|
On October 06 2012 04:51 Coagulation wrote: why the fuck am I on the list? Im sorry but I have done nothing to look scummy at all. Maybe im not the most active player here but that sure as fuck doesnt indicate that im scum in any way. Omg, this post reeks of scumminess. Why the hell are you so defensive about Shiao's read of you? What about the rest of the guys on that list? You know how bad that read list is so you have no reason to clear yourself.
|
EBWOP: You're also assuming that he is finding your inactiveness scummy, when he never explicitly mentions it. That means you are aware of your scumminess and are desperate to make it seem unscummy.
|
On October 06 2012 05:27 Coagulation wrote: yeah im just desperate you got me bro. Thank god your internet came back on for you to come crack this game wide open. Great answer. But seriously why are you so defensive about such a casual FoS? And how could you assume he disliked your inactiveness. There are tons of inactive players (im the most at this point), so you didn't need to make that distinction at all.
|
On October 06 2012 06:00 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2012 05:37 BroodKingEXE wrote:On October 06 2012 05:27 Coagulation wrote: yeah im just desperate you got me bro. Thank god your internet came back on for you to come crack this game wide open. Great answer. But seriously why are you so defensive about such a casual FoS? And how could you assume he disliked your inactiveness. There are tons of inactive players (im the most at this point), so you didn't need to make that distinction at all. he fucking said im not contributing enough to get a read on me. read the fucking thread. Im blind, find it for me. My quick ctrl-f and scan through have only pulled your name once:
On October 06 2012 03:40 ShiaoPi wrote: LoL, you will just call me out for not doing cases again if I drop reads without reasoning, whatever the fuck here comes:
scummy as hell: VE, Coag and Matt, various reasons for each, but mainly for being vets their impact has been close to zero in this game.
scumleaning: BC, Sloosh and whoever replaces for Node, I know I had him more on the townieside but fuck it no reason at all to go MIA like this.
kind of wary off: Sharrant, risk, fuba, boson and kush
Es-tu satisfait de mon travail, mon ami?
|
##Vote: hapa You guys are doing a good job of teaching me about breadcrumbing. LVII was terrible for me.
|
On October 06 2012 11:03 Hapahauli wrote: @ DP
I disagree. Kush drops WIFOM bombs as either alignment. The one thing that could be interpreted as scummy is him semi-trolling you, but it looks more like a joke than something you should take at face value. He's much less angry than the scumplay I'm used to seeing out of him. He could've learned, but I'm leaning town on him unless there's something really egregiously scummy in his filter that I haven't seen (like him knowing you were town in XXVIII). What do you think of Hapa's response DP? Personally I find his constant soft defense of Kush pretty damning considering Kush's play this game.
|
+ Show Spoiler +On October 06 2012 16:04 Promethelax wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Sorry for any crazy in this post I've been out drinking (and more) since my last post in thread, I think I'm sober now but we'll see. Show nested quote +On October 06 2012 09:04 Hapahauli wrote:On October 06 2012 06:54 Promethelax wrote:On October 06 2012 06:49 risk.nuke wrote: It's starting to become a habit in this thread,someone yells a question at me over a post in which I EXPLICITLY explained what they are questioning. it is starting to be a habit of yours to not add anything to the thread with your posts. Who is your top scum read right now? On October 06 2012 06:45 Hapahauli wrote:Still catching up, but this caught my eye: On October 06 2012 06:37 risk.nuke wrote: I'm just to lazy to build a case before the nightflip. I'm always watching the thread incase someone decides to pull some shenanigans. As for why I'm not posting. I consider the atleast last 20 pages useless shit and I haven't seen a point in joining the conversations that's been had. Shouldn't you be much more concerned about death than this if you are town? Glad we're on the same page Hapa, I hope we're both town this time around so I can see if I like playing with you when you aren't slaughtering me. Yah, I hope we're both town as well <3 I'm pretty surprised that no one has commented on that risk quote - not even risk himself! I'll have to take a look through risk's filter and see if he's capable of this as town, but the silence here is disconcerting. I'm also quite interested as to why imperfection chainsaw defended him - thoughts? Since my first game with Imperfect where we were both scum (XIX) I feel generally decent at reading him. I like the kid a lot which helps, I think. The thing is in this game he hasn't stood out to me, nothing he does takes him to the next leve as either scummy or Towniel. Imperfect is a smart player who knows better than to lurk this much so his actions worry me, I have him in my Null column but I hope he is town as I like him a lot and his analysis always helps me solidify my own understanding of the game. I don;t like the connection theory until on of Risk Iamp flips and I think Risk is much more likely to be scum. Show nested quote +On October 06 2012 09:28 austinmcc wrote:On October 06 2012 09:20 iamperfection wrote: he could be "gasp" telling the truth. Nah. My play may not have been a documentary, but it's based on true events. Node was mafia. hey Austin, bro, care to share your reasons? What about hapa's plays to or detracts from this read? Since Annul was not scum how does your read of Node change? + Show Spoiler +On October 03 2012 06:44 austinmcc wrote: Headed out soon for the evening, may not be back before deadline.
