TL Mafia XXXVI
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
| ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
Alright, it's time to get some activity going in here. What do you guys think about lynching inactives in the first day? Although, there is only a slim chance of us catching mafia, it would encourage people to post more and the more that mafia post, the greater the chance that they will slip up. | ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
On January 23 2011 11:34 LSB wrote: It points to people outside of 31 players that play in the game For example, who is ??? what's the point of discussing the clue to that then? | ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
On January 23 2011 11:39 Kavdragon wrote: Lynching inactives is a tactic to start a discussion. I don't think that we will need to do this, because we will have clues to look at, and a mayor to elect. That should be starter enough to get the information we need to lynch scum. No, I am not doing this only to start discussion. I want to encourage activity and make sure that no one lurks in this game. | ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
| ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
Hmm so far I don't really like any of the candidates. RoL didn't bring much of a platform. DrH, uggh how many times has he lead us astray us town leader? Kavdragon, I don't really like the things he is advocating for. Anyone else want to run for mayor? | ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
On January 24 2011 13:24 DoctorHelvetica wrote: Once. I was only scum mayor once and it was my first game of my mafia about a year ago. I am not talking about you as a mayor, I mean as a town leader in general. I mean take a look at Salem mafia. I think that you are still a better candidate than kavdragon though, and if no one else steps up I will vote for you. And Almost 1500 post, not sure if I can do any long post for my 1500th post as we have only gotten started, but don't expect me to post for a while. | ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
It would be well worth it if you can trade the mayor for 1 scum, it would be even better if you can trade for 2 but that's highly unlikely. Also, making greens volunteer to be bodyguard is such an ANTI-TOWN PLAN. It would let mafia be able to narrow down who is blue from those who did not volunteer. Well I'm off for tonight. | ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
| ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
Woot, looks like RoL is now seriously running RoL for mayor everyone! And I seriously don't want to have kavdragon for mayor. He is pushing for a scummy plan right from the beginning with the bodyguard volunteering. It has already been covered by multiple people why that is a bad idea. Even if only 4 people volunteered, that still narrows down the list of blues. And there is still the same chance of picking mafia as before(mafia can just volunteer). There is no advantage to town whatsover to volunteering bodyguard. | ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
That is who are you going to lynch/plans whatever. and RoL since you are back, how are you planning on choosing your bodyguard, and who are you going to lynch first day? | ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
On January 25 2011 13:01 Kavdragon wrote: A word on policy: Should the Mason contact the mayor night one? This would ensure that masons survive the night, though it's unlikely that the mason, and his convertee are both killed. Other than that, the mayor would then be able to entrust any other information with the original mason. (For instance, my role, any information on blues I have, and vise versa.) Note that while the Mason would be a confirmed townie, the mayor would not be confirmed. Thus the flow of information should only go to the mason, who should not pass it to anyone else unless extreme conditions warrant it. Perhaps with time, the mayor will build enough trust that he can be entrusted with information that the mason has, but I'm not going to assume that. This seems the best plan to me, but I'm looking at it from the mayor's position. Anyone have any problems with this? I'm sorry but this just sounds bad(once again). You are basically putting everything into the hands of the mayor. It is not likely that mafia will find masons during the first day. The disadvantages far outweights the advantages of this plan. | ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
On January 25 2011 13:15 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Kav, my entire platform is not to put all your eggs in one potentially scum basket. By revolving everything around the mayor you are dooming the town. Stop with the stupidity. I am leaning towards Amber[LighT] for my Day 1 lynch. Why Amber[Light]? kitaman, I would rather not depend on clues over post analysis. And fine, if you think the clue leads to him, and want him lynched for the first day. Don't you already have kavdragon's support? Why discuss it further if kav has already decided to lynch him? | ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
On January 26 2011 09:24 bumatlarge wrote: Ok then, Stupid idea. Crossing my fingers on Kav. Mostly my fault for not being here for a bit. Or you can always vote RoL | ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
