|
NeverGG
United Kingdom5399 Posts
On February 19 2010 09:21 Irrelevant wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2010 09:16 NeverGG wrote:On February 19 2010 09:00 sassy wrote:On February 19 2010 08:32 Tien wrote:On February 18 2010 16:52 poisongirl wrote:so this woman is not attractive according to the guy in that video cos shes fat/chubby/slightly fat That girl is super hot. I don't consider that fat. this is the whole argument here. She is fat, theres no other option in this thread. Thats why the OP video is retarded. No one is arguing that a 250 pound beast could be attractive. Ofc not. I am around her size and I'm nowhere near 250 pounds. I think you need to stop assigning incorrect weights to people before judging them like that. Also she's not a beast - you don't even know her. God some of the guys in this thread are head-desk worthy. According to you I am apparently slap bang in the middle of the 'beast' 'thing' 'horrific abomination' category and so is Susie. You took his statement wrong and out of context. He said she is hot. (notice the period) then went on to say no one is saying 250lb beasts are sexy (not this girl, as she looks much more in the 180-190range, depending on height but girls that do weight 250lbs in general). Maybe you should just stick to posts about how much everyone wants you since reading isn't your strong suit.
I just took it out of context and if you go and check you'll see I edited the post about ten seconds after making it. Don't be such a condescending cunt thank you very much.What do you mean by 'stick to posts about how much everyone wants you' - I was simply talking about a small cross-section of Korean men who hit on me regularly. There's no need to be so rude back to me about simply posting in a thread. I'd think as a veteran member here I should be allowed to do that without being bitched at.
|
NeverGG
United Kingdom5399 Posts
On February 19 2010 09:17 sassy wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2010 09:12 Tien wrote:
I'd have babies with that girl all day long. And my babies will be very happy too with those kinds of boobies. she looks super healthy and would have easiest pregnancy. This is definitely the type of mother you want for your babies. Skinny girls with narrow hips can rarely give birth without complications Show nested quote +On February 19 2010 09:16 NeverGG wrote:On February 19 2010 09:00 sassy wrote:On February 19 2010 08:32 Tien wrote:On February 18 2010 16:52 poisongirl wrote:so this woman is not attractive according to the guy in that video cos shes fat/chubby/slightly fat That girl is super hot. I don't consider that fat. this is the whole argument here. She is fat, theres no other option in this thread. Thats why the OP video is retarded. No one is arguing that a 250 pound beast could be attractive. Ofc not. I am around her size and I'm nowhere near 250 pounds. I think you need to stop assigning incorrect weights to people before judging them like that. Also she's not a beast - you don't even know her. God some of the guys in this thread are head-desk worthy. According to you I am apparently slap bang in the middle of the 'beast' 'thing' 'horrific abomination' category and so is Susie. nonoononoonon thats not what i meant yo shes attractive, i said guys would definitely run after her. But this thread suggest that she needs to be labeled as "fat". In this instance "fat" is attractive for sure. But no one is defending 250 pound ladies here, we arguing about "thick" rather than "fat" which is being classified as "fat" anyway
I edited the post because I realized we weren't talking about the same woman in hindsight. Still, calling people you don't even know 'beasts' is kind of a shitty thing to do imo. I guess some of us still try to judge people on their personality before their looks. Maybe it's just a personal thing. I just don't think 'thick' is a good way of describing muscular women. It sounds odd.
|
that girl on the right is just genetically designed to be heavy-set. She isn't really fat, she's about the optimum weight for her body structure. It just sucks that she has the body structure of a powerlifting big mama, and not a normal girl. Definitely not attracted to girls whose bodies are better designed for UFC than the majority of guys I meet lol.
But she isn't really a 'fat woman'...so you shouldn't be using her as an example.
