|
/confirm
"Alternatively he could have a change of heart and post normally, but I don't see that happening."
As a matter of fact, it is happening! Ver is my witness, but he is not playing! Argh! After the last game I played, I told Ver that I would play a serious game. Also, since there are no flips -- I can not afford to act crazy because that will just confuse the town. My death can't explain anything. So, I will avoid riddles and equivocal communication.
If town does decide to lynch me, I will most likely play crazy in more games to come. Last time I attempted to play the sane game, I was shot on day 1. That game I decided to play normally, because I was tried of trolling (trolled the two games prior -- trolling is a tiring task).
There is no pms this game -- more the reason for me to play sane. I cannot have any hidden agendas. So, that leaves me with the option of analyzing scum in the open -- which i typically never do.
Things I noticed about my scum analysis abilities:
I find I typically good at analyzing people in the shadows where there isn't much spotlight on them. A flaw I have is that I have trouble discriminating people with blues roles vs being red. I find I can spot non-roles vs roles rather easily. However, this game we don't know the roles nor how many, Everyone could have a role. But I know this isn't true. Of course, GM will say to ignore such matters. But for me roles have major impact on playing style, thus cannot be neglected in analysis. Ever hear of a role schema? If someone is given a role -- they will play that role. A clever player will try to pretend to be another role.. but let's hope we can see through such attempts.
No flips = DO NOT BE BROWN. In this game, everyone must be clear and straightforward. We must avoid typical scum hunting tatics. Do Not Lie to gain information. Do Not Lie to get someone to react in the thread. Do Not act crazy. Answer all questions directly. If you do not want to reveal information, then state that you don't feel comfortable providing such information. Do not ignore people. Not in this setup.
This is a new game.
|
On June 25 2011 13:35 GMarshal wrote: Why does no one comment on my post?
I take it from the silence that we are all ok with lynching Chez then, right? No one seems to be complaining...
And my policies are now accepted by all, right? The policy is unacceptable.
GMarshal, I know this question may seem to be irrelevant, but I will explain why I asked this question after you have answered it. What is your favorite mafia moment?
|
On June 25 2011 19:04 sandroba wrote: Shit, I'm so excited for this game, even though this is pretty much going to be impossible. I've thought a lot about this and came to the conclusion that mafia's optimal strat is going to be defending their team without fear, since no flips mean they keep hidden even after a scum lynch. Regarding the lynch, it's pretty obvious that we should try to agree on a lynch every day cycle, as the lynch is town kp and should not be wasted. A no lynch day is not acceptable at all and people that refuse to make a stand should be persecuted. About claims: you should only claim if you are about to get lynched or if you found enough mafia to make it worth it. I want to propose that anyone that claims without a damn good reason should be insta-lynched. This setup is even worse than normal, mafia has even a better edge on information, so if you claim you better have a pretty good reason. Also mafia can probably get away with bulshit claims without any repercusions so just don't fucking claim.
Ok so now down to business, I thought chezinu was insane, what's up with the straight foward post? I'm suspicious and dissapointed at the same time.
Reasons for saneness as i stated earlier:This is not your typical game, there are no pms, there are no-flips, and Ver was disappointed that I'm not living up to my full potential.
Your disappointed suspicious of me: Why the soft-accusation of me being suspicious? You disappointed that you can't accuse me as mafia for an easy lynch?
Why so angry? The curse words in your post makes you sound angry, are you?
What is your impression of GM?
|
On June 25 2011 19:12 Scamp wrote: /Confirm
I must disagree with a lot of what Radfield says. It really seems like he wants to steer us to a no-lynch.
Ok, here is the plan. Me, you, and Legendary are going on a special ops mission. You need to blow their defensive and Legendary will protect himself while I attract attention. It seems night 0 will be very important for town.
