| Palmar Iceland. February 23 2012 06:48. Posts 7621 | Profile Blog # |
| The voting will close 22:00 GMT[local] any votes cast at that minute or later will not be counted. You have been warned, the timing listed on the post on TL will be used. |
| | ♥ http://www.iron-edge.co.uk ♥ | |
|
|
| DoctorHelvetica United States. February 23 2012 06:51. Posts 13955 | Profile Blog # |
That's fine then. Can I expect to see some contribution beyond criticism from you on Day 2, BC?
I'm pretty sure prplhz is scum and I'll make my case on him tonight in case I die. RedFF seems likely as well, but we'll see when the flip happens. BC has responded fairly well to the pressure as far as explaining himself in my opinion, all that's lacking is for him to make some positive play or follow through with his criticisms by scumhunting on the second day.
|
|
|
| BloodyC0bbler Canada. February 23 2012 06:52. Posts 6664 | Profile Blog # |
On February 23 2012 06:51 DoctorHelvetica wrote: That's fine then. Can I expect to see some contribution beyond criticism from you on Day 2, BC?
I'm pretty sure prplhz is scum and I'll make my case on him tonight in case I die. RedFF seems likely as well, but we'll see when the flip happens. BC has responded fairly well to the pressure as far as explaining himself in my opinion, all that's lacking is for him to make some positive play or follow through with his criticisms by scumhunting on the second day.
correct. |
| | #3 Member of the Chill Fanclub / Rhaegar fought nobly. Rhaegar fought valiantly. Rhaegar fought honorably. And Rhaeger died. --Ser Jorah Mormont TL MAFIA FORUM http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/index.php?show_part=31 go go ! |
|
|
| Blazinghand United States. February 23 2012 06:52. Posts 12824 | Profile Blog # |
| with Jitsu's vote on redFF, redFF is sitting on 7 votes to BC's 6 and will be lynched in 8 minutes |
| | When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back. |
|
|
| kitaman27 United States. February 23 2012 06:52. Posts 4861 | Profile Blog # |
On February 23 2012 05:29 syllogism wrote: Kita I know you have been around and yet do not care enough to even post. This is the second game in a row you have been completely worthless in thread and at least in arkham you were town. Is this your new standard of play?
No need to call people worthless in games you haven't played. It isn't the first time you've done it and it isn't constructive. I haven't been completely absent in this game, I've had classes for the last 7 hours.
On February 22 2012 23:34 Jackal58 wrote: Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 21:59 syllogism wrote: As I noted earlier, I do not think it's likely that the setup has a scum tracker but no town tracker. Therefore the town tracker can just counter claim him, but I doubt that's going to happen as it's more likely that he is our town tracker. These are assumptions, but reasonable and likely ones. Anyway, I don't think he is town because of his claim, but due to other aforementioned evidence and rationale.
What if there are 2 separate scum factions Syllo? Palmar states that multiple factions are a possibility in the OP.
Are you questioning whether red could be scum, just not from the same scum faction as yours? Because that's sure is a strange question to ask from a town perspective.
Jackal has a really poor filter and I think we should consider him tomorrow.
On February 23 2012 01:05 Tyrran wrote: There is the possibility that red is 3rd faction. That could explain several thing.
mmk, so now rather than a separate scum faction, he might be third party? Scummy conclusion to make.
blazing has moved his vote around plenty of times on the first day, which is a heuristic that generally points town. He can live.
The biggest thing about BC is his view of red. He goes from having a null/"bad" read on red to voting him based on the claim. What I'm wondering is if redff plans to save himself with his vote. Catching up on the posts that were made since typing this up, then I'll make my decision. (yay for last minute swings) |
| | Well, I'm better than dirt. Well, most kinds of dirt. I mean not that fancy store bought dirt. That stuffs loaded with nutrients. I... I can't compete with that stuff. |
|

|
| Jitsu United States. February 23 2012 06:52. Posts 900 | Profile Blog # |
I'm switching to red.
I can't support a BC vote switch this late, especially with the last few vote switches. I think red has acted in a much more anti-town manner then BC. |
| | Zerg Player in CheckMate Gaming - http://checkmategaming.webs.com/ |
|
|
| Dirkzor Denmark. February 23 2012 06:52. Posts 1351 | Profile Blog # |
shit. I'm not sure about BC but I think lynching RedFF is a waste.