Node scum. If node scum, annul and Z-BosoN scum. mkfuba very scummy.
annul is odd no matter node's alignment, but I'd be much more convinced of SCUM if node is red.
slOosh's return and look at mattchew strike me as not-scum.
BC and coag feel kind of distant. BC entered thread with a lot of thoughts yesterday, but mainly just called half the thread scummy (mainly for doing things that were scummy). I wish he'd interacted more with thread towards deadline last night, and I wish he'd have some thoughts on people who aren't scummy and whatnot. Coag I have never played with, and he's kind of in the same boat - wherefore art thou Coageo?
I think the meta arguments on Kush are overblown. If he's got a clear town meta and scum meta, and then is clearly told the difference between those two, then the whole thing flies out the window slightly. Unless he's got oodles and oodles of games where he's clearly town or scum, he can just play like he normally would with less f bombs and know he'll look townie on meta. So I don't give them too much credence.
that leaves out a whole lotta players. Some, like BKE/Talismania were active early on and then completely absent. And why are you so focused on the Janitor role and Node? Sorry I just picked up on that on this read through of your filter. Since this happened + Show Spoiler +On October 02 2012 09:00 austinmcc wrote:Another interesting mention of Shady: Show nested quote +On October 01 2012 17:40 Node wrote: I don't think Shady Sands is scum -- at least, not given what we've seen so far. His "trolling" antics were silly, but they weren't scummy. If he were scum, I don't think he would've dropped the trolling pretext so quickly, and I certainly don't think he would be willing to reappear and start pushing targets. These feel like incredibly bad reasons for a townread. I don't see how NoT coNtINUinG TYpINg LIKe tHIs and throwing a bunch of obscenities around is townie. I don't see Shady pushing other targets. I'm interested in BC's thoughts on Shady. I think Node's thoughts, already given, make Node look scummy. Your only posts have been about Node and Janitors. Why tunnel so much, you are better than this. Oh never mind, I see Hapa is claiming scum with his actions after the day post. ##Vote: hapa. Die Scum, and think this through you could have fought for yourself way to fold up and die (you are as bad as i was last time we played together). Dont post while drunk Austin is dead. How do your reads change?
|
|
On October 03 2012 00:14 Coagulation wrote: yay I made the list This is Coag's reaction to being on austin's list. + Show Spoiler [Austin's post] + Coagulation - On October 02 2012 12:17 Coagulation wrote: Everyone keep your votes on shady sands. Node bandwagon looked scummy as fuck and only makes shady look even scummier. Wagon looks scummy. No substantive thoughts on Node.
On October 06 2012 04:51 Coagulation wrote: why the fuck am I on the list? Im sorry but I have done nothing to look scummy at all. Maybe im not the most active player here but that sure as fuck doesnt indicate that im scum in any way. This reaction is totally different, but the accusations behind them are virtually the same. Austin's a townie so I feel its some sort of weird distancing strat on Coag's part. + Show Spoiler [Shiao's post] +On October 06 2012 03:40 ShiaoPi wrote: LoL, you will just call me out for not doing cases again if I drop reads without reasoning, whatever the fuck here comes:
scummy as hell: VE, Coag and Matt, various reasons for each, but mainly for being vets their impact has been close to zero in this game.
scumleaning: BC, Sloosh and whoever replaces for Node, I know I had him more on the townieside but fuck it no reason at all to go MIA like this.
kind of wary off: Sharrant, risk, fuba, boson and kush
Es-tu satisfait de mon travail, mon ami?
