/in
need to kill EchelonTee
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
/in need to kill EchelonTee | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
Also me kita and VE are the templar bros lol | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
Mattchew Pandian Hassybaby phagga grush57 MidnightGladius GG scum, you can resign now + Show Spoiler + I think telling the scum they can resign will be my catchphrase | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
On May 26 2012 07:26 EchelonTee wrote: I thought this was your catch-phrase? No lol that was a gambit to see if any scum were also interested in resigning based on the assumption there was no more KP | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
kenpachi is always town. Always | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
Lots of people I don't know in this game, I would run for mayor but there are already a lot of candidates and I'd be happy with both ET and wiggles at the moment. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
I'll wait for your case before I pass judgement but until then I won't be voting for you at all. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
On May 28 2012 06:43 Toadesstern wrote: ok done reading. I think ET is the most likely to flip mafia for these reasons: "reasons" I'd give him a decent chance to flip mafia right now but I'd like to see him posting more because I'm not sure if he's really the best case yet but I find it troublesome that people consider him a good option right now for nothing other than his "I care about noobs"-posts. Dammit toad wtf is with the contradiction? First he's "most likely to flip mafia" then he's "I'm not sure if he's really the best case yet." Here's a tip, if you're gonna analyze someone and you get halfway through and realize "oh shit he's not as scummy as I thought" then do this, save your analysis in a word doc and wait and see what happens. If you continue to get bad vibes then revisit your case, if the person cleans up their act then your second guess turned out to be right. But please don't make cases like this. This case looks to me like you're testing the waters to see who else will jump on an ET lynch. This case just screams neutrality. If ET gets lynched and flips town then no one can point fingers at you, you just link them this post and say "well he looked kinda bad but I didn't think he was the best case." This is just super wishy washy but it also looks as if you're contributing by making "cases" on people. If you're gonna go after someone, then do it with conviction, don't hide behind qualifiers. You didn't help my initial impression of you toad. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
On May 28 2012 08:15 Toadesstern wrote: Show nested quote + On May 28 2012 08:10 grush57 wrote: On May 28 2012 08:04 Toadesstern wrote: On May 28 2012 08:01 grush57 wrote: On May 28 2012 08:00 Toadesstern wrote: On May 28 2012 07:52 grush57 wrote: If you guys are unsure about Toad being pardoner, I'm fine with being it. I won't use the "POWAH." why are you more likely to not use the power than I am when we both said we won't use it? Is your word better than mine for people who don't know what your alignment is because I look like a mafia? Surely the discussion right now is either lyncher or town for my alignment. I mean it's completly wrong to assume I'm a lyncher but let's just take it for granted for a second: Do you think a lyncher would ever use that power? No he wants to survive as long as possible to gets his lynch target lynched and doesn't care about someone else. Why would I use that power as lyncher? That would lose me the game instantly. Yeah, but your supposed to be mason. If your lyncher, then it would be perfect for town. However, you claimed Mason day1 for no reason at all >.<. You said "if you don't trust Toad make me Pardoner instead". Why shouldn't we trust a townie? Should we rather trust a mafia instead? The mason has nothing to do with a possibility of being a pardonar AT ALL. 1. I said if you didn't trust Toad I'm fine with being pardoner. 2. You should obviously trust a townie, but we don't know that for sure for your case because you have been anti-town in several of your posts and claiming Mason for no good reason. 3. No. 4.Yeah obviously it has nothing to do with possibility you vote the VP. You just said if I am a lyncher I am perfect for the role, not that I want it but that's what you said. You just said that if I'm a town mason that's awesome as well because I'm town. Those are the 2 options right now. Either way I'm good for the spot, the only thing that makes me bad for that thing is the fact that I don't want it lol. Do you honestly think a mafia would claim like that? Sure I could understand a lyncher but a mafia? or a SK? What do I do once people see I survived more than 1 cycle. Be all like "looool guyses, I'm modconfirmed townie but I chose not to talk to someone" ? And no I can't be RB'ed. Don't dip into wifom like that, it doesn't suit you. Also, why is being mayor so important? If you really are town you should understand why some people may be hesitant to elect you, but at the same time willing to give you pardoner since (as you correctly state), you should be able to confirm yourself by day two. We've pretty much established that pardoner is a dangerous role, dumping it off to you makes a lot of sense because we can then know for sure by day two whether you're scum or not. Your continued pursuit of the mayor role is odd. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
