Website Feedback
Closed Threads
IRC Chat
irc.quakenet.org #teamliquid
IRC Web ClientTeamSpeak 3 (55 users) | |
|
| grush57 Korea (South). June 09 2012 12:02. Posts 2525 | Profile # |
| Also, do you really think that I'm scum? Why the hell would a scum even post right now when 80% of people didn't even post yet. |
| | "Every thing is either simply awful or awfully simple." | "Weaklings can't pick... their way of death." |
|
|
| s0Lstice United States. June 09 2012 12:02. Posts 911 | Profile # |
| EBWOP: minus one 'no lynch' on the end there |
| | how if I seem like fox b Lynch I not inspire hippie--Blazinghand |
|
|
| Release United States. June 09 2012 12:04. Posts 3973 | Profile Blog # |
On June 09 2012 11:00 grush57 wrote:
Show nested quote +On June 09 2012 10:39 Release wrote:
Low activity levels and lurkers are Town-Killers. Start talking, or i will find you, and i will shove a dirty sock up you anus.
Yeah, but absolutely nothing to talk about right now. There is no mayor vote so really nothing to talk about right now.
You are trying to get people to believe that there is nothing to talk about on day 1. If people don't talk, there is no need for mafia to talk either, and this eliminates their chances of making scumslip. Then the night actions occur, where we can assume someone dies. But we still have "nothing" to talk about because no one talked on day 1 and we can't use the death to the town's advantage. Then another night action, more silence, ... , until the whole town is dead.
This doesn't help the town, therefore
On June 09 2012 11:51 Release wrote:
grush57 must be scum because one of the rules of this game is "play to win" and well, he clearly isn't.
|
| |
|
| grush57 Korea (South). June 09 2012 12:05. Posts 2525 | Profile # |
On June 09 2012 12:04 Release wrote:
Show nested quote +On June 09 2012 11:00 grush57 wrote:
On June 09 2012 10:39 Release wrote:
Low activity levels and lurkers are Town-Killers. Start talking, or i will find you, and i will shove a dirty sock up you anus.
Yeah, but absolutely nothing to talk about right now. There is no mayor vote so really nothing to talk about right now.
You are trying to get people to believe that there is nothing to talk about on day 1. If people don't talk, there is no need for mafia to talk either, and this eliminates their chances of making scumslip. Then the night actions occur, where we can assume someone dies. But we still have "nothing" to talk about because no one talked on day 1 and we can't use the death to the town's advantage. Then another night action, more silence, ... , until the whole town is dead. This doesn't help the town, therefore
Show nested quote +On June 09 2012 11:51 Release wrote:
grush57 must be scum because one of the rules of this game is "play to win" and well, he clearly isn't.
That was when there were 2 posts? 3? |
| | "Every thing is either simply awful or awfully simple." | "Weaklings can't pick... their way of death." |
|
|
| Release United States. June 09 2012 12:06. Posts 3973 | Profile Blog # |
On June 09 2012 12:02 grush57 wrote:
Also, do you really think that I'm scum? Why the hell would a scum even post right now when 80% of people didn't even post yet.
As far as i can tell, your agenda is to get a lurker lynch , you want to exclude yourself from the pool or lurkers. |
| |
|
| grush57 Korea (South). June 09 2012 12:07. Posts 2525 | Profile # |
| Yeah, but I'm not a lurker. |
| | "Every thing is either simply awful or awfully simple." | "Weaklings can't pick... their way of death." |
|
|
| Release United States. June 09 2012 12:08. Posts 3973 | Profile Blog # |
On June 09 2012 12:05 grush57 wrote:
Show nested quote +On June 09 2012 12:04 Release wrote:
On June 09 2012 11:00 grush57 wrote:
On June 09 2012 10:39 Release wrote:
Low activity levels and lurkers are Town-Killers. Start talking, or i will find you, and i will shove a dirty sock up you anus.
Yeah, but absolutely nothing to talk about right now. There is no mayor vote so really nothing to talk about right now.
You are trying to get people to believe that there is nothing to talk about on day 1. If people don't talk, there is no need for mafia to talk either, and this eliminates their chances of making scumslip. Then the night actions occur, where we can assume someone dies. But we still have "nothing" to talk about because no one talked on day 1 and we can't use the death to the town's advantage. Then another night action, more silence, ... , until the whole town is dead. This doesn't help the town, therefore
On June 09 2012 11:51 Release wrote:
grush57 must be scum because one of the rules of this game is "play to win" and well, he clearly isn't.
That was when there were 2 posts? 3?
