|
On April 07 2013 00:26 DarthPunk wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2013 00:15 iamperfection wrote:On April 07 2013 00:14 Oatsmaster wrote: oh the frustration?
I dont know, again, this seems similar to personality 2 where he had a shitfest with Marv.
Guess what? He was scum there.
here he is frustrated about not being listened to i don t remember that in personality Why don't you want to lynch oats. Please read his filter with an open mind if you have time. because i woud perfer killing prplhz, ace and wos wqell before him. oats has shown intrest in the lynch much rather kill those ppl
|
YA i dont understand that vote at all.
y shouldn't we kill you axle?
|
On April 07 2013 00:47 Sylencia wrote: ignore me your's was better
|
might want to kill axle now above all else his reasoning for voting for scrib is that he has none and he dosnt want to have a discourse with town
|
|
|
On April 07 2013 07:37 Palmar wrote: That is to say, taken at face value and assuming WoS is actually as derpy as he came across in his first few posts, it's unlikely he is scum based on the stance he took towards his own death. However if he is actually somewhat competent at scum play, what he did is not a terrible last-ditch attempt to get away from the guillotine. yes it is quite clearly one or the other.
---------------------------------
i still want to kill prplhz. has weak reasoning with his votes and he sheds all responsibility with his vote stating he clearly didn't even bother to read at all and is just sheeping others. Peopele react to his shityness comes back and says he "understands it better". Seems like to me prplhz dosnt give a shit about his vote and that is scummy.
|
it goes against all my principals but i may be willing to lynch rayn just so i dont have to see him post anymore.
+ Show Spoiler +
|
On April 07 2013 08:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2013 08:22 iamperfection wrote:it goes against all my principals but i may be willing to lynch rayn just so i dont have to see him post anymore. + Show Spoiler + Who do you want to lynch for real? Or is it me? see this is part of the problem if you cant tell who i want to lynch for real i simply don't get you.
CAN YOU READ
i just said prplhz
|
it pretty clear that wos didn't claim anything ace
|
|
On April 07 2013 08:49 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2013 08:48 marvellosity wrote:On April 07 2013 08:45 Ace wrote:On April 07 2013 08:41 Palmar wrote: I don't know how you approach a situation Ace, but I generally assume most players are somewhat naive and straightforward until I know better, as I explained earlier, it requires some basic thread comprehension skills to pull what WoS pulled when under heavy pressure. He may be getting advice from someone of course, or he may just be a better player than expected, but for now I think the simple explanation is that WoS isn't scum and his reaction was genuine.
So yes, it makes absolute sense to unvote WoS given the information I have. I also believe it's possible it really was a genuine reaction. Which is why I unvoted him and asked him that question to confirm my reasoning. However, where does the sciberbia vote come from? Can you explain that? If you believe that WoS is playing straightforward, then based on the information you have - why isn't sciberbia being afforded the same courtesy? Nothing in his play so far seem out of the ordinary so what stands out to you that warrants a vote? On April 07 2013 05:11 Ace wrote: I've been busy WoS. I actually don't think you should be lynched at the moment, as I think Oats is a far bigger distraction. Marv is just talking nonsense as always.
WoS since you're at L-2 right now don't hesitate to claim when the next person votes.I'm not gonna hammer you unless that situation resolves itself. For now tho:
##vote: Oatsmaster WoS never claimed, you never had your vote on him, you didn't think he should be lynched at any point. Stop making shit up, Ace. herp derp so if WoS never claimed, and you know this why are you voting for sciberbia when you know someone else lied? wat
|
wos "claim what" implies he didn't have anything to claim i think that is pretty clear.
You are the one who brought up the claim stuff ace
|
On April 07 2013 08:58 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2013 05:12 WaveofShadow wrote:On April 07 2013 05:11 Ace wrote: I've been busy WoS. I actually don't think you should be lynched at the moment, as I think Oats is a far bigger distraction. Marv is just talking nonsense as always.
WoS since you're at L-2 right now don't hesitate to claim when the next person votes.I'm not gonna hammer you unless that situation resolves itself. For now tho:
##vote: Oatsmaster Claim what? I already did. @marv: What else could "I already did" refer to? If I'm looking at this wrong then honestly, show me a different interpretation. @iamp: If he didn't have anything to claim then why would he say he already did? because there was nothing in all of his other posts about a claim. Therefore he claims nothing.
|
|
On April 07 2013 09:04 Ace wrote: ??? He was at L-1 before an unvote and was ready to die - how do you get a null claim from that post in that situation rather than he was just lying about claiming or forgot to? You don't think that someone about to be lynched would claim in that spot to save his life? who are you talking to?
|
im saying he made no claim ace.
|
On April 07 2013 09:11 Ace wrote: I don't know, maybe I'm not good at explaining my thoughts here. I completely understand he made no claim. He said he did. Which is why I asked right after for him to point it out to me. Does this part make sense? no
i took it as this
you say show me your claim
wos goes" wtf are you talking about i didnt claim anything"
thats what i get from the "what claim"
|
how can you not have a scum read prplhz
|
my initial reaction to this marv stuff is i don't buy it.
Ill wait till see more from marv tomorrow before i fully comment
|
|
|
|