Website Feedback
Closed Threads
IRC Chat
irc.quakenet.org #teamliquid
IRC Web ClientTeamSpeak 3 (92 users) | |
|
| xDaunt United States. June 27 2012 02:06. Posts 4364 | Profile # | |
|
|
| farvacola United States. June 27 2012 02:10. Posts 5411 | Profile Blog # |
That article makes it clear that the senator from Missouri has been skipping party functions for a while now, nothing new there. And the article ends on a totally bullshit opinion. And a governor you say? I still fail to see how any of this ends up being significant, there are mitigating factors in almost every case.Last edit: 2012-06-27 02:10:26 |
| | "Hey colaboy, you made the same exact post to me in the 2012 election thread. I am so glad that TL has thread constables!" |
|
|
| Arghnews United Kingdom. June 27 2012 02:11. Posts 166 | Profile # |
| People of America, please, don't vote for Romney, oh God please don't... |
|
|
| farvacola United States. June 27 2012 02:16. Posts 5411 | Profile Blog # | |
| | "Hey colaboy, you made the same exact post to me in the 2012 election thread. I am so glad that TL has thread constables!" |
|
|
| BluePanther United States. June 27 2012 09:53. Posts 2669 | Profile # |
That's not surprising really.
CO2 emission control by the EPA is hardly "arbitrary and capricious."
To meet that standard, the court would have to basically rule that there is no evidence that CO2 is destructive to the environment to some extent, which I think even non-global warming people wouldn't be on board with. |
|
|
| xDaunt United States. June 27 2012 10:24. Posts 4364 | Profile # |
On June 27 2012 09:53 BluePanther wrote:That's not surprising really. CO2 emission control by the EPA is hardly "arbitrary and capricious." To meet that standard, the court would have to basically rule that there is no evidence that CO2 is destructive to the environment to some extent, which I think even non-global warming people wouldn't be on board with.
Yeah, the only way to fix it is to have Congress remove CO2 from the EPA's jurisdiction. |
|
|
| Defacer Canada. June 28 2012 06:03. Posts 4809 | Profile Blog # |
This is a little surprising ... Rush Limbaugh calling out Romney for his evasiveness.
Rush Limbaugh had some harsh words for Mitt Romney on Tuesday, over the candidate's response to the Supreme Court's immigration ruling.
The court recently determined that certain parts of Arizona's controversial immigration policy are unconstitutional. Romney was criticized for his late and vague response to the decision. He said that he "would have preferred to see the Supreme Court give more latitude to the states."
On Tuesday, Limbaugh expressed his frustration with Romney's reaction, calling it "tepid" and a "red flag" for the campaign. The radio host declared that "Mitt Romney blew it" with his response.
"The Romney campaign was not ready for primetime on this illegal immigration Arizona decision," Limbaugh insisted, noting that it was the first time he thought that in a while. He added that he thought the campaign has been doing a "superb job" rapidly responding to new developments.
He argued that immigration was too important an issue for Romney to hold back on. "You can't live off of Obama's gaffes, like the economy's doing fine... forever," he said. "You gotta be a proud, eloquent defender of the Constitution when your opponent is stomping all over it."
I think this may be the only time ever in the history and future of humankind that I kind-of-sort-of agree with Rush Limbaugh.
Romney missed an opportunity to demonstrate his leadership ability by tepidly responding to this issue. If this is what his presidency will be like -- avoiding difficult decisions, backpedalling and constantly covering his own ass first -- I don't see how he would be an upgrade over Obama.
Last edit: 2012-06-28 06:04:24 |
|
|
| Gorsameth Netherlands. June 28 2012 06:18. Posts 1979 | Profile # |
The problem with romey is he comes over as an empty shell, there is nothing in there unless its put in by the GOP/rich people/corperations.
He is the prime example of a puppet president i have seen in a while. |
| | Fear is the keenest blade |
|
|
 jdseemoreglass United States. June 28 2012 06:23. Posts 3773 | Profile Blog # |
On June 28 2012 06:03 Defacer wrote:This is a little surprising ... Rush Limbaugh calling out Romney for his evasiveness.
