awwwwwyeahhhh.jpg
(shame about PMs though)
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
awwwwwyeahhhh.jpg (shame about PMs though) | ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
| ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
the hate against redff and drh is ill-advised, i think. their concerns are legitimate. drh is doing a better job of voicing them though. also heist wrote The heart of the matter is whether having a confirmed townie earlier is worth the risk of a less accurate vig shot. And the advantages are great, someone who can potentially point out suspicious claims, coordinate actions, provide a safe outlet for DT checks, etc those advantages don't exist if you're debating doing this plan day1 vs day2. in both cases, the person will be able to point out suspicious claims, coordinate actions, provide safe outlet for dt checks, just a day later. these advantages only exist if you're debating doing this plan vs not doing it at all. | ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
nobody can seriously feel threatened from a pressure vote, so there's no 'pressure' it's just a throwaway vote | ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
On August 03 2011 02:09 Mig wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2011 01:41 JeeJee wrote: pressure votes are stupid, where did this trend come from? you know when you say "yeah this is a pressure vote", that's pretty much equivalent to "idk who to vote so i'm voting you, but i'm not actually suspicious of you because all you need to do is say something and i'll remove my vote from you". nobody can seriously feel threatened from a pressure vote, so there's no 'pressure' it's just a throwaway vote JeeJee you are correct on this point but what exactly does pointing it out contribute? You have 2 posts and both of them while correct are bland and useless. You commented on pressure votes and neglected to comment on whether you actually thought varp was scummy or not. Who do you think is scum? What do you think about the 2 leading candidates varp/red? it points out the fact that sandro's vote isn't a real vote. apparently not everybody realizes that pressure votes are a joke. i think both of those candidates are a stupid idea. red is being ragged on due to him opposing a tempting plan, but not one without faults. his concerns are legitimate. claiming over-defensiveness as a scum-tell is something i particularly dislike, having been lynched for it multiple times as a townie. further, the people pushing him are useless people like minii who just jump on the hate with zero reasoning whatsoever. the extent of minii's posts are as follows: On August 02 2011 16:26 youngminii wrote: fairly certain redff is scum he's playing exactly like that other game where i was scum with him i'm sorry red but your scum play is so obvious Fin. varp is being ragged on due to wishy-washness. i just re-read his posts, and the tldr progression is as follows -vigi dont shoot on hunches -be active -no problems re dayvig plan -realizes its better to delay or outright not do the plan due to stacked hits -random fos on trotske i see re-evaluation there, not wishy-washiness. do you see otherwise? random fos are just as useless as pressure votes. sandro and varp are both bad in that department as far as i'm concerned. by itself though, it doesn't mean much, and there's nothing else yet. as for me, i don't have scum leanings on anyone. town leans yes, scum leans no. | ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
| ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
usually when people say 'lurking is a scumtell', i disagree because they clump 'afk' and 'lurk' as interchangeable. afking means nothing as far as i'm concerned, just look at ace in snmm5. lurking (ie being there but not speaking) a la drazerk is a different story. still not voting, but i'll be here before the deadline tomorrow, no worries. | ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
anyone disagree with drazerk as a candidate? | ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
On August 04 2011 02:18 TheAwesomeAll wrote: why is the amount of votes on a person a reason? rather vote on real scum like jeejee. On August 04 2011 03:34 TheAwesomeAll wrote: Ok JeeJee, since you are probably not going to get lynched im going to hit you tonight. Unless you can convince me of your own innocence, and someone else's scummyness (yes im trigger happy) reading is a useful talent toi have. On August 04 2011 03:34 BloodyC0bbler wrote: shinbi had no scum leanings, then in 10 hours without posting serious reasons he sheeps onto something I say to try and force a bandwagon on a player? Not only that, rather than push said bandwagon with any conviction, he makes his move then vanishes from the thread completely since. As such, until he reappears to explain his actions I am throwing my vote there. vote jeejee i sheeped on you? that's news to me, considering i was the first one to bring up drazerk. i still think the case against varp is terrible. it's pretty much equivalent to redff's case, which is equally bad. drazerk is still deliberately avoiding this thread while posting in others but sadly not enough people care. seems to be off to a wonderful start. | ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
| ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
| ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
surprising, although the flip doesn't make the argument against varp any less shitty | ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
as far as i see, it's the same argument as was against redff, except with pointless meta thrown in. correct me? | ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
On August 04 2011 07:51 DoctorHelvetica wrote: why are you being so antagonistic jeejee? we found a scum yet you're still basically opposing his lynch. there were reasons don't try to discredit this it wasn't all luck how am i being antagonistic and to whom? yeah, there were reasons for his lynch, but they weren't good ones. your analysis is marred by results. if he had flipped town you'd be "oh well they weren't the best of reasons but its day one anyway". the reasons you listed apply to redff just as much | ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
On August 04 2011 07:59 DoctorHelvetica wrote: No, I would have said he played scummy as hell because he did. Right away from his first post I thought "ok that looks like scum posturing" and he continued that throughout the whole thread. They weren't objective reasons, that's not what drives scumhunting it's about understanding what scum try to accomplish and how they do it differently than town and he had all the warning signs man k i hope you mistyped objective/subjective but if not.. if you do your scumhunting subjectively how do you expect others to agree? that's the dumbest thing i've ever heard. you state a behaviour and an objective interpretation/reasoning for it. not go with your hunches. | ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
| ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
On August 05 2011 08:29 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Ok, to start with I believe of the remaining 3 scum, jeejee is one of them. I say this for a few reasons. He defended Varpulis. However, he didn’t commit to this defense, he posted one near the very beginning of the bandwagon on him then never touched on the issue once it became a solid lynch. His defense of varpulis Show nested quote + On August 03 2011 02:41 JeeJee wrote: On August 03 2011 02:09 Mig wrote: On August 03 2011 01:41 JeeJee wrote: pressure votes are stupid, where did this trend come from? you know when you say "yeah this is a pressure vote", that's pretty much equivalent to "idk who to vote so i'm voting you, but i'm not actually suspicious of you because all you need to do is say something and i'll remove my vote from you". nobody can seriously feel threatened from a pressure vote, so there's no 'pressure' it's just a throwaway vote JeeJee you are correct on this point but what exactly does pointing it out contribute? You have 2 posts and both of them while correct are bland and useless. You commented on pressure votes and neglected to comment on whether you actually thought varp was scummy or not. Who do you think is scum? What do you think about the 2 leading candidates varp/red? it points out the fact that sandro's vote isn't a real vote. apparently not everybody realizes that pressure votes are a joke. i think both of those candidates are a stupid idea. red is being ragged on due to him opposing a tempting plan, but not one without faults. his concerns are legitimate. claiming over-defensiveness as a scum-tell is something i particularly dislike, having been lynched for it multiple times as a townie. further, the people pushing him are useless people like minii who just jump on the hate with zero reasoning whatsoever. the extent of minii's posts are as follows: On August 02 2011 16:26 youngminii wrote: fairly certain redff is scum he's playing exactly like that other game where i was scum with him i'm sorry red but your scum play is so obvious Fin. varp is being ragged on due to wishy-washness. i just re-read his posts, and the tldr progression is as follows -vigi dont shoot on hunches -be active -no problems re dayvig plan -realizes its better to delay or outright not do the plan due to stacked hits -random fos on trotske i see re-evaluation there, not wishy-washiness. do you see otherwise? random fos are just as useless as pressure votes. sandro and varp are both bad in that department as far as i'm concerned. by itself though, it doesn't mean much, and there's nothing else yet. as for me, i don't have scum leanings on anyone. town leans yes, scum leans no. Note that rather than draw emphasis to the posts of those accusing varpulis, or any of varps posts he just sums the series of posts varp made up. I would normally say that this is a moot point, however he did opt to find it worth quoting posts in relation to redff. Why would you defend two people within one post but only bring attention to specific posts on one bandwagon? Possibly moot, but definitely not normal. minii was hating on red, not varp. if he were hating on varp, i'd have put him in the varp category. it doesn't matter who he is hating when the hate is ill-founded given that he hasn't provided any reasons for it His next post is 