TL Mafia XLIV - Page 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
| ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
On August 20 2011 01:09 xtfftc wrote: Sorry but who/what is Nemesis? The picture explains it all. What do you think about Sevyrn? | ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
Palmar why is DB scum over Sevyrn? He made a stupid policy post in Werewolves too and he was a Medic. | ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
On August 20 2011 01:56 Palmar wrote: read both posts. notice the different attitude. He's calling shit stupid and has balls in werewolf and ptp2. He's being super-duper cautious this time around. READ THEM AGAIN NEMESIS, READ THEM I can see your point, but I don't think DropBear and Sevyrn can both be scum. Sevyrn's post was just such an awful "I don't want to be seen having an opinion, so I will make up a bad reason to follow Palmar and then excuse myself from doing anything else the rest of the day" vote that I'm far more convinced on him than Drop. But let's see how Droppy defends himself. | ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
On August 20 2011 04:22 GreYMisT wrote: Alright I'm back and caught up, for the most part it seems. some stuff still confuses me though. Palmar, I think multiple people agree that we are going to need additional reasoning behind your HEAVY aggression on DB. Just because he posted a policy post is simply not enough. He did it in the werewolf game and flipped medic. That being said... DB, though I agree that a no-lynch must be avoided, I think electing an informal mayor is a terrible idea. the mayor could end up being mafia. Nominating yourself is a little bit odd, as well as supplying the reasoning "and most importantly I am town." This sounds like something someone would say who defiantly isn't town. additional to that is the fact that nominating yourself mayor makes you a very high priority target for the mafia on night1. Though i disagree with your reasoning and methods palmar, i am inclined to feel a bit wary about DB myself. I look forward to being potentially swayed by your evidence. So did you have something original to add in? All I see here is rehashing what everyone else has already said. Don't wait for Palmar to sway you and sheep him, make the case yourself. | ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
| ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
On August 20 2011 06:52 BrownBear wrote: I asked for something of substance and this is what I got? Oh, you. Ok, something you've pulled out of my reasoning that really just wasn't there. You're saying I want to lynch someone inactive. Not necessarily true. Implied, maybe, but NOT what I said. Again, you really need to stop putting words in people's mouths. What I said there, and what anyone who took 5 seconds to think rationally got out of that sentence before you started spewing shit all over it, is that regardless of what I think about DropBear's alignment (and for the record, I think he's more green than not. Scummy, possibly, but not confirmed scum), I want to see people post more. We're on only 17 pages halfway through the first day, which is kind of sad. I want more content. DropBear's providing it. I'm for lynching any of the semi-actives - that is, the people who are just contributing one liners and sheeping along to do the bare minimum to fly under the radar. Inactives = people who haven't noticed the game's started yet, people in different time zones who are sleeping, or people who don't care about the game. No reason wasting a vote on them - modkills will get them soon enough. The real area where mafia are probably lurking are the semi-actives - the guys who have posted a few times to be able to say "hey, I was here", but haven't contributed anything of substance or worth to the discussion. That doesn't include DropBear right now. At the very least, he's provoking discussion both about his silly fake-mayor plan, and about whether or not he's red. He's defending himself and providing some alternate ideas. (Although, DropBear, "I will do so if it becomes necessary"? Really? That's not doing you any favors, bro). Right now, my list of semi-actives include: wherebugsgo, hiro protagonist, Foolishness, and JeeJee (when you read his posts, they don't contribute nearly as much as they do ask questions that go unanswered). I'm open to adding more to that list tho. So let's start talking about those guys! JeeJee is the most suspicious to me right now: He's posted the most, but I see not all that much in his posts... it looks to me as though he's trying to post while not adding anything of value to town discussion. Just a gut feeling, but I still feel a lot better about lynching him than I do DropBear. Anyway, long story short: You read things out of my post that didn't exist, those things are the entire basis of your case against me, your case against me sucks, gg, try harder. ##Vote: JeeJee I don't agree with lynch inactives. Way too easily manipulated by Mafia as every lurker would look the exact same and they could point you in the direction of one of them. Absolutely no discussion nor relevant information comes from simply policy lynching. The simplest way to deal with lurkers it to encourage people not do it. Everyone should know it's anti Town as hell to sit in the shadows and do nothing, so no Townie should be inclined to lurk anyways. If you can't keep interest, then ask to be replaced. Don't make us deal with you. Nobody else sees Sevyrn over there (hi Sevyrn!)