if there is still room sign me up please
Newbie Mini Mafia XIII
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
if there is still room sign me up please | ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On May 09 2012 19:24 Radfield wrote: Apparently not as Zen Man just left. You'll get a role PM tonight Unforgiven. Can't wait | ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
Oh man, did this just become even more pertinent ? | ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
| ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
But if he's town, shit. | ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On May 10 2012 23:28 Hyaach wrote: oh i kept reading it as 24 hour day. guess its 24 hour night/48 hour day cycle so we still got 1 full day ahead. ##Vote Anacletus What's your reasoning behind voting for me? | ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On May 10 2012 23:33 Hyaach wrote: No edits are allowed. IMO, i did whatever firmtofu wrote was just a innocent day 1 remark. There is nothing more suspicious about his post than yours actually. And say "if" he was mafia, what if the mafia decided to throw him under the bus? Not a good way to rule out anything. I'm also just voting you because there's nothing to discuss here /sarcasm It was for a misspell. I don't understand what your line about FirmTofu is saying, it makes no sense. I doubt that the mafia would try to be hyper-aggressive day 1. I think that the people who aren't voting are suspicious. I think it makes more sense for the mafia to try and be passive in voting yet vocal in chat to try and rule who otherw vote for and keep their hands clean. | ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On May 10 2012 23:49 Hyaach wrote: i meant i think whatever firmtofu wrote was just a casual remark. you seem to know a awful lot about how the mafia plans to play their game don't you. I've played mafia before. That being said nothing that I say is guaranteed so playing one playstyle will probably let them metagame us. I was only throwing out my 2 cents. Also, maybe I'm metagaming knowing mafia will read this. The hole goes deeper. | ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
I'm not mafia TT | ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On May 11 2012 04:46 ShiaoPi wrote: Is that your defense? Seriously? BroodkingEXE if you believe me scum and starting a scumwagon, I would like to know the reasons how you came to that assumption. Well, the way I figure it, if I try to defend myself too much I'll just draw more attention to myself. There really isn't any evidence on the board so I think that just not voicing my opinion until there's more evidence would be better. I'd just like to point out though that if I am hung, you will see that I am not mafia and you will probably want to go after those gunning for me..... Your justification for wanting to hang me is lacking evidence just as my claim. | ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On May 11 2012 05:03 Crossfire99 wrote: Anacletus, don't think that defending yourself is scummy; it is just good play and everyone should do it. If you know you are town, then defend yourself and prove it. If you are actually town, and go down without a fight, then you have done nothing for us except die. Also, what does scumwagon mean? I am unfamiliar with the term and don't know what it means. I'll disregard this for numerous reasons not worth explaining. On May 11 2012 04:56 ShiaoPi wrote: The thing is you already got a lot of attention, probably the most right now. I presented you the reasons why I am suspicious of your behaviour, what about trying to explain your thought-process? And for what kind of "evidence" are you waiting? I do not really understand the logic behind waiting for something to happen before defending yourself. The only thing which will give us any kind of evidence is a lynch, since that is still a bit away, I don't get your logic here. My logic wasn't to kill Tofu as I said, I was just trying to get a head count on who was voting and who wasn't. I seriously doubt anyone who was voting for him originally is mafia. So I was just keeping track for myself of various things. I also seriously doubt that I'll get hung day 1 which is why I'm not really making a big deal out of it. But on the off chance that I do get hung, you'll see that I'm town and you'll have to make some decisions on whether the mafia bandwagoned me, or if the mafia tried to look innocent by not voting. | ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On May 11 2012 05:56 Jailbreaker wrote: if you dont have much to add, then why post? If you haven't read my posts posts then why post about my actions? Reading the full thread and knowing what is going on is pretty powerful in mafia man, as I've addressed this already. | ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
