ps - if anyone's asking, these LR threads are meant for SC2 coverage in the SC2 forums. It was agreed back in the BW forums when the split was discussed that it may be better for separate LR threads in each so that flaming is less, and I'm hopeful that BW forums will make their own LR threads for SPL. I'm just providing the SC2 side of things.
On May 26 2012 11:39 Jaaaaasper wrote: If ace can beat kt, beating stx is a definite possibility, though not a likelihood. ACE fighting! ( I miss my ace icon)
On May 26 2012 16:04 haroz wrote: go kill probes ffs :|
Not worth it. You just subject your phoenix to taking hits from their defensive units and their own phoenix, and leave your own units completely on their own.
Jeez it's like mutalisk vs mutalisk, where if you stop making mutas for a second you die. and you can't run away from phoenix, if you get disadvantaged you will lose every phoenix.
On May 26 2012 16:08 Dodgin wrote: PvP is actually pretty cool like this, can this be standard please?
This is standard if both players open phoenix, which is about 5% of the time. So it's like 5% of 5% of games turn into phoenix wars. Problem is once you've seen one phoenix vs phoenix game, you've seen them all. Trust me, this is really boring to play and only exciting to watch because it's new for you.
This is...definitely weird. It's like watching a different branch of evolution, like koala bears in Australia. Clearly, they've been practicing builds in-house, but they've come to wildly different meta-game conclusions than the current SC2 community.
This mass phoenix PvP is clearly something the BW pros came up with on their own. And before someone says "mass phoenix has be in SC2 since beta...blah blah blah"...no, it's not a serious branch of the meta-game, not even against dual robo.
On May 26 2012 16:14 YMCApylons wrote: This is...definitely weird. It's like watching a different branch of evolution, like koala bears in Australia. Clearly, they've been practicing builds in-house, but they've come to wildly different meta-game conclusions than the current SC2 community.
This mass phoenix PvP is clearly something the BW pros came up with on their own. And before someone says "mass phoenix has be in SC2 since beta...blah blah blah"...no, it's not a serious branch of the meta-game, not even against dual robo.
It really has been around for a long time though. Mass phoenix is really only a thing when both players go phoenix, which has happened before on quite a few occasions (just not so often on broadcasted games). I don't mean to spoil anyone's enthusiasm, but that was standard SG vs SG pvp, the same way it's been played for months.
On May 26 2012 16:14 YMCApylons wrote: This is...definitely weird. It's like watching a different branch of evolution, like koala bears in Australia. Clearly, they've been practicing builds in-house, but they've come to wildly different meta-game conclusions than the current SC2 community.
This mass phoenix PvP is clearly something the BW pros came up with on their own. And before someone says "mass phoenix has be in SC2 since beta...blah blah blah"...no, it's not a serious branch of the meta-game, not even against dual robo.
On May 26 2012 16:14 YMCApylons wrote: This is...definitely weird. It's like watching a different branch of evolution, like koala bears in Australia. Clearly, they've been practicing builds in-house, but they've come to wildly different meta-game conclusions than the current SC2 community.
This mass phoenix PvP is clearly something the BW pros came up with on their own. And before someone says "mass phoenix has be in SC2 since beta...blah blah blah"...no, it's not a serious branch of the meta-game, not even against dual robo.
massing phoenixes is pretty common when you are playing against a player going phoenix too
On May 26 2012 16:14 YMCApylons wrote: This is...definitely weird. It's like watching a different branch of evolution, like koala bears in Australia. Clearly, they've been practicing builds in-house, but they've come to wildly different meta-game conclusions than the current SC2 community.
This mass phoenix PvP is clearly something the BW pros came up with on their own. And before someone says "mass phoenix has be in SC2 since beta...blah blah blah"...no, it's not a serious branch of the meta-game, not even against dual robo.
You only go mass phoenix in stargate vs stargate. In any other situation you would transition out of it, but in stargate vs stargate... you can't.
On May 26 2012 16:20 IshinShishi wrote: Imagine 20 dts moving out to attack as soon as the STX player moved up the ramp, the despair, the tears, inca would be proud.
Inca would be proud if someone goes DT expand in PvZ and WIN four times in a row
On May 26 2012 16:20 IshinShishi wrote: Imagine 20 dts moving out to attack as soon as the STX player moved up the ramp, the despair, the tears, inca would be proud.
On May 26 2012 16:16 mistsifter wrote: Those void-rays definitely the wrong choice
He had already committed to the 2nd stargate though. I don't think he had much of an option since he was already behind.
