Steamship Liquidia (TL Mafia 46)
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
| ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
| ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
| ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
On November 16 2011 00:49 Forumite wrote: Was that a scumslip? Because usually it´s the mob that picks itself off. "Us" implies that you are not part of the mob. Are you scum? This is my first game and im not sure of all the terms. I thought scum, mob, and mafia are the same. | ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
| ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
On November 16 2011 02:37 Zephirdd wrote: Gotta agree with Tyrran here. Lurkers are bad for townies. That said, I don't want to just go on "lynch ALL the lurkers!" mode, but at least lynching one or two a day should make them stay in high alert. You know I never thought about it like that. | ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
On November 16 2011 05:13 Drazerk wrote: ##Vote: Sabin010 Bad vibes also this - I've played many live games in my house, but never on TL. Vote as you will, but just because I make implications in my posts does not make me a liar. | ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
On November 16 2011 04:42 Lemonwalrus wrote: As far as lynching lurkers goes, I just thought of something. If we decide to lynch lurkers one a day or something, I think that gives mafia a slight advantage, in that they will be able to, with their numbers, lead the vote to non-mafia lurkers before it gets to mafia lurkers. So say there are 3 town lurkers and 1 scum lurker, the scum will be able to vote and probably help the scum lurker be the last of the 4 lynched and they won't look bad in hindsight since they were just following the policy we had set forth to lynch a lurker a day. I don't really know what we could do to stop this but I'd like to at least discuss it before we start playing in to scum hands. I know lurking townies aren't particularly useful, but they are still a warm body that puts town that much further from losing. Idk, anybody have any suggestions? This is how I feel about lynching lurkers. | ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
I have been in the process of reading up all of the terminology. This is my first game in a forum based environment, and the first post I made was in ignorance. I still don't understand FoS or LaL (is it liars or lurkers, very confusing) and will be learning the terminology as the game progresses. The reason I don't believe we should be lynching lurkers is we only have a 25% chance the lurker actually being mafia. Chances are we are just shooting our selves in the foot, with no evidence to back up our lynch. Nasani201 Can you back up your claim on Forumite? I don't see why you've decided to vote for him just for suspecting two of the newer players. His posts have done nothing but clarify TL metagame and point out inactives. risk.nuke What is tunneling, and how is WBG starting to tunnel? Chaoser Why did you claim green townie? You've seen what happend to Kenpachi after he claimed green townie. The two guys who have claimed green townie currently have the most votes. I can't see any benefit to saying you're a green townie day 1, its just bringing undeserved attention to your self. | ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
On November 17 2011 05:33 chaoser wrote: Should ask yourself first. Why would mafia want undeserved attention? And what does mafia gain from saying they're townie outright in thread? What does a townie gain from claiming townie outright in the thread just as the game starts? Ask yourself why are people saying the main reason they want to vote me/kenpachi for saying we're townie when it's a null tell? I don't mind getting lynched, but I'd rather kenpachi doesn't. He's pretty underrated. Sinani is a way better lynch. Mafia could use undeserved attention early to make a role call later in the game, but I see what you're saying. You're obviously lying about your role. First you said you're vanilla town, and then you role call doctor. I think you're full of shit, but you've already said you're not going to support lynching all liars, so I should expect you to lie. Sinani is a better lynch, and here is my reasoning. I believe Lanaia is a varient on the double voter and made a mistake using her anti-vote, anybody who is pressing a lynch on her should be a good suspect, as it is a bad idea for the town to take her out of the game. I'm going to re-read the thread a few more times before I make any votes. | ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
On November 18 2011 01:35 hyshes wrote: oh god.. it could be i meant "then" i actually don't know which is right.. than or then? im a native speaker and still havent figured that one out bro. | ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
On November 16 2011 00:22 Sabin010 wrote: I think its too early to start random lynching. I'm sure some of the lurkers are blues and have yet to get a chance to even check their role. We could get lucky and kill scum, but I have seen to many games where we lose our cop or doc first day and end up wasting our time as the mob picks us off. Seriously??? Reading the thread to find out who started this. | ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
