EDT 08:25 CEST 14:25 KST 21:25

Streams: 79 live
48682 total viewers

Active: 7658
Pizza Meter
WCS AM - Ro16 Interviews a…
AMD Premier League S1 Gran…
[WCS KR] Semis: Soulkey vs…
[WCS AM] Premier League Ro…
TI3 East Qualifier Preview
GomTV:about the gamespeed …
Papa John's explores EG, L…
TeamLiquid Map Contest Fin…
Liquid wins the Curse Invi…
mousesports defeats DD.Dot…
Dragon joins Clarity Gaming
Code S Group of Death, Par…
New Get 50% off Papa Joh…
TL Advertising Features
Arrested development - n…
US Politics Megathread
Anime Discussion Thread
Daft Punk: Random Access…
[TV] HBO Game of Thrones
G-1 Grand Finals Meetup
Ask TL Staff Anything
The Automated Ban List
2013 Philadelphia Starcraf…
TL.net Ten Commandments
The Neo.G_Soulkey Fanclub
RotterdaM Fanclub
[Stream] ASL in Korea
[stream] DieStar
Computer Build Resource Th…
How to switch Gamma in Sta…
Mechanical Keyboard Guide
Mac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lio…
Video Editing
Your Ideal morning invol…
GomTV:about the gamespee…
Twitch.tv needs to impro…
Post your Papa John's Es…
Papa John's explores EG,…
WCS AM - Ro16 Interviews…
[Code S] RO4 Day 1 WCS Kor…
Ritmix RSL gNations
[ATC] ROOT vs MVP, Week 8
BO7 Challenger Series 200€
[Code S] Placement Matches…
The HotS Zerg Help Me Thread
The HotS Terran Help Me Th…
[D] Innovation's TvZ (CC f…
[G] Boss TvP Allin
The HotS Protoss Help Me T…
[M] (8) Crux Breeze
[M] (4) TPW Strangewood Mire
OneGoal: A better SC2 [Pro…
[D] Favorite Maps that Did…
[D] Map Contest Finalists,…
General Discussion
Dota 2 QQ thread
Inhouse Dota
TL's Item Trading Thread.
The International Intera…
mousesports defeats DD.D…
Perfect World's Dota 2 Su…
[The International] Easter…
[TPL S5] Demon Edge Cup
[D2L] Na'Vi vs. Dignitas
Liquid Pasture Community L…
Solo Mid - Who? What? How?
Simple Questions, Simple A…
Drafting, my thoughts on it
A guide to Krobelus, the D…
Newly ported Hero discussi…
Pucca Comeback?
DES Sonic Interview 5/18…
[Update] itemBay SSL Gra…
Anyone know this Micro M…
Better Server Registry F…
snipealots 24/7 afreeca …
[TLS2] Qualifier #4
[GC S3] Gambit's Cup Semif…
D Ranks Teamleague Season 4
Torenhire Starleague II
2x Speed Hack Perversion T…
Increasing APM/EAPM
Challenger map on Starcraf…
Simple Questions, Simple A…
Tips and tricks: Defilers …
RollPlay -- D&D Campaign…
NBA Playoffs 2013
Pokemon X and Y [3DS]
Steam Trading Cards
2012 - 2013 Football Thr…
[Patch 3.07: Nerf Everythi…
The LoCicero Memorial for …
The Shikyo Memorial for QQ…
[OGN] Olympus The Champion…
[LoL] General Stream Thread
[D] Pro Scene Evolution
[Guide] Montegomery's Supe…
[Champion] Swain
[Champion] Ezreal
Selling Items Thread
Witch Doctor Discussion
D3 Hardcore Community
Les Mafia Voting Thread
[M][N] Les Mafia
Doctor Who Mafia
TL Health and Fitness Init…
The 2013 Weightlifting Pro…
The Injuries Thread
Leta - Movie
Michael - skyline
Anytime - Beast
By.Hero - Shuttle
Anytime - Pusan

Website Feedback

Closed Threads

IRC Chat
irc.quakenet.org #teamliquid

IRC Web Client

TeamSpeak 3 (46 users)

I Can't Believe it's not Themed MiniMafia - Page 12

Forum Index > TL Mafia 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93
 
 Mattchew   United States. July 13 2012 00:47. Posts 5120
Profile Blog # 

On July 13 2012 00:43 talismania wrote:
Reactions to talismania's Shitty Plan
(for those who care)


+ Show Spoiler +

So actually not that many people commented on it even though I thought like everyone did oops.