With the second stargate he'd taken the air, this would mean a robo into colossus transition would be possible. Except I agree in advance that he was too far behind to make that a reality either. Perhaps with some harass with the phoenix to buy time?... still, there were other options other then the voids
On May 26 2012 16:16 haroz wrote: the coaches look at the matchup winrates for sc2 in proleague so far... "fuck it send out more protoss!"
I feel like it's mainly because it's Entombed and most people seem to figure it favours protoss with the quick 3 base being very easily defended with force field, which tends towards PvP. I guess the BW guys aren't really advanced enough in SC2 skill to prepare a sniper just yet.
On May 26 2012 16:20 IshinShishi wrote: Imagine 20 dts moving out to attack as soon as the STX player moved up the ramp, the despair, the tears, inca would be proud.
STX guy had a lot of cannons though
A few cannons will fall like a butter to 10-20 dts
On May 26 2012 16:24 opterown wrote: the live report in the BW forums is pretty amusing, with all the terms they've coined to represent new SC2 units in their own vocab..hahah
most of us already know the names of the units, we're just trolling lol.
On May 26 2012 16:24 opterown wrote: the live report in the BW forums is pretty amusing, with all the terms they've coined to represent new SC2 units in their own vocab..hahah
On May 26 2012 16:24 opterown wrote: the live report in the BW forums is pretty amusing, with all the terms they've coined to represent new SC2 units in their own vocab..hahah
most of us already know the names of the units, we're just trolling lol.
i loved the rampstasis and the goliath on steroids rofl
On May 26 2012 16:24 opterown wrote: the live report in the BW forums is pretty amusing, with all the terms they've coined to represent new SC2 units in their own vocab..hahah
Corsair - Phoenix dtGoon - Stalker groundArbiter - Sentry RampStasis - Force Field, usually said as ff Citadel - Twilight Council - same function as BW's citadel, except it also has the blink upgrade for stalkers in addition to charge. Archons - count as a Massive unit. Amongst other things, they destroy forcefields by waking over them and can't be picked up by phoenix. Phoenix upgrades - Weapon/Armor at cyber core, +2 range at fleet beacon
On May 26 2012 16:24 Woizit wrote: If only there were enough DTs to do a ramp block.
Could you like, get your archons to attack your own zealots to splash damage DT's? That'd be pretty sick if you could.
yes, or just fly one phoenix over it and splash onto that if the zealots would die too fast.
Does splash from archons hitting air effect ground units? I never even thought of that. Man, that means zealot/archon would be really good against pheonix builds, given that pheonixes clump, and can't lift archons...
On May 26 2012 16:36 unit wrote: aaaaand shuttle's like "well that was a little easy"
edit: also anyone else notice that ace has been claiming that they've been primarily practicing sc2 yet they win the bw set and lose the sc2 set?
fbh for acematch? fbh for acematch!?
Everyone has been primarily practicing SC2. If it's anyone who should have a disadvantage it's the ACE guys as they've got less time to practice both games, considering they have to serve in the army and shit.
On May 26 2012 16:36 unit wrote: aaaaand shuttle's like "well that was a little easy"
edit: also anyone else notice that ace has been claiming that they've been primarily practicing sc2 yet they win the bw set and lose the sc2 set?
fbh for acematch? fbh for acematch!?
Everyone has been primarily practicing SC2. If it's anyone who should have a disadvantage it's the ACE guys as they've got less time to practice both games, considering they have to serve in the army and shit.
Yeah, they were largely playing Brood War from memory anyway, so if anything this has evened the field in Brood War for them .
Proleague really puts the gomTvT days into perspective, all we can do is wait until zergs and terrans become more accustomed to SC2 and can stand up to the protosses ;_;.
The quality of the StarCraft II in the ProLeague is so mediocre, sort of disappointing. Wish the players had more time to prepare (or only had to play on one game).
Not the greatest introduction to SCII for the Korean BW fans.
I want to see lots of scouts, sairs and that over glorified arbiter, along with masses of DT"s to make this worth my time and lack of sleep right now. But none of those War of the Worlds Tripods
On May 26 2012 16:50 X10A wrote: I want to see lots of scouts, sairs and that over glorified arbiter, along with masses of DT"s to make this worth my time and lack of sleep right now. But none of those War of the Worlds Tripods
I don't think I've ever seen a Mothership in PvP. I'm kinda curious, now that you've mentioned it, I want to see it too.
On May 26 2012 16:50 X10A wrote: I want to see lots of scouts, sairs and that over glorified arbiter, along with masses of DT"s to make this worth my time and lack of sleep right now. But none of those War of the Worlds Tripods
I don't think I've ever seen a Mothership in PvP. I'm kinda curious, now that you've mentioned it, I want to see it too.