Íts 6/6/4 in votes now. We can still hang BH.
|
| | Getting all badges on Kongregate.com -> My blog to see progress! |
|
|
| Jackal58 United States. February 23 2012 06:53. Posts 4264 | Profile # |
On February 23 2012 06:38 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote +On February 23 2012 06:36 Jackal58 wrote: On February 23 2012 06:28 BloodyC0bbler wrote: On February 23 2012 06:21 Dirkzor wrote:Its not like the BC wagon is forming quickly. Scum voting for RedFF can just sit there and hope 7 votes are enough to hang RedFF. And to be precise we have 3 wagons. RedFF Bloodyc0bble  --------------> Blazinghand <--------------  RedFF is a non-issue. He don't want to play anymore. If he returns we can take the discussion again. There are argument for and against keeping him alive even if he is scum. Bloodyc0bble is gone. He don't care. He is indifferent. He have been a target for some time now but he don't want to defend himself. Okayish lynch. Blazinghand is so far of his meta and have been sheeping thought troughout the game. He is the best lynch today and everyone should vote him.
Ok, i have to take off for work soon but as it seems people are being retarded I have to come in and defend myself. Reasons like this post are reasons I am more or less a dick this game. You just said redff is a non issue because he doesn't want to play? If he is scum he is still going to help his team and guess what else? It means you just gave him a free pass to lurk the fuck out of the game without ever contributing and not die unless he actively posts. There are no activity requirements this game and you are letting someone go with a free pass seriously. You then paint a bullseye on me for being indifferent and not defending myself? The case against me is terrible. Wasting my time on a case that imo doesn't warrant being lynched on is something I should never have to respond to. The fact that said case is also being pushed by players who know better is even sadder. Whats even worse is you have those same people pushing my lynch saying I am more likely scum, yet one of the major reasons for their defense (as near all of them have also defended redff), is that there was near no resistance to his lynch. Guess what? I have seen very few people defend me through this lynch yet redff has had a ton defending him.
If redFF quit he will not be mod killed for inactivity. But he will get mod killed for not voting. If he votes without posting we lynch him. He has already voted today before he quit I believe. I think it's a wasted lynch.
brilliant plan but redFF has already voted, on toad
On February 23 2012 06:39 Blazinghand wrote: Like are we gonna lynch redFF day3 for a non vote on Day 2? I'm pretty sure that's not even a realistic possibility
Apparently the new paradigm on TL Mafia requires me to call a person an idiot, moron, incompetent, useless, whatever other term of derision you care to employ before a person is capable of seeing the point being made. I won't play that game but I do wish you would read what I posted with something above a 1st grade comprehension level.
|
| | Life can only kill you once. |
|

|
| Blazinghand United States. February 23 2012 06:53. Posts 12824 | Profile Blog # |
redFF at 7 BC at 6 redFF about to get lynched |
| | When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back. |
|
|
| risk.nuke Sweden. February 23 2012 06:54. Posts 2768 | Profile # |
| God dammit don't lynch a person who claimed tracker day 1. If you have ANY brains. |
| | Neo.G Soulkey, Best, firebathero. // http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/index.php?show_part=31 |
|
|
| Toadesstern Germany. February 23 2012 06:54. Posts 6113 | Profile # |
On February 23 2012 06:47 Jitsu wrote: Show nested quote +On February 23 2012 05:15 Toadesstern wrote: oh crap it's actually only 1:50hours until deadline oO
Yeah totally voting BC right now, I had the balls to vote BC for mayor in GM's game although everyone said it's way too dangerous to vote and I'm having the balls to lynch him today. With this stacked of a set-up my "don't lynch vets d1"-rule really isn't an option. In 20-something games with 4 to 6 vets I still think it's good to not lynch into that but there's no possibility to think about that in this game.