Note: this is not equivocal communication nor a riddle. It is a restricted code.
|
On June 25 2011 19:29 sandroba wrote: @chezinu I'm suspiciously dissapointed. I'd rather be fooled all game and get entertained than get an easy mafia day1 and miss out on chez awesomeness. Pretty sad you are sane mafia this game =/ GM does not find your behaviour suspicious so I guess he's mafia with you? Great answer. Suspicion cleared.
|
On June 25 2011 19:42 sandroba wrote: Can I ask you the same? You pretty much shaped up after GM called for your lynch on his first post. What's your opinion on him so far? Leaning mafia. I think he will probably die tonight.
|
On June 25 2011 13:32 Fishball wrote:Show nested quote +On June 25 2011 13:27 Ace wrote: Everyone should have gotten a role PM. If you didn't send myself or YM a PM asap. Game *officially* starts in 23.5 hours, but you can start discussing things now.
REMEMBER WE START AT NIGHT 0!
Good Luck! Can't we just start the blood shed now. This is boring. I think night 0 is going to be big!
|
On June 26 2011 01:36 GMarshal wrote:Show nested quote +On June 25 2011 15:03 Chezinu wrote:On June 25 2011 13:35 GMarshal wrote: Why does no one comment on my post?
I take it from the silence that we are all ok with lynching Chez then, right? No one seems to be complaining...
And my policies are now accepted by all, right? The policy is unacceptable. GMarshal, I know this question may seem to be irrelevant, but I will explain why I asked this question after you have answered it. What is your favorite mafia moment? I won't pretend to know your reasoning, but I'll answer your question. I think my favorite moment was probably watching people (notably bill murray, smurfing as gryfindor) react to my cell organization plan in mafia XXXVII. I also really enjoyed being a Mole in PTP, particularly forcing the Palmar mislynch, as I felt that was the first time I really successfully pushed a lynch. I look forward to hearing your reasoning behind the question. I was going to go with "Seeing I got VT as my role in any game" but I feel like that would be a cheap answer to an interesting question. Also what is your favorite mafia moment? ^_^ Show nested quote +On June 25 2011 14:56 GGQ wrote:On June 25 2011 13:35 GMarshal wrote: Why does no one comment on my post?
I take it from the silence that we are all ok with lynching Chez then, right? No one seems to be complaining...
And my policies are now accepted by all, right? Sure, I have one major problem that leaps out immediately from your policies. Your policy number one is to ignore all role claims. Your policy number two is based on specifically NOT ignoring a role claim. Wuddup wit dat? In a more general sense, I have a problem with your policy of having policies. I find policies restrictive and in my experience different situations require situational judgement. If you want to stress that role claims are very unreliable in this setup and we should be highly skeptical of them, I approve. If you want to make a "policy" that we all have to ignore them, I disapprove. The reason behind the conflict between policy 1 and 2, is that the town is pretty much unable to ignore a DT claim, especially considering how vociferous some DTs can be. With that policy we have a clear guideline of how to handle these situations. Am I going to adhere to them strictly? No, I'm not, but having them there discourages actions we don't want to see. I don't want anyone claiming, since its essentially all WIFOM, by establishing this policy I keep people from claiming without excellent reasons, as they know they will most likely be ignored if they do. The same goes with the DT policy, by doing this I avoid any kind of shenanigans where mafia decides to claim DT. Obviously we aren't going to adhere to these policies no matter what, but by establishing them as the basic procedure we follow, barring exceptional circumstances, we basically avoid those situations. Would you like it better if I called them "guidlines" rather than "policies'? I just feel like the word policy carries more weight. Addressing Radfeild, I fully agree with killing an inactive/lurker day 1, and am opposed to no lynching, just on principle. Sure with a no flip setup its going to be difficult to obtain as much information from the lynch as it would be in a open flip setup, but if we don't lynch then our chances of hitting scum are 0. If we do lynch and we analyze, then they are significantly higher than zero. To win we need to kill scum, not lynching does not lead to killing scum, it just gives scum more time to shoot at the town. Yes, sure they only have one KP, but the more we no-lynch the easier time they have controlling the lynch. Also if people want to see games with majority lynch, I do believe the first PYPs required a majority to lynch. This is a mechanic almost as significant as no flip, so really pay attention to it.
The reason behind the question was to initiate small talk. I was hoping to get a conversation started where the atmosphere was relax. That way your guard would be down and I could get a good feel of your posting tendencies. However, you decided to go to sleep last night so I didn't have anyone to talk to..