? The worst reason for a vote I have ever seen in my life, followed by "I wasn't actually voting I was pressuring but I unvoted as soon as he made a post" followed by "I unvoted cause I don't want people to lynch me." | ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
Vote Sevyrn for me then. Look at dem posts. | ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
| ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
| ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
| ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
lynch sevyrn | ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
I will be good Townie tmrw | ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
On August 20 2011 23:38 chaos13 wrote: Let's take a brief look at the sevryn bandwagon. Did it build up quickly? Has there been any noticeable defense that appears flimsy or false or nervous? I don't think he's scum. Really? Since Sevyrn made that awful post there's been cases attempted on DropBear, BrownBear, Mig, Palmar calling everyone scum, it goes on. A DEFENSE THAT ISN'T FLIMSY? LOOK AT THIS SHIT: On August 19 2011 23:39 Sevryn wrote: Right now DB is looking the scummiest imo and after what palmar did in Swedish house mafia I am inclined to trust him. That said if there is a good case against anyone else i would be willing to give DropBear another lookskie ## vote DropBear On August 20 2011 03:41 Sevryn wrote: That was my whole point I didn't say it was a pressure vote untill after he responded and I took my vote off because palmar has a shitty case and I didn't want people to lynch me because they thought I was just bandwagoning LOOK AT THIS. THAT IS THE SCUMMIEST VOTE REASON ANYONE HAS EVER SEEN IN THE ETERNITY OF ANYTHING. That is an EVEN scummier unvote reason. He wants to leave his vote uselessly somewhere. Then replies that he knew it was useless, but he's unvoting because he doesn't want us to lynch him. This is the post that "convinced" Sevyrn to take his vote off DropBear: On August 20 2011 02:46 DropBear wrote: OK wtf Palmar? I actually don't understand. What is your problem with me exactly? Nearly all of your posts are one liners that are some variation of "Kill DropBear". The "not safe" post you link included a joke about Harry Potter, a complete throwaway vote on kitaman27 and a joke about sandroba's plans. My first post in this thread advocated forcing people to change their vote, how is that so incredibly safe compared PTP2? I don't actually understand your case, I will talk to you more if you actually come up with something. My posts are 2 pages after the game started. 2 pages. Half the players hadn't even posted yet and most of the ones who did posted nothing other than "/confirm". How do you expect me to have reads on people before they have even posted, through divination? Time travel? What's with the random defence of your actions at the end? It's like you know it's a stupid idea, but you're doing it anyway. Yeah bullshit, nothing here makes him look unscummy enough to cancel the "pressure vote" that Sevyrn knew was useless on him anyways. He unvoted because we were calling him out for his terrible voting and doesn't want to get lynched. | ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
| ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
| ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
I like it. | ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
On August 21 2011 02:26 Palmar wrote: chances of sevryn flipping scum: ~0.2% You seem awfully certain. You redFFing bro? | ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
| ||
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
On August 21 2011 02:31 Palmar wrote: I'm pretty amazed that you don't see this, because normally your town play is relatively solid and your reads good. I see Sevyrn being scummy as all hell. His past games as Town he's looked scummy too, but in a different way. He's not afraid to put his vote on someone and keep it there unless someone brings up a better case against someone else. He defends his vote and attacks people who call his vote a sheep or bandwagon (him vs Lucidity in Kurumi's game). Here he's retracted his vote altogether, not made enemies with anyone calling him out for scuminess and disappeared forever. How do you not see this? | ||
| ||