I'll have more time for this one :D:D
Bastard Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
I'll have more time for this one :D:D | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Also, please stop spoiling SoIaF, we have to read everything in mafias... :/ | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 10 2012 09:11 Hassybaby wrote: I vote C_C for trying to get is to mass claim I did no such thing. Twisting my words like that is pretty scum bro. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
So why does Drazerk keep saying it does? ##Vote Drazerk | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 10 2012 06:16 layabout wrote: Put a bullet in Bluelightz and i will hold you On April 10 2012 06:38 VisceraEyes wrote: layabout, do you dislike Bluelightz? Do you think Bluelightz is in the scumteam that you're speculating doesn't exist? Why would you want me to shoot Bluelightz? Something about this VE-layabout interaction seems off. VE's questions seem somewhat inappropriate compared to the discussion. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 10 2012 13:38 johnnywup wrote: ok we've re-rated VE's questions rated R. DO you think it's appropriate now? No, I mean it seems forced. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 10 2012 14:15 VisceraEyes wrote: I'm just curious to know why Bluelightz is all. That seemed pretty specific for so early. Were you not interested in the answers to those questions Cheese? I wasn't no. There hasn't been much reason to legitimately want to vig yet. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Furthermore, why would you try using code, when you have the anonymous message at your disposal? | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 11 2012 01:17 Macheji wrote: @ Bluelightz . Quoted off me, check my filter. I had this on my mind since yesterday. I just made it more clearer this time. The reason for witch i can't go 100% in with this is because, in my mind, after 1 day of talking i just can't gather enough "evidence" on a person to be 100% sure of something. There are just not enough facts tbh, and this is the only reason i said that i still keep an open mind. But i back my claim up... In my mind, layabout is the person i suspect most.... closely to the tought that there aren't any bad guys, only townies separated into different interest groups ( check my post from before ). If there is nothing to change my mind until the day of the lynch, i will vote for layabout. This seems to have a large focus on the defensive... Facts? Evidence? 100% sure? On day 1? On April 11 2012 05:40 Macheji wrote: Oh and before bluelightz starts accusing me of sheeping or whatever it's called again. I know i used Drazerk's point. I added some details so other people don't have to start checking all the forums for the times. I also said it to show you guys what determined me to cast my vote and to reply to layabout's On April 11 2012 05:45 Macheji wrote: We just showed you tbh. It's all Occam's razor here ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor ). And you being innocent has way more assumptions than you beeing guilty in my eyes . More pre-emptive defence. Why would a townie be so scared of being called out? Given the odds of being scum tend to range from 20-25%, this use of probabiliy seems suss. Not to mention the use of probablility at all, it seems to just be more excusing himself His fliter: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=326599&user=234970 ##Vote: Macheji | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
1) + Show Spoiler [strongandbig] + On April 10 2012 14:48 Cyber_Cheese wrote: Hey, strongandbig, why are you obsessed with the sleeper cell agents? Furthermore, why would you try using code, when you have the anonymous message at your disposal? On April 11 2012 07:54 layabout wrote: I think Strongandbig is a third party. His posting History this game is the following: I want to /in /in I am going for "bastard meta" /confirm Is Darzek claiming broken shell? oh btw i haven't seen lost 37 "!" you a sleeper cell? Contrived twitpic nonsense "Im Tovn" dont trust ppl I looked at the lsot wiki, maybe everyone in town is a survivor? I think BM is a smurf and he is lurking, so i am going to pressure him, aren't i useful 2) + Show Spoiler [Macheji] + On April 11 2012 08:08 Cyber_Cheese wrote: This seems to have a large focus on the defensive... Facts? Evidence? 100% sure? On day 1? More pre-emptive defence. Why would a townie be so scared of being called out? Given the odds of being scum tend to range from 20-25%, this use of probabiliy seems suss. Not to mention the use of probablility at all, it seems to just be more excusing himself. His filter: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=326599&user=234970 ##Vote: Macheji 3) VE, for getting me killed day 1 last game, and not being nearly as active as in any other game I've seen him. 4) My target. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 11 2012 16:38 johnnywup wrote: oh, figured it was majority. Then to keep layabout more likely to be lynched: ##vote Layabout sheep | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 11 2012 18:43 phagga wrote: Hey Bagmanager, where have you been? Did you actually read the thread? It has been explained pretty well why some people want layabout dead. And why whould you want that? Care to elaborate before you go hardcore lurking again? Explained pretty well? There's hardly anything worth mention... Why are you trying to excuse peoples sheeping? | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 11 2012 19:18 Macheji wrote: @ Cyber_Cheese . This is the first time i play this game, just tought i have to make a defence after bluelightz "attacked" me. Maybe cuz of excitement, to talk , interact or something. But the first one was really legit, right after he accused me. The second one was because i used some arguments somebody else used before me ( so that my new added details can be understood easier ) and i felt like bluelightz will have another go at me. I just wanted to make my intentions clear. If argumenting my posts and actions when someone accuses me on various reasons is "suspect", and "incriminating" then i don't really know how to act in such a situation . Hmm, it's weird cuz i'm defending myself right now, tought proving innocence would be easier ... between a rock and a hard place huh... Newbie card, entirely defensive play, no accusations/original thoughts... A much more solid lynch than layabout. This time, you've been caught already, but next time you roll scum, you don't have to defend yourself from everything like this. If the argument is you defend yourself too much, form some opinions and state them. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
TOWN WE ARE PLAYING THE STOP BEING RETARDED SHEEP GAME On April 11 2012 19:33 Macheji wrote: Anything worth mention .... What are you talking about... He has the most things worth mentioning about. I'll summerise it for you one last time. 1. He proposed 4 people to get lynched so far. The last one beeing me for "missuse" of Occam's Razor ( in reality it's because i'm making a case against him ) 2. He lied about posts timing in his "kill bluelightz" posts 3.When people were starting to make a case against him he done this : ... Our claims were preatty clear, we were serious, and transparent, well , how can you EVEN do that. He ends it with "thread is trash" in order to diminish the last page's importance ( the last pages were about why should we lynch him ) 4. Then Ok, am i the only one tottaly confused by this... What exactly prooves he's a third party... I find that post bullshit. AND it's 20 minutes after the "thread is bullshit " post. I think that post was made in order to distract the topic from " let's lynch layabout" to ... are there third parties, who is this strongandbig guy etc. Let me get this straight: He was looking for viable lynch targets, mistook at what time he posted on a 'kill bluelights' thing that wasnt even serious in the first place, asked for a real reason to be lynched, and pointed out a non contributing player. OH MY GOD WTF LYNCH HIM!!!! /sarcasm | ||
| ||