Knightess August 12 2011 23:23. Posts 2009 | Profile Blog # |
| Apparently it will be released Q1 2012 O.o |
| | I love my life: http://imgur.com/jxCts |
|
|
| billy5000 United States. August 12 2011 23:25. Posts 610 | Profile Blog # |
Am I being way too skeptical thinking that valve would release console versions of the game? I hope not  |
| | Tiger got to hunt, bird got to fly; Man got to sit and wonder, 'Why, why, why?' Tiger got to sleep, bird got to land; Man got to tell himself he understand. Vonnegut |
|
|
| ak1knight United States. August 12 2011 23:26. Posts 279 | Profile # |
On August 12 2011 22:35 Senx wrote: Show nested quote +On August 12 2011 22:25 maartendq wrote: On August 12 2011 22:00 Senx wrote: On August 12 2011 21:30 setzer wrote: Does Valve not get it? We don't want another CSS, we want a true successor to 1.6. This news is very disappointing to say the least.
The fact that they gave up on cs 1.6 many years ago pretty much speaks volumes at to which counter strike game they wanted to succeed. Never seen a gaming company be so stubborn and ignorant to what their community wants.
You'd be more correct if you said "what the hardcore esports community, which is rather small compared to the casual community, wants."
So you think fixing 10 year old flash bugs is exclusively what a hardcore community wants? I think its a pretty basic concept that games are supposed to be without bugs, it has nothing to do with esports. Also new maps, game modes and standarizing the netcode would definantly help the newb pub players to enjoy the game more aswell. I don't understand how you can defend valve when theyve pretty much done nothing to further 1.6 as a game. 1.6 is a perfect example of a community driven game that for most of its time was neglected and ignored by the creators.
Valve didn't even make 1.6 lol
|
| |

|
| Snorkle United States. August 12 2011 23:27. Posts 735 | Profile Blog # |
| source.... =[ so sad. Hearing Scoots reaction on Lo3 when it was alleged that they were asking source players for input was hilarious and sad at the same time. I guess we can put our hopes in promod? |
|
|
| NuKedUFirst Canada. August 12 2011 23:33. Posts 3138 | Profile Blog # |
Is it going to be a reskinned CSS or are they making the graphics nicer? Edit: From what I heard, it's using the same engine as source..Last edit: 2011-08-12 23:34:44 |
| | FrostedMiniWeet wrote: I like winning because it validates all the bloody time I waste playing SC2. |
|
|
| ReturnStroke United States. August 12 2011 23:41. Posts 798 | Profile Blog # |
| I just hope there is at least a little competitive merit. |
|
|
| Lumi United States. August 12 2011 23:42. Posts 1026 | Profile # |
| thank god... the FPS games that pass for esports today are so... hahahahaha |
| | KT_Violet 1988 - 2012 | n.Die_aSam 1992 - 2012 |
|
|
| Jedclark United Kingdom. August 12 2011 23:44. Posts 847 | Profile Blog # |
| They better not CoD-ify it, that is one of the reasons why I still play 1.6 a lot today. It's simple, but it is really good. The physics/recoil, etc. are good, and it's a serious game. As opposed to CoDMW2. |
| | "They make it so scrubnubs can PM me. They make it so I can't ignore scrubnubs!" - "I'm gonna show you how great I am." MKP fan since GSL Open Season 2 #hipsternerd |
|
|
| hugman Sweden. August 12 2011 23:44. Posts 4591 | Profile # |
On August 12 2011 23:26 ak1knight wrote: Show nested quote +On August 12 2011 22:35 Senx wrote: On August 12 2011 22:25 maartendq wrote: On August 12 2011 22:00 Senx wrote: On August 12 2011 21:30 setzer wrote: Does Valve not get it? We don't want another CSS, we want a true successor to 1.6. This news is very disappointing to say the least.
The fact that they gave up on cs 1.6 many years ago pretty much speaks volumes at to which counter strike game they wanted to succeed. Never seen a gaming company be so stubborn and ignorant to what their community wants.
You'd be more correct if you said "what the hardcore esports community, which is rather small compared to the casual community, wants."
So you think fixing 10 year old flash bugs is exclusively what a hardcore community wants? I think its a pretty basic concept that games are supposed to be without bugs, it has nothing to do with esports. Also new maps, game modes and standarizing the netcode would definantly help the newb pub players to enjoy the game more aswell. I don't understand how you can defend valve when theyve pretty much done nothing to further 1.6 as a game. 1.6 is a perfect example of a community driven game that for most of its time was neglected and ignored by the creators.
Valve didn't even make 1.6 lol
They did, they bought the game after beta 7, and gooseman was getting help with the netcode even before that. |
|

