|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36598 Posts
|
your Country52793 Posts
I'm in favor since this match seems like it will be pretty close.
|
Sure, I've been hoping this for a while!
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36598 Posts
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36598 Posts
I need more answers than this. Please respond if you are reading this thread.
|
I think in this case its always more fun with more bets so don't see any reason not to do it
|
I'm fine with either really, bigger stakes feels more rewarding when you get it right, but I guess I don't mind if it's changed. On the other hand I don't follow the scene close enough to even break into top 100 these days, so I don't put as much thought into the LBs either.
|
On October 08 2015 02:56 Seeker wrote: I need more answers than this. Please respond if you are reading this thread. Yes.
|
I would love to have individual liquibets, makes it less all or nothing.
|
Yeah I definitely think it'd be a good idea. Especially because it's obvious SKT is going to win, it's just a matter of how badly!
|
Are we talking about a one time thing? Or would that be the case for every proleague match? I would love it if that would be a common thing, but obviously it would be a lot more work.
|
|
East Gorteau22261 Posts
|
your Country52793 Posts
On October 08 2015 05:04 The_Red_Viper wrote: Are we talking about a one time thing? Or would that be the case for every proleague match? I would love it if that would be a common thing, but obviously it would be a lot more work. Since this is the GRAND FINALS and everything is on the line, I'm guessing it would just be for this.
|
On October 08 2015 07:06 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2015 05:04 The_Red_Viper wrote: Are we talking about a one time thing? Or would that be the case for every proleague match? I would love it if that would be a common thing, but obviously it would be a lot more work. Since this is the GRAND FINALS and everything is on the line, I'm guessing it would just be for this. Meh, if it would be a one time thing, rather don't do it at all. It would be a way too cool feature to not have all the time for proleague
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36598 Posts
On October 08 2015 07:29 The_Red_Viper wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2015 07:06 The_Templar wrote:On October 08 2015 05:04 The_Red_Viper wrote: Are we talking about a one time thing? Or would that be the case for every proleague match? I would love it if that would be a common thing, but obviously it would be a lot more work. Since this is the GRAND FINALS and everything is on the line, I'm guessing it would just be for this. Meh, if it would be a one time thing, rather don't do it at all. It would be a way too cool feature to not have all the time for proleague This will be trial and error. If it works, I might implement it again in the future. If it doesn't, then we won't do it.
|
On October 08 2015 11:02 Seeker wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2015 07:29 The_Red_Viper wrote:On October 08 2015 07:06 The_Templar wrote:On October 08 2015 05:04 The_Red_Viper wrote: Are we talking about a one time thing? Or would that be the case for every proleague match? I would love it if that would be a common thing, but obviously it would be a lot more work. Since this is the GRAND FINALS and everything is on the line, I'm guessing it would just be for this. Meh, if it would be a one time thing, rather don't do it at all. It would be a way too cool feature to not have all the time for proleague This will be trial and error. If it works, I might implement it again in the future. If it doesn't, then we won't do it. Work? I mean it's more work for you i guess and i would understand if you think that it's too time consuming doing this every week for 4 matches. But i also believe that it's a lot more fun and makes liquibets for proleague more skillfull because there is way more room for error, which is great.
|
On October 08 2015 11:30 The_Red_Viper wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2015 11:02 Seeker wrote:On October 08 2015 07:29 The_Red_Viper wrote:On October 08 2015 07:06 The_Templar wrote:On October 08 2015 05:04 The_Red_Viper wrote: Are we talking about a one time thing? Or would that be the case for every proleague match? I would love it if that would be a common thing, but obviously it would be a lot more work. Since this is the GRAND FINALS and everything is on the line, I'm guessing it would just be for this. Meh, if it would be a one time thing, rather don't do it at all. It would be a way too cool feature to not have all the time for proleague This will be trial and error. If it works, I might implement it again in the future. If it doesn't, then we won't do it. Work? I mean it's more work for you i guess and i would understand if you think that it's too time consuming doing this every week for 4 matches. But i also believe that it's a lot more fun and makes liquibets for proleague more skillfull because there is way more room for error, which is great.
You'd have to rebalance the points though. Having each game be worth one point would make liquibets only about Proleague.
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES48860 Posts
No
its a team match, it doesn't matter which of the players win because in the end its the team that needs to win on the whole.
|
On October 08 2015 11:35 ZigguratOfUr wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2015 11:30 The_Red_Viper wrote:On October 08 2015 11:02 Seeker wrote:On October 08 2015 07:29 The_Red_Viper wrote:On October 08 2015 07:06 The_Templar wrote:On October 08 2015 05:04 The_Red_Viper wrote: Are we talking about a one time thing? Or would that be the case for every proleague match? I would love it if that would be a common thing, but obviously it would be a lot more work. Since this is the GRAND FINALS and everything is on the line, I'm guessing it would just be for this. Meh, if it would be a one time thing, rather don't do it at all. It would be a way too cool feature to not have all the time for proleague This will be trial and error. If it works, I might implement it again in the future. If it doesn't, then we won't do it. Work? I mean it's more work for you i guess and i would understand if you think that it's too time consuming doing this every week for 4 matches. But i also believe that it's a lot more fun and makes liquibets for proleague more skillfull because there is way more room for error, which is great. You'd have to rebalance the points though. Having each game be worth one point would make liquibets only about Proleague. Maybe. I don't think it would be a bad thing though to have a proleagie focus, because proleague produces by far the most sc2 content. In general i think liquibets atm is too black and white due to the format (gsl groups too forgiving, box series awarding a lot of points for a coinflip) Not sure if TL plans to change how liquibet works overall though, probably not.
On October 08 2015 11:41 BLinD-RawR wrote: No
its a team match, it doesn't matter which of the players win because in the end its the team that needs to win on the whole. For the competition it doesn't matter, but for the gamedesign (liquibets) it should matter if you ask me. Betting on SKT could mean anything from 4:0 to 4:3 and every single possible scenario of these scores. So no matter how close your prediction is to what actually happened, as long as you coinflipped SKT you get all the points. Which is imo bad for finding the best player in liquibets. Maybe liquibets isn't meant to be THAT competetive though, could be the case.
+ Show Spoiler +ROFL, obviously JinAir will win
|
|
|
|