Pick Their Power Mafia 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 22 2011 14:17 bumatlarge wrote: put me in as a replacement please What a bum | ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 25 2011 07:53 Tackster wrote: It's my fault the messages are late - i invited our host to the movies and made him walk slowly home while explaining what horcruxes were and why severus isn't a dick... That be a mafia ploy... | ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
Has there ever been an instance where a mafia claimed day 1 in a game such as this? Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think there has. TL mafia players aren't ballsy enough to do something like that. You guys can yap all you want about these people being mafia, but while you do players like kitaman get a free ride as they make useless posts while pretending to be active. | ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 25 2011 13:37 chaos13 wrote: Sandroba, keeper of the wand My big question is why was he willing to hand out a KP so early on day 1? Unless he knew ON was town somehow, but with the deal of it being handed back to him, that seems highly unlikely. At first I would say he is town, because he was ready to hand the wand over to someone who flipped town instead of someone on his scum team. But then...nobody says that the keepers of the hallows and the collectors have to be on the same team. We really have no guarantee of this either way, but if we see Sand flip before Jackal, we can rest assured that they are not mafia together or Potter would have the wand now. In conclusion, I'm uncertain on him. This business has introduced a lot of wifom around Sand, and I've really got nowhere in writing out my thought process on him. In the First game, Palmar got fistpounds right off the bat. People don't really stop and think about these kinds of things.... Although considering the Batman/Joker duo in the first game, I wouldn't be surprised if we had a similar issue going on here. | ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 25 2011 15:02 Curu wrote: Dec stated people who failed to create roles were going to be modkilled though. And, judging from my own role, people who made up roles in five minutes are not all that uncommon . I don't see what Wiggles's issue is, can you clarify that for me Wiggles? What I said about the Hallows makes sense IMO since pure randomization really defeats the purpose of having the Hallows game sine you'd ensure they'd never be given away if they randomized into the hands of Mafia or malicious 3rd Party. Win conditions are surely not made up by the players themselves so I don't think dec would have put in an extra win condition for Voldy then made it a redundant one. @Foolishness It's already generating discussion. What behavior do we have to go off of atm? @Tackster I didn't say a thing about Jackal's claim being well founded. Can you point out to me where I ever said Jackal's claim is legit and I don't want to lynch him? All I said was I think he's 3rd Party rather than Mafia but that makes a good lynch too. And did you even bother to read OriginalName's role PM? He chooses people to Mason that changes each day, he doesn't start the game Masoned with a set someone. I don't see anyone making any arguments against Jackal based on his behavior thus far. I read through his posts and frankly there's nothing indicating that he needs to hang from the noose. I am not convinced that a mafia would roleclaim straight up on day 1, that's just an lol newbie move. Of course his responses tomorrow will greatly help us, but lynching him off of flavor text is like lynching off of day 1 clues. It never works, and inactives sit and mafia twiddle their thumbs. I decided to Start counting the number of posts where kitaman asks a question. I gave up because I was starting to run out of fingers. It would be nice to see him make a post longer than 2 lines. | ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 26 2011 05:31 redFF wrote: I Really don't understand why you guys are arguing against a free alignment Check. Thanks for making me immune to death the rest of the game bro...I Really appreciate it | ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 26 2011 06:05 sandroba wrote: @foolishness do you have anything to say on the matter? I assume you want a check on kita, is that right? No. I want to use our Killer powers to lynch Kita, I want someone to vigi Kurumi, and I want the check on Lanaia or Wiggles. Probably Wiggles. | ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
We use the Check on someone like Wiggles, and even if it turns up mafia, we still kill Kitaman (or Jackal if he comes back and can't explain himself). We need the check's information, but we should not act upon it today. | ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 26 2011 06:18 Curu wrote: And what's your reasoning behind that Foolishness? Why Lanaia or Wiggles, what have they done that stands out to you? Wiggles is probably an SK. Lanaia does not seeM to be posting with a pro-town state of mind. | ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 26 2011 06:30 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Jackal claimed ON was a red in disguise via his role, whereas ON claimed he was town. ON's role included a bit stating he had to kill HP. Regardless they were fighting for the same power items. It seems unlikely both are the same alignment, although they could be. Also, kita could have a good scum role? Everyone in this game could have a good scum role, that is not a valid reason to lynch someone. He asked questions and got shafted for it. That is far less scummy than a ton of day 1 rc's into creating this chaotic mess as of right now. Jackal did not claim ON was a red in disguise. Jackal did not say ON was mafia. Jackal did not say we should lynch ON. All he said was 'don't give the wand to him'. Read his posts if you don't believe me. On July 26 2011 06:31 Kurumi wrote: Foolishness please don't make roles for me while scratching Your balls. Love, Kurumi Love you too. On July 26 2011 06:30 heist wrote: Are you kidding me? How is his argument getting better and better? SS using his check gives us NO NEGATIVES. Who cares if he just says town? If he flips green, we'll have a load of confirmed townies. Even if town argues about the dt target, if SS even checks one of them, we'll be good. ITS BETTER THAN NOTHING. See I want to use the check but not act upon it just yet. However knowing the intelligence of this town so far that possibility is probably out the window in a Flash. There are a bunch of negatives because the town will misuse the information. | ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 26 2011 08:18 kitaman27 wrote: The OP says no posts restrictions are allowed in roles. Either 1) An exception to the rules was made for your role 2) You've created your own post restriction. If its the first, claim that you do indeed have a post restriction and if that is false, your role creator can counter claim that you are lying. If its the second, you are distracting town. Who cares what you are saying when you're posts are full of progamer names! lolz Your skill of reading between the lines (and the thread for that matter) is pretty Bogus | ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 18 2011 20:26 deconduo wrote: Penalties: In additon to picking a role for the person given you can send in a penalty as well. You will not know who you are picking the penalty for. Penalties are hidden and inactive initially and will activiate under Special circumstances through out the game. For example, if you reveal who you picked your role for or details about said role your penalty will activate. There are other ways to activate it as well. | ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 26 2011 20:16 bumatlarge wrote: I haven't read a word, someone update me? I'll try to read through this later today. Wiggles is a serial Killer, Lanaia and RedFF are good lynches but are sadly not going to get lynched. People are incapable of stepping into another persons' shoes (particularly BC's shoes) and seeing things from a different perspective. This leads to foolproof logic arguments of "you don't agree with me? you must be mafia!" which reminds me that if I don't believe in another persons' religion I'm automatically going to hell. | ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
In hell? Yes I bought a one Way ticket ages ago. | ||
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 26 2011 20:51 DropBear wrote: In fact, what makes Lanaia and redFF good lynches? Well right now my choices are between lynching based on flavor text, lynching a guy who's only suspicious because he can't stay Calm, and a policy lynch. Might as well just flip a coin. | ||
| ||