intimidating, but should be fun
Harry Potter Mafia!
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
why
United States215 Posts
intimidating, but should be fun | ||
why
United States215 Posts
I'd be more than happy to vote for an experienced player, but I'm new so I don't know who's good and who's not. So, at the moment, my vote is with Zeks. | ||
why
United States215 Posts
| ||
why
United States215 Posts
On December 11 2010 11:36 CubEdIn wrote: But yeah, that's a good question, how will the MoM decide who to kill first, whoever he is (will be). My sense is that, as this is the MoM's only official power, a significant part of each player's campaign will revolve around their answer to this question. | ||
why
United States215 Posts
On December 11 2010 12:14 Mr.Zergling wrote: I think LSB is making himself suspicious by proposing a 1st kill voting style that can be easily manipulated I actually think this debacle has made LSB come out looking pretty town. there's no way he wouldn't have thought of these objections if he was mafia and he would have realized that no sane town would ever agree to them. If we really want to have a private vote and have an auditor, we should have 5 or 6 of them, chosen by RNG, to really ensure there is at least one town among them. Or is that too paranoid? | ||
why
United States215 Posts
On December 11 2010 12:30 jcarlsoniv wrote: Pure WIFOM. Of course everything WIFOM is possible, but it's really difficult to read into someone's intentions. Good point. Sorry about that. I like reasoned vote a lot. Of all of them I think that would result in the most discussion and more discussion is always better. | ||
why
United States215 Posts
Speaking of which, anybody got any good ideas of in flavor power roles for the death eaters? It would be nice to have some idea of what they could be capable of. | ||
why
United States215 Posts
| ||
why
United States215 Posts
I'm going to use my vote as a pressure to an inactive. I'm going to randomly pick Chaoser, because he's posting a lot in pokemafia and isn't posting here. That's pretty weird. I won't be able to come back in time to change my vote, so if he comes and posts hopefully everyone else will just back off him and my vote won't matter. ##VOTE: Chaoser Here are some random other thoughts: Does anyone see a character that might be aligned with Death Eaters but checks as town? Because both RoL and LSB seem to be begging for DT checks. I know someone said imperious curse and that makes me suspicious of both. It's weird that airbag defended inactive players as not scummy. I thought the reasoning for pressuring inactive players was pretty obvious and well known. | ||
why
United States215 Posts
| ||
why
United States215 Posts
| ||
why
United States215 Posts
2) My interpretation is that 3 death eater hits went out, 1 on Amber, 1 on RoL, and 1 on Beneather. RoL survived the hit, but got taken out by a 3rd-party (quite possibly town-aligned since he was garnering a lot of suspicion). I think RoL got hit by death eater because only 1 person has claimed to be hit and because RoL was playing more scummy than normal. A scum would interpret this as trying to make him a less attractive target (you don't NK scummy players) and NK'ed him anyway. This makes LSB more likely to be scum as RoL was quite vocal in his denunciation. 3) Kenpachi and LSB = mod-confirmed patil sisters? The only thing I can think of that makes his defense make sense (other than them both being scum, of course). In this case your play is REALLY STUPID Kenpachi. | ||
why
United States215 Posts
On December 14 2010 10:24 kitaman27 wrote: So were the unlynchable and vet abilities considered to be the remaining two of the five abilities, which he needed to activate first? Probably the three different DT abilities make 5. | ||
why
United States215 Posts
| ||
why
United States215 Posts
| ||
why
United States215 Posts
| ||
why
United States215 Posts
I don't have a particular reason other than that it seems overpowered to have two mason groups in play and no one else is chiming in with you which makes it likely its a two person group. What's the obvious two person group? Patil sisters. Regardless, I'm willing to hold off on LSB for now based on your word. | ||
why
United States215 Posts
| ||
why
United States215 Posts
In conclusion, I'm not sure. | ||
why
United States215 Posts
On December 14 2010 13:02 Mr.Zergling wrote: Well if we group claim, reds will be forced to counter claim, and if they fail, well to the gallows they go. However if we have successful counterclaims we might end up lynching town Not all town are in groups. Lockhart/RoL wasn't in a group. We don't know how many groups there are or how many town are in group. So reds don't have to counterclaim, they can just blend in with however many non-group-aligned townies there are, and maybe throw in a fake group or two. | ||
| ||