|
United States7483 Posts
On December 29 2012 13:22 BLinD-RawR wrote:Show nested quote +On December 29 2012 13:20 sc2superfan101 wrote: what possessed them to ever put in reaction shots? I guess it makes some sense in BW, but with SC2 it's horrible. they cut away from the battle to show me the players face but that isn't ever interesting at all. IDK why they don't just put the players faces at the bottom anyway..
STOP THE REACTION SHOTS FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!!! Doom zooms are amazing. what makes you think it makes sense in BW but not SC2
Probably because BW was a bit slower.
Either way, it's only slightly annoying even if you don't like it.
|
So JYP should be called The Comedian from now on imo.
|
Hyvaa might have been okay if he hadn't lost that overlord
|
On December 29 2012 13:20 Pandain wrote:Show nested quote +On December 29 2012 13:18 Fionn wrote: The Dream Line: Jaedong, Taeja, Hero and JYP.
Once they have Stephano they'll be soooo fricking good. And they can then just prepare snipers in specific matchups in Huk/Thorzain/Puma(although puma can be used overall , too.) + Show Spoiler + Problem is I know they won't ever do this as Huk and Thorzain, perhaps, I mean I know rightfully have too much ego to just be used as snipers. But that's what alot of BW teams would do with lower B-Teamers, they would use them in specific specific matchups as a suprise.
It wouldn't shock me. I'm really excited to see Stephano in the PL though, as well as the OSL! JD, Teaja, Hero, JYP, and Stephano along with a few snipers would be deadly!
|
What is the point of having a replay directly after the game, which is half as long as the entire game?
|
Jaedong, like Idra, has top tier ZvZ. No surprise he dominated!
|
Now TaeJa. Come on, Yeongseo-yah, beat Bogus! Hwaiting!
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES48983 Posts
On December 29 2012 13:22 Emzeeshady wrote:Show nested quote +On December 29 2012 13:20 Dr.Sin wrote: For all the bitching and moaning about the casting that we've been doing, I'd like to take a moment to recognize how awesome it is that we have the games on Twitch at good definitions. It makes watching these games so much more pleasant. I agree the reaction shots are not useful as the players tend to always have the same faces all the time, with the mouth slightly open and the blank look. ty and QFT
if it were true, then you would have a point, you are quoting what you want to hear.
|
On December 29 2012 13:22 Emzeeshady wrote:Show nested quote +On December 29 2012 13:17 Whatson wrote:On December 29 2012 13:16 liberate71 wrote:On December 29 2012 13:14 Snijjer wrote: Amazing use of 2 banelings. Damn, I wish my control was that good. My zvz sucks :/ I think if you can control Z v Z like that, usually your vT and vP is for some reason subject to questionable A-moving into retarded armies that leaves you typing gg... i'm not sure why, but it just happens hahahaha (not specifically talking about JD) You know what, this is actually kinda true... Save all your micro for ZvZ i guess Well to be fair ZvZ requires the most micro out of ANY matchup while ZvP and ZvT requires very little micro on the zerg part. Forcefields basically make zerg micro irrelevant anyway. It requires the most micro because that's the only time where zerg units are useful to micro. In any other matchup, the useful units are either too slow, or pointless to micro. Especially in the late game.
|
On December 29 2012 13:23 Dexington wrote: What is the point of having a replay directly after the game, which is half as long as the entire game? Probably to fill time while the players are setting up. I agree it's kind of annoying
|
On December 29 2012 13:23 Dexington wrote: What is the point of having a replay directly after the game, which is half as long as the entire game?
Tradition from BW, but SC2 games are just too shot, not much to show.
|
Brace yourself for the best matchup in the game ladies :D
|
On December 29 2012 13:23 Whitewing wrote:Show nested quote +On December 29 2012 13:22 BLinD-RawR wrote:On December 29 2012 13:20 sc2superfan101 wrote: what possessed them to ever put in reaction shots? I guess it makes some sense in BW, but with SC2 it's horrible. they cut away from the battle to show me the players face but that isn't ever interesting at all. IDK why they don't just put the players faces at the bottom anyway..
STOP THE REACTION SHOTS FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!!! Doom zooms are amazing. what makes you think it makes sense in BW but not SC2 Probably because BW was a bit slower. Either way, it's only slightly annoying even if you don't like it.
Also probably a tradition thing. As well as an identifier of proleague. Just something thats different between them and GSL or other leagues.
|
On December 29 2012 13:22 BLinD-RawR wrote:Show nested quote +On December 29 2012 13:20 sc2superfan101 wrote: what possessed them to ever put in reaction shots? I guess it makes some sense in BW, but with SC2 it's horrible. they cut away from the battle to show me the players face but that isn't ever interesting at all. IDK why they don't just put the players faces at the bottom anyway..
STOP THE REACTION SHOTS FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!!! Doom zooms are amazing. what makes you think it makes sense in BW but not SC2 Given his name I would guess he does not have too much experience with BW. In any case I feel there is some truth to the fact that they are disruptive, however I don't feel this is because of SC2 or because there is anything wrong with player zooms, but they don't seem to be done correctly. In BW whoever chose to zoom always had impeccable timing, but here they seem to just do it at random moments when there is action. Once it gets smoothed out I believe it will be awesome, but atm they are mostly just annoying.
|
oh my god so many tvts
:D :D :D
|
I really really value the reaction shots... The human element is what I'm in this for; to see the differences in reactions between different players is really important to me.
|
|
And now comes the really cool games .
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES48983 Posts
On December 29 2012 13:23 Whitewing wrote:Show nested quote +On December 29 2012 13:22 BLinD-RawR wrote:On December 29 2012 13:20 sc2superfan101 wrote: what possessed them to ever put in reaction shots? I guess it makes some sense in BW, but with SC2 it's horrible. they cut away from the battle to show me the players face but that isn't ever interesting at all. IDK why they don't just put the players faces at the bottom anyway..
STOP THE REACTION SHOTS FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!!! Doom zooms are amazing. what makes you think it makes sense in BW but not SC2 Probably because BW was a bit slower. Either way, it's only slightly annoying even if you don't like it. in SC2 most of the time you know exactly how the battle is going to go so it doesn't matter.
|
On December 29 2012 13:25 Engore wrote:Show nested quote +On December 29 2012 13:23 Whitewing wrote:On December 29 2012 13:22 BLinD-RawR wrote:On December 29 2012 13:20 sc2superfan101 wrote: what possessed them to ever put in reaction shots? I guess it makes some sense in BW, but with SC2 it's horrible. they cut away from the battle to show me the players face but that isn't ever interesting at all. IDK why they don't just put the players faces at the bottom anyway..
STOP THE REACTION SHOTS FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!!! Doom zooms are amazing. what makes you think it makes sense in BW but not SC2 Probably because BW was a bit slower. Either way, it's only slightly annoying even if you don't like it. Also probably a tradition thing. As well as an identifier of proleague. Just something thats different between them and GSL or other leagues.
well i personally like the shots if i dont miss important action for it.
|
|
|
|