On November 15 2011 15:10 bumatlarge wrote: /confirm I'm mostly interested in the multi-lynch. It's possible to blanket votes over multiple scummy players, so if instead of busting LSBs balls on posting piles of garbage, I'll echo the analysis statement. There is no wrong way to do it, just post who and why. And going out of your way to point out someone is acting townie does not help any discussion. I'll vote anyone who has a good argument against them. And since I only know a quarter of the player-base, I'll forgive Hiroruby for his fairly obvious insights, because it's effort and if he can forge that into scumhunting, it makes the town that much stronger. And also I see no reason not to do this. ##Vote Kenpachi And I will most likely not be taking it off until I see something that benefits town come out of his mouth. I don't really care about spam, I'll read all of it anyway so I won't discourage it. It will just help my reads so thats all I'm concerned about. This post started the the voting for Kenpachi. The following people voted yes on both lynches. DCLXVU, Drazerk, Zephirdd, Riske.nuke, Tyrran, Lemon Walrus, and Cyber_Cheese. Drazerk FoS'd Sinani first, and Chaoser started the voting for him. If Bumatlarge was mafia out of the people that put 2 yes votes on the two who are dead the following DID NOT vote for Bumatlarge, DCLXVI, Drazerk, Zephirdd, Tyrran, Cyber_Cheese. If I'm hit tonight there is a good chance there are at 3 or more Mafia out of those 6 people, but if Bumatlarge is not mafia I need to go and re-analyze the data. | ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
On November 17 2011 19:44 Coagulation wrote: Cause people love lists chaoser wherebugsgo Drazerk bumatlarge theres scum in there somewhere. How did you arrive at those conclusions? I have Bum and Drazerk on my list as well. | ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
| ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
| ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
| ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
##Vote: prplhz Risk.Nuke is completely pro-town and I'm keeping this vote on you until you've removed your vote. | ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
Tyrran I only voted prp because he voted Risk.nuke who had been playing a great game for us all game. | ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
On November 23 2011 01:32 Tyrran wrote: Okay guys, i've been thinking this over. First of all : It is very likely that both 666 (fuck roman numerals) and cyber_cheeze are blues. Yes, both of them. I'll explain why in the beginning of day 3, do not want to give any info to the mafia rigth now. Secondly : You just gave the worst possible excuse. Prplhz made a case against risk.nuke, who succefully defended himself and nothing happened. THAT WAS GOOD. That's how mafia is supposed to be played. Player put pressure on each other to make them slip. You played IRL mafia, how do you not know this ? You voted against prp because he played good. You dont lynch people because they made a case against someone else. you suspect them because of this, you build a case against them and if they fail to defend themself you lynch them. Quite frankly, this look like a scum, wondering "Can I safely bandwagon? Oh yeah he voted for a town so i'm safe". Oh and going trough your filter i find this : Lynching 6 people on day 2 ? Really ? You are obviously using the fact that Ken and Sinani played bad in order to lynch as much town as possible.( I take good not that 4 out of 6 are likely town, and 2 of them are blue. Thank god nobody listen to you). This has to be the most mafia oriented play yet. Yes you had to be drunk to post something like this. How did we not lynch you? Oh rigth, because you are lurking and not getting any attention. Typical mafia play again. Also, I'm not forgetting that this makes a lot of sense if you are mafia and you intent to lurk a lot. And last but not least : Saying obvious stuff without contributing a bit. Mafia play again. You have so many scummy play in so little post, I will definitely try to get you lynched on day 3. And if i dont survive nigth 2, I hope someone else will remind town to lynch you. I felt prp was using poor logic for his decisions in game. He didn't remove his vote after the rebuttle which is all I asked. This is why I voted for him. I'm not going to deny it was a blown call, but he seemed to be pressing his own agenda, instead of working with others. Maybe my style of play isn't suited for a forum based game. Between MLG and traveling I haven't had enough time to post, but I will be actively searching through the thread to find Mafia. In light of recent developements I was wrong with my assumption about lynching 6 guys to get 3 mafia out of the way. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but so far we've lynched 3 and have done nothing but take out some of our best roles in the process. | ||
| ||