Show nested quote +Rush Limbaugh had some harsh words for Mitt Romney on Tuesday, over the candidate's response to the Supreme Court's immigration ruling.
The court recently determined that certain parts of Arizona's controversial immigration policy are unconstitutional. Romney was criticized for his late and vague response to the decision. He said that he "would have preferred to see the Supreme Court give more latitude to the states."
On Tuesday, Limbaugh expressed his frustration with Romney's reaction, calling it "tepid" and a "red flag" for the campaign. The radio host declared that "Mitt Romney blew it" with his response.
"The Romney campaign was not ready for primetime on this illegal immigration Arizona decision," Limbaugh insisted, noting that it was the first time he thought that in a while. He added that he thought the campaign has been doing a "superb job" rapidly responding to new developments.
He argued that immigration was too important an issue for Romney to hold back on. "You can't live off of Obama's gaffes, like the economy's doing fine... forever," he said. "You gotta be a proud, eloquent defender of the Constitution when your opponent is stomping all over it."
I think this may be the only time ever in the history and future of humankind that I kind-of-sort-of agree with Rush Limbaugh. Romney missed an opportunity to demonstrate his leadership ability by tepidly responding to this issue. If this is what his presidency will be like -- avoiding difficult decisions, backpedalling and constantly covering his own ass first -- I don't see how he would be an upgrade over Obama.
That's why republicans spent so much time looking at crappy alternatives like Cain, Gingrich, Santorum..... They've known from the beginning that Romney is as boring and vanilla of a candidate as they could ever hope to muster. But he's squeaky clean and very careful, and I guess that matters more in American politics these days where the media crucifies people for the smallest blemishes. |
| | "If you want this forum to be full of half-baked philosophy discussions between pompous faggots like yourself forever, stay the course captain vanilla" - FakeSteve[TPR], 2006 |
|
|
| farvacola United States. June 28 2012 06:24. Posts 5411 | Profile Blog # |
On June 28 2012 06:03 Defacer wrote:This is a little surprising ... Rush Limbaugh calling out Romney for his evasiveness.
Show nested quote +Rush Limbaugh had some harsh words for Mitt Romney on Tuesday, over the candidate's response to the Supreme Court's immigration ruling.
The court recently determined that certain parts of Arizona's controversial immigration policy are unconstitutional. Romney was criticized for his late and vague response to the decision. He said that he "would have preferred to see the Supreme Court give more latitude to the states."
On Tuesday, Limbaugh expressed his frustration with Romney's reaction, calling it "tepid" and a "red flag" for the campaign. The radio host declared that "Mitt Romney blew it" with his response.
"The Romney campaign was not ready for primetime on this illegal immigration Arizona decision," Limbaugh insisted, noting that it was the first time he thought that in a while. He added that he thought the campaign has been doing a "superb job" rapidly responding to new developments.
He argued that immigration was too important an issue for Romney to hold back on. "You can't live off of Obama's gaffes, like the economy's doing fine... forever," he said. "You gotta be a proud, eloquent defender of the Constitution when your opponent is stomping all over it."
I think this may be the only time ever in the history and future of humankind that I kind-of-sort-of agree with Rush Limbaugh. Romney missed an opportunity to demonstrate his leadership ability by tepidly responding to this issue. If this is what his presidency will be like -- avoiding difficult decisions, backpedalling and constantly covering his own ass first -- I don't see how he would be an upgrade over Obama.
When your campaign would do well to listen to political strategy advice from Rush Limbaugh,________________________.
You fill out the rest 
Last edit: 2012-06-28 06:24:40 |
| | "Hey colaboy, you made the same exact post to me in the 2012 election thread. I am so glad that TL has thread constables!" |
|
|
| sunprince United States. June 28 2012 06:29. Posts 1979 | Profile # |
On June 27 2012 10:24 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +On June 27 2012 09:53 BluePanther wrote:That's not surprising really. CO2 emission control by the EPA is hardly "arbitrary and capricious." To meet that standard, the court would have to basically rule that there is no evidence that CO2 is destructive to the environment to some extent, which I think even non-global warming people wouldn't be on board with.
