Website Feedback
Closed Threads
IRC Chat
irc.quakenet.org #teamliquid
IRC Web ClientTeamSpeak 3 (86 users) | |
|
 Sinensis United States. May 21 2012 11:05. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
/in me
Everyone should elect me mayor so that I can D1 lynch grush as revenge for last game. >:DLast edit: 2012-05-21 11:06:20 |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 27 2012 13:20. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
I have a few things to say:
First, I'm running for mayor. As mayor I will lynching grush57 night one because after last game I do not believe he is capable of helping town in any way. All he will do all game is spread confusion and post badly. Already
Second I'm voting for myself as mayor. ##Vote: Sinensis
Third, you should vote for me, so that I can kill grush. He's already three posts in, all one line each, if I don't get elected as mayor he will sabotage town environment until all of you finally get tired and vote him yourself. |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 27 2012 13:21. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
| BLAZINGHAND WTF YOU TOOK MY IDEA |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 27 2012 13:25. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
On May 27 2012 13:22 Blazinghand wrote:
TBH it's a great idea. Grush really needs to die.
I would settle for being your VP if it means killing grush. |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 27 2012 13:43. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
On May 27 2012 13:34 jaj22 wrote:
If you're going to policy-lynch someone because they're useless and unreadable, why pick Grush over Kenpachi? I can see why some of you might be bitter from LIV, but at least give people the chance to improve.
@Grush: Making posts longer than one line would be a good start.
Also I'm not voting for Sinensis because I can't read him worth a damn.
I am picking grush over kenpachi because kenpachi doesn't respond to criticism with "I'm mafia, lynch me." I have never seen play as bad as grush's. Most of the people in LIV spent the game trying to get grush lynched because he literally refused to play, outside of nonsense 1 liners, throughout most of the game. I don't feel like dealing with it again because I don't like losing.
If you don't vote for me, I encourage you to check out BlazingHand's platform because killing grush N1 really is the best move for town. |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 27 2012 17:11. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
On May 27 2012 16:51 EchelonTee wrote:
You're getting over emotional dude, and it's making you look bad.
1. If you're offended, you deserve to be, I agree, but it's starting to look like you're going to build a gigantic, overblown case on him because you got offended. SnB is easy as shit to root out as scum, so I'm not too concerned with him. I'm more so concerned with you, and building a case off of emotion isn't the best plan.
2. No, you didn't post tons of gifs and hats this game. But hey, grush hasn't been a complete anti-town loser this game either. But you want to lynch grush for stuff that he's done in a previous game. Do you see the logical disconnect here?
3. That was a pretty rapid triple post. You're not a scrub so I'm not going to assume that you were actually flustered by my light questioning, but you seem more concerned with proving yourself right and bashing people that you dislike, then actually scum hunting.
So calling BH a retard is fine and if he's offended, he deserves to be, because he's retarded... right?
Or are you just randomly defending some guy's OMGUS because it's against someone who is also running for mayor? |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 27 2012 17:19. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
On May 27 2012 17:13 EchelonTee wrote:
Show nested quote +On May 27 2012 17:11 Sinensis wrote:
On May 27 2012 16:51 EchelonTee wrote:
You're getting over emotional dude, and it's making you look bad.
1. If you're offended, you deserve to be, I agree, but it's starting to look like you're going to build a gigantic, overblown case on him because you got offended. SnB is easy as shit to root out as scum, so I'm not too concerned with him. I'm more so concerned with you, and building a case off of emotion isn't the best plan.
2. No, you didn't post tons of gifs and hats this game. But hey, grush hasn't been a complete anti-town loser this game either. But you want to lynch grush for stuff that he's done in a previous game. Do you see the logical disconnect here?
3. That was a pretty rapid triple post. You're not a scrub so I'm not going to assume that you were actually flustered by my light questioning, but you seem more concerned with proving yourself right and bashing people that you dislike, then actually scum hunting.
So calling BH a retard is fine and if he's offended, he deserves to be, because he's retarded... right? Or are you just randomly defending some guy's OMGUS because it's against someone who is also running for mayor?
What exactly are you trying to say in this post?
I'm trying to say your post and your reasons suck, BlazingHand's questions for SnB are legitimate, and the only reason I can imagine you having a problem is because BlazingHand is running against you. |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 27 2012 17:30. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
On May 27 2012 17:25 Blazinghand wrote:
BTW, I'd like to propose a sweet plan: We elect me mayor, and elect Grush57 vice-mayor, and I immediately lynch him. I don't like the Pardoner mechanic and I think this is the easiest way to get rid of the Pardoner and Grush57, both of which are threats to town, neatly in one day. Thoughts?
Grush57 pardons himself, hilarity ensues. |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 27 2012 17:33. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
On May 27 2012 17:31 EchelonTee wrote:
Show nested quote +On May 27 2012 17:19 Sinensis wrote:
On May 27 2012 17:13 EchelonTee wrote:
On May 27 2012 17:11 Sinensis wrote:
On May 27 2012 16:51 EchelonTee wrote:
You're getting over emotional dude, and it's making you look bad.