|
On October 07 2012 06:11 Promethelax wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2012 06:08 BroodKingEXE wrote:On October 03 2012 00:14 Coagulation wrote: yay I made the list This is Coag's reaction to being on austin's list. + Show Spoiler [Austin's post] + Coagulation - On October 02 2012 12:17 Coagulation wrote: Everyone keep your votes on shady sands. Node bandwagon looked scummy as fuck and only makes shady look even scummier. Wagon looks scummy. No substantive thoughts on Node. On October 06 2012 04:51 Coagulation wrote: why the fuck am I on the list? Im sorry but I have done nothing to look scummy at all. Maybe im not the most active player here but that sure as fuck doesnt indicate that im scum in any way. This reaction is totally different, but the accusations behind them are virtually the same. Austin's a townie so I feel its some sort of weird distancing strat on Coag's part. + Show Spoiler [Shiao's post] +On October 06 2012 03:40 ShiaoPi wrote: LoL, you will just call me out for not doing cases again if I drop reads without reasoning, whatever the fuck here comes:
scummy as hell: VE, Coag and Matt, various reasons for each, but mainly for being vets their impact has been close to zero in this game.
scumleaning: BC, Sloosh and whoever replaces for Node, I know I had him more on the townieside but fuck it no reason at all to go MIA like this.
kind of wary off: Sharrant, risk, fuba, boson and kush
Es-tu satisfait de mon travail, mon ami? Interesting. I hadn't noticed this. So do you feel that both Coag and Shio are scum? How about VE who Coag is also reacting to poorly when called out by. Matt and Risk, where in the bloody hells are you? You have only come back to the thread to write off my questioning of you and summarily vanished again. What are your reads, what has changed for you after the Night Kills? Yeah Coag for reasons I've made already. Shiao cause he isn't playing to his meta and that list of reads. It irks me that his top reads hadn't been mentioned at all and seemed to be a meshing together of people that were viewed as scummy in the thread. His fuba case was basically a rehash of fuba's day 1 actions, not having an ounce of analysis. + Show Spoiler +On October 04 2012 02:28 ShiaoPi wrote:okay I am heading to bed now, sharing this before I do so: mkfuba07:First thing that struck me was the timing of the early game movements fuba did with marv. This + Show Spoiler +On October 02 2012 07:19 mkfuba07 wrote: I'm back from class and should be here until the lynch.
Like marv I may have to reconsider KJ. If he's bound to give himself away with his actions pretty quickly, then I can wait it out. I never found his "spy slip" scummy, just his interaction with Kei where he seemed to be implying that Kei was scummy, only to follow it up by saying he didn't say that. It could be considered as an accusation and distancing, but it could just be statement of facts as he saw them.
My problem is that I'm not sure about voting for kush or shady. I'm not a fan of how either of them are playing, but I don't necessarily get scum from them. Shady is being incredibly strange with his absence, but that's not in keeping with either his town or scum metas. I didn't like Kush's policy lynch because "shady was mean to me", but that also doesn't tell me anything about his alignment.
I'm going to take a look at austin. I'll also probably think a bit about mementoss, just 'cause. is awfully close to + Show Spoiler + On October 02 2012 07:13 marvellosity wrote: Your point on austin is way better though, BC There are a couple of things about austin:
- he gives way too much thought and time to setup speculation and shenannies and can go off on tangents.
So with that alone I wouldn't find him banging on about spy that relevant, except for two things (which you mention)
- the fact that it specifies pretty damn clearly in the OP that all available role names are known to us - that's all he's talked about having been absent for a long time.
If you're gonna derp around talking about setup and spy lololol you'd imagine you'd at least fucking read the setup first. Gonna give his filter another look. Anyway I'm gonna unvote kj for now
##unvote Only half an hour passes and fuba is here: + Show Spoiler +On October 02 2012 07:46 mkfuba07 wrote:What bothers me most about austin is what's already been said: he apologizes for his absence, and then follows it up by only mentioning the spy-slip. Is that really all there is to talk about right now? His first post of the game also bothers me. Show nested quote +On October 01 2012 00:29 austinmcc wrote:Man I missed a fun night.On September 30 2012 20:03 kushm4sta wrote: I voted for shady because he called me a troll. There is no one better to vote for atm. I might as well vote for someone who was mean to me and has a history of being mean to me.