My views:

scummy responses: austinmcc, dropbear

null responses: marv, mattchew, keirathi, strongandbig

townie response: gonzaw

did not respond directly although was in the thread: Risen, sciberbia, solstice

so me explaining why it is bad doesnt differentiate me from marv, keirathi, strongandbig
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Old Post

 
 marvellosity   United Kingdom. July 13 2012 00:49. Posts 11331
Profile # 
i explained why it was bad as well mattchew. get over yourself :>>

"People shouldn't be 'forced' to make effort, the making of the effort willingly is what helps gives us our reads on people."
I disagree with myself - kushm4sta
Old Post

 
 Mattchew   United States. July 13 2012 00:50. Posts 5120
Profile Blog # 
nah, my shit is why that exact plan shouldnt be used and the negative effects it will have.
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Old Post

 
 talismania   United States. July 13 2012 00:51. Posts 2364
Profile Blog # 

On July 13 2012 00:47 Mattchew wrote:

Show nested quote +


so me explaining why it is bad doesnt differentiate me from marv, keirathi, strongandbig



well you added different reasons for why you thought it was bad but that doesn't move you into the townie or scum camps in my mind so you're still null.
Old Post

 
 marvellosity   United Kingdom. July 13 2012 00:57. Posts 11331
Profile # 
Having a quick flick through a few filters, Keirathi comes across as sounding incredibly neutral.
I disagree with myself - kushm4sta
Old Post

 
 austinmcc   United States. July 13 2012 01:31. Posts 2942
Profile # 

On July 13 2012 00:43 talismania wrote:
Reactions to talismania's Shitty Plan
(for those who care)

marvellosity


Show nested quote +




Show nested quote +




Predictably shits on it, suggests policy lynching me out of his annoyance that I keep proposing these dumb plans.


austinmcc

Show nested quote +



Actually this reads scummy again on the second go-round too. He says he's about to "add" something but literally just copies/expands on what marv said and doesn't add anything at all.



Talis, underlined portions of Marv's posts are what I interpret as his reactions to your plan. Underlined portions of mine are my reaction that I wrote.

Two things.
One,

He says he's about to "add" something but literally just copies/expands on what marv said and doesn't add anything at all.

this. If you think I'm just "expanding on" marv, that IS adding something. Otherwise Marv's initial "no" is it, and EVERYONE who disagreed is just "expanding on no."
Two, here WAS new content, specific scenarios that I noted your plan could lead to, which I think are bad and weren't mentioned by others:
  • someone will inevitably only find 1-2 people scummy and we'd end up in some "does x not making 3 cases = scummy?" discussion
  • we also might end up lynching people that EVERYONE finds a little bit scummy rather than someone that a few people have a strong scumread on for good reasoning
The first scenario is bad because a really good plan is going to end up "follow this or get lynched." Look at the pick your power games, liar game, etc. With your plan, we'd have to derail the thread from scumhunting and have a policy discussion later in the game about whether someone who didn't follow "the plan," didn't post 3 suspicions, was scummy or just wasn't suspicious of 3 people. Not posting 3 cases wouldn't be alignment-indicative, so we couldn't just lynch them. There'd have to be discussion of that, which would gunk up the thread. That's the full thought process behind that point. As to the second point I made, having players*3 cases in the thread could lead us to a situation where we were lynching based on case quantity and not case quality. Oh, 70% of people are suspicious of X, so we lynch him. Even if he was most people's third choice, and we had a few folks highly suspicious of Y. Ta da.

Overall, I think your plan is bad if you want us to follow, and still bad if you want to gauge reactions to it. You got responses from a little more than half the thread, which is alright, but you need a plan that SOME people want if you're going to actually generate "discussion." You got reactions, but not actual discussion. People weren't weighing the pros and cons of the plan, people were just saying no to it. That doesn't get you the sort of interactions that I want to draw conclusions from, because nobody gains town OR scum points for being the 5th or 6th person to pooh pooh a plan that nobody likes.




I'm more interested in Risen though. Need to read him and see if he actually doesn't have scumreads early, but does that sit alright with people? My D1 reads are AWFUL, but I still have them. How do you read the game as town and not have scumreads?

