Website Feedback
Closed Threads
IRC Chat
irc.quakenet.org #teamliquid
IRC Web ClientTeamSpeak 3 (69 users) | |
|
| Meltage Sweden. June 11 2012 03:31. Posts 560 | Profile # |
Colonial
0.4
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Ngy3j.jpg)
Other versions
+ Show Spoiler +
Facts
Bases: 12 (10 standard, 2 half-bases with HYg)
Towers: 2
Size: 184x106
Analyzer
+ Show Spoiler +
VODs
Mappers Monthly, July 8th features Colonial II in the final game, picked by SCSLyra.
http://sv.twitch.tv/veloh15/b/324177966
--
This map is a WIP. I prefer to display it early for the community to discuss rather than keeping it for myself until I feel it's done and having some basic flaw I didn't realize because I was looking too closely.
This thread is for two maps that orgin from the same map. I'm currently testing both. Which one do you like the most and why?
--
Published as Colonial (0.3) on EU and (0.3) NA
and Colonial II on EU and NALast edit: 2012-07-10 20:11:13 |
| | TPW - The Planetary Workshop - map making team |
|
|
| Herfelt Denmark. June 11 2012 04:00. Posts 86 | Profile # |
| Three watchtowers are too much. I would keep the one in the middle or perhaps use two watchtowers, but closer to the center so the entire mapheight cannot be covered by the towers. |
|
|
| a3den June 11 2012 04:23. Posts 481 | Profile # |
| This looks very good, very interesting shape. |
| |
|
| PandaZerg Canada. June 11 2012 04:40. Posts 148 | Profile # |
want it on NA  Last edit: 2012-06-11 04:40:21 |
|
|
| Zaphid Czech Republic. June 11 2012 04:51. Posts 1342 | Profile Blog # |
| They layout is really weird, would love to see some games on it |
| | I will never ever play Mech against Protoss. - MVP |
|
|
 Aunvilgod June 11 2012 05:22. Posts 2031 | Profile # |
wtf how big is this.
I think this map will evolve just a bit too much into splitmap stalemate.
Also make your pathing homework. |
| |
|
| EatThePath United States. June 11 2012 05:32. Posts 2453 | Profile Blog # |
While it seems cool and fun (legitimately), I fear the underlying dynamic is expand and turtle, because even a slow army can camp the high ground near the ramp with rocks and bounce to cover any major incoming attacks, especially with those towers on the wings. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, but from the look of things I don't think this was your intention. All in all, I like this better than Daybreak because it doesn't deceive you with lategame impossible bases. I think it'd be a better map if the center was open ground and not a constricted spot (assuming you keep the tower there). Alternatively you could make two bridges with a small space between them. The tower ensures that the center is powerful, but it's too hard to engage there, with your only option to avoid it two small ramps.
I feel like maybe the two small bases should be relocated as normal bases somewhere else, or things shifted around slightly to make those gold bases that don't cover the two normal expansions behind them. What if you put a normal base in that empty space at 5 and 11, with a long low ground army connecting to them? Or whatever you want to give it to one side of the map or the other.
Maybe a very small horizontal ramp leading to the middle would be cool, to let people check on the tower easily.Last edit: 2012-06-11 05:33:26 |
| | Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE |
|
|
| NewSunshine United States. June 11 2012 05:39. Posts 1014 | Profile # |
The mains are huge, the map overall is huge. And the openness given by the analyzer is deceiving, because it's including all those tiny dots of terrain in its calculations, so I suspect it's closer to 3.8-3.9 overall, which is fine. I like the defining feature of the 3rd's though, where if you spot a far away 3rd base you can take the forward one to offset its distant position, because both options are rather extremely positioned, which in turn only works I think because of how big the map is. I don't necessarily like maps that are gratuitously large, but in this case it's necessary I think. I do think the mains could stand to be more like 40 CC's in size, 50 is really out there, literally.