Also I'm not a fan of his content. Maybe I need to read some past games of kush's, but this didn't seem as scummy to me as it does to others. Poor reason to vote, sure, but he could have just voted based on "wtf is shady doing/I don't buy this" and not looked odd. Don't see any reason to make himself this visible as scum with a sillyvote when a real explanation is easily at hand. + Show Spoiler +I think we should lynch BM24... On September 29 2012 10:37 BlackMamba24 wrote: game will start with a 24 hr night 0 by the way You'd think that since it was such a "fun night" he would have a lot to comment on, but for over 24 hours all he mentions is how something kush has said isn't as scummy as some people apparently find it. After that he gets trapped in spy-slip land, when that issue can be resolved by reading the OP. He's posted a lot (comparatively) and yet has said little except that he didn't find kush too scummy hours ago. Not sure if scummy or just busy+confused... While his vote comes later at around 8:30 timestamp, keep this in mind for the bigger picture. Now to his voting behaviour closer to lynch + Show Spoiler +On October 02 2012 12:33 mkfuba07 wrote: ##Unvote
Austin's posts since returning have made me throw that vote out the window.
As for Node's posting frequency, I don't see that as much different than his behavior in DN mafia... Does he normally contribute more? As for his content, I see the slight "lie" but I can see no reason to intentionally "lie" like that as scum. What would he gain?
Of the two on the block right now, I'd rather vote for Shady. As I said before, I'm not naturally inclined to vote for him D1, but I don't want to vote for someone who I haven't seen anything scummy from. While I didn't see his excuse for trolling as terribly scummy, and I believe his absence could be explained somehow, the fact that he hasn't done it or actively participated in any way since his last post makes me want him gone.
##Vote Shady Sands He now is content with a shady lynch before switching it up again after half an hour + Show Spoiler +On October 02 2012 13:05 mkfuba07 wrote: Ugh, this is driving me crazy. I'm not a huge fan of any of the possibilities...
I'm going to change my vote again. If we can get a better replacement for Shady I think keeping him in is going to be better than keeping Node in. I got completely screwed in DN Mafia because it was down to Node, myself, another pretty inactive player, and scum marv, and there was no discussion. I don't want to be in that situation again.
Not sure if this will do anything, but:
##Unvote ##Vote Node Now why the hell does he bank on a modkill (that like in 99% of the cases does not come) and tries to lynch node again? Feels a lot like confusing town and disrupting us in the crucial timeperiod around lynch. After the lynch he gets asked about an update on Node and he gives out this: + Show Spoiler +On October 03 2012 06:25 mkfuba07 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2012 04:30 austinmcc wrote: mkfuba, what is your read on Node? How do you view annul's actions before the lynch? I'm still feeling really stupid for not being able to understand what's so scummy about Node's defense of Shady. There were plenty of good players voting for Node, and as town OR scum I don't see them voting for someone for stupid reasons. Despite what you've said before, I have been reading the thread. My reading comprehension being as crappy as it is, I can't pinpoint what makes his defense scummy. Did scum Node gain something from lying in his defense of Shady? Or was it just that he appeared to not be reading the thread, and is trying to participate with a minimum of effort/gaining some town-cred for defending town-Shady? Or something else entirely that I haven't considered because I'm bad at this game? ...(checking through filters)... ...And now, having more closely checked the the timestamps, which I incorrectly read last time, Node's jumped up quite a bit in scumminess. When I looked the first time, I missed the fact that the two posts (shady's last post where he actually made a read at all, and Node's defense) were on different days. I thought Node's happened within hours of Shady's FoS on kush, so I didn't really see it as too absurd for him to say that Shady had been pushing targets. I think I now understand why the defense was scummy (and I feel like a dumbass for not being able to read). Shady did nothing to warrant defending him, and the fact that Node defended him, with evidence that was the opposite of the truth, is strange. The fact that Node seemed to have reasons to find Shady town when the evidence he provides is contrived makes me think that he had another reason to believe Shady to be town that he didn't want to mention. Thus, Node seems scummy. Correct me if I'm wrong, but this feels right to me. Basically you can sum it up as "I dunno, he seems scummy" It's a great wall of fluff besides the timestamp remark. Keeps pushing node and throws annul into the mix as scum as well for being against the node lynch. Now after the nightphase resolves and marv is as good as confirmed scum through his reactions he goes after VE. While I can understand it (having made suspicions on VE as well) it feels quite sudden. No mentions of VE earlier and no more mentioning of Node. He also occasionally calls mementoss out (which is pretty easy to do anyway). Summarizing: I think there is a decent chance for fuba to flip scum, reasoning: fuba was more or less following marv during day 1 play, continued to try to push for Node but as soon as marv gets outed he switches onto VE with no more mentioning of Node, whom he previously had targeted quite extensively. What happened to your Node read fuba?