On May 26 2012 17:11 Alabasern wrote: This has got to be a 1st for televised SC2.
It's a first in that they could afford a nexus when they base traded. Usually they have no money in the bank and are stuck guarding an assimilator or pylon.
but anytime one guy gets blink and the other doesn't, you can be he will try to base trade if he gets attacked.
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
Ye, they have the level of decent/good master league players.
Few might be considerd high masters or even grand masters, but as a whole they're terrible. Watching these games after code S selection was painful, that misblink, that lack of pressure with blink stalkers... that misread from the ACE protoss players who didn't all-in immediately after mini lost stalkers...
It's not mechanics or game understanding they're lacking, it's EVERYTHING.
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
What was terrible btw , Both the PvPs between mini and M18M were decent to watch with the builds they did ? Woonjing vs Khan had some good games as well ?
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
why are people still on about the elephant.
Basically, the BW pros have not met the hype.
True, but it's still really early to be making any judgments, and regardless of whether the games show great skill or not, it's been pretty entertaining watching SC2 in SPL -- some strange builds / situations, and the great commentary / production value helps a lot.
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
Did you watch killer's PvP last night? It's a shit mu and airforce games should be discarded in terms of analysing how much potential the bw scene has. M18M can't even practice full time for the 6 weeks or so since he switched. The elephant's relevant if you watched zero's play earlier today and the article never said they'd be dominating in such a short time.
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
Did you watch killer's PvP last night? It's a shit mu, one of them is in the airforce and can't even practice full time for the 6 weeks or so since he switched. The elephant's relevant if you watched zero's play earlier today and the article never said they'd be dominating in such a short time.
Even the coaches and players said sc:bw and sc2 were 2 different games, and that skill in bw wasn't linearly translating into sc2. Now you've the results to back it up.
What more would be needed to abundon your fairy tale of seeing code A BW players above everyone else in a few months ?
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
why are people still on about the elephant.
Basically, the BW pros have not met the hype.
it only comes to affect when there is a full transition. not this fucking hybrid league.
Here's a quote from the infamous Elephant article.
I am saying that there are 300 current pros and semi-pros that have the potential to come in and dominate SC2 at any moment, with a latency of a few months from the day they switch. Among this group there are a notable few that CRUSH any other players in terms of raw talent and/or work ethic and/or ability to learn. This knowledge cheapens any form of competition I see right now, no matter how much I try to enjoy the games.
That's very strong rhetoric. From what I can tell, some BW pros have been playing for 2-3 months. The hype is that these guys are suppose to be a world above MVP, MMA, MC, Nestea (some of the names mentioned in the article) very quickly after the switch.
On May 26 2012 17:19 Fionn wrote: Bisu/Fantasy SC2 debut + Effort SC2 + Flash/Jaedong SC2 for tomorrow. Should be good.
Can you plz tell me why it's not on the calendar?
Yeah what the fuck is up with that ? PL is the biggest thing in e-sports and it's not in the calendar ...
You guys have to show BW. PL is still BW according to the calendar.
I can see the OSL on the calendar , but i seem to miss the PL matches ? Maybe because of the 123213231311 meaninless events in SC2 /LoL and dota added on there .
I am saying that there are 300 current pros and semi-pros that have the potential to come in and dominate SC2 at any moment, with a latency of a few months from the day they switch. Among this group there are a notable few that CRUSH any other players in terms of raw talent and/or work ethic and/or ability to learn. This knowledge cheapens any form of competition I see right now, no matter how much I try to enjoy the games.
That's very strong rhetoric. From what I can tell, some BW pros have been playing for 2-3 months. The hype is that these guys are suppose to be a world above MVP, MMA, MC, Nestea (some of the names mentioned in the article) very quickly after the switch.
it was wrong, obviously. not sure why you keep bringing up an article that was written a year ago when everyone was bad at sc2.
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
Did you watch killer's PvP last night? It's a shit mu, one of them is in the airforce and can't even practice full time for the 6 weeks or so since he switched. The elephant's relevant if you watched zero's play earlier today and the article never said they'd be dominating in such a short time.
Even the coaches and players said sc:bw and sc2 were 2 different games, and that skill in bw wasn't linearly translating into sc2. Now you've the results to back it up.
What more would be needed to abundon your fairy tale of seeing code A BW players above everyone else in a few months ?
what the fuck is a Code A BW player?
again players have to practice BOTH BW and SC2. even if the skills transfer well its would be really hard to practice for 2 games at a professional level.