|
| ak1knight United States. August 12 2011 23:50. Posts 279 | Profile # |
On August 12 2011 23:44 hugman wrote: Show nested quote +On August 12 2011 23:26 ak1knight wrote: On August 12 2011 22:35 Senx wrote: On August 12 2011 22:25 maartendq wrote: On August 12 2011 22:00 Senx wrote: On August 12 2011 21:30 setzer wrote: Does Valve not get it? We don't want another CSS, we want a true successor to 1.6. This news is very disappointing to say the least.
The fact that they gave up on cs 1.6 many years ago pretty much speaks volumes at to which counter strike game they wanted to succeed. Never seen a gaming company be so stubborn and ignorant to what their community wants.
You'd be more correct if you said "what the hardcore esports community, which is rather small compared to the casual community, wants."
So you think fixing 10 year old flash bugs is exclusively what a hardcore community wants? I think its a pretty basic concept that games are supposed to be without bugs, it has nothing to do with esports. Also new maps, game modes and standarizing the netcode would definantly help the newb pub players to enjoy the game more aswell. I don't understand how you can defend valve when theyve pretty much done nothing to further 1.6 as a game. 1.6 is a perfect example of a community driven game that for most of its time was neglected and ignored by the creators.
Valve didn't even make 1.6 lol
They did, they bought the game after beta 7, and gooseman was getting help with the netcode even before that.
343 is doing updates for Halo Reach, doesn't mean it isn't Bungie's game. |
| |

|
| SnowyPsilocybin United Kingdom. August 12 2011 23:54. Posts 254 | Profile # |
On August 12 2011 23:50 ak1knight wrote: Show nested quote +On August 12 2011 23:44 hugman wrote: On August 12 2011 23:26 ak1knight wrote: On August 12 2011 22:35 Senx wrote: On August 12 2011 22:25 maartendq wrote: On August 12 2011 22:00 Senx wrote: On August 12 2011 21:30 setzer wrote: Does Valve not get it? We don't want another CSS, we want a true successor to 1.6. This news is very disappointing to say the least.
The fact that they gave up on cs 1.6 many years ago pretty much speaks volumes at to which counter strike game they wanted to succeed. Never seen a gaming company be so stubborn and ignorant to what their community wants.
You'd be more correct if you said "what the hardcore esports community, which is rather small compared to the casual community, wants."
So you think fixing 10 year old flash bugs is exclusively what a hardcore community wants? I think its a pretty basic concept that games are supposed to be without bugs, it has nothing to do with esports. Also new maps, game modes and standarizing the netcode would definantly help the newb pub players to enjoy the game more aswell. I don't understand how you can defend valve when theyve pretty much done nothing to further 1.6 as a game. 1.6 is a perfect example of a community driven game that for most of its time was neglected and ignored by the creators.
Valve didn't even make 1.6 lol
They did, they bought the game after beta 7, and gooseman was getting help with the netcode even before that.
343 is doing updates for Halo Reach, doesn't mean it isn't Bungie's game.
I thought alot of the people who work for 343 worked for Bungie on Halo Reach anyway?
Bit of a side comment there so back to CS....
Please let this be a Port of 1.6, dont screw us over for a second time Valve please  Last edit: 2011-08-13 00:08:14 |
|

|
| K_Dilkington Sweden. August 13 2011 00:00. Posts 445 | Profile # |
| This is only interesting if it's in the spirit of 1.6 a css/cod clone is not interesting. |
| | Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by the age of 18 |
|
|
| QuanticHawk United States. August 13 2011 00:02. Posts 21278 | Profile Blog # |
On August 12 2011 22:00 Senx wrote: Show nested quote +On August 12 2011 21:30 setzer wrote: Does Valve not get it? We don't want another CSS, we want a true successor to 1.6. This news is very disappointing to say the least.
The fact that they gave up on cs 1.6 many years ago pretty much speaks volumes at to which counter strike game they wanted to succeed. Never seen a gaming company be so stubborn and ignorant to what their community wants.
The community is split pretty evenly between 1.6 and CSS, so it's not a cut and dry thing of what the community wants. CSS with different hitboxes and recoil would make most people happy (and frankly, I thought that shit was always overstated anyway by annoying fanboys)
HLEP3 and this would make me buy a new comp. Nothing like spending $1000 to play two new games. Smart use of money! |
| | PROFESSIONAL GAMER - SEND ME OFFERS TO JOIN YOUR TEAM - USA USA USA |
|
|
| hugman Sweden. August 13 2011 00:04. Posts 4591 | Profile # |
On August 12 2011 23:50 ak1knight wrote: Show nested quote +On August 12 2011 23:44 hugman wrote: On August 12 2011 23:26 ak1knight wrote: On August 12 2011 22:35 Senx wrote: On August 12 2011 22:25 maartendq wrote: On August 12 2011 22:00 Senx wrote: On August 12 2011 21:30 setzer wrote: Does Valve not get it? We don't want another CSS, we want a true successor to 1.6. This news is very disappointing to say the least.
The fact that they gave up on cs 1.6 many years ago pretty much speaks volumes at to which counter strike game they wanted to succeed. Never seen a gaming company be so stubborn and ignorant to what their community wants.
You'd be more correct if you said "what the hardcore esports community, which is rather small compared to the casual community, wants."
So you think fixing 10 year old flash bugs is exclusively what a hardcore community wants? I think its a pretty basic concept that games are supposed to be without bugs, it has nothing to do with esports. Also new maps, game modes and standarizing the netcode would definantly help the newb pub players to enjoy the game more aswell. I don't understand how you can defend valve when theyve pretty much done nothing to further 1.6 as a game. 1.6 is a perfect example of a community driven game that for most of its time was neglected and ignored by the creators.
Valve didn't even make 1.6 lol
They did, they bought the game after beta 7, and gooseman was getting help with the netcode even before that.
343 is doing updates for Halo Reach, doesn't mean it isn't Bungie's game.
Beta 7 was an almost completely different game |
|

