Steamship Liquidia (TL Mafia 46)
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
##Signup | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
trollface but at least the game is starting! | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
HAI GUISE I'll be back in about 9-10 hours. See you guys then. | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
##Vote: chaoser | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 16 2011 04:48 Hiroruby wrote: the # of Lynches I think we should never do more than two a day, unless we know for a fact we're are killing scum. I.E. 3 types of lynches I would be in favor of, in this order. 2x suspected scum Suspected Scum + lurker 2x lurker if we have no solid suspects. No. This is not only useless (too easy for scum to dodge), but it will be hard to regulate anyway. | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 16 2011 09:06 Drazerk wrote: Your not going to lurk the first day, come out of no where and then vote chaoser without reason. FoS sinani206 His posts this game are nothing like what I've seem out of him before and even if I hadn't played with him before, the posts are straight up scummy. | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 16 2011 11:41 chaoser wrote: Not my fault. I blame rest of town. I gave them a 1 KP mafia by end of Day 3 and they lost it =[ im too good at faking idiocy for you, i guess lol | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 16 2011 13:16 wherebugsgo wrote: to clarify again, each person go for whoever they think is scummiest. That doesn't mean all of us go for the same person. This is completely stupid because some people have more than one read at a time. Why focus when you can divide (your attention) and conquer? | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 16 2011 17:27 wherebugsgo wrote: Coag is also a pretty good player, so if he's scum, he's capable of lurking and surviving. For the same reason he doesn't make a good day 1 lynch because if he's not scum, then scum will want to shoot him. No. yes | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 16 2011 16:34 Cyber_Cheese wrote: You've taken divide and conquer out of context, historically its about dividing the enemy, not yourself. You shouldn't be taking any less precaution over any of your votes than you usually would. It's better to scrutinize one person to best determine whether they are scum or not. If everybody does it, there should be enough information to extract reasonable opinions come voting time for anyone else you might want lynched. Using divide and conquer properly here is essentially lynching one scum at a time. you understnad the point, which is all that matters | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 16 2011 23:50 xsksc wrote: That's a pretty silly assumption, my post said nothing of the sort. Why does "This is my first big game" become "I'm trying to help but will probably fail"? What makes you think that because I'm new to this sort of thing, I'm just gonna be a hindrance? Sure, I don't have the same experience as some of the veterans here, but I can still be just as useful. I'm not using being new as an excuse to "lurk", I've actually posted a decent ammount already. You really seem to be over-analyzing a simple hello post, I don't know what else to say. You seem to really be over-defending yourself against an idiot. I don't know what else to say. | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 16 2011 18:14 Drazerk wrote: + Show Spoiler + On November 16 2011 17:33 HarbingerOfDoom wrote: Calling out lurkers? Sure thing! And then we have hyshes: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=282366&user=132738 As mentioned above, there is also Coagulation. I may very well be missing some, but hyshes and risk stood out to me since I played with them in my previous game. If we want to include people with more posts that are just all useless...well then the list becomes much longer :-) Hyshes is still very new I wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't post much on day one + Show Spoiler + No yes | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
##Vote: Lanaia ##Vote: Kenpachi | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 17 2011 08:24 Cyber_Cheese wrote: No. Why are you discussing it still, and frankly, how are you this useless? yes | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
It's kind of sad how people disagree with me when I say he's scum. So obvious. His play this game is very very terrible and stuff. Lanaia and Kenpachi: obvscum. Let me explain in case you are stupid. Kenpachi getting usual votes for being Kenpachi. Lanaia (scumbuddy) uses power to try to save him without realizing that it will show up on the vote list. Quickly removes anti-vote, but not before people see and you can even still see the anti-vote on the list. Epic fail by both. | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
