|
On October 06 2012 05:09 BlackMamba24 wrote: Promethelax will be replacing Sharrant.
Hi all, I'm replacing in for Sharrant who was the Vigi, he shot Annul last night.
I'm going to read the thread and see where we are.
As some of you know I work weird hours, when I'm here I'll be here a lot and when I'm not here I won't. Glad we have that settled and thanks for having me.
Liquid city here I come!
|
So I don't have a lot of time right now but what the hell is going on with Risk.Nuke? when I've seen him play town he is brash, compulsive and generally decent at the game. (See Pick Your power, whichever one it was where Matt vig'd mafia in two minutes). Here Risk is playing a lurky style so unlike anything I have seen from him that I think he is mafia.
Risk isn't playing like a townie and the things he has put in the thread, go on look at them, amount to a total of nothing. Interestingly enough his contributions have been: attacks on Shady and Kush early game (clearly the easiest targets) a response to Kreb. A back and forth with BC and A comment on marv
he also constantly called out a useless lurker Sharrant (now me), not as scummy but as "where are you" Risk hasn't contributed to any cases and is trying to fly under the radar. For the moment at least he is my best scum read.
@Risk: why would you play like this? What do you gain by lurking?
|
On October 06 2012 06:00 VisceraEyes wrote: I haven't given up. Quite the opposite. Tell me what's telling about my activity levels please.
what the hell are you doing this game VE? You are usually a hella good player (see every game ever), why aren't you contributing to the level you are capable of?
And why does Matt have a town read on you? (seriously, try answer this question) Matt who has done nothing this game which is 100% to his scum meta.
Why are all the vets in this game playing like crap.
|
sorry for triple post, Matt's town read on VE
On October 04 2012 01:45 Mattchew wrote: marv you played well and i thought you were town... now I see why you buddy'd up VE so hard
I realized I should have cited this right after I hit post.
|
Hi lurking vets who haven't added anything to the thread, we've missed you.
On October 06 2012 06:37 risk.nuke wrote: I'm just to lazy to build a case before the nightflip. I'm always watching the thread incase someone decides to pull some shenanigans. As for why I'm not posting. I consider the atleast last 20 pages useless shit and I haven't seen a point in joining the conversations that's been had.
I don't disagree with you, reading this thread is like wading through a pile of cow shit. That being said what are you reads based on not the last 20 pages? You seem pretty confidant that you'll be here to build a case after the flip, want to share why?
On October 06 2012 06:40 Mattchew wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2012 06:36 Promethelax wrote:sorry for triple post, Matt's town read on VE On October 04 2012 01:45 Mattchew wrote: marv you played well and i thought you were town... now I see why you buddy'd up VE so hard I realized I should have cited this right after I hit post. i didn't call VE town. I just felt marv's relationship with him was off. i thought marv had a strong town read on him, it turns out he was just scum.
okay, that is a reasonable explanation. Why haven't you done anything this whole game since defending an obviously town Shady? (I though he was obviously town but I've played with him as scum and town so maybe that is just me)
|
On October 06 2012 06:49 risk.nuke wrote: It's starting to become a habit in this thread,someone yells a question at me over a post in which I EXPLICITLY explained what they are questioning.
it is starting to be a habit of yours to not add anything to the thread with your posts. Who is your top scum read right now?
On October 06 2012 06:45 Hapahauli wrote:Still catching up, but this caught my eye: Show nested quote +On October 06 2012 06:37 risk.nuke wrote: I'm just to lazy to build a case before the nightflip. I'm always watching the thread incase someone decides to pull some shenanigans. As for why I'm not posting. I consider the atleast last 20 pages useless shit and I haven't seen a point in joining the conversations that's been had. Shouldn't you be much more concerned about death than this if you are town?
Glad we're on the same page Hapa, I hope we're both town this time around so I can see if I like playing with you when you aren't slaughtering me.
|
On October 06 2012 06:56 slOosh wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2012 06:53 kushm4sta wrote:On October 06 2012 06:51 slOosh wrote: ShiaoPi seems uncharacteristically aggressive this game compared to what I remember from LVII. Granted he was tracker but the general demeanor is more drastic than what a simple shy blue -> confident green could account for. His throwup of all reads looks more like a defensive play rather than a frustrated one.
