 31 2011 08:09 sandroba wrote: Could you claim pls lanaia? If someone other than you also thinks I should claim, yes. I don't want to claim if only one person wants me to. I'm sure that's understandable. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 31 2011 08:18 Varpulis wrote: @lanaia either predict my or sandroba's imminent doom, or proclaim that the gods watch kita/chaos (whoever we don't lynch) this will make sense when/if she claims. I was thinking that, but I wasn't sure who we'd lynch. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 31 2011 08:20 sandroba wrote: @Lanaia Alright. If you have some sort of check use it on kita/palmar. Since you have no night actions as you claim either palmar is scum or you are SK. If you are town I would sugest you check palmar. I have no checking powers. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 31 2011 08:28 sandroba wrote: Got this PM right now. What does it mean lanaia? The Crackpot Fortune Teller has predicted your imminent doom. You will die the night after next. No. I'm a crackpot. I protect you this coming night. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
1. Their Imminent Doom. The victim is told that they will die the night after next. they will instead get an extra life for that night and that night only 2. That they have the protection of the angels, and they have an extra life that night. They will instead take a shot (1 kp) 3. That the gods watch their actions, and their movements that night will be unstoppable. they will instead be roleblocked. you cannot use a power twice in a row, and each fortune has a maximum of two uses. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I also believe we have a mafia roleblocker at this point seeing as there's not really another reason for me to have been blocked. Are we 100% sure kita is SK and not mafia? Those were what ran through my mind. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
(Voting Chaos FWIW) | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
We were allowed to suggest who the penalty would be for. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 31 2011 12:42 sandroba wrote: Hmm, and there's also Palmar's slip about the role thief role. I'd completely forgotten about this. Has Palmar claimed making any role? | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 31 2011 13:15 Curu wrote: So here's how I see it: sandroba is the most Pro Town player thus far. I'm not banking on him lying. chaos's action against sandroba must have gone through for them to be in the circle. That means it was not a kill, unless sandroba is the SK and/or can somehow survive night hits. Palmar and DropBear must be lying or this game has the weirdest mechanics I've ever seen. The only thing that gets me is I'm almost certain Foolishness was RBed night 1 and DropBear claimed that one as well. DropBear lying about what? | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On July 31 2011 13:26 Curu wrote: The only part that doesn't make sense to me is Foolishness's claimed roleblock. But reading over my role PM again, Foolishness may have thought he gets new powers just for waiting rather than actively using the powers and thus didn't use anything since there's the insanity caveat and the first two powers weren't all that helpful for Mafia. DropBear, your full role PM please. There is a daykill ability still out there (supersoft's death) but no one claiming a power related to it, someone is BSing. And for the cult thing, once again unless sandroba lied about his ability (I don't believe he did) then he was not the one. supersoft never did any action to sandroba either. DropBear has a roleblock. He also has the penalty I made (unless someone else made the same one). I made his role. He does indeed have a role block. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
Every night, he can wail someone which is a roleblock and it scares them half- to death essentially. So if he blocks the same person twice, they die. I worded it a little differently when I PMed Decon. I also made his penalty which he claimed earlier, which was that he is unable to target the same person two nights in a row. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
If decon did something to it, I'm unaware of it. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On August 02 2011 01:27 sandroba wrote: That bread crumb kind of convinced me. When I think I got the game solved I start getting paranoid =P Er, which way did it convince you? That he's town? | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
We likely have one or two mafia left, correct? | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I feel stupid cause I can't figure out how many scum we theoretically should have. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
If you guys'd prefer to be rid of me, go ahead. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
(oh, BTW, I never lost my vote like bum's roleblock was supposed to do). Something to think about. Final Vote Count yesterday: On August 02 2011 06:00 Eiii wrote: chaos13 DropBear Drazerk Kurumi Curu Lanaia <----- heist Palmar sandroba kitaman27 | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On August 02 2011 08:09 sandroba wrote: That means shit. Chaos vote was on foolishness and they were both mafia. But anyway shoot palmar first =) Not what I meant. I was supposed to lose my vote when bum roleblocked me. I never lost my vote. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
Now that I'm aware he knows who the mafia are, part of me wants to think he's a mole, but... I cannot fathom why he would claim not being town unless he were survivor (though we'd still likely get rid of him anyways, no?) On August 02 2011 08:52 bumatlarge wrote: He's probably SK, or ninja at this rate, if what he says is true. But then my bullet will nail him only if he isn't SK, and in that case he's assured and we can lynch him. This is probably good for mafia to hear, as it prolongs their defeat, but now it is possible that they only have 1 member left. In this case, what is a ninja? Is it a separate alignment or something? | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
