TL Mafia XXXIV: Pokemafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
| ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
(1) We're probably going to hang you sooner or later for being useless (2) If you're blue you might be unluckily sniped Basically just holding back the town in a witch hunt. Make informative posts and contribute. I'm pretty sure the veterans of the game here are somewhat forgiving of newbie mistakes - just don't pull the "newbie card" on us repeatedly. Otherwise the game is pretty easy to pick up | ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
6 scum + 1 third party = 7 / 31 = 22% chance of sniping someone. I haven't played for a couple months but most the player list looks relatively foreign to me so I'm assuming theres quite a number of new players (over half?) From what I've seen from past games newb scum tend to lurk (correct me if I'm wrong) so we shouldn't give a free pass to inactives. And with new players we don't have any material from past games to work with. | ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
Nice to get a reaction from you folks though | ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
It's 3 votes out of 31 people, stop overreacting. I have my suspicions of infun from his posts but I think he's "contributed" enough to warrant an exemption from day 1. Because the cop wants to not be found by the mafia so he should know how people look for him And because the medic wants to find the cop so he can protect him. Small hunch its a soft claim so take it with a grain of salt (and don't go ape shit on me) I'm going to keep my vote on him for now until tomorrow when enough time has passed and we can make a fair inactive list, which then I'll vote for one from there. | ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
| ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
On December 12 2010 00:36 LSB wrote: Zeks pretty scummy from what I remember in other games. Then again he was SK. I've voting for Kenpachi because I don't like how immediately he got strong support from Jcarlsoniv, and how lots of people ignored what Gabriel was talking about, and immediatly jumped the bandwagon. Lol you only remember that one game when I was SK and got super unlucky Fact I've actually never been scum before in the 7 or 8 games I've played in TL history. Anyways I'm still pushing for an inactive lynch and I intend to stay with stormtemplar barring any new compelling evidence against someone. | ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
On December 11 2010 23:58 Node wrote: As weird as Gabriel's play is -- I still highly doubt that he's mafia, there's no way scum would draw so much attention to themselves And I supposedly placed the first "bandwagon" vote on infun which resulted to attention to myself. | ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
"by the way new players should read this link: http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=JEEP's_Tells_for_Finding_the_Cop i would ignore the numbers part. there are some interesting articles on the mafia scum wiki, but do not take them as gospel. i gather that the playstyle over there is somewhat different." Is what I found fishy. Same with LSB's reasoning. Why are you so defensive on your posting? I don't think I'm that defensive, I just don't like it when people sound angry =| Why did you actually change your vote without a "fair inactive list" just as you said you would do? I actually voted Stormtemplar after LSB made the inactive list. What I meant by "fair" was to have the list made after the first day to give people a chance to post if they haven't. Do you still insist on voting a random inactive even when he is going to get modkilled? No. I was under the impression that modkills happen after being inactive for 2 cycles consecutively from other games. Since DH reiterated the modkill policy I'm likely to change my vote. What do you think about people voting Kenpachi? I don't think Kenpachi is scum because he's being too blatant with the soft claim and all the other mindless posting he's done and if he was his scum buddies would've told him to shut up by now. But its interesting to note how the voting has gone so far: 1. Infun gets 3 votes (LSB, me and you) 2. You get stacked on with 6 votes soon after 3. You FoS me and now I got 5 and Kenpachis got 6 now Pretty much everyone who voted infun right away got scrutinized. As for your question - probably some scum in there. We're in practically a 3 way tie...scum could already have started to spread their votes out because of no scum candidate on the chopping block. So yes for now I think you're not scum either, nor Kenpachi. | ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
On December 12 2010 05:06 tree.hugger wrote: So who do you think is scum then, if not those two? My aim in this game is to prevent people from getting away with "I don't think these people are mafia" without offering alternatives. You simply cannot be helpful if you don't pitch in with your own accusations. I don't have a strong feeling for anyone but anyone who's posted once or twice this whole game just to agree/disagree is a good bet | ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