Yeah, the only way to fix it is to have Congress remove CO2 from the EPA's jurisdiction.
Why would removing CO2 from the EPA's jurisdiction be a good thing?
On June 28 2012 06:23 jdseemoreglass wrote:
Show nested quote +On June 28 2012 06:03 Defacer wrote:This is a little surprising ... Rush Limbaugh calling out Romney for his evasiveness.
Rush Limbaugh had some harsh words for Mitt Romney on Tuesday, over the candidate's response to the Supreme Court's immigration ruling.
The court recently determined that certain parts of Arizona's controversial immigration policy are unconstitutional. Romney was criticized for his late and vague response to the decision. He said that he "would have preferred to see the Supreme Court give more latitude to the states."
On Tuesday, Limbaugh expressed his frustration with Romney's reaction, calling it "tepid" and a "red flag" for the campaign. The radio host declared that "Mitt Romney blew it" with his response.
"The Romney campaign was not ready for primetime on this illegal immigration Arizona decision," Limbaugh insisted, noting that it was the first time he thought that in a while. He added that he thought the campaign has been doing a "superb job" rapidly responding to new developments.
He argued that immigration was too important an issue for Romney to hold back on. "You can't live off of Obama's gaffes, like the economy's doing fine... forever," he said. "You gotta be a proud, eloquent defender of the Constitution when your opponent is stomping all over it."
I think this may be the only time ever in the history and future of humankind that I kind-of-sort-of agree with Rush Limbaugh. Romney missed an opportunity to demonstrate his leadership ability by tepidly responding to this issue. If this is what his presidency will be like -- avoiding difficult decisions, backpedalling and constantly covering his own ass first -- I don't see how he would be an upgrade over Obama.
That's why republicans spent so much time looking at crappy alternatives like Cain, Gingrich, Santorum..... They've known from the beginning that Romney is as boring and vanilla of a candidate as they could ever hope to muster. But he's squeaky clean and very careful, and I guess that matters more in American politics these days where the media crucifies people for the smallest blemishes.
He's really not all that careful, considering the gaffes he's had so far.Last edit: 2012-06-28 06:30:47 |
| |
|
| xDaunt United States. June 28 2012 06:34. Posts 4364 | Profile # |
On June 28 2012 06:29 sunprince wrote:
Show nested quote +On June 27 2012 10:24 xDaunt wrote:
On June 27 2012 09:53 BluePanther wrote:That's not surprising really. CO2 emission control by the EPA is hardly "arbitrary and capricious." To meet that standard, the court would have to basically rule that there is no evidence that CO2 is destructive to the environment to some extent, which I think even non-global warming people wouldn't be on board with.
Yeah, the only way to fix it is to have Congress remove CO2 from the EPA's jurisdiction.
Why would removing CO2 from the EPA's jurisdiction be a good thing?
Because I'd rather the EPA not pass bullshit CO2 regulations that unnecessarily hamper the American economy. |
|
|
| sunprince United States. June 28 2012 06:39. Posts 1979 | Profile # |
On June 28 2012 06:34 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +On June 28 2012 06:29 sunprince wrote:
On June 27 2012 10:24 xDaunt wrote:
On June 27 2012 09:53 BluePanther wrote:That's not surprising really. CO2 emission control by the EPA is hardly "arbitrary and capricious." To meet that standard, the court would have to basically rule that there is no evidence that CO2 is destructive to the environment to some extent, which I think even non-global warming people wouldn't be on board with.
Yeah, the only way to fix it is to have Congress remove CO2 from the EPA's jurisdiction.
Why would removing CO2 from the EPA's jurisdiction be a good thing?
Because I'd rather the EPA not pass bullshit CO2 regulations that unnecessarily hamper the American economy.
