WCS Grand Finals Format and Seedings - Page 3
Forum Index > SC2 General |
hansonslee
United States2026 Posts
| ||
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
| ||
MrProdigious
36 Posts
| ||
Yakikorosu
1203 Posts
| ||
FanaticCZ
Czech Republic287 Posts
| ||
hansonslee
United States2026 Posts
On October 22 2013 08:28 FanaticCZ wrote: So looking forward to this. MLG Winter 2013 was the same format and it was awesome. I'm just sad that Flash and Life didnt make it....not even closely. Or what if this Blizzcon had Nestea vs MVP, like the last Blizzcon for nostalgia sake. | ||
TaishiCi
Korea (South)211 Posts
I don't think there is a doubt that both of them are in better form than Naniwa, not that they were ever in worse form than Naniwa. Dear winning KR and not making it to the Grand Finals would be outrageous. | ||
Dragoonstorm7
United States599 Posts
On October 22 2013 05:49 Strivers wrote: Hero vs MC in the First Round. My two favorite protoss ? That matchup isnt very likely to happen. HerO is at 5, so right now he'd play Alive. If you look at the standings, its not that likely that HerO drops at all and MC is only really in danger of dropping a spot to Duckdeok. | ||
frogrubdown
1266 Posts
On October 22 2013 07:51 kochanfe wrote: Actually it's quite possible that Polt or Jaedong will end up no.1 Overall, there are 8 players that have a chance to pass Innovation. Maybe none of them will get enough points, but these are exactly the players that Naniwa needs to do well in order to keep the players below him from passing him. So, if Naniwa doesn't get eliminated, some players will probably have passed Innovation. | ||
igay
Australia1178 Posts
Also good news for my man mvp | ||
StarscreamG1
Portugal1652 Posts
| ||
Advantageous
China1350 Posts
| ||
Kompicek
Czech Republic245 Posts
On October 22 2013 08:33 TaishiCi wrote: I hope soO and Dear keep Naniwa out. I don't think there is a doubt that both of them are in better form than Naniwa, not that they were ever in worse form than Naniwa. Dear winning KR and not making it to the Grand Finals would be outrageous. I really hope Naniwa will get there. I hope for the sake of SC2, many more people will be watching and the event will have much more success with at least one foreigner in there. If naniwa doesnt qualify i bet there will be at least 30% people less watching the event. | ||
RaiZ
2813 Posts
| ||
Popkiller
3415 Posts
On October 22 2013 08:25 MrProdigious wrote: The Ro16 might just be 8 grand final matches, quality wise going to be amazing. Pretty much. Even if you seed it as they are now, all the matchups are really good. The only stomp would probably Innovation vs Revival. | ||
esReveR
United States562 Posts
| ||
Killmouse
Austria5700 Posts
On October 22 2013 09:01 RaiZ wrote: Not sure the bo5 in all those games will please the audience, final in bo7 is definitely too much... Time will tell though. final bo 7 too much? wtf are u talking about a different game? cauz bo7 finals is pretty standard in sc2 | ||
TaishiCi
Korea (South)211 Posts
On October 22 2013 08:58 Kompicek wrote: I really hope Naniwa will get there. I hope for the sake of SC2, many more people will be watching and the event will have much more success with at least one foreigner in there. If naniwa doesnt qualify i bet there will be at least 30% people less watching the event. I really don't think the difference between one foreigner and none will mean 30% dip. Maybe if it was between 20% foreigners and no foreigners. If you define success as in views instead of getting the highest quality matches between the best players, I feel sorry that you can't appreciate starcraft. | ||
ZAiNs
United Kingdom6525 Posts
On October 22 2013 09:08 TaishiCi wrote: I really don't think the difference between one foreigner and none will mean 30% dip. Maybe if it was between 20% foreigners and no foreigners. If you define success as in views instead of getting the highest quality matches between the best players, I feel sorry that you can't appreciate starcraft. Have you seen Naniwa vs Life? | ||
doffe
Sweden636 Posts
On October 22 2013 09:08 TaishiCi wrote: I really don't think the difference between one foreigner and none will mean 30% dip. Maybe if it was between 20% foreigners and no foreigners. If you define success as in views instead of getting the highest quality matches between the best players, I feel sorry that you can't appreciate starcraft. IEM NY is a good example of one foreigner increasing the viewer number by ALOT. I for one will watch some either way but I will be so much more interested if Nani makes it. The foreigner vs Koreans stories is what draws me the most nowadays and I know plenty that feel the same. And what do you base Nani not being a good enough player on? He just recently came second in a pretty damn stacked tourney beating the beast Hyun, beating San, Hack(twice) and playing really well vs. life. a set he could definitely have won looking at the individual games.. Naniwas form is good and I'd say if you actually earn enough points to be top 16 you damn well deserve it.. The point of the format is to reward success over the year not just winning one tourney, that would kinda defeat the purpouse of ranking... it's like any sport that has similar systems... you don't get automatically a huge rank cause you win one big tourney in the end of the year.. it goes up for sure but you have to perform steadily. | ||
| ||