Heart of the Swarm Preview - [22.01.13] - Page 21
Forum Index > News |
rEdEEmEd
Canada68 Posts
| ||
AnachronisticAnarchy
United States2957 Posts
| ||
Qwyn
United States2778 Posts
But god damn it Blizzard's cinematics have done it again. EDIT: Whoops ><. "Wasn't interested." | ||
exog
Norway279 Posts
On January 23 2013 13:35 rEdEEmEd wrote: Won't buy. Leaving the StarCraft dynasty after 14 years playing. ok User was warned for this post | ||
Jenia6109
Russian Federation1607 Posts
Starcraft and Diablo2 cinematics were cool! Warcraft3 cinematics were masterpieces! WoW cinematics were epic! Starcraft2 cinematics were WOW!! Diablo3 cinematics were ubercool!!! And now this... I have no words... TvZ rough battle, classic in itself, and all of this is a dream of a girl... this is absolutely crazy... | ||
Deleted User 61629
1664 Posts
| ||
nimdil
Poland3743 Posts
On January 23 2013 17:49 Jenia6109 wrote: Every new Blizzard cinematic is better than previous. Starcraft and Diablo2 cinematics were cool! Warcraft3 cinematics were masterpieces! WoW cinematics were epic! Starcraft2 cinematics were WOW!! Diablo3 cinematics were ubercool!!! And now this... I have no words... TvZ rough battle, classic in itself, and all of this is a dream of a girl... this is absolutely crazy... Actually the way the battle is handled seems rather stupid - especially the viking: "ooh, that guy just ignored several tank shots and stomped the machine; I better land down to fight it with my low calliber machine guns" wtf o_O Also - where are Thors. I want to see Thors because Tanks/Ultralisk scale is waaay different than in the game (unless these were Omegalisks which I seriously doubt). | ||
Deleted User 61629
1664 Posts
| ||
nimdil
Poland3743 Posts
I guess Mengsk without Warfield coach. | ||
Copymizer
Denmark2075 Posts
| ||
FHC Nex
Bulgaria44 Posts
On January 23 2013 18:24 nimdil wrote: Actually the way the battle is handled seems rather stupid - especially the viking: "ooh, that guy just ignored several tank shots and stomped the machine; I better land down to fight it with my low calliber machine guns" wtf o_O Also - where are Thors. I want to see Thors because Tanks/Ultralisk scale is waaay different than in the game (unless these were Omegalisks which I seriously doubt). Trolled by blizzard, vikings are useless after an Ultralisk remax :D :D I've already watched the trailer like 10 times, will watch for the first time today v0v cant wait for the campaign TBH. No demo for us? | ||
NEEDZMOAR
Sweden1277 Posts
On January 22 2013 19:26 heishe wrote: If the skins are just different textures, there should be literally no performance hit at all. The size of those textures is pretty small, so additional skins would likely fit on the same texture file (the same texture atlas). There wouldn't be a performance hit since the texture gets drawn anyways, a different skin just means that it gets drawn from a different sub-position in the texture file. The only performance hit with such a change could come if your ram is really small and can't handle the couple of megabytes of additional data, meaning you constantly have to reload stuff from the hard drive. Alright, thanks for clearing that up! my Ram is fine, for instance In Heroes of Newerth I started lagging so much when they added all the skins and new heroes, and I thougt it was because of bad coding (the optimized a lot of shit and performancewise its much better for me nowadays). this might be a cool add for casters | ||
Youtakenocandle
543 Posts
| ||
summerloud
Austria1201 Posts
much more climatic that way | ||
Weirdkid
Singapore2431 Posts
Source: http://s.163.com/13/0123/10/8LT9831I00314D0E.html + Show Spoiler [Easter eggs] + At 8 seconds and 18 seconds at the screen changes, there are pictures of people (supposedly the development group) partying. + Show Spoiler [At 8 seconds] + + Show Spoiler [At 18 seconds] + This is not fake by the way. I saw it for myself by pause/playing really quickly on the 1080p Youtube video. A bit freaky to be honest | ||
PonceDeLEGABE
United States117 Posts
| ||
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34456 Posts
On January 23 2013 23:10 Weirdkid wrote: There are Easter eggs to be found in the opening cinematic Lol not that I found it out myself. Just read on another website. The people who found it are pretty imba I gotta say. It's pretty much impossible to spot if you don't know what you're looking for. Source: http://s.163.com/13/0123/10/8LT9831I00314D0E.html + Show Spoiler [Easter eggs] + At 8 seconds and 18 seconds at the screen changes, there are pictures of people (supposedly the development group) partying. + Show Spoiler [At 8 seconds] + + Show Spoiler [At 18 seconds] + This is not fake by the way. I saw it for myself by pause/playing really quickly on the 1080p Youtube video. A bit freaky to be honest The Wilhelm scream is also borderline an easter egg by this point as well. | ||
Boo.Crazy
Sweden21 Posts
| ||
nimdil
Poland3743 Posts
Maybe because I'm not used that much in macroscale battles in StarCraft cinematics. On January 24 2013 01:40 Boo.Crazy wrote: lol so epic, i hope that one day Blizzard will make a movie about startcraft =))) You realize that it will almost surely be crappy below-B-class movie? What's good for the game is not very good for the cinema. | ||
AnomalySC2
United States2073 Posts
On January 23 2013 18:24 nimdil wrote: Actually the way the battle is handled seems rather stupid - especially the viking: "ooh, that guy just ignored several tank shots and stomped the machine; I better land down to fight it with my low calliber machine guns" wtf o_O Also - where are Thors. I want to see Thors because Tanks/Ultralisk scale is waaay different than in the game (unless these were Omegalisks which I seriously doubt). Dude the viking landing in front of the ultra was a really obvious (to me anyways) and humorous nod to how infamously bad vikings are on the ground. I loled anyways. I still can't get over the sheer quality of the cgi though, pretty crazy. | ||
| ||