never played before, kinda super excited to try this out
Surprisingly Normal Mini Mafia XI
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Jailbreaker
United States62 Posts
never played before, kinda super excited to try this out | ||
Jailbreaker
United States62 Posts
Lazermonkey - Day one is the most important day to analyze. Even though it is a noob game, work needs to be done. Pure-SC2 - The no lynch is a terrible idea. Misslynch is collateral damage. It happens. I'm not playing the hate mafia squad, I dont want to get thrown out the air lock on the first day. | ||
Jailbreaker
United States62 Posts
THERE'S MAFIA SCUM AMONG US. I know it is day one, but does it have to be so passive? I don't want to vote for the wrong person based on three posts | ||
Jailbreaker
United States62 Posts
| ||
Jailbreaker
United States62 Posts
I voted for you because: On April 27 2012 00:04 yomi wrote: hi lets all be best friends and work together to solve the puzzle! and On April 27 2012 13:16 WhySoMuch wrote: nreekay's vote on me is weirder than yomi with all the hate on whysomuch, i think we need to look into other players as well? | ||
Jailbreaker
United States62 Posts
Bold: check Colon: check Space: check User: check | ||
Jailbreaker
United States62 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + These are my thoughts so far on what has been posted. right or wrong, this is my interpretation. On April 27 2012 02:57 yomi wrote: these players havent posted: whysomuch mordanis calls them out for lurking: bandwagon under construction On April 27 2012 03:24 yomi wrote: ya rando lynch is bad that's 25% I think to hit which is not profit. But you only need 25 more points to get to 50% and then we are in profit territory so we'll see how it plays out. if everyone is getting along friendly and lurking all day like they are now then we can't do anything. and being useless: bandwagon mobilized. On April 27 2012 03:52 Mordanis wrote: Shit. I was asleep or at class until now. Anyways, I personally think that a lynch on the first day would be a mistake. I haven't followed much mafia, played before, or read as much as I should have, and so my personal view is that it would be a shame to lynch someone solely based on trying to trim down the total pool of people in the spaceship. OHMIGOSH was called a lurker! time to panic! On April 27 2012 04:00 Mordanis wrote: As an addendum to my previous post, it is going to be hard to judge whether someone is lurking or just sleeping, seeing as we have people from USA, Europe, and even South Pacific. Since days are 24 hours and nights are 48 hours, I definitely think that you need to wait for a fairly long time (I'm thinking about 9 hours), because people do occasionally sleep If nothing else, at least for first little bit we should tell everyone our relative schedules so that there is no misunderstanding. To start this off, I will be going to class in about an hour, and after that I'll be able to post maybe once before going to work until about 10:30ish PM (AZ time) Tries to clear lurker name. because hey, this is a gobal game right? somepeople might need more time. seemsreasonabletome. On April 27 2012 05:27 Lazermonkey wrote: But yet your own post doesn't really contribute much at all. If you think not enough people are posting or that they are posting useless stuff, wouldn't it be better if you did some analysis yourself? I think everyone are conscious about that we have mafia among us and everyone would like to avoid dumb misslynches. You are stating the obvious here. Your post is even a bit counterproductive in that you discouraging people from making posts about lynch/no lynch. Afaik there isn't much else to talk about atm but please let us know if there is something. Talking about peoples opinions about lynching gives us a tell on their gameplan/motives etc. so I find nothing bad with it. I'm off to bed now. There is a chance that I will not be able to post to much untill 20:00 CEST tomorrow. You're right, I should put more analysis into my posts. On April 27 2012 10:22 WhySoMuch wrote: Hey all, This is my first game on this site, but I have played WW elsewhere so I'm not a total newbie. First off, with regards to No-Lynch, this is a very bad idea. We have 2 kills a day as of right now, the vig and the lynch, by negating a kill we are automatically giving the wolves an edge by not taking advantage of our kill-rate. Also, even though a villager is more likely to be lynched, the information we gain via wagon analysis, late vote changes etc. becomes very valuable as we progress through the game. And a random question: Is there any way to get more posts per page? Right now mine is set to default and couldnt find a way to make me see more posts. Idk if it's possible. totally not drawing attention to myself Page 5 is the Yomi versus WhySoMuch showdown Yomi votes for whysomuch, whysomuch votes for The_Zen_Man (where did this come from?) they talk about win rates for town correctly lynching and whatnot I vote for Yomi because I feel like you are starting a bandwagon against whysomuch so early in the game then he asks why i voted for him. I think that is suspicious. then On April 27 2012 12:38 nreekay324 wrote: they're almost as bad as vampires ##vote: whysomuch so confused by this, dont know what to say. next is: On April 27 2012 13:16 WhySoMuch wrote: nreekay's vote on me is weirder than yomi I think I see this as: "YOMI has a reason to vote for me. Nreekay is prolly jumping on the bandwagon" O.Golden_ne - obvious critical analysis out in the open. BOOM CHECK IT next set of posts is my fail vote, lol. I vote for yomi for reasons stated above Mordanis- i think he is just trying to keep a "netural" image. I'm totally against the witchhunt too, I will put more analysis into posts. | ||
Jailbreaker
United States62 Posts