On another note, BKE, what have you been doing all game long? Who is your highest read besides the no-brainer vote on marv? Coags response to VE(clicky!) seems closer to the Austin response, and VE had a deeper accusation so Im not going to draw a scumread from that alone. VE's meta has been changing drastically in the last few games Ive played with him, so its hard to get a good read.
|
EBWOP: I still have a scumread on Matt (since he hasn't responded).
|
On October 07 2012 17:29 ShiaoPi wrote: DP, you know my meta, I am a horribly bad townie in the first couple of cycles, always lurking around and stuff, now I tried to make an effort earlier with the fuba-case (granted not very good) and I get called out for that shizzle.
Seeing all of you call for my death because of "meta" is so fucking ridiculous. If you want to meta-analyse me then do it properly by only comparing the bigger games (LVI, LVII) and the first cycles in there, see any difference? I am playing like I always do in large games.....
LVII was a whole different matter DP, you know that just as well as I do, the situations are not even remotely comparable. The case of our french dude was weak, I already answered it.
I do give a shit about town, I just get lazy since we got 2 cycles of 100%-red lynches now already. Your meta is shit for those two games and you know it. You played bad in LVI and you were blue in LVII. When you make a case on someone it doesn't depend on the size of the game. It depends on how bad you believe someone is scum and how much you can prove that. In games Ive played with you before formal cases have hard evidence. the fuba case is a retelling of events and a bad connection between marv and his actions.
|
@BC Ive found both Matt and Coag to be scummy. I personally would like to lynch Coag to draw out Matt (as I think Coag has been more scummy). Who would you lynch first/ have a bigger scumread?
|
On October 08 2012 08:45 risk.nuke wrote: nice case BC, I can also spend 5 minutes too call all the afk vets scummy for beeing afk. Really nice demonstration of your scumhuntingskills. And you're different how? I'd feel better if you actually spent 5 minutes to call someone scum.
|
On October 08 2012 08:47 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2012 08:45 BroodKingEXE wrote: @BC Ive found both Matt and Coag to be scummy. I personally would like to lynch Coag to draw out Matt (as I think Coag has been more scummy). Who would you lynch first/ have a bigger scumread? Im not scum. Dont say I didnt warn you. Ask me anything. Im 100% open to answer any questions. K give me a legit reason behind you responses to VE, Shiao and Austin. And why only now you've decided to respond to accusations as opposed to posts like this:
On October 07 2012 03:36 Coagulation wrote: yeah im not scum but nice try.
|
|
|
@Mementoss. If my idea of a SK is correct then he should be killing on a nightly basis. Do you have any theories behind his NKs? And why lynch him instead of scum?
|
EBWOP: Never mind about the second question I see why.
|
On October 09 2012 06:10 Mementoss wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2012 06:04 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 09 2012 04:35 Mementoss wrote:I am the Medical Examiner aka, I am the watcher, after clues got taken away my role was changed. Breadcrumb, the only breadcrumb would be I changed my quote to "mommy whats a gravedigger" cause I imagined the medical examiner digging up dead people to examine them. The other would be how I exchanged words with BC after he claimed he was shot. Okay to the more juicy stuff. Night 1: I watched BC, BC was visited by Node(Hapa) or the mafia vigilante. So he did not lie about the shot. However, he did lie about being medic protected. On October 04 2012 04:42 BloodyC0bbler wrote: That is the single most amusing outing of a scum I have seen since A RNG shot toad a few games ago. Shitty that you were punished for bad play Marv, but well, if it makes you feel any worse.... I survived your shot. Thank you magical man who saved my life, as I didn't want to die again before day 2. On October 04 2012 04:53 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 04 2012 04:47 Mementoss wrote:On October 04 2012 04:42 BloodyC0bbler wrote: That is the single most amusing outing of a scum I have seen since A RNG shot toad a few games ago. Shitty that you were punished for bad play Marv, but well, if it makes you feel any worse.... I survived your shot. Thank you magical man who saved my life, as I didn't want to die again before day 2. Why do you think marv shot you? I find it highly unlikely a town vig shot me over any of the other players in the game tbh. Given that I was shot and survived I assume it was the mafia and thus thanking the magical medic. Why would town lie about this? I can't think of motivation. The only reason BC would lie about this would be because he wanted to make scum think there was a medic saving his ass. Actually, the only possible way BC is town is if he is veteran, I don't see why he would lie about this as town, and just say hai guys I was shot, but I was veteran so give me some protection tonight. However, I doubt Blackmamba would take out the veteran role after one of the vets already lost his life. Also, given the fact that Mafia didn't try to shoot him again makes me 95% sure BC is the 3rd Party Night Immue Serial Killer. On October 04 2012 05:02 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 04 2012 05:00 Z-BosoN wrote: Wait, so Risen the paramedic, another medic on BC, and, incredibly, another one @ austin, who was also shot?? Do we have three medics, does everyone buy this?? Given that no one has claimed any of the shots on the dead players, (ie no one is claiming vig) We know we have two dead vanilla's, shots on me and austin, and risen raped himself while giving us marv. We know we have mafia, and 1 third party based on setup, so 4 kp appearing isn't that unlikely I think. This quote also seems like he knows a bit too much, it implies that third party has some kp since no one is claiming vig. I would 100% lynch BC tomorrow because of this lie. That brings me to my next point. Mafia knew BC was third party after night 1. On October 08 2012 09:08 Hapahauli wrote: Guys guys guys.
