Mr. Wiggles Mini Mafia I
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
Lynch all Lurkers is also terrible, as 100% of the time, when you lynch a lurker, a mafia member or the mafia as a whole will stray it to be a town member. This rule is basically asking to kill a townie. I'm going to conclude with my general opinion on policies in general : No. Every single policy on, "he did this, *lists policy*, time to lynch him" is stupid, plain and simple. Let's get smarter and start playing this game right, with case-by-case analysis. | ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
@Grack: I'm just saying things should be done on a case-by-case basis. What I believe is that a lie should be counted as A piece of evidence against someone instead of all the evidence against someone. | ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
On Sephiroth (goddamn you were hard to beat in Kingdom Hearts 2 ), I think his post is definitely scummy, and I'm placing my FoS on him, but I am not lynching him yet. I want to see more than one post out of him to decide if I want to lynch him, as I don't believe one singular post should ever be the reason someone is lynched unless it is really extremely crazy. I'm looking forward to his defense and responses to future questions I ask of him | ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
First of all, you expected to be voted on early? A town would never have that tendency. You made a comment on your tendencies that just sparks excuses for yourself later on down the road, that's NOT pro-town. Your last sentence didn't really "generate discussion", as that info was used as a footnote to other people's posts already. ##Vote sephirotharg | ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
On December 24 2011 03:38 sephirotharg wrote: RE: GiygaS No, you misinterpreted my post - I expected somebody to notice that part about me lurking long before they did - I didn't expect to get votes so early! You see, mafia will tend to push for a mis-lynch day 1 - and I don't mind putting myself out there as a target, if it lures them out of hiding. So, anyone who has pushed for lynching me, consider yourself on notice. And the last objection you have to me: my asking people about day 1 lynches did indeed generate discussion. See this post: And this one: Then why did you write the thing about lurking >.< Now you are implying that everyone accusing you is mafia, and "warning" everyone voting for you. Those quotes are just what I said, footnotes that came in to agreement as soon as the question was asked. | ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
Reading through the rest now. | ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
On December 25 2011 06:38 sephirotharg wrote: Care to expand on that? Why do you believe Jay and not me? Lay out your reasoning, convince others. That's the town play. A lot of the stuff on Jay is twisting words to say he's mafia. While the first evidence against you was indeed flavor text (the lurker thing), most of he stuff on you now is how you've reacted to things IMO. Meanwhile Jay only has weird flavor text twisting against him. BTW, I think the reason he hasn't scumhunted yet is there's pretty much him and you on the chopping block. That and I just get a tone of voice thing in yours that makes it seem you're way more concerned about getting lynched than Jay is, which I usually associate with a mafia. | ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
On December 25 2011 22:20 Dirkzor wrote: GiygaS: I would like to kill him. It would atleast be very interesting to see what he flips. (Wow batman slow down... It's ALWAYS interesting what people flip... O_o) + Show Spoiler + On December 24 2011 21:18 Dirkzor wrote: GiygaS: and He adds nothing new other then to hesitate a bit before voting for seph (after his first defence). This could easily be jumping on the wagon that Shraft and myself started. I can't really say anything here other than I disagree. My hesitation to lynch him was merely that, a hesitation, based off my previous experiences. I hate voting for people off one vote to "pressure them" because it starts a bandwagon too easily, but at the time of Sephs second post, I was convinced he was scum (wrongly). I also was the first to analyse (and only) his second post. As i wrote earlier (see spoiler) he jumped on the Seph wagon prette early without much reasoning. He don't want to vote on a person with just 1 post but immediatly after sephs 2nd post he votes for him with not much more to go after then after the first post. I thought he was scum after the first post, it was confirmed (for me) in the second post, for the reasons I entailed in that post. Why is that so hard to believe? After this he have a few post with nothing in them. Then he is gone for almost 24hours and comes back posting this: He admits that he just skimmed trough "the whole jaybrundage thing" but in the same post comes to the conclusion that Seph is more scummy than Jay. The reasoning for thinking Seph is scum is okay, but not very in-depth considering how much Seph had actually written to defend himself at this point. I didn't come to the conclusion that Seph was more scummy, I came to the conclusion that he WAS scummy (you must have agreed considering you voted for him too.) I did say I only skimmed through the jay thing because I was saying that I was going to read through it and give my thoughts, which I did in the next post 30 minutes later. I said I was going to post my thoughts, and the throughts weren't really all that in-depth in my mind either that Jay wasn't AS scummy as seph, of course, now I have my doubts on him based off seph's results, going to be looking through his filter some. The last post just screams scumbuddy to me. No reasoning. No logic. Just a statement to further enhance the image that Jay is a good guy. How does it scream scumbuddy? I posted my thoughts that I didn't think Jay was as scummy as Seph, that's it that's all. I'll be honest, I was tunelling on Seph, which I won't do again. This post is to me a null read. But i'll run over it anyway. The first part (bolded) makes perfectly sense to me. GiygaS argues that the case on Jay is mostly twisting words and then acknowledges that the case on Seph is similar but to him its more _how_ seph responded then what was the actual case. Again i would have liked to see more in-depth analysis. How did Seph react to make you think he was scum? How did Jay react better? Last part of the post is again defending Jay on why he hasn't scumhunted (besides Seph). At this early stage of the game why would you defend someone? It just strikes me as weird since it is hard to get a read this early. Sorry, I'll be more in-depth with my thoughts from now on *salute* All in all not much was done from his side on day1. Would we have missed him if he had not posted at all? (yes he had a few post regarding lynch policy but those are useless) He pushed gently towards Seph in the beginning not overcommiting. Then later comes back and push Seph again without going all out crazy bananas mega case. Small nudges to get wagon on seph to continue while taking of spotlight from potential scumbuddy Jay. On Shraft's coming soon! | ||
| ||