There are many things to talk about though and your defeatist, lets-not-talk attitude does not help town.
Those 2/3 posts at least had content in them. Yours was simply trying to discourage discussion. |
| |
|
| Release United States. June 09 2012 12:09. Posts 3973 | Profile Blog # |
On June 09 2012 12:07 grush57 wrote:
Yeah, but I'm not a lurker.
Therefore, in your agenda, you won't be lynched. Pretty funny how logic works isn't it? |
| |
|
| KtheZ United States. June 09 2012 12:11. Posts 668 | Profile Blog # |
What kind of policy lynching would be a good idea for us? Lynch all liars and lynch lurkers (in the absence of a clear majority)?
Just a couple suggestions of mine.
My two cents on the grush debate unfolding:
grush has given a minor scumtell but it doesnt hurt to keep discussing the situation. Once we get enough opinions we could probably have enough information (hopefully) to decide an educated day 1 lynch. |
|
|
| grush57 Korea (South). June 09 2012 12:12. Posts 2525 | Profile # |
On June 09 2012 12:09 Release wrote:Therefore, in your agenda, you won't be lynched. Pretty funny how logic works isn't it?
Yeah but I want scum lynched not necessarily a lurker. However, if there are no clear scum then a lurker lynch would be best. |
| | "Every thing is either simply awful or awfully simple." | "Weaklings can't pick... their way of death." |
|
|
| KtheZ United States. June 09 2012 12:14. Posts 668 | Profile Blog # |
On June 09 2012 12:12 grush57 wrote:
Show nested quote +On June 09 2012 12:09 Release wrote:
On June 09 2012 12:07 grush57 wrote:
Yeah, but I'm not a lurker.
Therefore, in your agenda, you won't be lynched. Pretty funny how logic works isn't it?
Yeah but I want scum lynched not necessarily a lurker. However, if there are no clear scum then a lurker lynch would be best.
What kind of criterion is "clear scum"? A majority? |
|
|
| KtheZ United States. June 09 2012 12:16. Posts 668 | Profile Blog # |
| We obviously don't want to go into bandwagon syndrome (for a majority) and bandwagon after 1 person does some minor analysis; We will win if everyone does analysis of their own analysis and fingers point at the correct people |
|
|
| grush57 Korea (South). June 09 2012 12:17. Posts 2525 | Profile # |
On June 09 2012 12:14 KtheZ wrote:
Show nested quote +On June 09 2012 12:12 grush57 wrote:
On June 09 2012 12:09 Release wrote:
On June 09 2012 12:07 grush57 wrote:
Yeah, but I'm not a lurker.
Therefore, in your agenda, you won't be lynched. Pretty funny how logic works isn't it?
Yeah but I want scum lynched not necessarily a lurker. However, if there are no clear scum then a lurker lynch would be best.
What kind of criterion is "clear scum"? A majority?
When someone is very suspicious and someone makes a very solid case on them that is very reasonable. Someone who is probably going to flip scum.
|
| | "Every thing is either simply awful or awfully simple." | "Weaklings can't pick... their way of death." |
|
|
| Release United States. June 09 2012 12:21. Posts 3973 | Profile Blog # |
On June 09 2012 12:12 grush57 wrote:
Show nested quote +On June 09 2012 12:09 Release wrote:
On June 09 2012 12:07 grush57 wrote:
Yeah, but I'm not a lurker.
Therefore, in your agenda, you won't be lynched. Pretty funny how logic works isn't it?
Yeah but I want scum lynched not necessarily a lurker. However, if there are no clear scum then a lurker lynch would be best.
!
Something to talk about. Guess you were lying earlier.
Now your helpi No shit we want to lynch a lurker. Thank you for repeating points that have already been made.
|
| |
|
| grush57 Korea (South). June 09 2012 12:21. Posts 2525 | Profile # |
On June 09 2012 12:21 Release wrote:
Show nested quote +On June 09 2012 12:12 grush57 wrote:
On June 09 2012 12:09 Release wrote:
On June 09 2012 12:07 grush57 wrote:
Yeah, but I'm not a lurker.
Therefore, in your agenda, you won't be lynched. Pretty funny how logic works isn't it?
Yeah but I want scum lynched not necessarily a lurker. However, if there are no clear scum then a lurker lynch would be best.
! Something to talk about. Guess you were lying earlier. Now your helpi No shit we want to lynch a lurker. Thank you for repeating points that have already been made.