As for my favorite moment in mafia... geez, so many! I will have to answer this more broadly. My favorite moments in mafia is when everyone in the game thinks I'm horrible or crazy and then I used my super abilities and shock the town. That and Trolling, making stories, videos, riddles, encrypted codes, hidden messages, establishing my own top secret groups, dodging lynches at the last second, random voting, being unreadable, creating games within games, redefining the normal approach to the game, being on the suspect list the entire game and not dying, taunting mafia as town, taunting town as mafia, PM land, taunting in pm land, pretending I have bombs or am some imba role which I have never ever gotten.. just you wait.. pm threat letters, killing to form a message, escaping death when it seems all is lost, making pictures..../sigh I love this game../cry its been so nice to me... It would be a shame if someone decides to kill me..
|
Suicidal and Legendary, What are YALL doing?
PS: Also, great job on that mafia hit!
|
On June 27 2011 17:42 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Chezinu are we going back to those code names you devised literally like 20 games ago? You can call me Corps!
The first and second poster have been killed. That means they have a high probably of having a blue role or being red. Knowing that mafia killed one means that we have lost a special role.. . However, if by chance a town aligned or third party member killed the other player, there could be a chance that a mafia has been killed. So, Fishball how do you feel about this?
|
Caller role analysis?
+ Show Spoiler +On June 27 2011 07:25 Caller wrote: just popped in to say two things
if Radfield doesn't die by night 2 he's scum and Scamp is mafia
^^ On June 27 2011 08:38 Caller wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2011 07:37 GMarshal wrote:On June 27 2011 07:25 Caller wrote: just popped in to say two things
if Radfield doesn't die by night 2 he's scum and Scamp is mafia
^^ And where do you get that Scamp is mafia? Just curious as to your reasoning ^_^ because im the boss and everyone should know it next question i can do this shit all day On June 27 2011 12:55 Caller wrote: post already i want to see all the people that i have personally shot to death. with my bare two hands.
thats right. i shoot people to death with my hands. My fingernails bypass medic protection and the only thing harder than the force that they hit with is my penis. On June 27 2011 12:59 Caller wrote: also i'm claiming Drive-By Shooter which is a shooting role where I pick three people and the following three verbs: shoot, save, sodomize. So tonight expect one person to die, one person to be saved, and one person to be waking up the next morning wondering just what they ate last night. Possibly not in that order. On June 27 2011 13:16 Caller wrote: oh wow ggq, sorry bro, if i had known that sodomy left your anus open enough to make you "annihlated" i woulda not brought that horse in. also ace you gave me a buggy role where is my shot and my save
Could all the vulgarity be a requirement of his role?
|
On June 27 2011 18:53 Radfield wrote:Show nested quote +On June 25 2011 19:47 Chezinu wrote:On June 25 2011 19:42 sandroba wrote: Can I ask you the same? You pretty much shaped up after GM called for your lynch on his first post. What's your opinion on him so far? Leaning mafia. I think he will probably die tonight. Hi Chez. Did you kill GM last night? Negative.
|
oops, I typed it inside the quote..
On June 27 2011 20:51 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2011 17:47 Chezinu wrote:On June 27 2011 17:42 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Chezinu are we going back to those code names you devised literally like 20 games ago? You can call me Corps! The first and second poster have been killed. That means they have a high probably of having a blue role or being red. Knowing that mafia killed one means that we have lost a special role.. . However, if by chance a town aligned or third party member killed the other player, there could be a chance that a mafia has been killed. So, Fishball how do you feel about this? You say that like it was coordinated. What do you know we don't?
I know my role and I have intuitive abilities that have been refined past experiences in mafia. As for the rest that I know, I do not feel comfortable fully answering your question.
|
On June 27 2011 21:37 Amber[LighT] wrote: Okay first off anyone who is suggesting that there is a serial killer is automatically getting an FoS today. You're just introducing more unnecessary discussion into a chaotic setup. Have no fear, there's a plan to clear this crap up. If you have a pro-town KP role, don't fucking use it tonight. Consider tonight a day off from your ability. Unless you're some compulsive vigilante this shouldn't be a problem. Assuming there is only 1 night kill tonight we can safely say there is NO serial killer.
