| OxyGenesis United Kingdom. July 10 2012 23:22. Posts 278 | Profile # | |
| | Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net |
|

|
Aunvilgod July 10 2012 23:26. Posts 2031 | Profile # |
Cute texturing of the center. Ulnar is definately underused.
I think this map is quite choked. I would love to see some analyzer pictures.
|
| |
|
| OxyGenesis United Kingdom. July 10 2012 23:44. Posts 278 | Profile # |
On July 10 2012 23:26 Aunvilgod wrote: Cute texturing of the center. Ulnar is definately underused.
I think this map is quite choked. I would love to see some analyzer pictures.
I would loooove to do some analyser pictures but alas, I have a mac.
|
| | Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net |
|
|
| Penke Sweden. July 11 2012 00:15. Posts 346 | Profile # |
You know that cliff merging is possible right? With that you wouldn't get the small ledges around the man maid areas  |
|
|
| OxyGenesis United Kingdom. July 11 2012 00:24. Posts 278 | Profile # |
On July 11 2012 00:15 Penke wrote:You know that cliff merging is possible right? With that you wouldn't get the small ledges around the man maid areas 
Yeah, except none of the nice manmade protoss cliffs work very well on a space platform, hence the small ledges. That said, I actually kinda like the aesthetic, and if I put a bit more time in to it could probably make it look quite spiffy. Concentrating on the bigger problems right now though. |
| | Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net |
|
|
Aunvilgod July 11 2012 00:47. Posts 2031 | Profile # |
On July 11 2012 00:24 OxyGenesis wrote: Show nested quote +On July 11 2012 00:15 Penke wrote:You know that cliff merging is possible right? With that you wouldn't get the small ledges around the man maid areas 
Yeah, except none of the nice manmade protoss cliffs work very well on a space platform, hence the small ledges. That said, I actually kinda like the aesthetic, and if I put a bit more time in to it could probably make it look quite spiffy. Concentrating on the bigger problems right now though.
I think there are some Xel´Naga doodads that would be quite well- fitting. They are hard to use though. Maybe you could take a look at the map of that Xel´Naga spaceship mission of the single-player. Don´t ask me where to load it though.
I would definately wait until the basic design is finished too.Last edit: 2012-07-11 00:47:56 |
| |
|
| OxyGenesis United Kingdom. July 11 2012 01:14. Posts 278 | Profile # |
On July 11 2012 00:47 Aunvilgod wrote: Show nested quote +On July 11 2012 00:24 OxyGenesis wrote: On July 11 2012 00:15 Penke wrote:You know that cliff merging is possible right? With that you wouldn't get the small ledges around the man maid areas 
Yeah, except none of the nice manmade protoss cliffs work very well on a space platform, hence the small ledges. That said, I actually kinda like the aesthetic, and if I put a bit more time in to it could probably make it look quite spiffy. Concentrating on the bigger problems right now though.
I think there are some Xel´Naga doodads that would be quite well- fitting. They are hard to use though. Maybe you could take a look at the map of that Xel´Naga spaceship mission of the single-player. Don´t ask me where to load it though. I would definately wait until the basic design is finished too.
Spoilers! I'm not that fair in the campaign yet 
Yeah at the moment the aesthetics are more protoss than Xel'Naga, I might push it a bit more to the Xel'Naga side of things though. Thanks for the suggestions. The Ulnar tileset is underused but I know why, the weird circle tiles I've used can be kinda tricky to use in combination with the others, and I'm not convinced it works very well on large areas. |
| | Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net |
|

|
| OxyGenesis United Kingdom. July 11 2012 03:34. Posts 278 | Profile # |
Last edit: 2012-07-13 08:56:30 |
| | Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net |
|
|
| OxyGenesis United Kingdom. July 13 2012 08:56. Posts 278 | Profile # |
| Updated! just in time for the ProAm. Fixed a lot of the previous issues with the map. Feedback welcome. |
| | Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net |
|
|
| FlaShFTW United States. July 13 2012 09:53. Posts 4957 | Profile Blog # |
THE THIRD!!!!! AIYAHHHHHHHH too difficult to defend. the distance between the natural and third is too long. imo. |
| | Never Surrender. Never GG. Always Fighting. BW4LYF. Woo Jung Ho Never Forget. |
|
|
| NewSunshine United States. July 13 2012 09:57. Posts 1011 | Profile # |
| I've spotted a much more fundamental problem: the main's resource line is in a terrible spot, it could easily be pummeled by siege tanks with a barracks for spotting. If you stretch the bounds a bit, the main can be pushed towards the boundaries and the mineral line can be put into a good spot. Incidentally, you'll also have room to put a new expansion up against the main, if you're into that sort of thing. It might work, since the expansions in the corners seem a bit close. |
| | [ESV mapmaking team member] [Former DF map team founder] [@ESVNewSunshine] |
|
|
| OxyGenesis United Kingdom. July 13 2012 10:14. Posts 278 | Profile # |
On July 13 2012 09:53 FlaShFTW wrote:THE THIRD!!!!! AIYAHHHHHHHH  too difficult to defend. the distance between the natural and third is too long. imo.
Yeah that is something I had been thinking about, I just didn't want to move the 3rd too close to the natural so as you could siege from it. Would closing the choke and putting a backdoor with destructible rocks between the natural and 3rd help?
On July 13 2012 09:57 NewSunshine wrote: I've spotted a much more fundamental problem: the main's resource line is in a terrible spot, it could easily be pummeled by siege tanks with a barracks for spotting. If you stretch the bounds a bit, the main can be pushed towards the boundaries and the mineral line can be put into a good spot. Incidentally, you'll also have room to put a new expansion up against the main, if you're into that sort of thing. It might work, since the expansions in the corners seem a bit close.
Aha I had actually meant for that to be a semi-interesting feature of the map but you may well be right there. Damn Terrans. I think they are some great ideas, that also frees me up to do something more interesting with the corner expansion. The mains have always felt a bit cramped too.Last edit: 2012-07-13 10:16:49 |
| | Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net |
|

