| gedatsu May 28 2012 19:34. Posts 828 | Profile # |
On May 28 2012 19:33 blooddrunKK wrote: Is it just me or the quality looks really bad compared to other days (on HQ)
I think it looks really good... but I've been watching the Proleague SC2 broadcasts which look like complete crap. |
|
|
| Fragile51 Netherlands. May 28 2012 19:34. Posts 15572 | Profile # |
On May 28 2012 19:33 blooddrunKK wrote: Is it just me or the quality looks really bad compared to other days (on HQ)
Looks fine to me. |
| |
|
| Belisarius Australia. May 28 2012 19:34. Posts 1768 | Profile # |
| ...why bother proxying that much stuff when the toss can't see up the ramp anyway? |
| |
|
| Inflicted_ Australia. May 28 2012 19:35. Posts 3098 | Profile # |
On May 28 2012 19:34 IshinShishi wrote: Show nested quote +On May 28 2012 19:31 Inflicted_ wrote: On May 28 2012 19:30 IshinShishi wrote: On May 28 2012 19:27 MangoMountain wrote: On May 28 2012 19:25 IshinShishi wrote: Why didn't he try to neural the mothership and vortex the carriers into infested/fungal doom?
Because any infestor that moved forward to try to neural would instantly evaporate to 125 3/3 interceptors.
But if you are fast enough I think its possible to do it, just use neural with multiple infestors, anything is better than spamming infested terrans, what prevents the protoss from simply walking away without giving a fuck?Nothing.
Fungals.
But didn't you just use all the energy from the infestors in the front to spawn infested?Logic.
Don't need 40 Infestors worth of ITs, you can use ~30 and you'd still have sufficient ITs to tank/kill the Carriers. |
| |
|
| ReadySetFire Kuwait. May 28 2012 19:35. Posts 544 | Profile # |
On May 28 2012 19:34 Belisarius wrote: ...why bother proxying that much stuff when the toss can't see up the ramp anyway?
yo mama
User was warned for this post |
|
|
| Sargonian United States. May 28 2012 19:36. Posts 163 | Profile # |
On May 28 2012 19:17 pt wrote: its bothering me that they haven't mentioned neural yet... he can neural his whole army.
That's what I was thinking at first too but then I realized it would be very hard to pull off with no support units if Crank controlled correctly |
|
|
| Tobblish Sweden. May 28 2012 19:36. Posts 3336 | Profile # |
No Khaldor, don't say that live on stream!!  |
| | EG: Ok we can't have Naniwa in EG because he is so much better than our players so lets get him his own team! "The Alliance" is born. |  |
|
|
| KristofferAG Norway. May 28 2012 19:36. Posts 9826 | Profile Blog # |
| I wouldn't mind seeing Jjakji win, but... SlayerS! |
| | Writer for sc2.no| ST_Bomber #1 fan on Wednesdays| BW VoDs from snipealot - http://www.youtube.com/user/KAGBWVoDs | |
|
|
roymarthyup May 28 2012 19:36. Posts 1442 | Profile # |
fungal normally always ends up doing more DPS to clumped air than infested terrans
infested terran is very strong to trade energy to focus down and kill a nexus but fungal is normally better in combat
infestors only true weakness is if you can keep attacking constantly never giving them time to regenerate energy, they are much weaker when they have 75 energy each compared to when they have 200 energy each. The protoss in that game did exactly what was needed to abuse the weakness of infestors. after the infestors blew their energy in that big battle he kept attacking and they have no energy left
infestors are strong when you have 20-25, weaker when you have 40 like that and no combat units. a healthy 200food army with say 76 drones, 124 combat units 50food of infestors 74 food left 10 broodlords 34food left 17 corrupters. 17 corrupters plus mass fungal can actually kill 200food of carriers because fungal and nueral parasite DESTROYS clumped carriers/voids and corrupters have a ton of armor
broodlords outrange storm and feedback so if you keep infestors behind the broodlords with overseers they are protected from feedback cuz HT die instantly to broodlord fire
also a technique from zerg is take 30 drones, make 30 spines (2250/0) and 15 corrupters (2250/1500). to give yourself 30 supply of corrupters over max. possible to do with a 4500/1500 bank lategame which isnt too uncommon. ends up costing you 570 for cancelsLast edit: 2012-05-28 19:37:17 |
|

|
GDbushido United States. May 28 2012 19:36. Posts 926 | Profile # |
I'm sorry for caster-bashing but wolf is just so fucking ignorant it hurts.
