Autumn Leaves Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
| ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
| ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
| ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
On September 27 2018 03:04 Koshi wrote: Says he wants to pressure afkers. Procedes to remove all pressure from afkers. I might've phrased that kinda mediocrely, I also didn't vote for an afker, lemme fix that rq ##Vote Vivax On September 27 2018 03:07 prplhz wrote: Also, third person on the "lets lynch into AFKers"-train. i mean it's definitely not a terrible option with the amount of information we have, I'd rather argue over policy lynching in the first place and have people actually talking than actually going through with the policy lynch but eh its not even getting into least bad option territory - although the faster it becomes the least bad option the better as usually we actually have other options at that point. | ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
On September 27 2018 07:08 Mocsta wrote: TL is dead.. like.. why even join if you not going to play. Why does this discussion keep coming up.. seriously.. we already know that lynching an afk'r is a terrible option. (1) there is limited to nil content to vote analyse (2) if we hit town, we are essentially at d1 again (3) as proven recently by HF, it can create seeds of distrust in town that never disappear. (4) The rules require 3 posts per cycle. 2nd offense is modkill. So AFK will self-resolve if genuine; and if making 1 post to stay alive, then we can sort that out as required. and lastly, (4) if the lottery pick actually hits, we are unlikely to be closer to finding the other mafia; given the ease for either alignment to bandwagon. I would rather "no-lynch" vote then throw a random afk. I can't get over that in a 9 player game, the activity is so poor that 1/3 is contemplating a random afk vote. I mean I'd rather no Lynch too but this is plurality. The reason the disscussion probably comes up time and time again is that at least some people try to post meaningfully, there's no reason we have to commit to it yet but theres no reason that we can't contemplate it. and even with these points I'd say 3 and 4 are probably the two most valid ones. point 1 is only bad if literally its 'agree to afk lynch and then do it and everyone shuts up afterwords' point 2 is negated by lack of a no lynch option, since low activity d1 lynches are basically just as random as an afk lynch imo. hell if you want a no lynch option your not going to get better than lynching a modkillee since its essentially the same thing. | ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
On September 27 2018 07:19 Mocsta wrote: i was wondering, why did originalname select vivax out of all the supposed "afks". was it random, was it first is queue, last in queue etc etc. Well turns out, Vivax is the only person to not post.. So wtf is this talk about afks.. @Conversion How do you wake up, read through a 2 + 1/2 page game and conclude there are ??AFKs?? oh ya btw can totally confirmed i pick Vivax cause he hasn't posted even once. | ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
On September 27 2018 07:24 Mocsta wrote: Hi OriginalName, Whats your assessment of the landscape? Barren and full of generic wtf Chezinu behavior and generic d1 shitposting, but I mean at least we're having a cool conversation and I think thats great. | ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
On September 27 2018 07:38 Mocsta wrote: Chez is always Chez.. you appear to know that, so im not sure why you are dangling that about. Is the HF/Koshi interaction generic d1 shitposting? What about Koshis interaction with prplhz and me? Do you think mafia and town are willing to put a lot of effort into making a joke post, realise its not funny and still post? 1) Nostalgia 2) i didn't read to deep into it looked like either salty meta gaming or an in joke to my uneducated eyes and the whole bubble tea thing definitly screamed generic d1 shitposting 3) Not enough data, I don't think its quite as unnatural as you made it out to be, however depending on subsequent behaviors can certainly be revaluated 4)YES | ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
On September 27 2018 21:44 Conversion wrote: I don’t like this post and I don’t like how hard you are pushing into lynching an AFK question is, do you also like taro boba? I don't think I'm pushing that hard into afk lynching at all considering I stated multiple times that if a better option presented itself I'd prefer that. I also don't think Mocsta is scum just for voting me over a difference of opinion and I'm honestly confused why he went all "IF ITS BETWEEN ME AND ON IM GOING TO VOTE ON!!!!" when honestly I think both of us are pretty piss poor options since at least we were trying have some posts with actual substance. Holyflare and Conversion both arguing over minor semantics like 'how green should your reads start' literally just reads like posting for the sake of posting to me. Which I mean is better than just lurking but considering that honestly it shouldn't matter how people read as long as you're willing to be objective and actually be willing to change your reads. and like cool now everyones posted, tbh i think its weird that chezinu just quickly hops on the first wagon presented and I'd like to know why he did that. I haven't exactly been around for more than a few years and I'm not trawling 5-6 games to metagame you guys so I'm just saying how it looks to me without past context. | ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
On September 27 2018 22:21 Conversion wrote: good point on Mocsta's all or nothing play trying to understand why someone is calling me scum, and then challenging him on it isn't what I'd quite necessitate as posting for the sake of posting, but eh so who would you lynch between Mocsta and Chezinu, now that everyone has posted? I don't think Mocsta is scum so id pick Chez, hes allowed to be weird and cryptic all he wants as long as hes at least helpful and playing not just ayy lmao bandwagon and throw out a question. He's not stupid and shouldnt be allowed to get away with acting like it either. | ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
| ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
| ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
| ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
| ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
On September 28 2018 05:35 Conversion wrote: why is swapping to Chezinu considered not a no-lynch alternative? Because chez fulfilled activity rules at the time whil3 at time of post vivax hadnt. Altho 'i had spoopy reasons for afking and suddenly last minute avoiding modkill is suspect af especially when you dont even attempt to respond to the votes on you regardless. | ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
"If i sound a authoritative enough maybe sheeple will ignore the whole point of the game and I'll get an easy win as I pick off town one by one" Like I want to vote vivax but man koshi is really laying this shit on thick. | ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
| ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
| ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
On September 28 2018 07:57 Mocsta wrote: @ON, are you seeing conspiracy theory because of this?
Thats the big one, that and how hard koshi was pushing the RREeEEE im right vote vivax now thing but i mean allegedly hes always like that and i might be reading too much into it. | ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
On September 28 2018 08:06 Mocsta wrote: Wouls you bus the roleblocker so easily? Without koshi vote thr lynch coukd have gone anywhere. Esp with grack voting me. I put wine image because vivax first post commented on koshi/hf stronger than it did you so i consider it somewhat natural to fall on koshi. When he avoids modkill by 30 minutes hell fucking yeah I would but I mean theres a reason i said conspiracy, its certainly a worthwhile gut read and conversation. I fully admit I voted him to start off an afk policy lynch that decided to stick with it off that pathetic end of day lol I wont be modkilled meme. However you have to realize that regardless of his exact role as scum he was a liability and dumping him is certainly an option. | ||
| ||