On July 12 2012 15:18 Risen wrote:
I think it's too early for anything. I don't really like to make reads without any connections (this might be a bad thing to do). I just think it's easier for me to make cases when I consider people as members of a team, not as individual scum members.



Anyway, Risen's filter is a lot of talking about how he's going to play this game. Which is helpful, lets us know his plan and can explain away some differences in behavior. But it's basically filler about oneself.

Early interaction with Gonzaw, which ends with this:

On July 12 2012 10:38 Risen wrote:
I was just pointing out I found it odd you would try and push people onto "lurkers" so early on. I don't think anything about you. There's nothing to go on right now. I don't think that post was in your favor, though.


When he speaks about DropBear later, we get:

On July 12 2012 15:22 Risen wrote:
For example: this could be DropBear bussing/giving his teammate a way to backtrack on his plan or it could be scum calling out a townie. I'm not saying I even have a scumread on drop as he seems to want a pro-town environment, which is something I'm all for, but this is something that could be used to confirm a connection in my mind at a later point in time.


On July 12 2012 15:22 Risen wrote:
EBWOP: He could also just be a townie doing pro-town things. This is the most likely option.


On July 12 2012 15:25 Risen wrote:
I don't like how drop is trying to take the lead here and I think previously with all this "hey mate decent line but try this instead" or "hey mate lets be bros but I don't think you should be doing this"

I generally don't like anything that could be considered guidance coming from anywhere other than a plan with spelled out logic.

He could be scum bussing a scumbuddy. He could be scum calling out town. He's probably a townie. He's a townie but I don't like what he's doing. A lot of filter, but nothing really said.

Dunno. Being wrong as a townie is plenty forgiveable. It's going to happen, especially on the early days. But not scumhunting, or not having reads until later in the game, isn't helpful to town at all. Even if you don't trust your reads early as much as your reads late, you've got to contribute. Apart from just not having contributed much except the discussions concerning Gonzaw and DropBear, neither of whom he has any strong feelings on, it just doesn't feel like Risen has done anything this game despite having a lot of posts.
Fe fi fo fum.
Old Post

 
 DropBear   Australia. July 13 2012 01:32. Posts 2454
Profile Blog # 

On July 13 2012 00:45 talismania wrote:

Show nested quote +



Yo so this isn't true at all. I've been very clear from the beginning that I think the roleblocker should not use their power unless they have a clear shot with it or the situation demands it. Essentially, don't use it N1 or N2, then proceed cautiously.

Your post clearly says you can't see a reason behind using it.


On July 12 2012 08:05 talismania wrote:
@gonzaw on the RB: yeah for sure I don't think there's any point to a RB using their power.


What did you mean then? The first post or this not on night1 or 2 post?>
One of things I think, in my judgement, is a good and useful way of promulgating your beliefs is to say them
Old Post

 
 DropBear   Australia. July 13 2012 01:33. Posts 2454
Profile Blog # 
Talismania are you saying that your plan was completely bogus then?
One of things I think, in my judgement, is a good and useful way of promulgating your beliefs is to say them
Old Post

 
 DropBear   Australia. July 13 2012 01:34. Posts 2454
Profile Blog # 
EBWOP: cos if so then that changes a few things.
One of things I think, in my judgement, is a good and useful way of promulgating your beliefs is to say them
Old Post

 
 talismania   United States. July 13 2012 01:34. Posts 2364
Profile Blog # 
I said in my first post "If roleblocker does exist but doesn't want to come out then I kindly request he not use his power at all until it makes sense." I mean that. I mean don't use it unless it makes sense, which means probably don't use it early on.
Old Post

 
 talismania   United States. July 13 2012 01:37. Posts 2364
Profile Blog # 
No I don't think my plan was completely bogus. A variant worked in bastard 2 as you should know. I don't think it's that terrible if everyone follows it. Did I expect people to follow it? No. Did I expect people to react? Yes of course. Not sure how useful the reactions are but you can see my handydandy summary above.
Old Post

 
 talismania   United States. July 13 2012 01:39. Posts 2364
Profile Blog # 
@austin you need to compare what you said not just to what marv said, but also to what mattchew said. I don't see what you added as any different from what mattchew said, just more longwinded.

now to digest the rest of that post...
Old Post

 
 DropBear   Australia. July 13 2012 01:39. Posts 2454
Profile Blog # 
Vivax I am very confused as the reasoning behind your voting so far. Why did you choose strongandbig initially?