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
Did you watch killer's PvP last night? It's a shit mu, one of them is in the airforce and can't even practice full time for the 6 weeks or so since he switched. The elephant's relevant if you watched zero's play earlier today and the article never said they'd be dominating in such a short time.
Even the coaches and players said sc:bw and sc2 were 2 different games, and that skill in bw wasn't linearly translating into sc2. Now you've the results to back it up.
What more would be needed to abundon your fairy tale of seeing code A BW players above everyone else in a few months ?
Nothing has happened. The article was written with no knowledge of the dual league. These PL games are in no way an indication of the legitimacy or failures of that article. All the top SC2 players were ex-BW players, with no exception. When these players are allowed to fully transition to SC2 we will see how good they truly can be. Many recent GSL games haven't looked much better if at all compared to the PL games.
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
why are people still on about the elephant.
Basically, the BW pros have not met the hype.
it only comes to affect when there is a full transition. not this fucking hybrid league.
Here's a quote from the infamous Elephant article.
I am saying that there are 300 current pros and semi-pros that have the potential to come in and dominate SC2 at any moment, with a latency of a few months from the day they switch. Among this group there are a notable few that CRUSH any other players in terms of raw talent and/or work ethic and/or ability to learn. This knowledge cheapens any form of competition I see right now, no matter how much I try to enjoy the games.
That's very strong rhetoric. From what I can tell, some BW pros have been playing for 2-3 months. The hype is that these guys are suppose to be a world above MVP, MMA, MC, Nestea (some of the names mentioned in the article) very quickly after the switch.
it was wrong, obviously. not sure why you keep bringing up an article that was written a year ago when everyone was bad at sc2.
You fail to take into consideration that that article meant 1 game! not both at the same time. Give it couple of months more, and the elephant will grow considerably. Why are people so ignorant and expect the change to happen over night?
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
Did you watch killer's PvP last night? It's a shit mu, one of them is in the airforce and can't even practice full time for the 6 weeks or so since he switched. The elephant's relevant if you watched zero's play earlier today and the article never said they'd be dominating in such a short time.
Even the coaches and players said sc:bw and sc2 were 2 different games, and that skill in bw wasn't linearly translating into sc2. Now you've the results to back it up.
What more would be needed to abundon your fairy tale of seeing code A BW players above everyone else in a few months ?
what the fuck is a Code A BW player?
again players have to practice BOTH BW and SC2. even if the skills transfer well its would be really hard to practice for 2 games at a professional level.
Hey brawr can you make the LR for the spl section in broodwar ? I am busy tomorrow ... if you can that's great ^_^
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
Did you watch killer's PvP last night? It's a shit mu, one of them is in the airforce and can't even practice full time for the 6 weeks or so since he switched. The elephant's relevant if you watched zero's play earlier today and the article never said they'd be dominating in such a short time.
Even the coaches and players said sc:bw and sc2 were 2 different games, and that skill in bw wasn't linearly translating into sc2. Now you've the results to back it up.
What more would be needed to abundon your fairy tale of seeing code A BW players above everyone else in a few months ?
what the fuck is a Code A BW player?
again players have to practice BOTH BW and SC2. even if the skills transfer well its would be really hard to practice for 2 games at a professional level.
Hey brawr can you make the LR for the spl section in broodwar ? I am busy tomorrow ... if you can that's great ^_^
I've been reluctant to do PL LR threads because of feeling very unhyped but at least X10A has made it fun so sure I'll do it.
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
Did you watch killer's PvP last night? It's a shit mu, one of them is in the airforce and can't even practice full time for the 6 weeks or so since he switched. The elephant's relevant if you watched zero's play earlier today and the article never said they'd be dominating in such a short time.
Even the coaches and players said sc:bw and sc2 were 2 different games, and that skill in bw wasn't linearly translating into sc2. Now you've the results to back it up.
What more would be needed to abundon your fairy tale of seeing code A BW players above everyone else in a few months ?
what the fuck is a Code A BW player?
again players have to practice BOTH BW and SC2. even if the skills transfer well its would be really hard to practice for 2 games at a professional level.
Hey brawr can you make the LR for the spl section in broodwar ? I am busy tomorrow ... if you can that's great ^_^
I've been reluctant to do PL LR threads because of feeling very unhyped but at least X10A has made it fun so sure I'll do it.
On May 26 2012 17:34 Oboeman wrote: BW needs to be LR'd with sc2 unit names, just like how sc2 was being LR'd with ground arbiters and fire vultures.
ahaha indeed we can have stuff like -dancing immortals -motherships that you can have a lot of -crab infestors -reaper-hellions (vultures) -burrow roaches that shoot spines -fire marauders -banshess that shoot air
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
Did you watch killer's PvP last night? It's a shit mu, one of them is in the airforce and can't even practice full time for the 6 weeks or so since he switched. The elephant's relevant if you watched zero's play earlier today and the article never said they'd be dominating in such a short time.