1. If you're offended, you deserve to be, I agree, but it's starting to look like you're going to build a gigantic, overblown case on him because you got offended. SnB is easy as shit to root out as scum, so I'm not too concerned with him. I'm more so concerned with you, and building a case off of emotion isn't the best plan.
2. No, you didn't post tons of gifs and hats this game. But hey, grush hasn't been a complete anti-town loser this game either. But you want to lynch grush for stuff that he's done in a previous game. Do you see the logical disconnect here?
3. That was a pretty rapid triple post. You're not a scrub so I'm not going to assume that you were actually flustered by my light questioning, but you seem more concerned with proving yourself right and bashing people that you dislike, then actually scum hunting.
So calling BH a retard is fine and if he's offended, he deserves to be, because he's retarded... right? Or are you just randomly defending some guy's OMGUS because it's against someone who is also running for mayor?
What exactly are you trying to say in this post?
I'm trying to say your post and your reasons suck, BlazingHand's questions for SnB are legitimate, and the only reason I can imagine you having a problem is because BlazingHand is running against you.
I'm going to make this clear, because hinting doesn't seem to be enough in this case. I AGREE THAT SNB RUNNING FOR ONLY PARDONER IS WEIRD AND IT'S COOL THAT BH WANTED TO ACCUSE HIM. I didn't want to make it so obvious because being subtle is important, believe it or not. I also said in that post that "HE DESERVES TO BE OFFENDED FOR BEING CALLED A RETARD", because BH IS NOT A RETARD AND I HAVE NEVER THOUGHT THIS. Clear enough?
Well it sounds like you're getting emotional so I don't know if I can trust anything you've said. You'll probably be okay with this because it's how you're playing. |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 27 2012 17:52. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
On May 27 2012 17:51 Blazinghand wrote:
I was also considering intentionally voting someone into second place in order to lynch them. That could be dangerously difficult to coordinate, though.
I am not willing to do that. |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 27 2012 17:57. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
| EBWOP: I see no reason to believe someone in second place can't pardon themself. The rules haven't suggested that. |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 28 2012 06:05. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
On May 27 2012 20:49 strongandbig wrote:
BH I apologize for calling you retarded.
However I don't see how your questions for me make sense.
I didn't even mention the "keep pardoner power out of scum hands" the first time because that seemed me the obvious motivation for any townie to run for that office, and I was interested in explaining why I specifically was interested in running for that.
I'm interested in hearing where I've been omgus-ing, from whoever it was that accused me of that before; as far as I cam tell I haven't called bh scum, but I could be missing something.
OMGUS means Oh My God U Suck, not Oh My God U Scum.
Saying half of someone's posts are "trolling or retarded [sic]" is an OMGUS. |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 28 2012 11:45. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
On May 28 2012 09:07 strongandbig wrote:
1. I am not running for mayor. In case that wasn't obvious from my earlier post "don't vote for people who haven't made a case for mayor but only for pardoner". I haven't said anything like "vote for me" since I realized that the runner up for mayor gets the pardoner rather than it being a separate election.
2. Sinensis are you still running for mayor? Do you still want to policy lynch grush? I'm pretty sure BH still does but idk about you.
3. MrWiggles, you've said a lot about pardoner but this is an election for mayor. Also, how do we know if you're town? Obviously the "I'm town" paradigm posted by the subject of suspicion should always be treated with several grains of salt, but it can still be useful to townies making up their minds so I'd like it if you could post one.
Yes I'm still running for mayor and am still for policy lynching grush. The only other candidate I would consider voting for, and only to consolidate to achieve the same agenda, is BlazingHand.
I do not think anyone should vote for Toad. If he really is a mason, which should be easy enough to prove if he is, I am confused by his claim; I see no benefit for town to him claiming.
If there are town players who do not support a policy lynch on grush, then Mr. Wiggles is looking like a safe choice for you. Though I hope everyone will at least consider the benefits to getting rid of grush early. |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 28 2012 12:08. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
On May 28 2012 11:55 VisceraEyes wrote:
What benefits if he's town? The only benefit that moves me when we're talking about a lynch is the benefit of removing a sum from the game...because that is what the lynch is for.
There are zero benefits if grush is town, but it is impossible to know his alignment and someone has to get lynched. The basis for the policy lynch is that I believe he is incapable of helping town, and very likely to help the scum team. |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 28 2012 12:10. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
| EBWOP: If a mislynch is going to happen, which in all likelyhood it will because that's the nature of day 1 lynches in big games, I would much rather lose grush than someone like, for example wiggles. |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 28 2012 12:47. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
On May 28 2012 12:36 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Show nested quote +On May 28 2012 12:10 Sinensis wrote:
EBWOP: If a mislynch is going to happen, which in all likelyhood it will because that's the nature of day 1 lynches in big games, I would much rather lose grush than someone like, for example wiggles.