On July 12 2012 18:30 Vivax wrote:
@ NSH

It's cause of a habit. I just tend to expect links in underlined words <_<.

Back to the topic:

##unvote strongandbig
Very informative post about marv there.

Wanted to vote Milton next but he posted.
He tries to make himself pretty transparent by posting his games. It's a good sign, but nothing decisive.

Speaking of meta, sciberbia doesn't look good based on that.I was with him in two games and I feel like he's being different in this one.
s0lstice already pointed out the missing fast posts we're used to see from scib at the start of the game.

That alone is forgivable given the posted reasons. But the overall gut feeling is still bad cause of the overall style.


What do you mean by an informative post? Cos he made a case he must be town or something?

What are the differences in sciberbia you talk about?

One of things I think, in my judgement, is a good and useful way of promulgating your beliefs is to say them
Old Post

 
 DropBear   Australia. July 13 2012 01:40. Posts 2454
Profile Blog # 

On July 13 2012 01:37 talismania wrote:
No I don't think my plan was completely bogus. A variant worked in bastard 2 as you should know. I don't think it's that terrible if everyone follows it. Did I expect people to follow it? No. Did I expect people to react? Yes of course. Not sure how useful the reactions are but you can see my handydandy summary above.

I spent the entirety of bastard 2 arguing with a brick wall i.e. Acrofales. I can't even remember this plan you speak of lol.
One of things I think, in my judgement, is a good and useful way of promulgating your beliefs is to say them
Old Post

 
 marvellosity   United Kingdom. July 13 2012 01:40. Posts 11331
Profile # 

On July 13 2012 01:34 talismania wrote:
I said in my first post "If roleblocker does exist but doesn't want to come out then I kindly request he not use his power at all until it makes sense." I mean that. I mean don't use it unless it makes sense, which means probably don't use it early on.


Ah yes. As opposed to the roleblocker using his power when it doesn't make sense.

Fun thought game: when someone proposes not doing something, consider the opposite that he is proposing against.

"Don't do x stupidly!"
"thank god! I was thinking of doing it stupidly"

"Don't lynch townies!"
"gosh, that's where my thinking was wrong!"

"Don't use roleblocker unless it makes sense!"
"wow! I was thinking of using it willy nilly for no good reason!"

Generic advice-giving with no real purpose as the opposite case is silly anyway. No?
I disagree with myself - kushm4sta
Old Post

 
 talismania   United States. July 13 2012 01:44. Posts 2364
Profile Blog # 
yeah that does sound silly lol

I mean the point still remains: don't use it early because it doesn't make sense then. Use it later when you have a good read or the situation demands.
Old Post

 
 talismania   United States. July 13 2012 01:45. Posts 2364
Profile Blog # 

On July 13 2012 01:40 DropBear wrote:

Show nested quote +


I spent the entirety of bastard 2 arguing with a brick wall i.e. Acrofales. I can't even remember this plan you speak of lol.


It was the part where I said I was a dayvig and everyone had to make a case or I shot you if you didn't. And then I ended up shooting scum.
Old Post

 
 marvellosity   United Kingdom. July 13 2012 01:46. Posts 11331
Profile # 
Katina blocked SK KP night 1 in Emergency.

I think RBer (should we have one) should use his RB role how he sees fit rather than listen to general advices about it.
I disagree with myself - kushm4sta
Old Post

 
 Vivax   Italy. July 13 2012 01:49. Posts 3782
Profile Blog # 

On July 13 2012 01:39 DropBear wrote:

What do you mean by an informative post? Cos he made a case he must be town or something?




No, he doesn't have to be townie.
But I initially voted for him cause he didn't post anything, then he posted the metagame info and I found it good enough to unvote him.

I remember sciberbia for more concise, compact posts, and I remember him posting really early. He already explained why he didn't post early in this game, so what remains are the posts that subjectively look different to me. But I prefer to not rely heavily on meta, my play changes often aswell and I don't have as much experience.


Anyway, I don't like Matt's filter, it looks like he posts rather meaningless content, no active scumhunting in it, rather commenting on what other players already said.