"it is going to be hard to judge whether someone is lurking or just sleeping" There are several who have very few posts: Starting from "day one" Lazermonkey with 2 Pure-SC2 with 3 The_Zen_Man with 1 Veriat with 3 Splinter[eP] with 1 nreekay324 with 3 AcesAnoka with 2 everyone else has at least +7 posts. more posts, more to analyze | ||
Jailbreaker
United States62 Posts
| ||
Jailbreaker
United States62 Posts
I dont want to post a Fos untill i can get my logic straightened out. Yes, I realize that my posts have flaws, but I will stand by my decision untill i am fully convinced to change my vote. I don't want to sit in the neutral zone because I feel that it is to passive. What Golden has said in the post above me, "Both these players seem very afraid to be lynched, and squirm under scrutiny." Even though it is for two different players, getting accused causes panic and action. I feel like it would be easier to identify between scum and town. Im going to stand by my vote of yomi. No apologies for my shallow posts. | ||
Jailbreaker
United States62 Posts
Can't you see that other players are trying to rush people into a decision so fast?? Just because we dun have a majority vote, doesn't mean we should rush. Even though I voted for Yomi so fast in the game, i didn't rush. Just like what golden says, stay clam and dont panic. I know its fail logic right here, no apollo-gies here on my part. Mordanis says: + Show Spoiler + Hopefully our analysis has been good enough that at least some of the people who have 2 or 3 votes are scum. That being said, our strategy should be to have everyone post the people they'd be willing to vote for. This will force the mafia to either risk voting for their own or they will reveal themselves (the circle of people who won't vote for each other will be the mafia). Personally, I'll vote for anyone who is close to a majority, or one of the triangle who won't vote for each other. Come on guys, we are running out of time and we need to start working together to make a lynch. Its crunch time guys, and we need teamwork to beat the mafia. and + Show Spoiler + Guys, we have 4 hours. We need to get going. the closest we have is 4 now. Sounds a bit to me like a rushing/get-on-the-band-wagon On April 29 2012 00:25 Lazermonkey wrote: Noone is posting atm really. AcecAnoka havn't been posting in about a day, which could very well be due to IRL stuffs. But he is still my prime suspect. ##Vote: AcecAnoka This vote may very well change tho, depending on the events in the evening! Why are you voting for him? plz give a real reason. I also feel like O.Golden_ne has the most influence over the votes with your "in depth analysis" and a galactic wall of texts. On April 28 2012 18:26 Veriat wrote: Ok here are my thoughts on who are the scum: The_Zen_Man nreekay324 Jailbreaker The_Zen_Man You're stance on the "lynch no lynch" discussion has left me a little puzzled, and your overall playstyle seem fishy to me, so you're getting my vote. nreekay324 All your posts just seem off and scummy. Many of them seem rushed or flawed, and you basically just jumped the bandwagon with your early vote on Why_So_Much. On a side note i did find Why_So_Much's playstyle kind of off, but i don't think he's scum, because then why would you vote for him? Jailbreaker You've my number 3 due to consistent flaws in your previous posts. Sounds more like regurgitation of O.Golden_ne's posts. From what AcecAnoka has posted, I feel like we dont have enough info to point fingers at him. get off the bandwagon and look at other players posts just in general | ||
Jailbreaker
United States62 Posts
Since I voted to horribly wrong, I'm going to delay my vote until it is closer to the deadline. WhySoMuch - so honored to be a suspect on your list. You're right, i have been commentating to much on everyone's posts. i didn't vote veriat because it seemed like a bandwagon case to me. Mordanis - + Show Spoiler + On April 30 2012 11:53 Mordanis wrote: Frankly, I was simply reluctant to change my 3 times in about an hour. In reality, I was more for a lynch for either player than I was for a lynch of specifically one of them. At that point, Aces hadn't posted in about a day, so without knowing any justification for why he was lurking, he was a good candidate for a lynch even if there was a low probability of his being mafia just because he wasn't any help for the town. Hell, I'm still for lynching lurkers even if there is a low probability of them turning out scum because we need to work together. Lurking only hurts us. Also, if you look at the earlier parts of the thread, I was one of the first to put pressure on Veriat, which I don't see mafia doing. After that little bit of defense, I'm very glad to have suspicion cast upon me. We need to have everyone defending themselves and looking at other players behavior. I'd like to think that I'm one of the least scummy posters, but I have no problems. I'll be able to post a bit more in a little bit, so bye for a few minutes :D All I get is a scum vibe from you on this post. But i feel like i don't have enough info on you to make a significant case against you. Seeing how I take individual posts instead of looking at the context of the posts. will post more when i have a goodnight sleep | ||
Jailbreaker
United States62 Posts
Yes, I am a lurker. Barely have time to post with my boatload of homework! Mordanis - Whats with all the hate?!? "if we're wrong and he turns out to be town, we aren't going to lose much." Well yeah, if you are MAFIA. Pure-SC2 - I've been in full panic mode when players started to point at me with suspicion. I have literally no idea how to defend myself. "and no response at all to the cases made against him in conjunction with lurking, he makes by the far the best lynching candidate we have." Splinter[eP] hasn't posted at all either, yet I'm the one with all the votes? Lazermonkey - NOOOOOOOO You're vote still matters bro. Just because i have majority, doesn't mean that you should just jump on the bandwagon. ##Vote: Pure-SC2 FOS Mordanis | ||
Jailbreaker
United States62 Posts
| ||
| ||