Dat attitude... Also dat logic failure. You lynch people for acting scummy, not because they fucked you over in the last game. You threw out a huge red herring there by comparing wiggles to grush. Unless wiggles decides to claim scum, I'd bet every penny I own he won't be lynched today. Why? Because wiggles has been posting clearly, coherently, and in a protown manner. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize wiggles is a bad lynch, we're in no danger of "losing him". You're attempting to policy lynch grush (for the record policy lynches are retarded), because he's bad, not because he's scummy. Nobody wants to policy lynch wiggles, thus comparing grush to someone like wiggles is like comparing apples to oranges. If you want to bring an actual case about why grush is scum then please do, until then both you and blazinghand can drop it.
That middle paragraph is what it sounds like when a point flies at high speed over someone's head. I have nothing to add other than: DUH. Of course wiggles isn't getting lynched today, because his posting is good. He is an asset to town, the opposite of what grush is.
And I'm not going to "drop it." That is my platform. You don't like it, don't vote for me. If I get elected mayor, grush is dying.
RE: grush
None of those 15 lurkers ruined my last game with poor play. Lurking has nothing to do with why I want you lynched. |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 28 2012 12:57. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
On May 28 2012 12:54 MajuGarzett wrote:
Why are you so hung up on lynching Grush Sinensis? You seem to neglect that the fact that even if a mislynch is likely on day one it's still better to try to lynch scum than to lynch someone who thus far has been active and seems like town. At least BH conceded that if there was a substantiated target he would lynch them but you haven't done even that. Would you be open to a different lynch or not?
How about this, you find me a confirmed mafia and I will happily support their lynch instead of grush's.
Hear that mafia? Go ahead and reveal yourselves now. -_-... |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 28 2012 13:01. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
On May 28 2012 12:55 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Show nested quote +On May 28 2012 12:47 Sinensis wrote:
On May 28 2012 12:36 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
On May 28 2012 12:10 Sinensis wrote:
EBWOP: If a mislynch is going to happen, which in all likelyhood it will because that's the nature of day 1 lynches in big games, I would much rather lose grush than someone like, for example wiggles.
Dat attitude... Also dat logic failure. You lynch people for acting scummy, not because they fucked you over in the last game. You threw out a huge red herring there by comparing wiggles to grush. Unless wiggles decides to claim scum, I'd bet every penny I own he won't be lynched today. Why? Because wiggles has been posting clearly, coherently, and in a protown manner. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize wiggles is a bad lynch, we're in no danger of "losing him". You're attempting to policy lynch grush (for the record policy lynches are retarded), because he's bad, not because he's scummy. Nobody wants to policy lynch wiggles, thus comparing grush to someone like wiggles is like comparing apples to oranges. If you want to bring an actual case about why grush is scum then please do, until then both you and blazinghand can drop it.
That middle paragraph is what it sounds like when a point flies at high speed over someone's head. I have nothing to add other than: DUH. Of course wiggles isn't getting lynched today, because his posting is good. He is an asset to town, the opposite of what grush is. And I'm not going to "drop it." That is my platform. You don't like it, don't vote for me. If I get elected mayor, grush is dying. RE: grushNone of those 15 lurkers ruined my last game with poor play. Lurking has nothing to do with why I want you lynched.
Also stating is ridiculous. You lynch someone because they're scummy, not because you don't like them. Nobody will be voting Sinensis, thank you in advance for your compliance.
I didn't compare them. Don't believe me? I'll show you:
On May 28 2012 12:10 Sinensis wrote:
EBWOP: If a mislynch is going to happen, which in all likelyhood it will because that's the nature of day 1 lynches in big games, I would much rather lose grush than someone like, for example wiggles.
I said I would much rather lose grush, A NON-ASSET, than a valuable town asset, LIKE WIGGLES.
There isn't a comparison there. Everything you have typed in the last 10 minutes has been unsubstantiated.
Thanks. |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 28 2012 13:17. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
On May 28 2012 13:02 MajuGarzett wrote:
Show nested quote +On May 28 2012 12:57 Sinensis wrote:
On May 28 2012 12:54 MajuGarzett wrote:
Why are you so hung up on lynching Grush Sinensis? You seem to neglect that the fact that even if a mislynch is likely on day one it's still better to try to lynch scum than to lynch someone who thus far has been active and seems like town. At least BH conceded that if there was a substantiated target he would lynch them but you haven't done even that. Would you be open to a different lynch or not?
How about this, you find me a confirmed mafia and I will happily support their lynch instead of grush's. Hear that mafia? Go ahead and reveal yourselves now. -_-...
Don't be pedantic. I meant that if there is a target generally thought to be mafia would you lynch them.
Yeah. What target? There isn't one. So I want to hit grush. In the hypothetical situation that there were a good target, would I want them lynched instead of grush? Yes.
You're not going to get a good target day 1 if mafia does their job right. In the absence of a good target... what do we do? We could lynch a lurker, or we could lynch a non-asset (like grush). I think grush will do more damage to town than a lurker, so I want to lynch him. |
|
|
| Sinensis United States. May 28 2012 13:30. Posts 2503 | Profile Blog # |
| EBWOP: Or we could wait for some weak quoted post-by-post anaylsis, based on the the ZERO facts present, and lynch based off that. |
|
|
| 1 2 Next All | |
|
|
|
| |
|
Sidebar Settings...
|
Store