Did this catch anyone else's eye, or am I seeing shit. When was it implied that the set-up was stacked? I know Palmar said the Set-Up was "hard,"...but "stacked" is another thing all together. Stacked would imply you have a knowledge as to the ratio of faction to another faction. Viscera, how sure are you on BC?
stacked in like "we got more vets than people who are not vets" |
|

|
| Blazinghand United States. February 23 2012 06:55. Posts 12824 | Profile Blog # |
| Helvetica sealing the deal it seems |
| | When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back. |
|
|
| DoctorHelvetica United States. February 23 2012 06:56. Posts 13955 | Profile Blog # |
On February 23 2012 06:54 risk.nuke wrote: God dammit don't lynch a person who claimed tracker day 1. If you have ANY brains.
He claimed tracker powers day 1 and hasn't played since then, he didn't claim a named role though which is extremely odd since it's allowed. |
|
|
| Blazinghand United States. February 23 2012 06:56. Posts 12824 | Profile Blog # |
On February 23 2012 06:56 DoctorHelvetica wrote: Show nested quote +On February 23 2012 06:54 risk.nuke wrote: God dammit don't lynch a person who claimed tracker day 1. If you have ANY brains.
He claimed tracker powers day 1 and hasn't played since then, he didn't claim a named role though which is extremely odd since it's allowed.
And this is weirder than BC's weirdness? |
| | When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back. |
|
|
| wherebugsgo United States. February 23 2012 06:56. Posts 7962 | Profile Blog # |
So many pages
Why must I go to class
Based on my skim and what I haven't already said I believe that prplhz is scum. RedFF is still a good lynch, and if he flips red IMO we need to 100% kill prplhz. |
| |
|
| Jackal58 United States. February 23 2012 06:57. Posts 4264 | Profile # |
On February 23 2012 06:52 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote +On February 23 2012 05:29 syllogism wrote: Kita I know you have been around and yet do not care enough to even post. This is the second game in a row you have been completely worthless in thread and at least in arkham you were town. Is this your new standard of play?
No need to call people worthless in games you haven't played. It isn't the first time you've done it and it isn't constructive. I haven't been completely absent in this game, I've had classes for the last 7 hours. Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 23:34 Jackal58 wrote: On February 22 2012 21:59 syllogism wrote: As I noted earlier, I do not think it's likely that the setup has a scum tracker but no town tracker. Therefore the town tracker can just counter claim him, but I doubt that's going to happen as it's more likely that he is our town tracker. These are assumptions, but reasonable and likely ones. Anyway, I don't think he is town because of his claim, but due to other aforementioned evidence and rationale.
What if there are 2 separate scum factions Syllo? Palmar states that multiple factions are a possibility in the OP.
Are you questioning whether red could be scum, just not from the same scum faction as yours? Because that's sure is a strange question to ask from a town perspective. Jackal has a really poor filter and I think we should consider him tomorrow. Show nested quote +On February 23 2012 01:05 Tyrran wrote: There is the possibility that red is 3rd faction. That could explain several thing.
mmk, so now rather than a separate scum faction, he might be third party? Scummy conclusion to make. blazing has moved his vote around plenty of times on the first day, which is a heuristic that generally points town. He can live. The biggest thing about BC is his view of red. He goes from having a null/"bad" read on red to voting him based on the claim. What I'm wondering is if redff plans to save himself with his vote. Catching up on the posts that were made since typing this up, then I'll make my decision. (yay for last minute swings)
My poor little filter.
My question regarding factions has to do with me seeing scummy looking people pushing other scummy looking people. Not a hard concept to grasp.
|
| | Life can only kill you once. |
|

|
| Blazinghand United States. February 23 2012 06:57. Posts 12824 | Profile Blog # |
| Well good news for you WBG is that redFF is dead. |
| | When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back. |
|
|
| prplhz Denmark. February 23 2012 06:58. Posts 4116 | Profile Blog # |
Rofl wherebugsgo.
Are you trying to say something about my alignment based on another player's alignment? |
| |
|
| Jackal58 United States. February 23 2012 06:58. Posts 4264 | Profile # |
On February 23 2012 06:57 Blazinghand wrote: Well good news for you WBG is that redFF is dead.
Happy little scum bucket aren't you. |
| | Life can only kill you once. |
|
|
| Blazinghand United States. February 23 2012 06:58. Posts 12824 | Profile Blog # |
| how about based the fact that you are captain mcunhelpful |
| | When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back. |
|
|
| Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 100 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 Next |
|
|
|