Even the coaches and players said sc:bw and sc2 were 2 different games, and that skill in bw wasn't linearly translating into sc2. Now you've the results to back it up.
What more would be needed to abundon your fairy tale of seeing code A BW players above everyone else in a few months ?
But my dear friend BW players have been above everyone else since the beta of SC2 . The difference here is that the TOP BW players have started playing the game later , because they had no reason to switch with all the good money they are making in BW .They are making good money right now while learning SC2 also .
BW pros are being payed to practise for at least 8 hours a day BW and SC2 . They will practise at least 8 hours a day SC2 when PL swithes completely to SC2 . Top players like Flash , Jaedong , Bisu , Fantasy , Stork , Zero , Effort and others practise more then 8 hours a day to remain the best in the sport . So expect them to excell once BW is over . Then will see where SC2 is heading and with HOTS beeing released everyone will start on equal grounds . I personally hope for GOM and Kespa to work together in the future .
Code A is just a quallifier for Code S it's not even a good term for the measurement of skills . Yes it's the strongest tournament in SC2 right now , but it has a small sample size . If all the BW pros had a run from Code B to Code S i would put money that a big number of them will make code A and get eliminated while going to code S . Some could make Code S who knows SC2 skill ceiling isn't that big for that not impossible to happen .
I am saying that there are 300 current pros and semi-pros that have the potential to come in and dominate SC2 at any moment, with a latency of a few months from the day they switch. Among this group there are a notable few that CRUSH any other players in terms of raw talent and/or work ethic and/or ability to learn. This knowledge cheapens any form of competition I see right now, no matter how much I try to enjoy the games.
That's very strong rhetoric. From what I can tell, some BW pros have been playing for 2-3 months. The hype is that these guys are suppose to be a world above MVP, MMA, MC, Nestea (some of the names mentioned in the article) very quickly after the switch.
Didn't MVP, who's average/above-average A-teamer, spend about 6 months practicing before he started to come onto the scene in SC2? And this was back when it was less competitive and he could practice entirely in SC2? Currently, BW pros just came back from an offseason in which they all had vacations, came back to basically start anew in SC2 while still practicing a little BW, and what do you expect?
As for those who have practiced longer, they are mostly B-teamers whom the teams don't need for the proleague last season. So to compare them with star players is absurd to say the least.
On May 26 2012 17:34 Oboeman wrote: BW needs to be LR'd with sc2 unit names, just like how sc2 was being LR'd with ground arbiters and fire vultures.
Ground Arbiters?
sentries, because they can cast rampstasis
That's... pretty weak actually. Better call them High Templar, they're both ground units recruited from Gateways who can cast Hallucination, so at least there's that. Besides, Motherships are clearly already Arbiters.
It'd make more sense to call stasis on ramps Force Fields rather than the other way 'round, since Force Fields are actually working as intended whereas stasised ramps are a seldom used and unexpected derivative from the ability's actual purpose.
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
why are people still on about the elephant.
Basically, the BW pros have not met the hype.
it only comes to affect when there is a full transition. not this fucking hybrid league.
Here's a quote from the infamous Elephant article.
I am saying that there are 300 current pros and semi-pros that have the potential to come in and dominate SC2 at any moment, with a latency of a few months from the day they switch. Among this group there are a notable few that CRUSH any other players in terms of raw talent and/or work ethic and/or ability to learn. This knowledge cheapens any form of competition I see right now, no matter how much I try to enjoy the games.
That's very strong rhetoric. From what I can tell, some BW pros have been playing for 2-3 months. The hype is that these guys are suppose to be a world above MVP, MMA, MC, Nestea (some of the names mentioned in the article) very quickly after the switch.
Didn't MVP, who's average/above-average A-teamer, spend about 6 months practicing before he started to come onto the scene in SC2? And this was back when it was less competitive and he could practice entirely in SC2? Currently, BW pros just came back from an offseason in which they all had vacations, came back to basically start anew in SC2 while still practicing a little BW, and what do you expect?
As for those who have practiced longer, they are mostly B-teamers whom the teams don't need for the proleague last season. So to compare them with star players is absurd to say the least.
not to mention, as other people have said, they have to practice for two games. Especially the top bw players too who have to worry about the OSL
On May 26 2012 17:34 Oboeman wrote: BW needs to be LR'd with sc2 unit names, just like how sc2 was being LR'd with ground arbiters and fire vultures.