We don't need to give him a chance. He's not town so I don't see why we need to aid him here. I'm fine with being blocked: it's okay. Waitttt.... I submit my action during the day. I've got Sandroba protected... But that has to stop if I'm blocked, I take it. Unless I don't fully understand day actions with roleblock. If I'm blocked, we risk Sandroba being killed. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On August 02 2011 12:54 Lanaia wrote: But yeah, if he hasn't actioned yet, he should block me. effing accidental tab and enter. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On August 03 2011 06:05 Curu wrote: wtf, I thought Lanaia had prot on sandroba. ##Vote Palmar I did. There has to have been two hits on Sandroba OR one hit that can count as two. I wasn't roleblocked or anything so I am so confused as to why Sandroba died. I am confused as to why Palmar isn't dead. On August 03 2011 06:38 heist wrote: Dropbear did you RB bum? Only two people can roleblock: dropbear and bum. Kita claims rb. Bum claims rb. I can as well! (but I didn't) If you guys want, I can shoot bum or palmar today. I'm allowed to do that again now. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On August 03 2011 06:56 heist wrote: How do propose you got roleblocked then? Palmar, dropbear, and kita are lying? Who was that addressed at? bum? if it was at me, I was saying I have the capability to roleblock. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On August 03 2011 06:57 Kurumi wrote: BUMATLARGE IS SCUM AND HAS ROLE WITH KP, THERE'S YOUR STACK OH GIVE ME A BREAK Right... but then, this means they had to coordinate their kills, no? | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On August 03 2011 07:09 Palmar wrote: Lanaia did not visit sandroba. SHE'S A LIAR! Again, I action during the day. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On August 03 2011 07:04 bumatlarge wrote: You should have claimed RB and blamed your prot failure on me, and kept me around a bit til you could get a lynch on me. If your mafia that is Guys, sandroba confirmed that I did in fact action him. It gave him a PM telling him is doom was imminent. If you'd've actually read my claim, you'd realize that I did, in fact, protect him. This was also confirmed by varpulis as a protect. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On August 03 2011 07:31 Kurumi wrote: bumatlarge himself claimed he is scum, why not lynch him? Where did he do that? I seem to have missed it. I'd prefer lynching bum at this point, I think. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
Leave Palmar to me. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On August 03 2011 07:57 bumatlarge wrote: Lanaia just used her protection of the angels on me. Okay, change of plans. Lynch Palmar. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
Everyone, please vote Palmar. Bum will die tonight. Sorry for the confusion. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On August 03 2011 08:02 Palmar wrote: NO The hero lanaia brought us closer to victory! Now we must kill EVIL KITAMAN27!!!! No, we're not getting rid of kita, at least, not yet. You've claimed being anti-town. It's in our best interests to be rid of you. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
god I'm stupid. I don't know what more I can contribute at this point. The wording in Palmar's posts lately kinda... weirds me out. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I don't think DB is scum, and I still have that nagging sensation about Drazerk that has come and gone a few times this game. I second Kurumi's request for a sped-up cycle. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On August 05 2011 09:15 Curu wrote: I third Kurumi's request for a sped-up cycle. Also Lanaia your gut may be right this time! That's exciting. I'm excited. We're going to win this. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I like this whole gamestyle I think. It's kinda neat. Just wondering: do we want another roleblock thrown into this coming night or not? I know roleblocks can get headachy. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
But an updated list would be appreciated. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
But I'm okay with that given we know wtf we're doing. I believe drop so I'm going to change my vote. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
So I think it's good that Curu is protecting himself. Wait, does that mean dropbear killed kita? | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
Should we by lynching DB then? Should I block him? | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On August 07 2011 04:42 Curu wrote: I have read the thread Drazerk. I've seen where you did nothing to stop the BC mislynch even though you claim to have known he was lying, where you came in with some bullshit cred buying move AFTER Jackal was already dead but didn't try to influence the actual lynch in any way. How you posted nothing at all in the game until it came down to trying to keep you alive till the end of the game. Look, one of Drazerk, bum, and DropBear is the last Mafia. Drazerk is UNACTIONABLE, which means he HAS to be lynched. Me and Lanaia can kill bum and DropBear at night. Kurumi just tell me what you'll do if bum flips Town. One problem... I don't have any kills left. The deal was two of each ability. I've already submitted my block on drazerk. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
Also thanks Dec and Eiii :D | ||
| ||