|
| OxyGenesis United Kingdom. July 13 2012 19:33. Posts 278 | Profile # |
I won't make the changes yet as it might be picked up for the contest but here are my preliminary plans for the next version.
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/LHWJ8.jpg)
Sorry for the rushed photoshopping. Moved the ramp to the 3rd closer to the natural. Added a backdoor passage between the nat and 3rd which is covered by destructible rocks. Added a 6m1g expansion as an optional 3rd which I think helps the flow of the map a lot too. Thoughts? |
| | Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net |
|
|
CaptainCrush United States. July 13 2012 21:20. Posts 784 | Profile Blog # |
On July 13 2012 09:53 FlaShFTW wrote:THE THIRD!!!!! AIYAHHHHHHHH  too difficult to defend. the distance between the natural and third is too long. imo.
It doesnt ALWAYS have to be easy to take or defend a third, no need to force every single game into a 45 min macro fest. I like the idea of keeping a few smaller maps in the mix to make things interesting. This looks like a decent one of those to me, I really like the aesthetics here as well! |
|
|
| Mullet_Ben United States. July 14 2012 03:39. Posts 45 | Profile # |
I don't know, I think the third would be defensible where it is if it were less open. The proposed changes should help, but I would favor redesigning the entire third tbh. Trying to reinforce by a passage that exits behind the mineral line? Come on man. I would just push the third closer to the natural and then closing off the area in front of the third dramatically, perhaps by grossly enlarging the little highground area.
I like the idea of the high ground progressing upwards as you get to the center. I don't think the half bases in the center will be able to be taken, though. I think it would be better if you took out those bases and made the other half bases you just added into full expansions, but that's not really something you need to do. I also feel the center ramps should be enlarged. Right now there's a huge area on either side of the central path that's really risky to move around in because you can get flanked while there and have no avenue for retreating. Either enlarging the center ramps or offsetting them would help you escape from being flanked in the center. |
|

|
| OxyGenesis United Kingdom. July 14 2012 20:05. Posts 278 | Profile # |
On July 14 2012 03:39 Mullet_Ben wrote: I don't know, I think the third would be defensible where it is if it were less open. The proposed changes should help, but I would favor redesigning the entire third tbh. Trying to reinforce by a passage that exits behind the mineral line? Come on man. I would just push the third closer to the natural and then closing off the area in front of the third dramatically, perhaps by grossly enlarging the little highground area.
I like the idea of the high ground progressing upwards as you get to the center. I don't think the half bases in the center will be able to be taken, though. I think it would be better if you took out those bases and made the other half bases you just added into full expansions, but that's not really something you need to do. I also feel the center ramps should be enlarged. Right now there's a huge area on either side of the central path that's really risky to move around in because you can get flanked while there and have no avenue for retreating. Either enlarging the center ramps or offsetting them would help you escape from being flanked in the center.
Thanks very much for the suggestions. I'm reluctant to make all of those changes as I feel it would make the map somewhat generic. The backdoor to the 3rd was just an idea that I thought might be interesting but maybe it's a dumb idea. The suggestion to enlarge the high ground area next to the 3rd is a good one, I think I will do that whilst rejigging things a bit to make the 3rd flow better. I'm not going to remove the centre half bases as I think they are key to the map but I might move them a little closer to the 3rd to make them more inviting. I'm not sure I entirely understand your comments about the middle, especially about having to retreat path, but I will look at the centre and see if there is anything I can do with it. |
| | Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net |
|

|
| Semmo Korea (South). July 14 2012 21:56. Posts 395 | Profile # |
hey, nice map. The 4th looks like itll be difficult though.
Also the main to nat dist is too long i think? Comsider moving the main mineral line towards the nat. |
| | Team Crux | teamcrux.tistory.com |
|
|
| ChaosRefined United States. July 14 2012 23:55. Posts 52 | Profile # |
| really cool texturing. although it looks like the XNT isn't in the center of the doodead circle? I could just be a moron though |
|
|
| OxyGenesis United Kingdom. July 15 2012 00:09. Posts 278 | Profile # |
@kim thanks for the comments man. Will definitely bare that in mind with the next update.
On July 14 2012 23:55 ChaosRefined wrote: really cool texturing. although it looks like the XNT isn't in the center of the doodead circle? I could just be a moron though
The Xel'Naga is actually in the middle but the circle is hovering in mid air. I thought it might be a nice aesthetic but I've not really tested it in a game setting. |
| | Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net |
|
|
| PiPoGevy Australia. July 16 2012 20:10. Posts 1557 | Profile Blog # |
| The third is deffinately able to be held, but after the third there isn't really much choice |
| | 'Only God Can Judge Me' and I dont care how many times Boxer loses, as long as he gives us entertaining games, boxer fighting! Help Support Warcraft 3!! http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=317133 | |
|
|
| 1 2 Next All |
|