I do like seeing new maps from you though, they always have a certain strangeness to them. Nifty tileset too, looking forward to close-up shots. |
| | [ESV mapmaking team member] [Former DF map team founder] [@ESVNewSunshine] |
|
|
| FlaShFTW United States. June 11 2012 11:29. Posts 4960 | Profile Blog # |
| too much of a splitty map. i mean split maps are fine, its just this one is wayyyy too split. |
| | Never Surrender. Never GG. Always Fighting. BW4LYF. Woo Jung Ho Never Forget. |
|
|
| PandaZerg Canada. June 11 2012 11:43. Posts 148 | Profile # |
Personally, I think the map is "perfect" as it (10/10 at first look), but I need to try before a final comment. Proportion seems very good. If you change something, I am afraid that you will have to change the rest of the map to keep proportions.
Remind me ESV brineclaw and Day Break at the same time! Looks very solid imo! Enough solid to easily win MotM.
I need to try this on NA
Just hope you will have less difficulties to upload this map on NA than you had with Silver Sands  Last edit: 2012-06-11 13:13:51 |
|
|
 Amlitzer United States. June 11 2012 13:26. Posts 468 | Profile # |
| Since there is only 3 pathways from one side of the map to the other I really feel like there should be less watchtowers, or maybe even have none at all. |
| | "Not even justice, I want to get truth!" | |
|
|
| Mullet_Ben United States. June 11 2012 14:45. Posts 45 | Profile # |
Third base looks really far away, and between the natural and third there are 3 attack paths, meaning defending against multi-pronged attacks from zerg as a protoss will be hell. Expect 2-base all-ins in PvZ, which should work pretty well considering the chokey-ness of the map. The long rush distance should help zerg hold it off, but breaking down the rocks should let toss move in rather quickly.
Anyway, I don't see Protoss liking this map at all. |
|
|
| Jebediah Germany. June 11 2012 20:12. Posts 105 | Profile # |
| Pathogen Glands is on the wrong research-hotkey and Neural does not need to be researched. Haven't noticed anything else, but I only played a short match against an AI to take a look at the map. |
|
|
| Meltage Sweden. June 11 2012 22:57. Posts 560 | Profile # |
On June 11 2012 20:12 Jebediah wrote:
Pathogen Glands is on the wrong research-hotkey and Neural does not need to be researched. Haven't noticed anything else, but I only played a short match against an AI to take a look at the map.
:O Nice find. I actually started the map in the Arcade Beta editor, so there could very well be issues like that. Thanks
On June 11 2012 05:32 EatThePath wrote:
While it seems cool and fun (legitimately), I fear the underlying dynamic is expand and turtle, because even a slow army can camp the high ground near the ramp with rocks and bounce to cover any major incoming attacks, especially with those towers on the wings. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, but from the look of things I don't think this was your intention. All in all, I like this better than Daybreak because it doesn't deceive you with lategame impossible bases. I think it'd be a better map if the center was open ground and not a constricted spot (assuming you keep the tower there). Alternatively you could make two bridges with a small space between them. The tower ensures that the center is powerful, but it's too hard to engage there, with your only option to avoid it two small ramps.
I feel like maybe the two small bases should be relocated as normal bases somewhere else, or things shifted around slightly to make those gold bases that don't cover the two normal expansions behind them. What if you put a normal base in that empty space at 5 and 11, with a long low ground army connecting to them? Or whatever you want to give it to one side of the map or the other.
Maybe a very small horizontal ramp leading to the middle would be cool, to let people check on the tower easily.
Yeah, when I made the made and took a secodn look I thought "oh, I made a turtle map. Very well, elts see what ppl think".
Why hate on the half-base? The idea initially was to provide a "free base" in a spot close to where your army is anyways. However, I think i'ts interresting that it's vulnerable to drops on the high ground above it (while the gas on the high groudn is vulnerable from below). Putting a normal base at the edge of the map at 12ish and 6ish oclock might be waht I end up doing for better spread of bases.
Nice point about the centre.. I dont really provide a broader safer path around it, as I should.
@PandaZerg - I'll try. Worst case scenario I send you the map file to host for me if you can.
On June 11 2012 11:29 FlaShFTW wrote:
too much of a splitty map. i mean split maps are fine, its just this one is wayyyy too split.