Is it that it's a guide to finding cops and that's generally something a mafia would be looking into? exactly. The last sentence just seems like you are trying to deflect suspicion by appealing to your main accuser by saying that you don't think he's scum either. I genuinely don't think he's scum. If I called him out as scum then you'd be saying I'm deflecting suspicion back to him? Also you included Kenpachi in there along with yourself and Gabe, the 3 main people under scrutiny at this point, which makes me think that you are trying to say something like "Oh, I don't think any of these people under scrutiny are scum right now. Let's just wipe the slate clean and start over guys." Also as stated by tree.hugger, you didn't offer anyone else except "I don't have a strong feeling for anyone but anyone who's posted once or twice this whole game just to agree/disagree is a good bet" well thats how I feel; better than FoSing a dude I don't feel strongly about | ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
Oceanic meapak Hesmyrr infundibulum Please take a good look at these people especially infun. Votes came off him way too easily and the people who voted for him got mobbed immediately for the dumbest reasons. Cheers and at least u didnt get a blue | ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
| ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
On December 13 2010 06:06 LSB wrote: AFAIK Zeks is also increadibly scummy in the other games he plays. What other games have I been scum in? | ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
Where the hell are you getting that from? | ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
On December 13 2010 06:28 Gabriel wrote: What? im not good at English but you just wrote: What other games have I been scum in? Meaning in what past games have I been scum? Reading into things too much? | ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
Zeks hasn't joined Team Mafia yet! (Most illigit lynch ever, but hey... could be slipup) By that I would've stopped joining games at this game then, but i joined HP mafia right after RAM: Zeks was inactive, non-comittal Harry Potter Mafia: Zeks has done nothing to contribute to the town and only talks about his own mayoral campagain. PYP2retty scummy from what I remember TL Mafia XXX: I dunno, I died quiet early. Glares at Infun PYP2 I was 3rd party...and i killed a scum day 1 lol TL Mafia XXX I died day 2 from scum RAM: Remind me what game that was? HP Mafia: My mayor campaign is already the best contribution in addition the games you didn't play with me TL Mafia XXVIII I played a huge role as the mad hatter getting BC and SouthRawrea Godfather - I was town played pretty mediocre | ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
| ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
If you are thinking about ever winning you need to hunt scum right now | ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
On December 12 2010 15:33 Gabriel wrote: What is done, is done. Right now the best for us is Gabriel's random lists (absolutely random and out of nowhere). Rolecheck list: + Show Spoiler + Eiii DCLXVI Hesmyrr Protection list: + Show Spoiler + node d3_crescentia jcarlsoniv Voltorb list: + Show Spoiler + tree.hugger dimnsab deconduo I'm really wondering if this was truly random or some meaning to it. You're doing no one any good from RNGing these lists - (Voltorb on decon and tree.hugger really?) and for someone who wanted me dead so badly I'd suspect you put me on the Rolecheck list (unless you think I'm the Godfather) or at least the Voltorb list. The whole purpose of you posting that was to try to wrongly dictate blue moves (very anti-town). On December 12 2010 15:37 Hesmyrr wrote: Okay, I do have to address before I go away. What is purpose of randomizing either of three actions again, when good PR can yield better results by intelligent decision making? Also wtf are you producing random results when you can simply tell the PR to use RNG to determine their results, which is FAR better method than using this "random" result of yours. Although I think this is somewhat suspicious too as Hesmyrr was on the rolecheck list and immediately he tried to dismiss Gabriel's random lists' validity - perhaps he has something to hide. Overall RNGing your actions is terrible so I don't know why its been suggested. Make informative decisions! Listen to the sound arguments, protect our assets and punish the suspicious. I am getting extremely suspicious of you Gabriel after looking at the people who died and their posts. Out of the initial 6 people who were threatening you, by far jcarlson and Meapak had the most compelling arguments, with Kenpachi being aggressive; quite a coincidence that they're all dead now. In fact the other 3 that had voted for you: dinsmab: In your list you wanted to bomb him Eiii: Heavy retaliation against his accusation - and he's in your list of DT check (trying to suggest he's scum) Brocket: Don't remember what you've done to him but plenty of people trying to discredit him as a poster by calling him a fake-newb/smurf whatever - I actually think he's pretty logical in his posting. Basically you've got rid of / placed suspicion on everyone who voted for you in the beginning. On top of that right as you get heat you divert it all to me based on a couple of weak slip-ups and immediately you bandwagons gone. As you best put it: Three posts later im the cleanest guy in the town. Throw me a bone here please. When Gabriel gets bandwagoned people say they have trouble understanding why and that the arguments were weak When I get bandwagoned he becomes god and no one questions his accusations against me. Fair enough I hope this gives you guys a reason to give this guy a vote tonight And should we vote in double lynch? | ||
| ||