and obviously kav is going to check the number of mafias tonight right? Next day, I think it might be more beneficial to check the number of SK's. | ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
On January 26 2011 14:33 LunarDestiny wrote: But if Kav tells town about how many SK are there, it will help mafia as well. If Kav only checks mafia every night, then it will only benefit town and SK. But I doubt SK threatens town more than mafia threatens town. And how will that help mafia as well? Mafia can already guess the number of SK's from the # of KP per night. | ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
Still I would like to see his response. | ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
On January 27 2011 14:16 BrownBear wrote: If anyone took a hit, now would be your time to claim. Also, right now I think the most obvious clue was pointed out already by LD: That's a pretty damning point directly to Nemesis. I do agree that we shouldn't lynch based purely off of clues though. Right now, who I'm thinking of voting for is either Nem or bum. I have voted for Nemesis for the time being, but that is definitely open to change depending on the situation. sigh, do I even have to point out why this analysis is crap? Fine, I guess I will. First of all, the clues are divided into two parts: the two seperate deaths. That means that the clues in the first night points to two different people. Now if you look at the statements that he took from the clues, those are spread out all over the place in the day post. They can be found in both deaths. So unless you are saying that both clues point to me, then that part of your clue analysis is crap. Second of all, this one is just a bit of speculation on how clues work, but the italicized parts and the bold parts feel a bit like red herring. If you look at Night 0's clue, none of the actual clues are found within the italicized parts. Third of all, that kind of feels forced. Well I don't necessarily blame you since you probably don't really understand what my quote is from, and what a reality marble is. A reality marble is magic that forces the reality in your mind to come to life in the real world. So using real as a clue to point to me is rather farfetched. And I just had to facepalm when you bolded really. That just kind of seems too forced. To people doing clue analysis, I would suggest to take a look at Night 0's clues. Since there are a lot of crap analysis going on right now. The clues from night 0 are the "duct tape" which was straight from Qatol's quote. The clues are pretty straightforward. Don't try and look for things which might be related to something in people's profile. For example, someone has a picture of a character from a movie. Then there was something in the clue that could be related to that movie but to a different character in the movie. Mods won't go that far to make the clues as vague as possible. Remember that the clue is directly related to the Profile, not second-hand relation. I don't really have time to delve hardcore into this day's clue right now, but let me just give you what I could find in a short amount of time. And there in the clearing, in the moonlight, Meapak_Ziph runs at full speed, jumping over roots, snapping aside branches. And close behind him a black shape, only a blur in the darkness, gaining, about to grab, only a hand-length away... From Gmarshal's profile As for the second kill, all I could find so far was this: I followed TheAldo. And as I ran my knife across his throat, no one was there to help him. From Kitaman's Profile: "Keeper Yes, my lord; But yet I cannot help you." "Surveyor 'If,' quoth he, 'I for this had been committed, As, to the Tower, I thought, I would have play'd The part my father meant to act upon The usurper Richard; who, being at Salisbury, Made suit to come in's presence; which if granted, As he made semblance of his duty, would Have put his knife to him.'" Now obviously I haven't read all of kitaman's profile so I'm not really sure if I'm taking those out of context. I'll read it when I have the time, but if someone who knows the story there can help me if anything could be related to the clues, I would appreciate it. And of course lynching based on clues alone would be stupid unless the clues are pretty damning, so I will hold out on my vote for now. | ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
On January 27 2011 15:32 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Oh and how many mafia did you census Kavdragon? Its important! 5 mafia according to him. | ||
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
If you are going to lynch me, at least have a better reason than LD's clue analysis. I have already pointed out why his analysis is crap. Bolding "really" to point out to Reality Marble. "Flash of steel gun" as pointing out to Flash in my profile. -.- Really, you think that Flash refers to GOD YOUNG HO's ID? And using "blood" to relate it to my profile again which seems to be a theme in all the post so far. If you think, I'm scum, say why. I feel like clues just let people FoS someone without giving a good reason for their votes. | ||
| ||