mogadishu isn't a country, asshole.
smh.
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Versatile
United States396 Posts
mogadishu isn't a country, asshole. smh. | ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
On March 21 2010 16:46 Ace wrote: are you gonna put your map down or sign up? yeah, i guess. | ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
insta-nuke of he posts 51 or more. maybe that'll make him think twice about posting 9845984760934 million times in a row. | ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
On March 23 2010 13:15 Zona wrote: P.S. RoL is probably vanilla town or miller, since he was added as the extra player after roles had already gone out. It'd be termendously unbalancing to add another mafia member. And I doubt Ace would invent another third party role just for an extra player, although that probably would be the most balanced way of handling things. uh, just to address this. ace is fcukin crazy. no one's alignment, even though RoL was added in at the last minute, is for certain. don't make this mistake. | ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
knowing the rules is important to town victory, but it's not necessarily fair to the mafia team if the mod keeps coming in and correcting town stupidity, as town stupidity is one of the mafia's tools to win. get it right, get it tight. | ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
also, there's all this discussion about how to punish someone for nuking without town consensus, but no discussion on how we decide who does nuke. and how to figure out who has nuking capabilities. i think some altered form of 789/ace's plan in the caller game might be useful here. | ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
so when the town decides person A needs to be nuked, how do we stop persons B-J from all firing a nuke @ him and ending the game? we have to think about this if we're trying to avoid chaos. | ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
there needs to be an established game plan, asap. if there isn't, as soon as the first nuke is launched, there's going to be mass-hysteria and confusion. mafia will take advtange of this. there must be a plan of action that can be carried out right away if/when this happens, and people need to know the consequences for their actions. otherwise, this is what's going to happen: person A: ##nuke your mafia ass, person B. person B: oh hell nah, ##nuke your ass back, person A. mafia 1: wth, person A and person B, what y'all doing? ##nuke both your hoe asses. this needs to be decided and set in stone RIGHT AWAY. if a nuke is launched before it is, give up all hope of town order as far as nuking goes. @ this point, i haven't see a single reason why someone wouldn't nuke. someone could do it, and say oopsie daisy, kill me if you want. and then you have to convince 12 people to lynch this lone wolf. and who knows how many mafia are even in this game who can screw with that count? i applaud the efforts of zona and whoever else so far, but we need faster action. | ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
zona, will you post your revised and complete plan again? just so it's on the latest page, and for easy reference. i would hope many players who have yet to check in would be arriving soon. | ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
On March 24 2010 03:59 XeliN wrote: I'll respond if other people agree that it can't be interpreted in that way, otherwise your wrong. screw it just to get this out of the way: + Show Spoiler + On March 24 2010 03:30 Fishball wrote: Show nested quote + On March 24 2010 02:04 XeliN wrote: L being banned for 2 days in my eyes means he is not a viable candidate to be lynched, although the posts he has made already I disagree with but that might simply be because he's L and thats my general reaction to whatever he posts. As to the idea of retaliation against a player who has an itchy trigger finger, we have the perfect form of retaliation. We lynch them. Or to put it more bluntly Any player launching a nuke against another without at the very least providing coherent argument for doing so will be lynched. Furthermore the only instance whereby we would launch against a player who acts in this way would be if we already have a good candidate for lynching, then we will nuke or multiple nuke them (I am of the opinion that 2 ought to be enough) To get things started off in the voting section I am going to be Voting ~OpZ~ His post earlier on both seemed different in style to the way he posted in the last game and also was riddled with subtle "I am town" choice of wording, something I consciously made an effort to do in the last game I was mafia so guess I'll go along with my instinct here. To me, the tone OpZ used gives me the impression that he has the power to nuke. Doesn't feel scummy to me at this point of the game though. If you're Mafia, that would be a dumb way to get unwanted attention. Firstly you are quoting me, so when you wrote "If you're Mafia", I took it to be me. Think the misinterpretation lies in the word "that", I took it to refer to the post you quoted of mine//my voting and reasoning in voting for OpZ and not to what OpZ wrote. If you still can't understand how I could misinterpret it then I'm just going to give up and call you an idiot ^^ lol @ calling someone an idiot when you misinterpreted. that's really stupid. and rude. just say, oops, my bad, yo and move on. why so sensitive? | ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
| ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
further, i bet if anyone else was in L's position, he'd probably be advocating for their death. it's a course of action that makes sense. ##i vote L unless another someone else does something incredibly stupid. | ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