ToutEstChaos you seem smart - if kush were no more would he be your #1 lynch pick? shiaopi.he has answered.that already So you don't think this means anything? Show nested quote +On October 06 2012 03:44 ToutEstChaos wrote: Well, I'd have believed it better if you'd divulged these reads immediately rather than waiting 20 minutes (enough time to, say, make up for not reading the thread), but this is infinitely better than before. I recognize that I've been somewhat strident with you.
Thank you. Or his read on DP means anything?
hey SloOsh what are your reads on anyone? You seem to think Kush is town and that is all i can find in your filter. I also see a call out of my previous incarnation, still think I'm scum? If not who is?
|
+ Show Spoiler +Sorry for any crazy in this post I've been out drinking (and more) since my last post in thread, I think I'm sober now but we'll see.
On October 06 2012 09:04 Hapahauli wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2012 06:54 Promethelax wrote:On October 06 2012 06:49 risk.nuke wrote: It's starting to become a habit in this thread,someone yells a question at me over a post in which I EXPLICITLY explained what they are questioning. it is starting to be a habit of yours to not add anything to the thread with your posts. Who is your top scum read right now? On October 06 2012 06:45 Hapahauli wrote:Still catching up, but this caught my eye: On October 06 2012 06:37 risk.nuke wrote: I'm just to lazy to build a case before the nightflip. I'm always watching the thread incase someone decides to pull some shenanigans. As for why I'm not posting. I consider the atleast last 20 pages useless shit and I haven't seen a point in joining the conversations that's been had. Shouldn't you be much more concerned about death than this if you are town? Glad we're on the same page Hapa, I hope we're both town this time around so I can see if I like playing with you when you aren't slaughtering me. Yah, I hope we're both town as well <3 I'm pretty surprised that no one has commented on that risk quote - not even risk himself! I'll have to take a look through risk's filter and see if he's capable of this as town, but the silence here is disconcerting. I'm also quite interested as to why imperfection chainsaw defended him - thoughts?
Since my first game with Imperfect where we were both scum (XIX) I feel generally decent at reading him. I like the kid a lot which helps, I think. The thing is in this game he hasn't stood out to me, nothing he does takes him to the next leve as either scummy or Towniel. Imperfect is a smart player who knows better than to lurk this much so his actions worry me, I have him in my Null column but I hope he is town as I like him a lot and his analysis always helps me solidify my own understanding of the game.
I don;t like the connection theory until on of Risk Iamp flips and I think Risk is much more likely to be scum.
On October 06 2012 09:28 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2012 09:20 iamperfection wrote: he could be "gasp" telling the truth. Nah. My play may not have been a documentary, but it's based on true events. Node was mafia.
hey Austin, bro, care to share your reasons? What about hapa's plays to or detracts from this read? Since Annul was not scum how does your read of Node change? + Show Spoiler +On October 03 2012 06:44 austinmcc wrote: Headed out soon for the evening, may not be back before deadline.
Node scum. If node scum, annul and Z-BosoN scum. mkfuba very scummy.
annul is odd no matter node's alignment, but I'd be much more convinced of SCUM if node is red.
slOosh's return and look at mattchew strike me as not-scum.
BC and coag feel kind of distant. BC entered thread with a lot of thoughts yesterday, but mainly just called half the thread scummy (mainly for doing things that were scummy). I wish he'd interacted more with thread towards deadline last night, and I wish he'd have some thoughts on people who aren't scummy and whatnot. Coag I have never played with, and he's kind of in the same boat - wherefore art thou Coageo?
