[M](4) Greenery by Monitor

---

On May 31 2012 08:28 LunaSaint wrote:
Hmmm, I like how it's very attractive to camp on the highground by the third and secure all three bases, but doing so would leave you with a long walk to the main. In fact, air play seems obnoxious in general.
On the aesthetics issues, I really don't like the way the sand transitions into the bricks. But that might just be the overview - could we get a closer image? :>

---

---

On May 31 2012 08:56 RumbleBadger wrote:
As much as I love parts of this map, the fact that the CCW spawning player gets a massively easier third kills it for me. Would it be the end of the world to flip the natural around and make the path to that base shorter? It messes with the style of the map a little, but it's still a good map either way.

---

---

On May 31 2012 10:29 EatThePath wrote:
Small easy adjustment you can make that will help a lot with zerg taking the lefthand 3rd:

Use a small cardinal direction ramp (the minimum size) to allow creep spread to go down from the main to the base beneath the cliff. You can put the ramp in the small unused area towards either geyser. Unpathable + doodads on top (as though it were just an extension of the trees climbing up the hillside).

I like how the 3rd-->4th works on this map. High ground ring dodging center tower is a nice setup, never gets old.

Would like to see this in ESV weekly, any word on whether that will happen?

Wooooowww Kurast has a lot of nice aesthetic cliff work. Instead of the generic Greenery, you should name this after the highlands area in Act 1 in D3, of which it reminds me. ^^

---

---

On May 31 2012 13:11 WniO wrote:
i want pretty pics or else idc. heh. nice original nat layout.

---

---

On May 31 2012 14:30 Sea_Food wrote:
Is there somethingwrong with my eyes, or the map as i see only 6 minerals in the natural?

The map seems otherwise realy good to me exept on how zvp favored it is. Very long rush distance, far away third, very open and air play favored.

---