This is a fat girl:
+ Show Spoiler +
Tell me if you could ever find that attractive lol. It's just a bunch of flesh that could come off with diet and exercise. It's not a bone structure issue lol. And she most certainly is far from healthy.
|
On February 19 2010 08:43 Irrelevant wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2010 08:32 Tien wrote:On February 18 2010 16:52 poisongirl wrote:so this woman is not attractive according to the guy in that video cos shes fat/chubby/slightly fat That girl is super hot. I don't consider that fat. well according to BMI charts she would be considered morbidly obese, which just goes to show how fucking retarded those things really are
She is absolutely not morbidly obese, by BMI nor by any other means. I would be shocked if she'd even be classified as Class 1 Obese. To me, she looks like she'd be classified as Overweight. To be Class 1 Obese, she'd have to be over 185lbs if she's 5'6", or 175lb+ if she's 5'4". To be morbidly obese, as you claim she is, she'd have to weigh TWO HUNDRED FORTY EIGHT POUNDS, if she's 5'6". Sorry, but no 5'6" woman can weigh 248lbs without having any folds, let alone any cellulite.
And the poll is pointless. Put a body fat percentage at the least. The word "fat" is defined by most people to basically mean "too big to be attractive," so obviously no one would find a "fat" woman attractive.
My personal order of preference, assuming everything else is the same (face, eyes, personality, interests, etc), would probably be Normal, Overweight, Underweight, Obese 1, etc. I personally find underweight women the most accessible, simply because my body has a natural tendency to be underweight, and I was for most my life. I'm too small for most overweight women to find me attractive, and I have to eat so much to maintain weight that even athletic women in the normal range don't often see me as compatible.
|
On February 19 2010 05:40 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2010 04:31 pyrogenetix wrote: eh... this is starting to really look like that "how many teamliquidians to change a lightbulb" joke
fat women just don't look attractive, the same way fat guys don't look attractive. CASE CLOSED
When did you get case closing powers? Sometimes different people have different opinions on the subjective.
Why the fuck do you have to argue with everything anyone ever says, you're as fucking annoying as a bad hangover. He is right, the majority of the world doesn't think that fat = attractive, unless you are in an African village somewhere. And yes, I can say that because I've lived all over the world and that is how it is. CASE CLOSED, of course there is that 1% that does like fatties... idk why
|
On February 18 2010 18:06 KwarK wrote:I prefer girls to look well fed, especially because I like big tits + ass. But it's a thin line, once they cross over into fat it just makes me feel they have no discipline. I'd probably take the right over the left on this, although obv the middle one is hottest.
To be honest I like the face and look/attitude (as far as you can judge that from a picture ofcourse) of the one on the right the most. However, that's not to say I like her because of her body. If I could pick and choose I'd have the body of the woman in the middle with the face/look of the girl on the right. I think for most people its all about weighing certain choices; a hot face goes a long way but at some point a body unactractive enough will counter it. Altho there is some limit to how fat a girl I'd find attractive, for me *uitstraling* (dutch word, dont know the right translation, I guess appearance combined with presence or something) is the main thing and its what I pay most attention to, but if a girl has a body that physically puts me off then that does certainly change things.Pictures ofcourse are just shit to judge on because certain looks can be incredibly appealing while others might not be so much.
|
On February 19 2010 08:58 sassy wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2010 07:07 Shiladie wrote: I definitely like a thin atheltic woman over anything else. I want them to be healthy, and to work at being healthy, because that shows a good drive to better oneself. somebody who is overweight and does nothing about it, (failed diet after failed diet, or going to the gym for a month after new years does not count) completely disgusts me, and only partially because they are physically unapealing, it is also the mental side of that type of personallity. ahahhaha athletic and healthy will rarely be skinny unless she runs track( couple other sports might qualify too) For instance if you ever met someone who plays tennis in person ud be ashamed she has broader shoulders than you do. Healthy/athletic is what you ultimately call "thick" in the best case scenario, most girls that did sports will become "big" in the future, its only natural. So anyone thinking that skinny = healthy is plain wrong. While picking the "middle girl" on that picture you should note that she is nowhere near athletic body type and she isnt looking any healthier then the girl to the right. If someone is skinny AND athletic they will be flat-chested and ripped, if you call that super feminine you should rethink your sexual priorities, this isnt what sexy women look like + Show Spoiler +heres an example of what athletic most often looks like as i mentioned, i personally love tiny girls with flat chests, but i wouldnt claim it to be healthy or super attractive. Its not for most males. They look more like boys if anything.