On May 28 2012 12:10 Sinensis wrote: EBWOP: If a mislynch is going to happen, which in all likelyhood it will because that's the nature of day 1 lynches in big games, I would much rather lose grush than someone like, for example wiggles. Dat attitude... Also dat logic failure. You lynch people for acting scummy, not because they fucked you over in the last game. You threw out a huge red herring there by comparing wiggles to grush. Unless wiggles decides to claim scum, I'd bet every penny I own he won't be lynched today. Why? Because wiggles has been posting clearly, coherently, and in a protown manner. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize wiggles is a bad lynch, we're in no danger of "losing him". You're attempting to policy lynch grush (for the record policy lynches are retarded), because he's bad, not because he's scummy. Nobody wants to policy lynch wiggles, thus comparing grush to someone like wiggles is like comparing apples to oranges. If you want to bring an actual case about why grush is scum then please do, until then both you and blazinghand can drop it. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
On May 28 2012 12:47 Sinensis wrote: Show nested quote + On May 28 2012 12:36 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 28 2012 12:10 Sinensis wrote: EBWOP: If a mislynch is going to happen, which in all likelyhood it will because that's the nature of day 1 lynches in big games, I would much rather lose grush than someone like, for example wiggles. Dat attitude... Also dat logic failure. You lynch people for acting scummy, not because they fucked you over in the last game. You threw out a huge red herring there by comparing wiggles to grush. Unless wiggles decides to claim scum, I'd bet every penny I own he won't be lynched today. Why? Because wiggles has been posting clearly, coherently, and in a protown manner. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize wiggles is a bad lynch, we're in no danger of "losing him". You're attempting to policy lynch grush (for the record policy lynches are retarded), because he's bad, not because he's scummy. Nobody wants to policy lynch wiggles, thus comparing grush to someone like wiggles is like comparing apples to oranges. If you want to bring an actual case about why grush is scum then please do, until then both you and blazinghand can drop it. That middle paragraph is what it sounds like when a point flies at high speed over someone's head. I have nothing to add other than: DUH. Of course wiggles isn't getting lynched today, because his posting is good. He is an asset to town, the opposite of what grush is. And I'm not going to "drop it." That is my platform. You don't like it, don't vote for me. If I get elected mayor, grush is dying. RE: grush None of those 15 lurkers ruined my last game with poor play. Lurking has nothing to do with why I want you lynched. Right back at you bro. You missed my point entirely. Comparing wiggles to grush is a red herring, if you can't see that then I really can't help you. Also stating If I get elected mayor, grush is dying. is ridiculous. You lynch someone because they're scummy, not because you don't like them. Nobody will be voting Sinensis, thank you in advance for your compliance. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
On May 28 2012 12:57 Sinensis wrote: Show nested quote + On May 28 2012 12:54 MajuGarzett wrote: Why are you so hung up on lynching Grush Sinensis? You seem to neglect that the fact that even if a mislynch is likely on day one it's still better to try to lynch scum than to lynch someone who thus far has been active and seems like town. At least BH conceded that if there was a substantiated target he would lynch them but you haven't done even that. Would you be open to a different lynch or not? How about this, you find me a confirmed mafia and I will happily support their lynch instead of grush's. Hear that mafia? Go ahead and reveal yourselves now. -_-... You're being useless right now, why don't you go find some mafia. Seriously bro, if you're not actually interested in scum hunting then you're not helping the town and would thus make a decent d1 lynch. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
On May 28 2012 13:01 Sinensis wrote: Show nested quote + On May 28 2012 12:55 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 28 2012 12:47 Sinensis wrote: On May 28 2012 12:36 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 28 2012 12:10 Sinensis wrote: EBWOP: If a mislynch is going to happen, which in all likelyhood it will because that's the nature of day 1 lynches in big games, I would much rather lose grush than someone like, for example wiggles. Dat attitude... Also dat logic failure. You lynch people for acting scummy, not because they fucked you over in the last game. You threw out a huge red herring there by comparing wiggles to grush. Unless wiggles decides to claim scum, I'd bet every penny I own he won't be lynched today. Why? Because wiggles has been posting clearly, coherently, and in a protown manner. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize wiggles is a bad lynch, we're in no danger of "losing him". You're attempting to policy lynch grush (for the record policy lynches are retarded), because he's bad, not because he's scummy. Nobody wants to policy lynch wiggles, thus comparing grush to someone like wiggles is like comparing apples to oranges. If you want to bring an actual case about why grush is scum then please do, until then both you and blazinghand can drop it. That middle paragraph is what it sounds like when a point flies at high speed over someone's head. I have nothing to add other than: DUH. Of course wiggles isn't getting lynched today, because his posting is good. He is an asset to town, the opposite of what grush is. And I'm not going to "drop it." That is my platform. You don't like it, don't vote for me. If I get elected mayor, grush is dying. RE: grush None of those 15 lurkers ruined my last game with poor play. Lurking has nothing to do with why I want you lynched. Right back at you bro. You missed my point entirely. Comparing wiggles to grush is a red herring, if you can't see that then I really can't help you. Also stating If I get elected mayor, grush is dying. is ridiculous. You lynch someone because they're scummy, not because you don't like them. Nobody will be voting Sinensis, thank you in advance for your compliance. I didn't compare them. Don't believe me? I'll show you: Show nested quote + On May 28 2012 12:10 Sinensis wrote: EBWOP: If a mislynch is going to happen, which in all likelyhood it will because that's the nature of day 1 lynches in big games, I would much rather lose grush than someone like, for example wiggles. I said I would much rather lose grush, A NON-ASSET, than a valuable town asset, LIKE WIGGLES. There isn't a comparison there. Everything you have typed in the last 10 minutes has been unsubstantiated. Thanks. You just quoted the original post which had the red herring, I can't tell if you're dumb or scum. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6781 Posts
On May 28 2012 13:34 Sinensis wrote: Show nested quote + On May 28 2012 13:28 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 28 2012 13:01 Sinensis wrote: On May 28 2012 12:55 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 28 2012 12:47 Sinensis wrote: On May 28 2012 12:36 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 28 2012 12:10 Sinensis wrote: EBWOP: If a mislynch is going to happen, which in all likelyhood it will because that's the nature of day 1 lynches in big games, I would much rather lose grush than someone like, for example wiggles. Dat attitude... Also dat logic failure. You lynch people for acting scummy, not because they fucked you over in the last game. You threw out a huge red herring there by comparing wiggles to grush. Unless wiggles decides to claim scum, I'd bet every penny I own he won't be lynched today. Why? Because wiggles has been posting clearly, coherently, and in a protown manner. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize wiggles is a bad lynch, we're in no danger of "losing him". You're attempting to policy lynch grush (for the record policy lynches are retarded), because he's bad, not because he's scummy. Nobody wants to policy lynch wiggles, thus comparing grush to someone like wiggles is like comparing apples to oranges. If you want to bring an actual case about why grush is scum then please do, until then both you and blazinghand can drop it. That middle paragraph is what it sounds like when a point flies at high speed over someone's head. I have nothing to add other than: DUH. Of course wiggles isn't getting lynched today, because his posting is good. He is an asset to town, the opposite of what grush is. And I'm not going to "drop it." That is my platform. You don't like it, don't vote for me. If I get elected mayor, grush is dying. RE: grush None of those 15 lurkers ruined my last game with poor play. Lurking has nothing to do with why I want you lynched. Right back at you bro. You missed my point entirely. Comparing wiggles to grush is a red herring, if you can't see that then I really can't help you. Also stating If I get elected mayor, grush is dying. is ridiculous. You lynch someone because they're scummy, not because you don't like them. Nobody will be voting Sinensis, thank you in advance for your compliance. I didn't compare them. Don't believe me? I'll show you: On May 28 2012 12:10 Sinensis wrote: EBWOP: If a mislynch is going to happen, which in all likelyhood it will because that's the nature of day 1 lynches in big games, I would much rather lose grush than someone like, for example wiggles. I said I would much rather lose grush, A NON-ASSET, than a valuable town asset, LIKE WIGGLES. There isn't a comparison there. Everything you have typed in the last 10 minutes has been unsubstantiated. Thanks. You just quoted the original post which had the red herring, I can't tell if you're dumb or scum. Must be dumb then if those are my only two options. So what makes my post a red herring other than that I compared grush and wiggles, which I didn't do in the first place? I found this definition from online webster's, I think it should help you out: [from the practice of drawing a red herring across a trail to confuse hunting dogs] : something that distracts attention from the real issue So what issue are you confusing? Your reason for why grush should die. You call for grush's death and rationalize it by saying that It's better that grush dies than someone useful like wiggles. I called you out and said that wiggles would never die and your comparison between them is a red herring. And please read your own posts, you did compare grush to wiggles: I would much rather lose grush than someone like, for example wiggles. In English, this is a comparison. It's mind boggling that you're even debating this. I agree with your self diagnosis of dumb, however that doesn't rule out the possibility of scum. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 RotterdaM 1415 StarCraft: Brood Wartrigger 471 UpATreeSC 120 SteadfastSC 92 Codebar 82 -ZergGirl 57 Nathanias 35 ZombieGrub31 ForJumy 1 Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games summit1g7402 Grubby3235 FrodaN1373 B2W.Neo1134 tarik_tv706 Hui .322 NuckleDu150 Trikslyr109 KnowMe99 Mew2King64 PPMD17 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • MEDOEDLive 84 StarCraft: Brood War• Hupsaiya 20 • LUISG 5 • Poblha • Migwel • aXEnki • Laughngamez YouTube • LaughNgamez Trovo • intothetv • IndyKCrew • Gussbus • Kozan Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Korean StarCraft League
Afreeca Starleague
hero vs Soulkey
AfreecaTV Pro Series
Reynor vs Cure
ESL Pro Tour
World Team League
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
Zhanhun vs DragOn
Dewalt vs Sziky
CSO Cup
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] ESL Pro Tour
World Team League
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
Gypsy vs Bonyth
Mihu vs XiaoShuai
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
|
|