7 hours later saying Hi to drazerk. Followed by 3 hours later appearing to take off on a post that I had made an hour before his post. actually it was asking drazerk a question, showing that he is indeed avoiding the thread, even questions directly addressed to him that can be answered in five seconds Show nested quote + On August 03 2011 12:30 JeeJee wrote: looks like cobbles picked up on the same thing i have. what particularly irks me about drazerk today is that he has been posting in the other mafia thread on his usual time of 5-10kst +/-1hr so he has been reading this thread as well. but he declined to weigh in, leaving his vote as-is (essentially throwaway). didnt even answer a simple "how are you" =( usually when people say 'lurking is a scumtell', i disagree because they clump 'afk' and 'lurk' as interchangeable. afking means nothing as far as i'm concerned, just look at ace in snmm5. lurking (ie being there but not speaking) a la drazerk is a different story. still not voting, but i'll be here before the deadline tomorrow, no worries. This post is the first one that seriously tries to move a bandwagon away from varpulis. This is done by first using my name as a “backup” as well as using a lot of out of thread reasoning. He then refuses to vote as he will be around for the deadline. Moments later he makes a post saying screw it, and votes. Now, as someone who mentioned early in the thread he doesn’t believe in pressure voting, we know that this vote is meant to be solid “I believe this person is scum”. We also know that as of roughly 10 hours before he voted he had no scum leanings on any player. How is it that someone who has been moderately inactive much like himself, is suddenly sure of the guilt of another player when his reasoning is “inactivity in this thread but active outside of it” He couldn’t find anything in thread? Or in irc to help. because it's actually pretty damn scummy when someone is reading the thread but refusing to weigh-in, particularly when his arguments were all shot down and he is throwing away his vote, with the deadline looming. i can't believe you said they weren't serious reasons He then spends the next bit of time after the lynch to accuse players of bad logic, spam, and refusal to even defend himself from general accusations. He attacks my accusation that I made of him by saying “I brought him up first” when all he had done previously was say “hi how are you” to drazerk. Overall he has had 17-18 posts all game where a fair majority of them have been spam or generally unhelpful / noncommittal. the general accusations against me were bad, why would i acknowledge them? like i said, i've been lynched for being overly defensive before. apparently shutting down arguments that nobody can possibly believe is more scummy than just ignoring them. responses in bold/red. as for claims,i think it's a good idea. unless you just happen to have a reasonable explanation for the missing KP. hell, even if mig's mafia, he can't just kill off all blues and hope nobody notices -- and him dying would cut mafia kp in half. lucid/red are being unreasonable imo. yeah nothing is 100%, but it's much more likely mig being town than mafia | ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
On August 05 2011 09:48 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2011 09:19 JeeJee wrote: On August 05 2011 08:29 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Ok, to start with I believe of the remaining 3 scum, jeejee is one of them. I say this for a few reasons. He defended Varpulis. However, he didn’t commit to this defense, he posted one near the very beginning of the bandwagon on him then never touched on the issue once it became a solid lynch. His defense of varpulis On August 03 2011 02:41 JeeJee wrote: On August 03 2011 02:09 Mig wrote: On August 03 2011 01:41 JeeJee wrote: pressure votes are stupid, where did this trend come from? you know when you say "yeah this is a pressure vote", that's pretty much equivalent to "idk who to vote so i'm voting you, but i'm not actually suspicious of you because all you need to do is say something and i'll remove my vote from you". nobody can seriously feel threatened from a pressure vote, so there's no 'pressure' it's just a throwaway vote JeeJee you are correct on this point but what exactly does pointing it out contribute? You have 2 posts and both of them while correct are bland and useless. You commented on pressure votes and neglected to comment on whether you actually thought varp was scummy or not. Who do you think is scum? What do you think about the 2 leading candidates varp/red? it points out the fact that sandro's vote isn't a real vote. apparently not everybody realizes that pressure votes are a joke. i think both of those candidates are a stupid idea. red is being ragged on due to him opposing a tempting plan, but not one without faults. his concerns are legitimate. claiming over-defensiveness as a scum-tell is something i particularly dislike, having been lynched for it multiple times as a townie. further, the people pushing him are useless people like minii who just jump on the hate with zero reasoning whatsoever. the extent of minii's posts are as follows: On August 02 