WTF man. lol |
| | "Every thing is either simply awful or awfully simple." | "Weaklings can't pick... their way of death." |
|
|
| grush57 Korea (South). June 09 2012 12:22. Posts 2525 | Profile # |
On June 09 2012 12:21 Release wrote:
Show nested quote +On June 09 2012 12:12 grush57 wrote:
On June 09 2012 12:09 Release wrote:
On June 09 2012 12:07 grush57 wrote:
Yeah, but I'm not a lurker.
Therefore, in your agenda, you won't be lynched. Pretty funny how logic works isn't it?
Yeah but I want scum lynched not necessarily a lurker. However, if there are no clear scum then a lurker lynch would be best.
! Something to talk about. Guess you were lying earlier. Now your helpi No shit we want to lynch a lurker. Thank you for repeating points that have already been made.
So you don't want to lynch a scum. You want to lynch a lurker that will give no information. Ah, that isn't scummy. |
| | "Every thing is either simply awful or awfully simple." | "Weaklings can't pick... their way of death." |
|
|
| Release United States. June 09 2012 12:25. Posts 3973 | Profile Blog # |
On June 09 2012 12:22 grush57 wrote:
Show nested quote +On June 09 2012 12:21 Release wrote:
On June 09 2012 12:12 grush57 wrote:
On June 09 2012 12:09 Release wrote:
On June 09 2012 12:07 grush57 wrote:
Yeah, but I'm not a lurker.
Therefore, in your agenda, you won't be lynched. Pretty funny how logic works isn't it?
Yeah but I want scum lynched not necessarily a lurker. However, if there are no clear scum then a lurker lynch would be best.
! Something to talk about. Guess you were lying earlier. Now your helpi No shit we want to lynch a lurker. Thank you for repeating points that have already been made.
So you don't want to lynch a scum. You want to lynch a lurker that will give no information. Ah, that isn't scummy.
Actually, you're right; that is scummy.
It is a response to "Yeah but I want scum lynched not necessarily a lurker" and it should have been "No shit we want to lynch a scum." I'm sure you could have figured that out, and i'm pretty sure the others did and that's why they didn't feel the need to bring it up. |
| |
|
| grush57 Korea (South). June 09 2012 12:26. Posts 2525 | Profile # |
On June 09 2012 12:25 Release wrote:
Show nested quote +On June 09 2012 12:22 grush57 wrote:
On June 09 2012 12:21 Release wrote:
On June 09 2012 12:12 grush57 wrote:
On June 09 2012 12:09 Release wrote:
On June 09 2012 12:07 grush57 wrote:
Yeah, but I'm not a lurker.
Therefore, in your agenda, you won't be lynched. Pretty funny how logic works isn't it?
Yeah but I want scum lynched not necessarily a lurker. However, if there are no clear scum then a lurker lynch would be best.
! Something to talk about. Guess you were lying earlier. Now your helpi No shit we want to lynch a lurker. Thank you for repeating points that have already been made.
So you don't want to lynch a scum. You want to lynch a lurker that will give no information. Ah, that isn't scummy.
Actually, you're right; that is scummy. It is a response to "Yeah but I want scum lynched not necessarily a lurker" and it should have been "No shit we want to lynch a scum." I'm sure you could have figured that out, and i'm pretty sure the others did and that's why they didn't feel the need to bring it up.
How would I know if it was a typo or not. And find me a post that said that.
|
| | "Every thing is either simply awful or awfully simple." | "Weaklings can't pick... their way of death." |
|
|
| s0Lstice United States. June 09 2012 12:28. Posts 911 | Profile # |
Lynching all liars is dicey. In a newb game I'm betting any lies we find will be unintentional. If you are referring to a blue claim, there will be plenty of context to interpret it if/when it happens. There is no need for a policy application there, just reasoning.
Lynching lurkers is still risky, but the chance of hitting scum is definitely there. As I said, the stakes are high, as every mislynch is painful. If the lurker in question flips green, then at least we have rid ourselves of a useless townie. This is why I still advocate it. People who are talking give us content to work with, and in the absence of a compelling case, we could do a lot worse than lynching a crappy townie/maybe get lucky hitting scum.
That said, it's a worst case scenario. The onus is on us to smoke out the scum so we don't have to resort to the policy lynch. |
| | how if I seem like fox b Lynch I not inspire hippie--Blazinghand |
|
|
| grush57 Korea (South). June 09 2012 12:29. Posts 2525 | Profile # |
| Actually, I state how I want to lynch and you just blindly tunnel me. |
| | "Every thing is either simply awful or awfully simple." | "Weaklings can't pick... their way of death." |
|
|
| Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Next All | |
|
|
|
| |
|
Sidebar Settings...
|
Store