the fuck dude | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 17 2011 09:48 chaoser wrote: Or you'll be eating your words when lanaia, me and kenpachi all flip town. WTF is the point of that post? I thought we already discussed the difference between a winning decision and a smart decision in Team Melee Mafia. I'd rather lynch hiroruby, a smart choice than kenpachi, a bad choice. Seriously go fuck yourself, I'm done playing TL mafia; after this game I'll be co-hosting/hosting only. umadbro? | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 17 2011 09:59 chaoser wrote: His entire case on me is literally built on the fact that I somehow "Lied" when I clearly did not. That's the one fact he keeps bringing up over and over again. What a joke. Your not getting voted because of LaL, it's because you're scummy. | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 17 2011 09:13 Lanaia wrote: As I write this, I am currently reading page 32 but I felt explanation has priority over my reading at this moment in time. I was most definitely aware it would show my anti-vote when I submitted it. He just felt more town to me than some of the other people in game.I felt trying to save someone I'd thought was town was a good idea, at least at that point in time. I knew it would appear in the votelist with my name attached, yes. I took it back because people got all pissy at me. And people getting pissy at me frustrates me. I've already said I'm terrible at convincing people. And if I were trying to lynch him, I'd have a vote on him, no? And no, I am not mafia trying to save my ass because that would not be the best way to go about it. I was most definitely aware it would show my anti-vote when I submitted it. I don't care if you don't believe me. Now I am going to finish reading the game. On November 17 2011 09:21 Lanaia wrote: OH, And for the record, I didn't remove it until it was evident everyone had seen it and I'd clearly done something effing stupid. I'm sorry. Oh, and I didn't consult with town because that would essentially mean a full role claim d1- not something I wanted to do. CLEARLY I SCREWED SOMETHING UP. LaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaL | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 18 2011 07:17 HarbingerOfDoom wrote: Do you know the full extent/limitations of Lanaia's role? How did she full role claim by anti-voting Kenpachi? We still don't know if she can double vote, how many times it can be used, etc etc. i doubt thats not her full role. if it isnt then she is scum because anything else would be too powerful for town. | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 18 2011 07:20 Tyrran wrote: So within four hours, we must focus on getting another lynch. We already have 2 people a 8 votes, i suggest we focus on them. Both look scummy, both are in my likely scum list, yet Drazerk voted for Sinani206 so its unlikely that both are scum. First of all, Sinani was a big partisan of dividing our attention . Quite amusingly he used the divide and conquer analogy, where as pointed by WBG, you are suppose to divide you enemy. Meaning we town are the enemy? He Bandwagoned against Lanaia, which as i explained before, is something that is very pro-mafia. Just look at his post just before, when we already established that Lanaia should not be lynched. Both his votes are given without any explanation other than "its obvious". He is either scum or an extremely bad town. Even Drazerk looks good in comparison. I dont think town needs him. ##Vote Sinani206 lololol hypocrite | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 18 2011 07:21 HarbingerOfDoom wrote: So please explain how that isn't Chaoser defending Kenpachi. If it is him defending Kenpachi, should you be lynched under LaL? oh didnt see that post lol | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 18 2011 07:27 Tyrran wrote: Great defense. I will remind you that I voted kenpachi only becaused i agreed with risk.nuke that this was the rigth way to proceed. And i will redirect you to This post where i explain why mafia would press charges on Lanaia, and thus why those who blindly voted for her are suspects. your bandwagoning on me when you vote me for bandwagoning | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
##Unvote: chaoser ##Unvote: Lanaia ##Vote: Drazerk ##Vote: Nisani201 | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 18 2011 10:00 Kibibit wrote: Ditto, I'll be at MLG, so there will be some relative inactivity, though I can post from my phone. barely missed that 24 hour thing | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
- You most post in the thread at least once every 24 hours. Your role may also include other activity requirements which you must follow. | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
no lol but also chaoser is always stupid so its ok | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 18 2011 10:27 chaoser wrote: I seriously suggest people give two more votes to vote sinani off. He's not going to be helpful for town at all in the coming days. I don't see how people can say kenpachi was a good vote and then NOT vote sinani due to "A lurker was already lynched". WBG, Palmer, Cyber, etc. talk about me making a mess in thread (which I didn't) but decide to ignore sinani? what bullshit look how the kenpachi vote turned out. do you want that to happen again? | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 18 2011 10:30 chaoser wrote: Unless sinani already knows he said he was town why would he lie | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
good night. | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 18 2011 11:33 prplhz wrote: hahahaha that lynch was totally your fault l2p you can't expect everybody to think that your lurking oneliner style is the greatest thing ever in mafia so stop being an asshole about it I would reply, but I'm dead. | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 18 2011 18:56 Palmar wrote: Sinani206's play is so far from optimal for town that it's borderline disgusting, that doesn't change the fact I deduced he wasn't mafia and did not vote for him. I did not expect sinani206 to play well, he never does. | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
| ||