##Unvite ##Vote Unforgiven_ve I don't actually want to vote for you, I just don't want to leave my votes on someone with other votes so he can get swing voted. I had no intention of actually hanging someone today. | ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On May 11 2012 08:28 Darkfirex5 wrote: [/b]yeah Unforgiving i think i have to put my vote on you, ill wait a little longer before i do so, but just puting your vote on Unforgiven_ve does not seem to have any justification, you're just leaving your vote on someone with no backing/reasoning why, it seems you are trying to draw attention away from explaining yourself. You still seem the guiltiest out of everyone, maybe you should start voicing your opinon on how you are not scummy, rather than place a vote holder and do nothing productive... you're most suspicious to me. I dont know if i will be able to get on before 7 tomorrow so im voting you atm [b\]##Vote Anacletus You're required to vote - so I am putting my vote on someone who has no other votes - I'm just leaving it as a placeholder in case I forget later. How is that suspicious at all man....what the hell are you on about.... >_> | ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On May 11 2012 09:16 BroodKingEXE wrote: @Anacletus, What have you been doing? Has the pressure vote brought any information? Scum hunting means analyzing responses to stuff like this, I'm willing to give you the benifit of the doubt if you provide useful information. I don't have any information. So no benefits and no doubts shall be given then I assume? | ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
Well, I'm just trying to poke and prod here and there to get an idea for myself about who is doing what. I don't really like the idea of letting others make decisions for me like deciding this player is neutral, or this other player is aggressive. You're right in that it probably was a bit silly and overzealous, but hopefully it's helped some, I'm formulating some hypothesis of my own. Remember the #1 rule: Vote for a bro? noooo | ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On May 11 2012 10:16 Mufaa wrote: [/b]Makes sense, but FYI you didn't actually vote for unforgiven. Instead of unvote you did unvite so I don't think your change will be counted. I figured after getting called out for editing you'd pay closer attention to your posts. For claiming to be pro-town these things(edit & failed voting) do nothing but benefit the mafia through ambiguity if you really are town. So why should we believe you're town if you can't take the extra 30 secs to proof your posts? Why shouldn't we assume the failed vote was you attempting to hide your focus on Tofu while ensuring that when you got called out you had a fallback ready by just saying oops? I never said I was protown, I just said that I've played mafia before. ##Unvote My personal feelings as of right now is that BioSC is mafia. He's been super passive while we've been at each others throats and has been trying to redirect attention off of himself. ##Vote Anacletus Well, this could turn out interesting On May 11 2012 08:08 BioSC wrote: Fair enough. I would probably be more suspicious of you if you weren't of me. I wanted to address this because I felt it trivial to discuss when there was more obvious things to consider and talk about. | ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On May 11 2012 11:45 dahdum wrote: Here are my reads and yes I know this is partially a rehash of events. --Scummy List - -- Most To Least Analectus - No point summarizing so far, chief suspect. Actually votes for himself after attempting to throw his vote away without reason, and says "I never said I was protown". Not acting like town. Hyaach - Bandwagons, no pressure at all. Urges caution. Scummy. BioSC - Highly defensive, focuses on Analectus. Darkfirex5 - Keeps cautioning against bandwagons and voting too early, sounds like scum trying to defend Analectus. Last post says he's voting against Unforgiven but then botches the vote for Analectus? Crossfire99 - Obsessed with Analectus, doesn't discuss anyone else. BKE - Not providing reads, only a semi-baseless vote which helped get the game going. Talks about scum will do and urges caution. Scummy. Jailbreaker - Worried about people pressuring too much, defensive, not contributing reads, promises something soon. Mufaa - Very few posts but cites RL reason and reiterates basic strategy. Jumps on Analectus for technicality, contributes no reads on anyone else. Austinmcc - Rightly pressures Analectus for his "i don't have much to add" vote, continues to lay one the pressure but never calls him out as scum or gives any real reads/analysis. FirmTofu - Defends the bandwagon well, placing reasonable pressure on Analectus. Compared to last game he seems more thoughtful however, so I'm suspicious of that. ShiaoPi - Jumps on Hyaach, lots of analysis. The huge post is somewhat indicative of a scum play, but I concur with his picks (Analectus/Hyaach) so far. Entirely subjective and of course you'd rush to create it so you could not be counted in it. Personally, I think that this is a bit suspicious. I'd just like for everyone to take a quick gander at his reasoning behind low suspicions of "agrees with me on lynches" and just how odd that is. When we start weening down the list - assuming the cop searches and finds me innocent - keep that in mind as you check everyone bandwagoning me. | ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On May 11 2012 04:05 BroodKingEXE wrote: @Hyaach Why did you put your vote on Ancletus? You had just as much reasoning as him. That is none. Okay.... On May 11 2012 16:08 BroodKingEXE wrote: Whatever Anacletus is trying to do it isn't town. His response to me is that he doesn't have any information, then he throws a vote at BioSC. Pretty cut and dry. ##Vote Anacletus Well then, you're just throwing a vote at me. Very cut and dry bandwagon. Has nobody worried about voicing themself too well, or making themself seem too unsuspicious so you become a mafia target? | ||
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
In the beginning I was just being reckless to start up the conversations. I've said it multiple times, but I'll say it again, I have no interest in hanging anyone yet as everything is just inconclusive guesses. | ||
| ||