2011 16:26 youngminii wrote: fairly certain redff is scum he's playing exactly like that other game where i was scum with him i'm sorry red but your scum play is so obvious Fin. varp is being ragged on due to wishy-washness. i just re-read his posts, and the tldr progression is as follows -vigi dont shoot on hunches -be active -no problems re dayvig plan -realizes its better to delay or outright not do the plan due to stacked hits -random fos on trotske i see re-evaluation there, not wishy-washiness. do you see otherwise? random fos are just as useless as pressure votes. sandro and varp are both bad in that department as far as i'm concerned. by itself though, it doesn't mean much, and there's nothing else yet. as for me, i don't have scum leanings on anyone. town leans yes, scum leans no. Note that rather than draw emphasis to the posts of those accusing varpulis, or any of varps posts he just sums the series of posts varp made up. I would normally say that this is a moot point, however he did opt to find it worth quoting posts in relation to redff. Why would you defend two people within one post but only bring attention to specific posts on one bandwagon? Possibly moot, but definitely not normal. minii was hating on red, not varp. if he were hating on varp, i'd have put him in the varp category. it doesn't matter who he is hating when the hate is ill-founded given that he hasn't provided any reasons for it His next post is 7 hours later saying Hi to drazerk. Followed by 3 hours later appearing to take off on a post that I had made an hour before his post. actually it was asking drazerk a question, showing that he is indeed avoiding the thread, even questions directly addressed to him that can be answered in five seconds On August 03 2011 12:30 JeeJee wrote: looks like cobbles picked up on the same thing i have. what particularly irks me about drazerk today is that he has been posting in the other mafia thread on his usual time of 5-10kst +/-1hr so he has been reading this thread as well. but he declined to weigh in, leaving his vote as-is (essentially throwaway). didnt even answer a simple "how are you" =( usually when people say 'lurking is a scumtell', i disagree because they clump 'afk' and 'lurk' as interchangeable. afking means nothing as far as i'm concerned, just look at ace in snmm5. lurking (ie being there but not speaking) a la drazerk is a different story. still not voting, but i'll be here before the deadline tomorrow, no worries. This post is the first one that seriously tries to move a bandwagon away from varpulis. This is done by first using my name as a “backup” as well as using a lot of out of thread reasoning. He then refuses to vote as he will be around for the deadline. Moments later he makes a post saying screw it, and votes. Now, as someone who mentioned early in the thread he doesn’t believe in pressure voting, we know that this vote is meant to be solid “I believe this person is scum”. We also know that as of roughly 10 hours before he voted he had no scum leanings on any player. How is it that someone who has been moderately inactive much like himself, is suddenly sure of the guilt of another player when his reasoning is “inactivity in this thread but active outside of it” He couldn’t find anything in thread? Or in irc to help. because it's actually pretty damn scummy when someone is reading the thread but refusing to weigh-in, particularly when his arguments were all shot down and he is throwing away his vote, with the deadline looming. i can't believe you said they weren't serious reasons He then spends the next bit of time after the lynch to accuse players of bad logic, spam, and refusal to even defend himself from general accusations. He attacks my accusation that I made of him by saying “I brought him up first” when all he had done previously was say “hi how are you” to drazerk. Overall he has had 17-18 posts all game where a fair majority of them have been spam or generally unhelpful / noncommittal. the general accusations against me were bad, why would i acknowledge them? like i said, i've been lynched for being overly defensive before. apparently shutting down arguments that nobody can possibly believe is more scummy than just ignoring them. responses in bold/red. as for claims,i think it's a good idea. unless you just happen to have a reasonable explanation for the missing KP. hell, even if mig's mafia, he can't just kill off all blues and hope nobody notices -- and him dying would cut mafia kp in half. lucid/red are being unreasonable imo. yeah nothing is 100%, but it's much more likely mig being town than mafia I am glad that through all of this "defending" you still opt to not weigh in heavily on the current day. More to the point however you directly misread a section of what I posted against you. Note that rather than draw emphasis to the posts of those accusing varpulis, or any of varps posts he just sums the series of posts varp made up. I would normally say that this is a moot point, however he did opt to find it worth quoting posts in relation to redff. Why would you defend two people within one post but only bring attention to specific posts on one bandwagon? Possibly moot, but definitely not normal. minii