Ground Arbiters?
sentries, because they can cast rampstasis
That's... pretty weak actually. Better call them High Templar, they're both ground units recruited from Gateways who can cast Hallucination, so at least there's that. Besides, Motherships are clearly already Arbiters.
It'd make more sense to call stasis on ramps Force Fields rather than the other way 'round, since Force Fields are actually working as intended whereas stasised ramps are a seldom used and unexpected derivative from the ability's actual purpose.
Weak or not it all started as a joke in the bw live report forums and it stayed with us since than . Bw players trying to look for familiar things in sc2 and we found that sentries really function like ground arbiters forcefield looks like stasis . Also if the protoss in sc1 and broodwar had these technology there will be no invasion of aiur instead it would have look like a one sided win from the protoss against kerrigan forces.
On May 26 2012 17:34 Oboeman wrote: BW needs to be LR'd with sc2 unit names, just like how sc2 was being LR'd with ground arbiters and fire vultures.
Ground Arbiters?
sentries, because they can cast rampstasis
That's... pretty weak actually. Better call them High Templar, they're both ground units recruited from Gateways who can cast Hallucination, so at least there's that. Besides, Motherships are clearly already Arbiters.
It'd make more sense to call stasis on ramps Force Fields rather than the other way 'round, since Force Fields are actually working as intended whereas stasised ramps are a seldom used and unexpected derivative from the ability's actual purpose.
Weak or not it all started as a joke in the bw live report forums and it stayed with us since than . Bw players trying to look for familiar things in sc2 and we found that sentries really function like ground arbiters forcefield looks like stasis . Also if the protoss in sc1 and broodwar had these technology there will be no invasion of aiur instead it would have look like a one sided win from the protoss against kerrigan forces.
Ah, it's an inside joke. That's fine then.
EDIT: Wait, is "Scouts" supposed to refer to Void Rays? Because if so, that would be awesome.
Hey guys, I can't watch the ProLeague. It always says "This video is not availably" (or the German Translation of this as I live in Germany) Is here anyone with the same problem? (i tried it multiple times already and everytime it gives me this message. I couldn't watch any ProLeague yet. Can somebody help me please?
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
Did you watch killer's PvP last night? It's a shit mu, one of them is in the airforce and can't even practice full time for the 6 weeks or so since he switched. The elephant's relevant if you watched zero's play earlier today and the article never said they'd be dominating in such a short time.
Even the coaches and players said sc:bw and sc2 were 2 different games, and that skill in bw wasn't linearly translating into sc2. Now you've the results to back it up.
What more would be needed to abundon your fairy tale of seeing code A BW players above everyone else in a few months ?
Nothing has happened. The article was written with no knowledge of the dual league. These PL games are in no way an indication of the legitimacy or failures of that article. All the top SC2 players were ex-BW players, with no exception. When these players are allowed to fully transition to SC2 we will see how good they truly can be. Many recent GSL games haven't looked much better if at all compared to the PL games.
Stephano, Thorzain, Grubby are now arguably the best foreigners. None of them ever plaid BW at a decent level, they were war3 players. And Stephano is now a better Zerg than Moon.
The reason why ex Korean BW players are dominating SC2 in Korea is because failed/retired BW pgmer were the only one with the motivation and mechanics to dominate it since they're no other RTS players there. You don't hear about all the ex BW players who failed, precisely, because they failed. Look at Hyun, forgg etc... who were all far better than the likes of MMA or Nestea...
On May 26 2012 17:57 roym899 wrote: Hey guys, I can't watch the ProLeague. It always says "This video is not availably" (or the German Translation of this as I live in Germany) Is here anyone with the same problem? (i tried it multiple times already and everytime it gives me this message. I couldn't watch any ProLeague yet. Can somebody help me please?
On May 26 2012 17:57 roym899 wrote: Hey guys, I can't watch the ProLeague. It always says "This video is not availably" (or the German Translation of this as I live in Germany) Is here anyone with the same problem? (i tried it multiple times already and everytime it gives me this message. I couldn't watch any ProLeague yet. Can somebody help me please?
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
Did you watch killer's PvP last night? It's a shit mu, one of them is in the airforce and can't even practice full time for the 6 weeks or so since he switched. The elephant's relevant if you watched zero's play earlier today and the article never said they'd be dominating in such a short time.
Even the coaches and players said sc:bw and sc2 were 2 different games, and that skill in bw wasn't linearly translating into sc2. Now you've the results to back it up.
What more would be needed to abundon your fairy tale of seeing code A BW players above everyone else in a few months ?