He also acts a little differently than in LVI.
Auctoritas non veritas facit legem 81
Old Post

 
 strongandbig   United States. July 13 2012 01:54. Posts 3198
Profile Blog # 

On July 13 2012 01:31 austinmcc wrote:

Show nested quote +



Talis, underlined portions of Marv's posts are what I interpret as his reactions to your plan. Underlined portions of mine are my reaction that I wrote.

Two things.
One,

Show nested quote +

this. If you think I'm just "expanding on" marv, that IS adding something. Otherwise Marv's initial "no" is it, and EVERYONE who disagreed is just "expanding on no."
Two, here WAS new content, specific scenarios that I noted your plan could lead to, which I think are bad and weren't mentioned by others:
  • someone will inevitably only find 1-2 people scummy and we'd end up in some "does x not making 3 cases = scummy?" discussion
  • we also might end up lynching people that EVERYONE finds a little bit scummy rather than someone that a few people have a strong scumread on for good reasoning
The first scenario is bad because a really good plan is going to end up "follow this or get lynched." Look at the pick your power games, liar game, etc. With your plan, we'd have to derail the thread from scumhunting and have a policy discussion later in the game about whether someone who didn't follow "the plan," didn't post 3 suspicions, was scummy or just wasn't suspicious of 3 people. Not posting 3 cases wouldn't be alignment-indicative, so we couldn't just lynch them. There'd have to be discussion of that, which would gunk up the thread. That's the full thought process behind that point. As to the second point I made, having players*3 cases in the thread could lead us to a situation where we were lynching based on case quantity and not case quality. Oh, 70% of people are suspicious of X, so we lynch him. Even if he was most people's third choice, and we had a few folks highly suspicious of Y. Ta da.

Overall, I think your plan is bad if you want us to follow, and still bad if you want to gauge reactions to it. You got responses from a little more than half the thread, which is alright, but you need a plan that SOME people want if you're going to actually generate "discussion." You got reactions, but not actual discussion. People weren't weighing the pros and cons of the plan, people were just saying no to it. That doesn't get you the sort of interactions that I want to draw conclusions from, because nobody gains town OR scum points for being the 5th or 6th person to pooh pooh a plan that nobody likes.




I'm more interested in Risen though. Need to read him and see if he actually doesn't have scumreads early, but does that sit alright with people? My D1 reads are AWFUL, but I still have them. How do you read the game as town and not have scumreads?

Show nested quote +




Anyway, Risen's filter is a lot of talking about how he's going to play this game. Which is helpful, lets us know his plan and can explain away some differences in behavior. But it's basically filler about oneself.

Early interaction with Gonzaw, which ends with this:

Show nested quote +



When he speaks about DropBear later, we get:

Show nested quote +



Show nested quote +



Show nested quote +


He could be scum bussing a scumbuddy. He could be scum calling out town. He's probably a townie. He's a townie but I don't like what he's doing. A lot of filter, but nothing really said.

Dunno. Being wrong as a townie is plenty forgiveable. It's going to happen, especially on the early days. But not scumhunting, or not having reads until later in the game, isn't helpful to town at all. Even if you don't trust your reads early as much as your reads late, you've got to contribute. Apart from just not having contributed much except the discussions concerning Gonzaw and DropBear, neither of whom he has any strong feelings on, it just doesn't feel like Risen has done anything this game despite having a lot of posts.


I'm getting some seriously bad vibes from the first half of this post - it seems like there's way too much detail responding to Talis's "you copied marv" thing, when one or two sentences would do. (and when I'm telling you you put too much detail into a post, you've got a problem.) Then you jump back into actually arguing about whether or not the plan is a good idea, which even tali has moved on from.
[QUOTE][B]On March 20 2013 14:51 WaveofShadow wrote:[/B] I don't know much about Coag, but he doesn't seem like the type of guy who goes against the grain just for kicks. [/QUOTE]
Old Post

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93
Please log in or register to reply.
 
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2
Dota 2
League of Legends
Other Notable Streams
[ Show 60 non-featured ]

» Recent SC2 Results
» Premier SC2 Tournaments
Sidebar Settings...

The Little App Factory



The opinions expressed by our users do not reflect the official position of TeamLiquid.net or its staff.

Advertising | Jobs | Privacy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren. Ad tag: TF_US.
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2002-2013 Teamliquid.net. All Rights Reserved