was hating on red, not varp. if he were hating on varp, i'd have put him in the varp category. it doesn't matter who he is hating when the hate is ill-founded given that he hasn't provided any reasons for it I had already implied the minii bit was in reference to red. The issue was that you were using posts to defend red whereas you were not using any to defend varp. It shows a "weak" and almost unmemorable defense of a mafia roleblocker. As for your vote of drazerk. Is he lurking and inactive? yes. However, taking the opportunity to jump and appear to try and start a bandwagon when you yourself have also been fairly lurky and inactive is well odd. You then rather than actually give reasonable responses to most people questioning you at that period you opt to do small posts that provide next to nothing. Not only that, but you appear frequently enough to "comment" on the goings on of the thread but you never leave a lasting mark on anything. The posts are very neutral and if someone wasn't looking at you they were be unmemorable. You are a much better player than this and as such should be more active or at least much more contributing than you are now. are you being serious right now? the current day is three hours old. again, you are misinterpreting what i said in the precise manner that i said you would. lurking isn't scummy if you clump afking and lurking as the same thing. i already said this yet you're doing it anyway? lurking by its intended definition is scummy. realize the difference between hiding and not being there. it's the same as the difference between lurking and afking. i never lurked. you insinuating that i did is laughable. as for your last words, thanks but i don't deserve the rep i seem to have around here. every single game i played this year (except where i subbed in ccm) i have been mafia, where it's very easy to run along with the herd, half-hiding and never calling out anyone, and nobody notices. even if you fuck up, you have teammates to cover you. it takes no skill (imho). being townie is a whole other ballgame and i'm doing my best. i guess you don't remember the games where i was townie since they were so long ago, but i routinely got lynched in them =\ hopefully it wont happen here | ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
On August 06 2011 02:37 Lucidity wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2011 01:32 Curu wrote: On August 06 2011 01:31 Lucidity wrote: That's simply not true. He "breadcrumbs" that he's going to kill X. X dies. Mafia killed X -.- Then there's only 2 KP in the night and he's not confirmed Vig. Herp. Not true. Another Vig could have killed a 3rd player. Scum/Vigs could hit a Vet/Med protected player etc. The fact is there are too many variables to confirm the player at night. your hypotheticals are a joke. sure a freak occurrence can happen where the vig doesn't become confirmed. the vast majority of the time, it will never happen. attempting to cast doubt on mig using that is silly, at least come up with something more reasonable. to everyone else using meta arguments: meta's a joke. you keep calling me a veteran and saying i don't scumhunt, therefore i must be scum... you don't see a glaring flaw with that? lol On August 06 2011 03:44 Mig wrote: I was going to wait for chaos and sevryn to show up before I posted this but half way through and they are still awol so gonna post it so everyone can discuss. One of JeeJee/Bc is pretty much guaranteed scum. DrH, BC, JeeJee have all claimed medic to me. I talked with BC, ON and DrH who have experience hosting and the odds that there are 3 medics 1 vet in a 20 man game, even with 2 rbers, is virtually none. I trust DrH so I am fairly confident he is telling me the truth. So we can almost guarantee that one of BC/JeeJee is lying. The case against JeeJee is much stronger I believe. He A) defended Varp right after I made the first case against him B) he put virtually 0 effort into contributing analysis and scum hunting, yet when people call him out he comes in and defends himself strongly. So the current plan should be to lynch JeeJee and if he flips red we can try to work out the best plan for the medics, probably something like one defends me one defends the other medic. Assuming JeeJee flips red then the other 2 scum are very likely between YM/Chaos/Sevryn/Lucid sigh, some people say i ignore accusations against myself, others say i defend myself too much. make up your mind. anyway i trust you'll adjust your judgment post-flip. just remember what we talked about and avoid tunnel vision. | ||
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
| ||
| ||
Next event in 4h
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH209 StarCraft: Brood War• Hupsaiya 104 • practicex 33 • Kozan • Laughngamez YouTube • aXEnki • Poblha • intothetv • Gussbus • Migwel • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamez Trovo League of Legends |
Replay Cast
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
Online Event
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
Sparkling Tuna Cup
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
[ Show More ] BSL
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
PassionCraft
|
|