Nothing has happened. The article was written with no knowledge of the dual league. These PL games are in no way an indication of the legitimacy or failures of that article. All the top SC2 players were ex-BW players, with no exception. When these players are allowed to fully transition to SC2 we will see how good they truly can be. Many recent GSL games haven't looked much better if at all compared to the PL games.
Stephano, Thorzain, Grubby are now arguably the best foreigners. None of them ever plaid BW at a decent level, they were war3 players. And Stephano is now a better Zerg than Moon.
The reason why ex Korean BW players are dominating SC2 in Korea is because failed/retired BW pgmer were the only one with the motivation and mechanics to dominate it since they're no other RTS players there. You don't hear about all the ex BW players who failed, precisely, because they failed. Look at Hyun, forgg etc... who were all far better than the likes of MMA or Nestea...
I don't think anybody cares about the foreign scene in relation to the elephant.
The elephant thread was posted ages ago. It was the case then it is not the case now. Some BW players have said that when they tried SC2 a while ago the switch then would have been far easier but that the skill level has increased since then. Moreover, everybody has admitted that it will take a while for BW pros to adjust and of course some will not make it. But the general idea is still there.
On May 26 2012 17:57 roym899 wrote: Hey guys, I can't watch the ProLeague. It always says "This video is not availably" (or the German Translation of this as I live in Germany) Is here anyone with the same problem? (i tried it multiple times already and everytime it gives me this message. I couldn't watch any ProLeague yet. Can somebody help me please?
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
Did you watch killer's PvP last night? It's a shit mu, one of them is in the airforce and can't even practice full time for the 6 weeks or so since he switched. The elephant's relevant if you watched zero's play earlier today and the article never said they'd be dominating in such a short time.
Even the coaches and players said sc:bw and sc2 were 2 different games, and that skill in bw wasn't linearly translating into sc2. Now you've the results to back it up.
What more would be needed to abundon your fairy tale of seeing code A BW players above everyone else in a few months ?
Nothing has happened. The article was written with no knowledge of the dual league. These PL games are in no way an indication of the legitimacy or failures of that article. All the top SC2 players were ex-BW players, with no exception. When these players are allowed to fully transition to SC2 we will see how good they truly can be. Many recent GSL games haven't looked much better if at all compared to the PL games.
Stephano, Thorzain, Grubby are now arguably the best foreigners. None of them ever plaid BW at a decent level, they were war3 players. And Stephano is now a better Zerg than Moon.
The reason why ex Korean BW players are dominating SC2 in Korea is because failed/retired BW pgmer were the only one with the motivation and mechanics to dominate it since they're no other RTS players there. You don't hear about all the ex BW players who failed, precisely, because they failed. Look at Hyun, forgg etc... who were all far better than the likes of MMA or Nestea...
Using players who transitioned well after their prime as the basis of your argument is a bad idea. Either way, Forgg is code S level and Hyun is apparently a practice bonjwa.
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
why are people still on about the elephant.
People are still on about the elephant because it was how most of us were welcomed by the BW community with contempt, despise and sometimes hate. The games were terrible. I have no interest in watching them anymore. Even the french amateur scene is more advanced than them.
I'll come back for the 2nd round and I'll judge then if they made any relevant progress.
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
why are people still on about the elephant.
People are still on about the elephant because it was how most of us were welcomed by the BW community with contempt, despise and sometimes hate. The games were terrible. I have no interest in watching them anymore. Even the french amateur scene is more advanced than them.
I'll come back for the 2nd round and I'll judge then if they made any relevant progress.
Please do and prepare to bow down to your BW overlords.
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
why are people still on about the elephant.
People are still on about the elephant because it was how most of us were welcomed by the BW community with contempt, despise and sometimes hate. The games were terrible. I have no interest in watching them anymore. Even the french amateur scene is more advanced than them.
I'll come back for the 2nd round and I'll judge then if they made any relevant progress.
Being suspicious in the ability of 200+ talented RTS gamers to make "relevant progress" in due time is foolish and laughable. Even through pure statistics, in the worst case scenario, a large handful of them will rise to the top of SC2. Might not be names we're all expecting, but make no mistake, it's going to happen at some point with some of these pros.
The big question is, how long will it take. Most people are expecting at least a few months after they fully transition, which should be around the end of the year. If all of these guys can devote their full resources to practicing one game, it'll happen sooner, but obviously, that's not the case now.
I have no clue why you're commenting on the obvious. Ever since this dual league bullshit was announced, everyone expected the gameplay quality of both games to be shit. And...taadaa...we were (mostly) correct in our premonitions.