On to more important things: The Lynch
We know that there needs to be a majority lynch, the magic number today is 9. Here's what we should do. Build a case against, AT THE MOST, 2 players. This should be done within the first 24 hours. Have some good arguments ready because the town will pressure you by asking WHY we should lynch the person you're suspecting. Once we have a general idea of the two players we want to lynch we settle it over a vote. This guarantees that one player will be lynched.
A couple of rules when voting should be established: 1. Do not vote for yourself 2. Do not vote for someone to essentially avoid confrontation or to "save your vote." 3. Try to vote once and stick with it.
If you are protown you should abide by these rules. If you're scum you are highly encouraged to break these rules. Townies caught breaking these rules will die, and I will not feel sorry when we lose due to idiocy.
Lurking will get you killed, so don't try it.
I'll post suspects when I'm ready, it's really too early to just throw names out there.
How will townies die if they break the rules? How will it be enforced? A vigi kill.. oh wait.. I guess rule breakers will live another day! How will lurkers get killed? Wait.. is there a day vigi? Don't Shoot!
|
On June 28 2011 02:30 Fishball wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2011 23:30 deconduo wrote:On June 27 2011 21:43 deconduo wrote: Unless I see them step up their posting significantly, I would suggest Fishball/Caller for today. No use keeping them around to crap up the thread. On June 27 2011 23:23 Fishball wrote:On June 27 2011 18:26 deconduo wrote: Fishball and Caller have been totally useless, and I'm waiting to see if LSB has anything to say. These are the people that should be up for lynching today. In a no reveal setup, anyone thats just fucking around without giving of any reads needs to die.
Such a hypocrite, and daft to boot. Although after what you displayed in PYP3, I expected nothing less from you. Or do you have a different agenda? Oh well, time will tell. -Super defensive -Resorting to (bad) personal attacks -Still hasn't contributed. Has Fishball stepped up his posting? Nope. ##Vote Fishball Me? Defensive? lol. (Bad) personal attacks? I only speak the truth. So if I start using the "shit"™ word, you'll start crying to mommy right? Contribute, contribute, contribute. I'm sick of these puny accusations every game. Not making a 12893019 word analysis does not mean not contributing; I'm constantly thinking how scummy you're acting, for real.##Vote deconduo
I love you fishball!!! Finally someone else is speaking the Truth!
+ Show Spoiler +On June 11 2010 06:36 Chezinu wrote: He called my post useless... I don't like that word.. I asked people in the past after playing games where people call my posts "useless" I never get an answer... On May 17 2011 06:47 Chezinu wrote: define useless...exactly.. no one really knows... at least no one has yet to inform me.. You see you have to entertain the crowds and win them over. For instance, let's say i want people to keep me around and want to form bonds of friendship... + Show Spoiler +There are some older posts of me saying the very same thing, you can dig them up if you want!
I don't want to think of you has a mafia player.. I likes you too much, I'll just pretend your a vigi,
|
#vote Amber[LighT]
made it!
|
ilovejohn does make sense.. he was the 3rd person to confirm..
|
So is this what we have so far?
RebirthOfLeGenD ilovejonn GMarshal sandroba Amber[LighT] LSB deconduo Caller Palmar BloodyC0bbler Fishball Radfield Chezinu VisceraEyes Scamp GGQ Jackal58 Kurumi
|
Is this better?
RebirthOfLeGenD ilovejonn - was third to confirm GMarshal - first to confirm and quite a few people suspected him sandroba - has been mean to me, disappointed that I'm not crazy enough to distract town and I don't really know this person.. Amber[LighT] LSB deconduo Caller - claimed blue Palmar BloodyC0bbler Fishball - was third to post Radfield - has been strange the whole game (though some argue he was only strange lately) Chezinu - town aligned VisceraEyes Scamp GGQ - 2nd to confirm Jackal58 - Don't really know that well and seems to not have a collective understand with the rest of the thread and what people think. Kurumi
|
##Vote Fishball
Why are you still alive? You seem fishy..
|
|
|
|