We should let businesses dump toxic waste anywhere they want, too. Restricting them would unnecessarily hamper the American economy. /sarcasm
If anyting, the EPA is extremely business friendly, to the point that it's been sued for being influenced by political appointees instead of legitimate science.Last edit: 2012-06-28 06:53:13 |
| |
|
| RCMDVA United States. June 28 2012 06:45. Posts 339 | Profile # |
The biggest (and it really is huge) thing that Obama has going for him is that US Gas prices are in a free-fall heading into the summer months.
$3.25ish or so heading to $3.00/gallon on average. Some states like SC are at $3.00.
That kind of shows that he's not sitting comfortably right now... $3.00 gas and he should be coasting...piling up all the undecideds/moderates.
|
|
|
| Saryph United States. June 28 2012 06:50. Posts 647 | Profile # |
Here in swing state virginia my gas is already below $3 and still dropping. It's nice, hope it continues.
Thanks election year! |
|
|
| DoubleReed United States. June 28 2012 07:02. Posts 3133 | Profile Blog # |
| Totally disagree with Limbaugh. Romney can't alienate Hispanics if he wants to win the swing states. Of course it may be hopeless by now. Last edit: 2012-06-28 07:02:55 |
| | Baby, you want to make like Stravinsky and perform a Rite of Spring? |
|
|
| xDaunt United States. June 28 2012 07:11. Posts 4364 | Profile # |
On June 28 2012 07:02 DoubleReed wrote:
Totally disagree with Limbaugh. Romney can't alienate Hispanics if he wants to win the swing states. Of course it may be hopeless by now.
I think he can because he'll take the white majority vote by a huge margin. |
|
|
| Deathmanbob United States. June 28 2012 07:46. Posts 1952 | Profile # |
On June 28 2012 07:11 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +On June 28 2012 07:02 DoubleReed wrote:
Totally disagree with Limbaugh. Romney can't alienate Hispanics if he wants to win the swing states. Of course it may be hopeless by now.
I think he can because he'll take the white majority vote by a huge margin.
i really dont think whites are going to vote for romeny as much as people say they are
unless you have polling that says otherwise? none rasmusian(sp?) polling |
| | No Artosis, you are robin |
|
|
| xDaunt United States. June 28 2012 07:50. Posts 4364 | Profile # |
On June 28 2012 07:46 Deathmanbob wrote:
Show nested quote +On June 28 2012 07:11 xDaunt wrote:
On June 28 2012 07:02 DoubleReed wrote:
Totally disagree with Limbaugh. Romney can't alienate Hispanics if he wants to win the swing states. Of course it may be hopeless by now.
I think he can because he'll take the white majority vote by a huge margin.
i really dont think whites are going to vote for romeny as much as people say they are unless you have polling that says otherwise? none rasmusian(sp?) polling
I can't find the link, but Rasmussen released a poll a couple weeks ago showing Obama with support among whites down in the 30s and Romney with white support in the 60s. |
|
|
| Deathmanbob United States. June 28 2012 08:03. Posts 1952 | Profile # |
On June 28 2012 07:50 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +On June 28 2012 07:46 Deathmanbob wrote:
On June 28 2012 07:11 xDaunt wrote:
On June 28 2012 07:02 DoubleReed wrote:
Totally disagree with Limbaugh. Romney can't alienate Hispanics if he wants to win the swing states. Of course it may be hopeless by now.
I think he can because he'll take the white majority vote by a huge margin.
i really dont think whites are going to vote for romeny as much as people say they are unless you have polling that says otherwise? none rasmusian(sp?) polling
I can't find the link, but Rasmussen released a poll a couple weeks ago showing Obama with support among whites down in the 30s and Romney with white support in the 60s.
i trust rasmussen polling as much as you trust polling from HP
they are both just way to biased to be considered legit |
| | No Artosis, you are robin |
|
|
| Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 100 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 Next | |
|
|
|
| |
|
Sidebar Settings...
|
Store