Don't lynch BC - he's a 3rd Party Role On October 08 2012 09:11 Hapahauli wrote:On October 08 2012 09:09 Coagulation wrote: How the fuck do you know hes third party? On October 05 2012 10:57 marvellosity wrote: Seriously guys, BloodyC0bbler. I expect specific thanks from all of you later in the game. It's actually really obvious. Last minute ploys by dead mafia players to get the lynch on the third party to try and save members of their team or just to put WIFOM not to kill BC. We can use this now known knowledge to our advantage. Anyone who has been pushing BC hard after night 1 without much reason, or seems like they know too much, is scum. They are scum looking for some town cred for leading a lynch on anti town. On October 08 2012 09:47 kushm4sta wrote: bc is scum. bc lied about getting shot. zboson is also scum. ve is also scum. these are my current thoughts. ##unfos coag Case later. This post rubbed me the wrong way. BC is scum because he lied about getting shot, yet kushm4ster has no evidence to prove BC lieing about being shot. He is using this as his only reasoning. Also Marv, hard defended this guy, almost single handedly getting a wagon off him with a meta case. On October 01 2012 23:33 marvellosity wrote:kush as townie: On September 03 2012 18:47 kushm4sta wrote: So it seems like the consensus is to lynch either cubu or kville. Anyone not feel this way? Even if they aren't mafia they are solid policy lynches. Now the question is which one. Kville is the bigger lurker, but I think there is a higher possibility for cubu to actually be mafia. Honestly cubu probably isn't mafia either, just because I think mafia would put more effort into their posts. Lynching one of these guys is better than lynching someone who is active though. So my vote is still on cubu. Will vote for policy lynches just fine, check Calls Cubu probably not mafia but is happy to have his vote on him, check On October 01 2012 23:57 marvellosity wrote: Good luck rationalising kush's play from any perspective. As in the post-game to my most recent newbie game, Hapahauli pointed out the significant difference in his town/scum play - his attitude. I'm nowhere near convinced his attitude this game is his scum attitude.
I could see kushm4sta as scum. Night 2: I watched sloosh and nothing happened. I wish the night deadline was earlier so I could do this last minute and get one last watch. But hopefully this will prove to be useful. Since I was shit all game and I'm sorry lol. But yeah look back after night 1/2 and see people that seemed to have a switch of thoughts on BC or knew too much. Because scum knew BC was 3rd party pretty early. I wish I could be more helpful but I haven't been doing enough reading into the game. I would say lynch BC > lynch kushm4ster TLDR; BloodyC0bblerkushm4stap You are correct, I did claim medic prot to avoid getting shot again. Given that I only have 1 extra night life. Not sure why everyone keeps coming at me about being a third party but since your reasoning for your conclusion is wrong I will sum it up for you. Miller was removed from this game, the miller role was named "veteran". The actual veteran role however was not removed from the game. I am Lucky Citizen . Whats even worse is that you assumed I was a third party serial killer. If you watched me you would have seen me visited and me go out and do something had I had a night action. Given that you knew that I had not visited anyone, and that I was visited you should realize the only logical conclusion is that I am town. You base your conclusion on false information as well as trusting two dead mafia. Not sure what to say here other then you are a horribly bad townie or mafia desperately attempting to remove me from the game. well of course thats what your gunna claim because thats the only way you would be town, its possible though I don't know if its true lol. I said SK because I just relate 3rd party with SK for some reason. Well this post answers my first question. The reason Im asking is that there are a bunch of unaccounted kills then. Two people die N1 and one N2. I highly doubt scum have 1KP or that we have meds and vets everywhere.
|
|
|
|