On September 04 2011 12:00 Bill Murray wrote:
/involuntarily out
/involuntarily out
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On September 04 2011 12:00 Bill Murray wrote: /involuntarily out | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On September 08 2011 05:56 Curu wrote: Show nested quote + On September 08 2011 04:27 bumatlarge wrote: I'm not role fishing, im simply stating that I think everyone has an ability. No one needs to counter claim that, but I half my fun in mafia is speculation. Don't think anyone should be voting anyone yet, we need 9 for a lynch, so silly accusations aren't gonna cut it 5 minutes into the game. What does needing 9 for a lynch have to do with your idea that we shouldn't be voting each other? I yes I forgot this is TL where we know the mafia team based off literally one sentence, and then taking what someone says and changing it to something completely different. All while thinking you are helping town. Did I say we shouldn't be voting each other? I know "yet" is a small word, but I would hope people would look for keywords in sentences that change their meanings. Apparently not. | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On September 08 2011 06:06 JeeJee wrote: Show nested quote + On September 08 2011 02:33 GGQ wrote: On September 08 2011 02:23 JeeJee wrote: On September 08 2011 01:12 GGQ wrote: On September 07 2011 13:15 JeeJee wrote: On September 07 2011 13:04 GGQ wrote: On September 07 2011 11:40 bumatlarge wrote: Let's talk about irrelevant things in ace's game! This set-up is weird is completely closed so I'm gonna throw it out there that I think everyone has some sort of ability. Given that we have 4/16 mafia, I imagine that you're probably right. Oh boy let's rolefish some more. ##vote:ggq Hm, if you think that's rolefishing, why vote for me and not bum, who brought it up first? why not? I think it's pretty clear that when someone does something, 'why?' is a far more relevant question than 'why not?' "why?" has one clear, defined answer that helps to clarify your action. "why not?" has infinite hypothetical answers that just obscure it further. So cut the crap. Why? Calm down broski. It's very simple. When reacting to an accusation, townies tend to point out flaws with the accusation, since they know the accusation is wrong. Scum tend to try and shift the blame elsewhere, since they know the accusation is right. if my vote didn't count since it was before Ace's post (although after 13KST), I'll re-write it here again. ##vote:ggq Here you transformed "idle speculation" into "rolefishing". Bum: I think everyone has a role GGQ: 4 mafia; I agree JeeJee: rolefishing ? But then GGQ, instead of pointing this out, points a finger at me for something he initially agreed with. Congratulations! You found an "Inconsistency"! ##vote:ggq | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On September 08 2011 07:01 Curu wrote: I'm still wondering why 9 votes to lynch means we shouldn't be voting anyone yet. You have a lot of "people misrepresented and twisted words, they're scum" in your posts but you're doing the exact same thing. GGQ did not point any finger at you, he was asking JeeJee why he chose to vote GGQ instead of you. I'm not going to waste energy explaining why votes in the first 2 minutes aren't helpful, you can achieve the same amount of pressure just talking about someone. GGQ could have pointed out that what he was doing was not rolefishing. Instead he gave an excuse about how he shouldn't be the focus. He had no intention of standing behind what he said if it brought focus on him, and in that JeeJee is completely justified in voting for him. And I've already stated that I disagree with JeeJee voting ggq early, because it was a vote based on nothing, an early vote with no reasoning behind it, which we shouldn't be doing. Now it's a solid vote and I will join him. Nothing was twisted in GGQ's post. He could have stood behind what he said, but now he's making it perfect obvious that there will be legitimate reasons for voting him. | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
wherebugsgo(1) - sinani206 sinani206(1) - xtfftc chaos13(1) - Palmar Mig(1) - TheAwesomeAll Palmar(1) - Mig All of these votes are useless. Switch now please or make a better case. I think TheAwesomeAll is mentally ill, but not mafia. Dont know him, so what do I care. Sporadic townie, we could do without him. iGrok is very active, which doesn't say much, I think he's always active. BA was very accurate that iGrok's posts have a distinct aura of fear and discomfort, different from what you usually see him post. GGQ's posts pales in comparison, where GQQ could very well have been misunderstood in one post, where as iGrok has betrayed his position multiple times. ##Unvote ##Vote iGrok | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On September 09 2011 10:52 wherebugsgo wrote: One of Palmar/Mig is scum methinks. IMO it might be Mig, because Palmar actually did defend townies in XLIV (I distinctly remember him giving Sevryn 0.2% chance to flip town) and he defended hiro and xt as well. In cosmic I feel like he did the same but Palmar was alive when I wasn't in the game and I don't remember too well ATM (not quoting stuff cause I'm on my phone) Would Mig purposely forget these things or is he just being ignorant as town? Iunno but from what I understand about his town play...neither is a likely town explanation. Anyway, at the current lynches: I say we keep it between TAA and iGrok. Either is an acceptable lynch to me but I'm not sold on GGQ. I'll switch off iGrok if we require lynching assistance I share your suspicions of the two. Let's keep it in mind for tomorrow. ##Unvote ##vote: TheAwesomeAll | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On September 10 2011 07:32 Zona wrote: bumatlarge, what changed your mind from: Show nested quote + On September 09 2011 08:50 bumatlarge wrote: I think TheAwesomeAll is mentally ill, but not mafia. The post you quote when voting TheAwesomeAll talks about Mig/Palmar, then states "keep it between TAA and iGrok" - but you already had your vote on iGrok. What made you decide to vote for TheAwesomeAll instead? To get a majority. We just barely hit 9. I don't know TAA. My read could have been easily wrong and I was willing to take the risk to ensure we did lynch instead of no lynch. | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On September 10 2011 13:01 Mig wrote: Bum what do you think about curu/sandroba? I think they are both talented and smart players, and if either them are doing something wrong they are probably scum. No I haven't the thread thoroughly. | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
That's why no one has pointed it out zona. On September 08 2011 07:18 bumatlarge wrote: Show nested quote + On September 08 2011 07:01 Curu wrote: I'm still wondering why 9 votes to lynch means we shouldn't be voting anyone yet. You have a lot of "people misrepresented and twisted words, they're scum" in your posts but you're doing the exact same thing. GGQ did not point any finger at you, he was asking JeeJee why he chose to vote GGQ instead of you. I'm not going to waste energy explaining why votes in the first 2 minutes aren't helpful, you can achieve the same amount of pressure just talking about someone. GGQ could have pointed out that what he was doing was not rolefishing. Instead he gave an excuse about how he shouldn't be the focus. He had no intention of standing behind what he said if it brought focus on him, and in that JeeJee is completely justified in voting for him. And I've already stated that I disagree with JeeJee voting ggq early, because it was a vote based on nothing, an early vote with no reasoning behind it, which we shouldn't be doing. Now it's a solid vote and I will join him. Nothing was twisted in GGQ's post. He could have stood behind what he said, but now he's making it perfect obvious that there will be legitimate reasons for voting him. I'll try to come back tomorrow. If someone is acting like sinani, you can only ignore him or vote him, but don't insult him, you don't know whats going on in his life. I'm going to agree with bayonette atm, as sandroba has been completely different then his normal townie self, someone who immediately jumped on me in resurrection for posting fluff, and hung onto my throat until I was lynched. This seems much more like the sandroba in Sleeper Cell. ##Vote Sandroba Shame to see iGrok popped a strong town role, it was a smart shot regardless. GGQ is high on my list still after sandroba. | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On September 12 2011 02:19 Zona wrote: Show nested quote + On September 12 2011 01:39 Curu wrote: What bugs me a bit is why would Zona be a shot + RB and why would a Medic choose to protect her, all in the same night. Of the current player list I think only a few have played games with Zona and also why would she shoot bum when her vote list was GGQ, me, Mig, sandroba? I decided to shoot bumatlarge because during Night 1 when I reread the game, I noticed the parts that comprise the case I presented publicly and decided he was scummier than the others. You'll notice that everything in that case occurs before day 2. And better yet, bumatlarge has said nothing since then except to appear and write a pithy single post in his own defense against my case. I don't remember any of this, I knew you claimed a hit or something, but you also shot me? Wut? Anyway, I think I believe for now that sandroba was not in the right state of mind, and I'm having second thoughts about GGQ. Recalling again the sleeper cell game (went back there to check sandrobas stuff; but he played smart mafia there in a blind game, he just seems lowkey for pureley non-mafia related reasons) where he slipped under my radar that game, I'm not feeling convinced as I was about him. I was more sure about iGrok, but he popped town, and I think it's even more likely for ggq to do the same thing. I think there are better targets. On the Palmar/Mig thing, I'm fairly suspicious of both, I'll read through it again. I can't tel if bugs is acting weirder then usual. Zona can you clarify exactly what you are claiming here? I was content with just leaving it at "you took a hit" but now you are claiming medic/RB and you are a vig? I'll better defend myself from your accusations if I am forced to, but I would rather not at the moment. READING | ||
| ||
Next event in 4h 9m
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games tarik_tv19183 summit1g7458 Grubby2565 FrodaN1874 fl0m1404 shahzam786 Hui .245 NuckleDu112 Mew2King83 PPMD39 ViBE31 Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • musti20045 42 StarCraft: Brood War• Hupsaiya 41 • RyuSc2 38 • davetesta35 • practicex 12 • Migwel • aXEnki • Poblha • intothetv • Gussbus • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamez Trovo • Laughngamez YouTube Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Korean StarCraft League
Afreeca Starleague
hero vs Soulkey
AfreecaTV Pro Series
Reynor vs Cure
ESL Pro Tour
World Team League
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
Zhanhun vs DragOn
Dewalt vs Sziky
CSO Cup
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] ESL Pro Tour
World Team League
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
Gypsy vs Bonyth
Mihu vs XiaoShuai
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
|
|