No transgender / gender identity / gender equality talk in this fanclub please.
| Deeno Finland. April 12 2012 07:15. Posts 60 | Profile # |
On April 12 2012 07:02 starojda wrote:Speaking about canadians being all the same... That reminded me of south park  ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/prR0K.jpg)
epic :D |
| | ^________________________^ |
|
|
| quaak April 12 2012 07:36. Posts 6 | Profile # |
| I really don't post that often but yes … count me in! Last edit: 2012-04-12 07:36:29 |
|
|
| Mystgun Hong Kong. April 12 2012 07:37. Posts 282 | Profile # | |
|
|
| sinistrorsey2 April 12 2012 07:40. Posts 42 | Profile # |
He/she is a really great player, he/she pulled a trimaster  .
User was temp banned for this post. |
|
|
| Ambre France. April 12 2012 07:48. Posts 246 | Profile # |
Me master terran no time to post very often
But SIGN ME IN plz thx. |
|
|
| lolspoon April 12 2012 07:50. Posts 423 | Profile # |
On April 12 2012 07:40 sinistrorsey2 wrote:He/she is a really great player, he/she pulled a trimaster .
SHE. SHE. SHE
How many times should we repeat this? Edit your post b4 u get warned/banned... |
| | NERD THATS TEH WAY WE LIEV |
|
|
| AlgeriaT Sweden. April 12 2012 08:00. Posts 1262 | Profile # |
On April 12 2012 07:50 lolspoon wrote:
Show nested quote +On April 12 2012 07:40 sinistrorsey2 wrote:He/she is a really great player, he/she pulled a trimaster .
SHE. SHE. SHE How many times should we repeat this? Edit your post b4 u get warned/banned...
Quoting these shitposts isn't necessary I think, that just spreads their stupidity out further. Better to just report and let the mods nuke them.
User was warned for this post |
| | CORN GIRL | Flash | FanTaSy | CholeraSC 4 eva <3 |
|
|
| Grumbels Netherlands. April 12 2012 08:07. Posts 3628 | Profile Blog # |
| Now all three of you need to edit your post. :o |
| | suffer by myself in a pool of blissful misery |
|
|
| fugs United States. April 12 2012 08:09. Posts 43 | Profile # | |
|
|
| See.Blue United States. April 12 2012 08:15. Posts 2295 | Profile Blog # |
| Sign me up! 'Bout time NA had someone who could take the fight to the koreans |
|
|
| McPhiz Canada. April 12 2012 08:20. Posts 183 | Profile # |
| i think she has lots of potential but i want to see stream and more matches before i sign up |
|
|
| IAMFAPMAN April 12 2012 08:37. Posts 45 | Profile # |
| this hype is so wrong ... gl to her anyway |
|
|
| xJonesy United Kingdom. April 12 2012 08:40. Posts 40 | Profile # |
| Hope she gets signed soon and get a good PC to stream :D Last edit: 2012-04-12 08:43:06 |
| |
|
| IAMFAPMAN April 12 2012 08:44. Posts 45 | Profile # |
On April 11 2012 21:50 PlagueWasp wrote:
Show nested quote +On April 11 2012 21:31 JOJOsc2news wrote:
On April 11 2012 21:23 Zaqwe wrote:
On April 11 2012 21:20 turdburgler wrote:
On April 11 2012 21:03 Zaqwe wrote:
Scarlett is, in fact, genetically and physically a man. The OP said this before but maybe it is edited out.
If Scarlett tried to compete in the women's olympics it would not be allowed.
there have been women who have been banned from the womens olympics for not being women so i dont see your point.
I am not sure I understand your post but my point was that claiming Scarletts achievements on behalf of women is problematic because Scarlett still has any physical or mental advantages that male DNA gives. This is why people who have male DNA and male physiology are not allowed to compete in womens olympics. If men have a natural advantage in Starcraft--not that they necesarily do, but it can't be ruled out based on results--Scarlett has the same natural advantage.
I am usually a very mannered person but... For fuck sake! This is a fan club thread! This isn't your personal blog! Write a personal blog about your feelings and all the wrongs in the world that are a burden on your soul! Write about how you are afraid of MM's ever since you choked on one in kindergarten... Do whatever you want but don't do it here! One more time: This is a fanclub thread!
Agree that this is a fanclub thread, but don't expect this to stop coming up in posts. It will continue to come up because apparently it is more important to some people what gender a player is instead of whether they can play or not. And they also can't seem to accept the fact that her results at IPL 4 as a previously unknown player are why she suddenly has a lot of fans.
feast?
|
|
|
| chocopan Japan. April 12 2012 08:59. Posts 986 | Profile # |
Heyhey they are about to discuss Scarlett on Live on Three right now. Will update with summary if it seems worthwhile.
I'm seeing red! harharhar
Update: Summary below.
+ Show Spoiler +They say the tg thing is the least notable thing about her and that her play is genuinely impressive. Note the buzz about team offers.
Acknowledge it is only one result, but can't not be impressed. Apparently everyone is asking teams if they are picking her up, and SirScoots says you can't make a career on one result. Watching her play he says she looks like she plays solid, it wasn't cheesy play or anything, which suggest she has real promise, but there have to be a series of solid results for serious teams to take her seriously.
He also notes sometimes it can be sort of easier if you come in as an unknown, eg. when she was given the regame, which probably wouldn't have happened if she had been perceived as a Real Threat. They think dm was unwise to give her a regame. (Obviously :D .)
But still regame aside she beat him no ifs no buts.
They comment that mostly the community has been mature about the tg aspects of the story.