I know. It's intended. What do you think this will do to the games on it? I also experiment with tower placements. Do you think less towers/no towers woudl make the map better in that regard? The issue I see with no towers is that theres a lot of space to scout on a big map like this.Last edit: 2012-06-12 00:08:52 |
| | TPW - The Planetary Workshop - map making team |
|
|
| SidianTheBard United States. June 12 2012 01:00. Posts 970 | Profile # |
| The bottom left and top right corners seem really weird. The bases feel too cluttered. It appears you either 2 base all-in or you get 5 base. You really need to work on those cluttered bases. Also 3 watch towers is too much. Honestly just get rid of the one in the middle because then if you do take the time to break down both sets of rocks and do feel like funneling your army through two 2x-wide ramps you won't be scouted unless they have a unit sitting in the area. Last edit: 2012-06-12 01:01:14 |
|
|
| sorrowptoss Canada. June 12 2012 05:56. Posts 999 | Profile Blog # |
Great TvT map. The layout makes it so that it's "half-half" with 5 expansions on each side and 2 expansions left near the middle and therefor the location of struggle between seige lines and such. And since there is SO MUCH space behind the nat and the 4th, drops are very likely to be effective.
The third is far for the Zerg player, so if the nat is blocked by a pylon (which happens almost all the time against decent P players (reference: MLG Anaheim)) Zerg has to go take the 12 o'clock which isn't the supposed 3rd, which is very far, near a watchtower and fairly open, not to mention (again) the HUGE space behind it for flying units aka voidrays. But if facing a rubbish non-nat-denying-protoss, this isn't such a big deal, since the terrain (ups and downs all over the place) and the numerous watchtowers help the Zerg to control the map, not to mention (again) the HUGE area behind the 12 o'clock and the 6 o'clock that could be used for death drops or mutas.
That brings me to my final point, playing Protoss on this map. I find it quite difficult to get a decent 3rd on this map for Protoss, so 2-base timing attacks would be quite present on the map... yet since the terrain makes it so long to get from 1 nat to another, I think it isn't so much of a good idea to do so, unless the Zerg sucks. The map, in general, is great for collosi since there are cliffs EVERYWHERE, so going infestorling wouldn't be such a good idea either, unless of course the Protoss doesn't utilise the cliffs. And fyi it would be hell for Protoss do defend against good run-bys and such because all bases around the supposed 3rd are quite open (2 entries).
That was my opinion. Thanks for caring enough to read |
| | Flash, Taeja, MvP, Jaedong, Stephano fighting! DEMUSLIM is the most awesome person in the world! |
|
|
| HighLach United States. June 12 2012 12:39. Posts 131 | Profile # |
1. Just from looking at the map it looks kind of narrow.
2. The natural is quite open to attacks. There should be someway to have a safer FFE for protoss.
3. And going along with that, there doesn't seem to be any "easy" progression to the third. I can see the corners being taken if the rocks were knocked down.
Other than that it looks pretty good and pretty good looking.
|
|
|
| Sea_Food Finland. June 12 2012 13:48. Posts 1612 | Profile Blog # |
Why is the map so huge?
Why do rocks block the shortest attack/scout path?
Why so much air space?
Why are the mains so big?
Why is there this path to behind naturals against wall from main to CC/nexus
What on earth is taht gas placement on the non main corner bases?
What is that highground area behind the side watch towers? Is it pathatble?
Ok, enough questions that should have been awnsered in the OP. Comments time.
I dont like how far the bases are from each other, even though the defensive chokes might allow multiple bases defendable against ground, I feel like mutalisk against every race, and warp prism haras vs terran is OP in this map. Really experimental map indeed. |
|
|
| Meltage Sweden. June 17 2012 22:44. Posts 560 | Profile # | |
| | TPW - The Planetary Workshop - map making team |
|
|
| PandaZerg Canada. June 18 2012 00:11. Posts 148 | Profile # |
I liked by far the older. Older had a very unique design and it was fresh and cool. Too bad it is not on US (NA) atm to test it. I would like to play on the older version...
EDIT: The newer looks good too, it's just that I liked more the original version.
Last edit: 2012-06-18 00:12:31 |
|
|
| 1 2 Next All | |
|
|
|
| |
|
Sidebar Settings...
|
Store
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/OjWQ7.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/hFc7n.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/YQSnL.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Y4hZg.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/icMj7.jpg)