what's the issue? what big grand plan did he come up with to implement before he got himself banned? listen. i don't care who it is, the dude got himself banned. period. he won't be active for two days. i'm usually for not lynching anyone on the first day because there is so little to go on, but since we've got someone sitting right there who will not benefit the town for two days, why not lynch them? honestly, if it was some other player, there would probably not be so much protesting to keep L alive. hop off his dick for a second and look for reason, loser. | ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
On March 24 2010 08:37 ~OpZ~ wrote: True...Abenson, Johnny, Don't just bandwagon. Give us a legitimate reason. oh.muh.gawd. give a legitimate reason for voting for someone? you say, DON'T bandwagon? what novel ideas. (that's how you do sarcasm, buddy.) | ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
| ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
On March 24 2010 09:38 Iaaan wrote: Show nested quote + On March 24 2010 08:48 Versatile wrote: so what makes abenson a better target, iaaan? for the most part, everyone is just as dumb as everyone else. the only thing that makes L different is he got himself banned. what's the issue? what big grand plan did he come up with to implement before he got himself banned? listen. i don't care who it is, the dude got himself banned. period. he won't be active for two days. i'm usually for not lynching anyone on the first day because there is so little to go on, but since we've got someone sitting right there who will not benefit the town for two days, why not lynch them? honestly, if it was some other player, there would probably not be so much protesting to keep L alive. hop off his dick for a second and look for reason, loser. I have the same opinion of L as I do of you, you both just love pissing people off. But at least the two of you actually do shit. I am not set on Abenson, lynching L would be silly for the reasons that have been posted, and Abenson is a reasonable alternative. I will listen to arguments against other people. What makes Abenson a better target than L is that, L posts; if he is mafia we can catch him, while players like Abenson do not post, and since he has hopped on a ridiculous bandwagon, that is scummy. His actions point to him, L's do not. We will have lots of chances to analyze L's posting, we will not have many to analyze against players like Abenson. Lynching someone for a completely useless reason, that they wont be around for a day and a night of the game is just scum trying to get the town to waste a lynch. On March 24 2010 09:45 Iaaan wrote: Oh, I forgot, Versatile helped get the bandwagon on L started, of course it hurts his e-peen to back down from his brilliant lynching plan >.> haha. nice. an actual response, and then a jab. thank god everyone isn't a crybaby. seeing as how ace is the mod, everyone needs to check their emotions @ the door. i don't believe i got the bandwagon going, as there were votes for L before i said a word regarding voting for him. i just don't think he's a bad lynch candidate. in any case, i don't especially care who gets lynched first. the likelihood of it being mafia is just so ridiculously low. to me, it makes sense to lynch L and unless someone better comes along, i'll keep my vote there. ps: my e-peen's a monster yo, be very afraid. i might smack you in the forehead with it. owwwww! | ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
On March 25 2010 01:06 d3_crescentia wrote: Lunchtiem. Don't really feel too strongly for anyone right now, though I'd rather vote L than Abenson, because L could dick over the town way harder. Abenson, well, doesn't really *do* anything so we can lynch him anytime. ##vote L lmao. worse.reasoning.ever. | ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
On March 25 2010 05:56 nemY wrote: Show nested quote + On March 25 2010 05:37 JeeJee wrote: On March 25 2010 05:20 Abenson wrote: Hooray I'm back and I basically find that I'm gonna end up dying if I don’t post anything soon :O Anyways, I think I have proven myself quite active in the past few games, even if the post are all first few hours huh. or maybe we could look at your history instead so, when the game started, you post /confirm then 18 hours later you make a one-liner post, voting for L (we all know how i feel about that) now 24 hours later (that's 42 in total for those keeping track) you come out with this. For you to sway people's votes, you'd have to at least come out of lurking, name some suspects, analyze the plans, give us content. you've had almost two full days to do this. that's a tad more than "first few hours". hell, L is almost unbanned by now. and you folks still think it's a good idea to lynch somebody who's almost unbanned? Pure genius on the following: tree.hugger Versatile Abenson Fishball RebirthofLegend ~Opz~ d3_crescentia careful now. i get kinda sensitive when i'm grouped up with a bunch of other people. i'm far superior. don't forget it. | ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
if it was only the inactivity claim, i could roll with that, but that combined with him being L's lynch choice doesn't sit well with me. it's too convenient. | ||
Versatile
United States396 Posts
however, with the sibling role, all that is certain is that you die when your sibling dies, but it does guarantee that either player is town or mafia. | ||
| ||
Next event in 9h 45m
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH195 StarCraft: Brood War• Hupsaiya 109 • practicex 38 • aXEnki • intothetv • Gussbus • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamez Trovo • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel • Poblha League of Legends |
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
Online Event
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
Sparkling Tuna Cup
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
[ Show More ] ESL Pro Tour
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
PassionCraft
|
|