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
Did you watch killer's PvP last night? It's a shit mu, one of them is in the airforce and can't even practice full time for the 6 weeks or so since he switched. The elephant's relevant if you watched zero's play earlier today and the article never said they'd be dominating in such a short time.
Even the coaches and players said sc:bw and sc2 were 2 different games, and that skill in bw wasn't linearly translating into sc2. Now you've the results to back it up.
What more would be needed to abundon your fairy tale of seeing code A BW players above everyone else in a few months ?
Nothing has happened. The article was written with no knowledge of the dual league. These PL games are in no way an indication of the legitimacy or failures of that article. All the top SC2 players were ex-BW players, with no exception. When these players are allowed to fully transition to SC2 we will see how good they truly can be. Many recent GSL games haven't looked much better if at all compared to the PL games.
Parting? Naniwa? Theres some exceptions from the latter half of the GSL last season. What about Polt and MarineKing? Stop making sweeping statements like that. Its as nonsensical as the elephant article.
In Korea, of COURSE most of the best players will have a broodwar history. Its a tiny sample size and there is a massive amount of crossover in the two games. Much more than say, football or cookery.
Heres a more accurate statement. All of the top SC2 Pros have played video games before with no exception.
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
Did you watch killer's PvP last night? It's a shit mu, one of them is in the airforce and can't even practice full time for the 6 weeks or so since he switched. The elephant's relevant if you watched zero's play earlier today and the article never said they'd be dominating in such a short time.
Even the coaches and players said sc:bw and sc2 were 2 different games, and that skill in bw wasn't linearly translating into sc2. Now you've the results to back it up.
What more would be needed to abundon your fairy tale of seeing code A BW players above everyone else in a few months ?
Nothing has happened. The article was written with no knowledge of the dual league. These PL games are in no way an indication of the legitimacy or failures of that article. All the top SC2 players were ex-BW players, with no exception. When these players are allowed to fully transition to SC2 we will see how good they truly can be. Many recent GSL games haven't looked much better if at all compared to the PL games.
Parting? Naniwa? Theres some exceptions from the latter half of the GSL last season. What about Polt and MarineKing? Stop making sweeping statements like that. Its as nonsensical as the elephant article.
In Korea, of COURSE most of the best players will have a broodwar history. Its a tiny sample size and there is a massive amount of crossover in the two games. Much more than say, football or cookery.
Heres a more accurate statement. All of the top SC2 Pros have played video games before with no exception.
except the really young ones, like life, creator, maru, etc.
On May 26 2012 17:16 Otolia wrote: That was terrible. They are terrible. The elephant is a tiny tiny tiny beast.
Did you watch killer's PvP last night? It's a shit mu, one of them is in the airforce and can't even practice full time for the 6 weeks or so since he switched. The elephant's relevant if you watched zero's play earlier today and the article never said they'd be dominating in such a short time.
Even the coaches and players said sc:bw and sc2 were 2 different games, and that skill in bw wasn't linearly translating into sc2. Now you've the results to back it up.
What more would be needed to abundon your fairy tale of seeing code A BW players above everyone else in a few months ?
Nothing has happened. The article was written with no knowledge of the dual league. These PL games are in no way an indication of the legitimacy or failures of that article. All the top SC2 players were ex-BW players, with no exception. When these players are allowed to fully transition to SC2 we will see how good they truly can be. Many recent GSL games haven't looked much better if at all compared to the PL games.
Parting? Naniwa? Theres some exceptions from the latter half of the GSL last season. What about Polt and MarineKing? Stop making sweeping statements like that. Its as nonsensical as the elephant article.
In Korea, of COURSE most of the best players will have a broodwar history. Its a tiny sample size and there is a massive amount of crossover in the two games. Much more than say, football or cookery.
Heres a more accurate statement. All of the top SC2 Pros have played video games before with no exception.
So what you are saying is that almost all top players in the scene that is by far the most competetive have BW background. And that there is massive amount of crossover between BW and SC2. And now you're calling the elephant nonsensical? Didn't I just tell people not go to full retard.
The fact that you are able to point out a name or two of people without BW background is not exactly very compelling argument. Of course there is talent outside of BW as well. There are players who have not played any game before SC2 who will end up becoming great. The point is that by far the most amount of talent in RTS games was found in BW and the most talented out of those have only transitioned now. And they will change the scene. It will not happen instantly though.
Mmm, didn't catch this, and don't have time to watch it now -- later tonight! -- but I'm looking forward to seeing how Mini did. I hope his transition to SC2 is a successful one, given how he just suddenly showed up and started playing well -- it'd be sad to see him suddenly disappear due to the game change.