User was temp banned for this post. |
| | remember not to think too much and your trip will be numbingly pleasant |
|
|
| KristofferAG Norway. May 28 2012 19:36. Posts 9826 | Profile Blog # |
On May 28 2012 19:34 gedatsu wrote: Show nested quote +On May 28 2012 19:33 blooddrunKK wrote: Is it just me or the quality looks really bad compared to other days (on HQ)
I think it looks really good... but I've been watching the Proleague SC2 broadcasts which look like complete crap.
what have you been watching? It's in high quality if you watch it live on the official stream, Sayle's doing it in HQ too now. |
| | Writer for sc2.no| ST_Bomber #1 fan on Wednesdays| BW VoDs from snipealot - http://www.youtube.com/user/KAGBWVoDs | |
|
|
| DizzySheep Australia. May 28 2012 19:36. Posts 1104 | Profile # |
The only protosses that hide their tech well are the Startale protosses Edit: Especially SquirtleLast edit: 2012-05-28 19:37:25 |
|
|
| monk United States. May 28 2012 19:37. Posts 6831 | Profile Blog # |
On May 28 2012 19:30 Lann555 wrote: Show nested quote +On May 28 2012 19:23 NrGmonk wrote: Man, I've been hyping carriers in PvZ for almost a year now. Even have a 1 page blurb written about it. Been waiting for a successful carrier transition in a pro game and I guess today was my lucky day.
Even a broken unit wins games twice per year. or something like that.
You'll soon see it being used more than than ^.~ |
| | @TL_monk |  |
|
|
| Irave United States. May 28 2012 19:38. Posts 7910 | Profile # |
On May 28 2012 19:37 NrGmonk wrote: Show nested quote +On May 28 2012 19:30 Lann555 wrote: On May 28 2012 19:23 NrGmonk wrote: Man, I've been hyping carriers in PvZ for almost a year now. Even have a 1 page blurb written about it. Been waiting for a successful carrier transition in a pro game and I guess today was my lucky day.
Even a broken unit wins games twice per year. or something like that.
You'll soon see it being used more than than ^.~
Carrier may have finally arrived, but Hots can't be too far away. |
| |
|
| QuixoticO Netherlands. May 28 2012 19:39. Posts 635 | Profile Blog # |
On May 28 2012 19:37 NrGmonk wrote: Show nested quote +On May 28 2012 19:30 Lann555 wrote: On May 28 2012 19:23 NrGmonk wrote: Man, I've been hyping carriers in PvZ for almost a year now. Even have a 1 page blurb written about it. Been waiting for a successful carrier transition in a pro game and I guess today was my lucky day.
Even a broken unit wins games twice per year. or something like that.
You'll soon see it being used more than than ^.~
Same with Mothership I guess. Funny that we start to see em more often when were so close to the expansion that supposedly removes them both. |
| | "Suum Cuique" - Cicero |  |
|
|
| Looms United States. May 28 2012 19:40. Posts 3985 | Profile # |
| great viking control to secure the win for this battle |
| |
|
| divinesage Singapore. May 28 2012 19:40. Posts 480 | Profile # |
On May 28 2012 19:22 Shellshock1122 wrote:lots of lings overlord drops with lings 12 min mothership stalemate 11 brood lords 12 min mothership mass carriers vs 45 infestors 3-3-3 carriers win
Thanks! Wow seems to be some epic skytoss strat |
| |
|
| Asha` United Kingdom. May 28 2012 19:40. Posts 26638 | Profile Blog # |
Jjakji <3
Still got that commanding and controlled TvP Last edit: 2012-05-28 19:40:59 |
| |
|
| Dodgin Canada. May 28 2012 19:40. Posts 25283 | Profile # |
Poll: Recommend SlayerS-EG vs. NSHoSeo Game 3?If you have time (17) 46% Yes (12) 32% No (8) 22% 37 total votes Your vote: Recommend SlayerS-EG vs. NSHoSeo Game 3? (Vote): Yes (Vote): If you have time (Vote): No
|
| |
|
| DJHelium Sweden. May 28 2012 19:40. Posts 3090 | Profile # | |
| |
|
| Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 Next |
|