Like pretty much all of the Scarlett coverage I've seen in the community, it was positive. SirScoots made fair points, contra the "so much hype" crit above.
Last edit: 2012-04-12 09:39:02 |
| |
|
| TicketoHELL Canada. April 12 2012 10:05. Posts 364 | Profile # |
| Sign me up! shes awesome! |
| | (づ.ㅡ) 부비적 (ㅡ.ど) 부비적 (づ.ど) 부비부비 |
|
|
| ABagOfFritos Canada. April 12 2012 10:07. Posts 454 | Profile Blog # |
On April 12 2012 08:59 chocopan wrote:Heyhey they are about to discuss Scarlett on Live on Three right now. Will update with summary if it seems worthwhile. I'm seeing red! harharhar Update: Summary below. + Show Spoiler +They say the tg thing is the least notable thing about her and that her play is genuinely impressive. Note the buzz about team offers.
Acknowledge it is only one result, but can't not be impressed. Apparently everyone is asking teams if they are picking her up, and SirScoots says you can't make a career on one result. Watching her play he says she looks like she plays solid, it wasn't cheesy play or anything, which suggest she has real promise, but there have to be a series of solid results for serious teams to take her seriously.
He also notes sometimes it can be sort of easier if you come in as an unknown, eg. when she was given the regame, which probably wouldn't have happened if she had been perceived as a Real Threat. They think dm was unwise to give her a regame. (Obviously :D .)
But still regame aside she beat him no ifs no buts.
They comment that mostly the community has been mature about the tg aspects of the story.
Like pretty much all of the Scarlett coverage I've seen in the community, it was positive. SirScoots made fair points, contra the "so much hype" crit above.
Can definitely agree with Scoots in a big way, but at the same time djWHEAT pointed out that the results aren't just some lucky wins from a few easy opponents in an easy bracket. They were significant players giving us good reason to expect more excellent results in the future. Can't wait to see what happens! |
|
|
| Psyborg Germany. April 12 2012 10:10. Posts 5 | Profile # |
he is a very good zerg!
User was warned for this post
User was temp banned for this post. |
|
|
| KebertXela United States. April 12 2012 10:20. Posts 317 | Profile # |
On April 12 2012 10:07 ABagOfFritos wrote:
Show nested quote +On April 12 2012 08:59 chocopan wrote:Heyhey they are about to discuss Scarlett on Live on Three right now. Will update with summary if it seems worthwhile. I'm seeing red! harharhar Update: Summary below. + Show Spoiler +They say the tg thing is the least notable thing about her and that her play is genuinely impressive. Note the buzz about team offers.
Acknowledge it is only one result, but can't not be impressed. Apparently everyone is asking teams if they are picking her up, and SirScoots says you can't make a career on one result. Watching her play he says she looks like she plays solid, it wasn't cheesy play or anything, which suggest she has real promise, but there have to be a series of solid results for serious teams to take her seriously.
He also notes sometimes it can be sort of easier if you come in as an unknown, eg. when she was given the regame, which probably wouldn't have happened if she had been perceived as a Real Threat. They think dm was unwise to give her a regame. (Obviously :D .)
But still regame aside she beat him no ifs no buts.
They comment that mostly the community has been mature about the tg aspects of the story.
Like pretty much all of the Scarlett coverage I've seen in the community, it was positive. SirScoots made fair points, contra the "so much hype" crit above.
Can definitely agree with Scoots in a big way, but at the same time djWHEAT pointed out that the results aren't just some lucky wins from a few easy opponents in an easy bracket. They were significant players giving us good reason to expect more excellent results in the future. Can't wait to see what happens!
Also she was a top 10 GM. You can't have a couple of lucky wins to get there. We all know that well
|
| | Check my last.fm out \\ http://www.last.fm/user/bigbobo1 |
|
|
| ABagOfFritos Canada. April 12 2012 10:22. Posts 454 | Profile Blog # |
On April 12 2012 10:20 KebertXela wrote:
Show nested quote +On April 12 2012 10:07 ABagOfFritos wrote:
On April 12 2012 08:59 chocopan wrote:Heyhey they are about to discuss Scarlett on Live on Three right now. Will update with summary if it seems worthwhile. I'm seeing red! harharhar Update: Summary below. + Show Spoiler +They say the tg thing is the least notable thing about her and that her play is genuinely impressive. Note the buzz about team offers.
Acknowledge it is only one result, but can't not be impressed. Apparently everyone is asking teams if they are picking her up, and SirScoots says you can't make a career on one result. Watching her play he says she looks like she plays solid, it wasn't cheesy play or anything, which suggest she has real promise, but there have to be a series of solid results for serious teams to take her seriously.
He also notes sometimes it can be sort of easier if you come in as an unknown, eg. when she was given the regame, which probably wouldn't have happened if she had been perceived as a Real Threat. They think dm was unwise to give her a regame. (Obviously :D .)
But still regame aside she beat him no ifs no buts.
They comment that mostly the community has been mature about the tg aspects of the story.
Like pretty much all of the Scarlett coverage I've seen in the community, it was positive. SirScoots made fair points, contra the "so much hype" crit above.
Can definitely agree with Scoots in a big way, but at the same time djWHEAT pointed out that the results aren't just some lucky wins from a few easy opponents in an easy bracket. They were significant players giving us good reason to expect more excellent results in the future. Can't wait to see what happens!
Also she was a top 10 GM. You can't have a couple of lucky wins to get there. We all know that well
Yes and no on this one. Both CombatEX and Deezer have also been up in the top GM spots. |
|
|
| Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 200 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 Next |
|
|
|
Store
WCS
SC2Links Mobile App …
