What is the max player count?
Steamship Liquidia (TL Mafia 46)
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
What is the max player count? | ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE! MAKE IT WORK NOW, YOU HAVE 1 HOUR. | ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 15 2011 20:44 Forumite wrote: /confirm I´m going to step in here. DCLXVI allready caught this and posted before me, but I don´t think my reason for noticing has been discussed. Okay, to me it looks like this; LSB wants us to Lynch All Liars. Kenpachi claimed Townie, but LSB doesn´t want us to take the Kenpachi claim seriously. My problem here is that either Kenpachi lied, or he just told Scum not to nightkill him, because it would be no use. If we are going to go by the LAL policy, then either Kenpachi lied or acted Pro-Scum, so why should we back off? Kenpachi does this every game, then we can ignore his claim, but what I don´t agree with is LSB promoting LAL wanting to ignore the claim, even if it is meta. It took him about 5 posts to go back on his own policy of Lynch All Liars. If Kenpachi lied (or play Pro-Scum), why does LSB then defend him after his first policy post? FoS LSB As for lynching 1-2 lurkers and 1-2 scum, sounds reasonable, I think we should stay at about that number for now. We need to be carefull about lynching, not just because of the consequences in the setup, but if we find 5 players who seem connected, then it´s better to lynch 1-2 and see if they are scum, than lynching all 5 at once and kill 5 innocent townies at once. Ummm... what? I'm sure you know this. Kenpachi's townie claim means nothing. It never means anything. He does it every single game. LSB ignoring it does not imply contradiction; it implies common sense. And your FoS on him is incredibly scummy. FURTHERMORE, claiming town is not pro-scum, because it is in everyone's best interest to appear as a vanilla towie. Townies want to look green because they are green. Blues want to look green so that they are not a Mafia target. And Mafia wants to look green (most of the time) because they don't want to get lynched. | ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 16 2011 01:19 Zephirdd wrote: "most of the time"? Care to explain to a newbie when would a mafia NOT want to appear green? Sometimes Mafia has to fakeclaim a blue role as a last resort to escape a lynch. | ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 16 2011 02:10 GreYMisT wrote: Nisani, in both your relevant posts of the game, you have given very neutral coments, and they both serve to give the mafia an "out." bolded are the examples. and To me this seems really odd. Care to elaborate on your reasons for posting these? I was simply responding to what some people were saying. | ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 16 2011 02:32 bumatlarge wrote: Next person that mentions LAL is getting a vote placed on them. Seriously enough with the useless shit. We will be lynching however many scummy people we can find on the particular day. We are restricting ourselves when we don't have a clue as to what our boundaries are. Nisani has posted complete fluff and none of it shows any effort in actually heling town. I don't think the new people are brain-dead, so unless the specifically ask about something, don't use them as an excuse to post asinine shit. Oh, hi kibbibit ##Vote Nisani201 I cannot tell if you are scum or just plain stupid. I make about a few posts and you accuse me of "useless fluff"? FoS on you for creating an anti-town atmosphere. None of what I said was useless fluff. | ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On November 16 2011 12:05 wherebugsgo wrote: Nah, remember I said we need to all focus on one person until 24-36 hours before lynch. Then we start consolidating to get multiple targets. Basically, if one person is working on a case on one person and one person only, it's more effective than if that one person tries splitting their attention to watch four or five at once. It's just not effective. If we all focus on one target each and then evaluate toward the end of the day, we can sift through the best cases and work on lynching those. However we need activity in the last 24 hours to make this viable, and we'll rack up a lot of posts. But it'll hopefully be the best way to find scum. What I don't want people doing is what chaoser is doing; just going out there and throwing votes left and right without actually thinking about them. Sure, you can do it if you want, but it's not going to be pretty. The thread will be a mess and you'll have multiple people OMGUSing because they're taking votes. Oh god... Why? Why do you always say things in every game that makes me mad? There are so many ways this could go wrong. For instance, say we're focusing on Target A, and then Target B does something that is moderately scummy. Do we FoS him? Vote him? "No," says the master, WBG. "First, we must finish discussing target A, THEN, we can go ahead with Target B." This can only protect mafia. Please, no one do this. | ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
Enough with the FoS. Forumite is scum. ##Vote: Forumite | ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
Both of them are bullshit. First we have this case against LSB, which I already mentioned: On November 15 2011 20:44 Forumite wrote: /confirm I´m going to step in here. DCLXVI allready caught this and posted before me, but I don´t think my reason for noticing has been discussed. Okay, to me it looks like this; LSB wants us to Lynch All Liars. Kenpachi claimed Townie, but LSB doesn´t want us to take the Kenpachi claim seriously. My problem here is that either Kenpachi lied, or he just told Scum not to nightkill him, because it would be no use. If we are going to go by the LAL policy, then either Kenpachi lied or acted Pro-Scum, so why should we back off? Kenpachi does this every game, then we can ignore his claim, but what I don´t agree with is LSB promoting LAL wanting to ignore the claim, even if it is meta. It took him about 5 posts to go back on his own policy of Lynch All Liars. If Kenpachi lied (or play Pro-Scum), why does LSB then defend him after his first policy post? FoS LSB As for lynching 1-2 lurkers and 1-2 scum, sounds reasonable, I think we should stay at about that number for now. We need to be carefull about lynching, not just because of the consequences in the setup, but if we find 5 players who seem connected, then it´s better to lynch 1-2 and see if they are scum, than lynching all 5 at once and kill 5 innocent townies at once. And then we have this: On November 16 2011 22:48 Forumite wrote: No, the game had allready started. You confirmed getting your role first of all players, then when people got going with discussing policy, you dropped the above post. During 2 hours people had been talking about policy, and even dropped a few weird posts that have since been called out, so the game had definetly started. And about which part is scummy about it? Everything! You excuse yourself as a new player, thereby lowering our expectations on your contribution in the game, making way for future lurking. It´s an empty icebreaker, full of forced enthusiasm. The message of the post is "I´m trying to help but will probably fail". Is that the kind of player we are going to rely on in this game, or someone who will be left until the end because noone will bother to shoot him? He is pressuring them based on bullshit cases. ------------ In regards to chaoser, I don't think that Palmar's analysis has enough evidence to prove him guilty. Just because it's Palmar doesn't mean that we can't look at his analysees objectively. | ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
But most of it is irrelevant. Kenpachi is not irrelevant. He should die. ##Vote: Kenpachi | ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
Is Kenpachi dead, or can I unvote him? | ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
##Vote: Palmar | ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
Seriously, why aren't more people voting for him? ##Vote: Drazerk | ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
I'm not voting Sinani or prplhz because I think we have pretty good non-lurker suspects that can die. I prefer lynching scum over lurkers. | ||
| ||