[WCS EU] Season 1 Finals -…
[SPL] Round 5 Week 3 Revie…
[GSTL] Week 10 - Prime Tim…
[WCS KR] Innovation vs. Sy…
[WCS AM] Ro16 Group D Prev…
TL Site Changes
[WCS EU] Grubby, MMA, Ret …
Pizza: All Tiers Reached
Vici and RisingStars Advan…
Up&Down groups for 2013 WC…
HerO, Revival Interviews -…
[SPL] Round 5 Week 4 Start…
Get 50% off Papa John's pi…
TL Advertising Features
Ice Fingers while gaming
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
McDonald's 'supporting' …
The XBox One
UK Soldier beheaded in L…
The Automated Ban List
TL Site Changes
Ask TL Staff Anything
DC/VA/MD Weekly Nerd Dinne…
Who Wants Free Pizza...GG?
IMMvp Fan Club
The Grubby Fan Club
LiLSighKoh's Stream!
Graphix Streaming Zerg
Computer Build Resource Th…
Simple Questions Simple An…
The Ultimate Mouse Thread
Bad Internet Signal Strength
Getting a new Mouse! Any R…
Looking for a team?
IdrA signs with eMG
FXOpen acquires Seed fro…
Designated Balance Discu…
Pizza: All Tiers Reached
[Show] Caster Challenges…
[GSTL] NSH vs MVP 2013 S1
[WCS EU] Finals Day 1 Prem…
Ottawa's Got Game! Estimat…
BO7 Challenger Series 200€
gearintherear 2v2 May Cup …
[G] TheCore - Advanced Key…
[G] [D] PARTING'S PVP PROL…
[Q] Is Mech weaker then bi…
Practice Partners Thread S…
ZvP - Carrier Help?
Map Jam & Challenge #5
[M] (2) Oasis 9
[M] (4) Eureka
Work In Progress Melee Maps
Map Analyser Tool
General Discussion
Dota 2 QQ thread
The International Intera…
Dota 2 funny pics thread
Beyond the Summit and TL…
All Pick - Wong Hock Chuan
[D2L] Fnatic vs. Mouz
[G-1] LAN Finals
Starladder Season 6
Dota 2 General LR thread
Merita $250+ Australian Do…
Simple Questions, Simple A…
Question: Luna Item Build
[G]uide to Lifestealer
Newly ported Hero discussi…
[G] In-Game Dota Guide for…
2 Artificial Intelligenc…
[D] New BW Server
sGs New Player/Low Level…
Map (4)Kyanite Prospect …
[Update] itemBay SSL Gra…
TeamLiquid Legacy Starle…
[TLS2] Results and Standings
D Ranks Teamleague Season 4
[GC S3] Gambit's Cup Semif…
Gambit's Cup Season 3 Roun…
C Ranks Teamleague Season 1
Simple Questions, Simple A…
Increasing APM/EAPM
Practice Partner Thread
Challenger map on Starcraf…
Champions League/Europa …
2012 - 2013 Football Thr…
TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
EVE Corporation
Magic: The Gathering Onl…
[T] Bastard "Mini" Mafia!
ESPORTS Mafia (streamed ma…
[M][N] Les Mafia
General nutrition recommen…
Running Thread
The 2013 Weightlifting Pro…
Leta - Movie
Michael - skyline
Anytime - Beast
By.Hero - Shuttle
Anytime - Pusan
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads


IRC Web Chat

TeamSpeak 3 (83 users)


Active: 8178 users

Ice melting.

Forum Index > General Forum 1 2 3 4 5 All
 
 Zodiac107   Sweden. August 02 2012 20:28. Posts 48
Profile # 
So a thought struck me the other day, and i wonder if its logical... In any case, if someone knows the answer to this id be glad if they could clarify it for my.

Lets start with an assumption.
1. The structure of water changes when turned into ice. During the transformation process the ice expands. (this can be tested at home by freezing water in a filled bottle, the bottle will crack and/or explode)
As far as i know this expansion is about 9%. But im not sure of those numbers since i haven't found more then 1 source for that. so this is also just an assumption at the moment.

Now here comes the problem, I and most likely many of you have heard on the news
and on/in movies and other kinds of media, also hearing from friends and family and so on, that the world will basicly drown if the ice melts in the poles.

Is that true though? Since the water expands and take up more space when turning into ice, then it would logically decrease in mass and take up less space if it melts. No considering that an iceberg only shows around 10% of its total mass and thus hides 90% of its mass under water. Shouldnt the waterlevels of the world actually lowered when the ice melts? Technically by 9% of the total mass of ice if the number is verified.

This is no troll post, but i figured that it would be interesting just throwing it out there.

Short version. Should'nt the sealevels decrease if the ice melts?

*edit - spelling
Last edit: 2012-08-02 20:30:31
Life is but a dream, sometimes we must all wake up.
Old Post

 
 SolHeiM   Sweden. August 02 2012 20:31. Posts 1260
Profile Blog # 
Ice floats on water, when the ice that floats melts and turns into water, the ocean levels will rise. Seems pretty simple to me.
Old Post

 
 Zodiac107   Sweden. August 02 2012 20:34. Posts 48
Profile # 
yes, well. Thats what most people belive anyway, but only 9% floats above water and 91% "floats" under water, so the ocean levels shouldnt rise at all if you factor in the decrease of mass when the ice melts.