Somebody doesn't have to be a pro athelete to be healthy. I'm talking about somebody who runs, does yoga or a martial art, and keeps active, going overly physical isn't 'healthy' in my mind.
|
Calling it now, this thread will slowly turn into a softcore porn thread.
|
On February 19 2010 10:04 Jyvblamo wrote: Calling it now, this thread will slowly turn into a softcore porn thread. No jinxing plz.
|
On February 19 2010 08:43 Irrelevant wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2010 08:32 Tien wrote:On February 18 2010 16:52 poisongirl wrote:so this woman is not attractive according to the guy in that video cos shes fat/chubby/slightly fat That girl is super hot. I don't consider that fat. well according to BMI charts she would be considered morbidly obese, which just goes to show how fucking retarded those things really are
thats not morbidly obese, this is. does anyone find that attractive? about the BMI charts http://www.laparoscopy.com/pleatman/am-i-morbidly-obese.htm 5'6 women at 185 is slightly overweight you need to get ~250 for morbid obesity level
|
More difficult to have sex with a heavier girl. Fewer positions possible. More noises (slapping noises). It's distracting. Sweat is a big issue. Body smells clean for a shorter period after bathing\showering. Some areas will never smell nice or clean, performing oral highly undesirable. All that aside, a heavy girl that keeps clean and groomed can still look really hot and be sexual and attractive. The cut and dry answer is no, I wouldn't seek sexual relations with a very heavy girl and I would probably go to great lengths to turn down such advances from another person.
|
Has anyone mentioned that being significantly overweight, ie fat, has serious health complications that most people naturally want to avoid? I know for sure i wouldnt want to be burdened with tens if not hundreds of thousands in bypass surgeries and other medical bills that will come to people who are that unhealthy.
|
Hell NO!
For fatties, go eat better and start exercising. There is no excuse unless you just had a baby.
|
|
On February 19 2010 10:56 Chen wrote: Has anyone mentioned that being significantly overweight, ie fat, has serious health complications that most people naturally want to avoid? I know for sure i wouldnt want to be burdened with tens if not hundreds of thousands in bypass surgeries and other medical bills that will come to people who are that unhealthy.
even having a bit of fat on your belly is a strain for your organs, i cant imagine how unhealthy a seriously overweight person is.
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
I don't know why this thread is 15 pages long. Fat is unattractive. I agree with that guy about 95%.
|
also the girl on the left is great. lean women with tone and definition is money, especially stomach area. i'd probably pick her over the middle/average girl too, i dont like those chunky/stumpy calves/cankles she's got
|
On February 19 2010 11:09 Kennigit wrote: I don't know why this thread is 15 pages long. Fat is unattractive. I agree with that guy about 95%. people just dragging it out in hopes of it turning into a softcore fattie porn thread
|
Girl #3 is fat, but not unattractive. #2 is questionable.
I don't hate fat people, but for a girlfriend or wife it becomes a tough choice because they will be gaining a lot more weight in 10-20 years. Certain thin people can eat all they want and you don't have to worry about them being massively large. With some people's genetic, they might have to work a lot harder than someone else to lose weight. Girl #2 might have to work hard to lose weight as she gets older.
My ex was 5'5 110-115 lbs. Weight could had been even less, I don't remember anymore.
|
On February 19 2010 11:09 Kennigit wrote: I don't know why this thread is 15 pages long. Fat is unattractive. I agree with that guy about 95%. Basically it's political correctness vs. the truth. And the fact is, being fat is bad for you, and is unnatractive.
|
|
|
|