|
| BankaiPwn Canada. August 13 2011 00:12. Posts 35 | Profile # |
45,648 /// 55,238 Counter-Strike 44,009 /// 53,007 Counter-Strike: Source
People have their preferences. Just because they don't like the same game as you doesn't degrade them in any way.
I personally preferred CSS to 1.6, something about the crouch-walking and the fimsy aspect of the walls turned me off. I'm not saying 1.6 is bad, far from it, but it didn't necessarily "fail" as hard as every fan of 1.6 claims it to have. |
|
|
| relic United Kingdom. August 13 2011 00:14. Posts 148 | Profile # |
| I hope everyone realises this is just going to be condition zero for CSS. |
| | "machine say me he win again, but he lie" |
|
|
| T0fuuu Australia. August 13 2011 00:27. Posts 2262 | Profile Blog # |
Cs community is such a joke of an esports scene. A decade on they still think that a remade 1.6 will be the messiah of fps when thats not what the majority of the gamers want. call them pub players or watever but the reason why the communities are dieing isnt because the level of competition isntthere it is because ppl are sick of playing the same maps and same guns for 10 years.
Fix that and you might get a new scene but if its going to be another 10years of train inferno and dust then fuck that. |
|
|
| Senx Sweden. August 13 2011 00:31. Posts 5019 | Profile Blog # |
On August 13 2011 00:12 BankaiPwn wrote: 45,648 /// 55,238 Counter-Strike 44,009 /// 53,007 Counter-Strike: Source
People have their preferences. Just because they don't like the same game as you doesn't degrade them in any way.
I personally preferred CSS to 1.6, something about the crouch-walking and the fimsy aspect of the walls turned me off. I'm not saying 1.6 is bad, far from it, but it didn't necessarily "fail" as hard as every fan of 1.6 claims it to have.
CSS is the real pub game of the two, it has and has always had a small competitive scene compared to 1.6.
CSS is just inferior, both community-wise but also as a competitive game. The number of people playing the game hardy makes an argument when valve has been promoting the shit out of it while 1.6 has been left rotting and still somehow succeeded.
Also casual games ALWAYS have a strong following in comparison to competitive/hardcore games. That goes without saying.
Esport is what matters here, so if I want a good and fun pub game I go play TFT2 or any of the 23 COD titles.
Last edit: 2011-08-13 00:44:43 |
| | "trash micro but win - its marine" MC commentary during HSC 4 |
|

|
| Grettin August 13 2011 01:47. Posts 20551 | Profile # |
Putting this here if you missed:
http://counterstrikego.com/
CS:GO Confirmed Features
Note that all of these features are from early alpha builds of the game and are subject to change or removal from the final release. See the sources list below for reference material used to compile this list.
Planned release in Q1 2012 Matchmaking system Focus on 5v5 competitive play Both Defuse (de_) and Hostage (cs_) map types confirmed! eSports-oriented Competitive and Casual modes Ranked / ladder play for individuals and teams Dedicated servers Gameplay has elements similar to both CS:S and CS 1.6 Classic maps (with both minor and major modifications) include: Dust2, Dust, Aztec, Inferno, Nuke, Train Molotov grenade: creates area of fire that slows players crossing through it Decoy grenade: emits fake weapon firing sounds to confuse enemies about your position Bullets penetrate some walls and objects like CS 1.6 Many changes to weapons, as well as new weapons Classic gameplay: no ironsights Beta in September or October (Unconfirmed) Sources / Relevant LinksLast edit: 2011-08-13 01:51:40 |
| | "If I had force-fields in Brood War, I'd never lose." -Bisu |
|

|
GTR August 13 2011 01:52. Posts 39107 | Profile Blog # |
| i'm 99% certain that molotovs/decoy grenades won't be used in competitive matches lol |
| | Twitter: @TL_GTR | Stream: http://www.twitch.tv/notyuna | |
|
|
| Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 100 200 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 Next |
|