*edit- spelling
Last edit: 2012-08-02 20:35:28
Life is but a dream, sometimes we must all wake up.
Old Post

 
 Kickboxer   Slovenia. August 02 2012 20:36. Posts 1043
Profile Blog # 
What kind of genius calculation is this?

According to your own numbers 10% of the iceberg is above water (this is probably terribly wrong) and the volume contracts by 9% when the ice melts.

So the surface still rises by 1% even if everything you said is accurate (it's not).
Old Post

 
 Mythra   New Zealand. August 02 2012 20:37. Posts 170
Profile # 
The melting ice that increases the sea level is the ice that is on land and not the floating ice. That why one of the main factors we look into for rising sea levels is the amount of ice melting greenland. floating ice doesnt raise sea levels beacuse the volume of the ice that is under watering keeping it bouyant is the same volume of water that will be produced when the ice melts as ice is less dense than water.
"Back then teams that won were credited, now it's called throw. I think it's sad." - KuroKy
Old Post

  thrawn2112   United States. August 02 2012 20:38. Posts 3599Profile Blog # 
there's a lot of ice on land
"People think they know all these things about other people, and if you ask them why they think they know that, it'd be hard for them to be convincing." ES
Old Post

 
 strongandbig   United States. August 02 2012 20:38. Posts 3263
Profile Blog # 
antarctic and glacier ice aren't floating they are sitting on land, which they will run off of when they melt.
[QUOTE][B]On March 20 2013 14:51 WaveofShadow wrote:[/B] I don't know much about Coag, but he doesn't seem like the type of guy who goes against the grain just for kicks. [/QUOTE]
Old Post

  miwi   Sweden. August 02 2012 20:38. Posts 179Profile # 
You do know there's a lot of ice on land right?
 
Old Post

  ControlMonkey   Australia. August 02 2012 20:38. Posts 1508Profile Blog # 
Greenland and Antarctica are above sea level.
Old Post

 
 b3n3tt3   August 02 2012 20:38. Posts 457
Profile # 
perform an experiment, put ice and water on your sink. measure the levels. measure it again after it melts
Old Post

 
 Surth   Germany. August 02 2012 20:38. Posts 119
Profile Blog # 
If I understand you correctly, I think this would be the solution to your idea:


To summarize the situation with Antarctic ice trends:

Antarctic land ice is decreasing at an accelerating rate
Antarctic sea ice is increasingn
Last edit: 2012-08-02 20:39:14
Old Post

 
 Meta   United States. August 02 2012 20:39. Posts 5802
Profile Blog # 
This theory seems easy enough to test in a cup of water, but as far as I know the density changes enough to counter the volume increase such that when it melts there will be 0 change to overall water level.

The problem is when ice that's not floating, but resting on continents (greenland and antarctia) melts and streams down into the sea. That's what will cause sea level rise in the event of the ice caps melting.
Last edit: 2012-08-02 20:40:18
Pure, immaculate, clean, omnicidal god machine
Old Post

 
 mardi   United States. August 02 2012 20:39. Posts 1159
Profile Blog # 
I think we need to remember that scientists also factor in the melting of glaciers as well.
Old Post

 
 Zodiac107   Sweden. August 02 2012 20:40. Posts 48
Profile # 
Well, math isnt my strong point... at all... but i agree the numbers looks a bit wrong. As i said earlier in my post, i havent been able to verify the numbers yet, i only found a single source of it, so please take the numbers with a grain of salt until they have been verified.
Life is but a dream, sometimes we must all wake up.
Old Post

  DrCooper   August 02 2012 20:40. Posts 115Profile # 
Ice Sheets/Continental glaciers (like greenland) are the big issue. These glaciers will primarily lead to the rising sea level.
Old Post

  Sinensis   United States. August 02 2012 20:42. Posts 2503Profile Blog # 
Water temperature effects ocean currents and climate. Ocean currents determine where water goes. Not to mention floating ice, glaciers, etc.
Old Post

 
 Zodiac107   Sweden. August 02 2012 20:42. Posts 48
Profile # 
Hmm, yes it is the ice upon land that will be the problem then, thanks for pointing that out. Does anyone know how much water the land will absorb upon a gradual melting?
Life is but a dream, sometimes we must all wake up.
Old Post

 
 wunsun   Canada. August 02 2012 20:42. Posts 587
Profile # 
The water level increasing is due to the ice that is on land; primarily on Antarctica and Greenland.
Old Post

 
 Sandtrout   August 02 2012 20:43. Posts 243
Profile # 
Apart from ice on land: Water has its highest density at 4°C, so as soon as water becomes warmer than that, it expands again.
Old Post

 
 Zodiac107   Sweden. August 02 2012 20:44. Posts 48
Profile # 

On August 02 2012 20:38 Surth wrote:
If I understand you correctly, I think this would be the solution to your idea:


To summarize the situation with Antarctic ice trends:

Antarctic land ice is decreasing at an accelerating rate
Antarctic sea ice is increasingn




Thank you for those, i will look into them.
Life is but a dream, sometimes we must all wake up.
Old Post

1 2 3 4 5 All
Please log in or register to reply.
 

» Recent SC2 Results
» Premier SC2 Tournaments

The Little App Factory