I think the meta arguments on Kush are overblown. If he's got a clear town meta and scum meta, and then is clearly told the difference between those two, then the whole thing flies out the window slightly. Unless he's got oodles and oodles of games where he's clearly town or scum, he can just play like he normally would with less f bombs and know he'll look townie on meta. So I don't give them too much credence.
that leaves out a whole lotta players. Some, like BKE/Talismania were active early on and then completely absent. And why are you so focused on the Janitor role and Node? Sorry I just picked up on that on this read through of your filter. Since this happened + Show Spoiler +On October 02 2012 09:00 austinmcc wrote:Another interesting mention of Shady: Show nested quote +On October 01 2012 17:40 Node wrote: I don't think Shady Sands is scum -- at least, not given what we've seen so far. His "trolling" antics were silly, but they weren't scummy. If he were scum, I don't think he would've dropped the trolling pretext so quickly, and I certainly don't think he would be willing to reappear and start pushing targets. These feel like incredibly bad reasons for a townread. I don't see how NoT coNtINUinG TYpINg LIKe tHIs and throwing a bunch of obscenities around is townie. I don't see Shady pushing other targets. I'm interested in BC's thoughts on Shady. I think Node's thoughts, already given, make Node look scummy. Your only posts have been about Node and Janitors. Why tunnel so much, you are better than this.
Oh never mind, I see Hapa is claiming scum with his actions after the day post. ##Vote: hapa. Die Scum, and think this through you could have fought for yourself way to fold up and die (you are as bad as i was last time we played together).
|
On October 07 2012 00:49 BroodKingEXE wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On October 06 2012 16:04 Promethelax wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Sorry for any crazy in this post I've been out drinking (and more) since my last post in thread, I think I'm sober now but we'll see. Show nested quote +On October 06 2012 09:04 Hapahauli wrote:On October 06 2012 06:54 Promethelax wrote:On October 06 2012 06:49 risk.nuke wrote: It's starting to become a habit in this thread,someone yells a question at me over a post in which I EXPLICITLY explained what they are questioning. it is starting to be a habit of yours to not add anything to the thread with your posts. Who is your top scum read right now? On October 06 2012 06:45 Hapahauli wrote:Still catching up, but this caught my eye: On October 06 2012 06:37 risk.nuke wrote: I'm just to lazy to build a case before the nightflip. I'm always watching the thread incase someone decides to pull some shenanigans. As for why I'm not posting. I consider the atleast last 20 pages useless shit and I haven't seen a point in joining the conversations that's been had. Shouldn't you be much more concerned about death than this if you are town? Glad we're on the same page Hapa, I hope we're both town this time around so I can see if I like playing with you when you aren't slaughtering me. Yah, I hope we're both town as well <3 I'm pretty surprised that no one has commented on that risk quote - not even risk himself! I'll have to take a look through risk's filter and see if he's capable of this as town, but the silence here is disconcerting. I'm also quite interested as to why imperfection chainsaw defended him - thoughts? Since my first game with Imperfect where we were both scum (XIX) I feel generally decent at reading him. I like the kid a lot which helps, I think. The thing is in this game he hasn't stood out to me, nothing he does takes him to the next leve as either scummy or Towniel. Imperfect is a smart player who knows better than to lurk this much so his actions worry me, I have him in my Null column but I hope he is town as I like him a lot and his analysis always helps me solidify my own understanding of the game. I don;t like the connection theory until on of Risk Iamp flips and I think Risk is much more likely to be scum. Show nested quote +On October 06 2012 09:28 austinmcc wrote:On October 06 2012 09:20 iamperfection wrote: he could be "gasp" telling the truth. Nah. My play may not have been a documentary, but it's based on true events. Node was mafia. hey Austin, bro, care to share your reasons? What about hapa's plays to or detracts from this read? Since Annul was not scum how does your read of Node change? + Show Spoiler +On October 03 2012 06:44 austinmcc wrote: Headed out soon for the evening, may not be back before deadline.
Node scum. If node scum, annul and Z-BosoN scum. mkfuba very scummy.
annul is odd no matter node's alignment, but I'd be much more convinced of SCUM if node is red.
slOosh's return and look at mattchew strike me as not-scum.
BC and coag feel kind of distant. BC entered thread with a lot of thoughts yesterday, but mainly just called half the thread scummy (mainly for doing things that were scummy). I wish he'd interacted more with thread towards deadline last night, and I wish he'd have some thoughts on people who aren't scummy and whatnot. Coag I have never played with, and he's kind of in the same boat - wherefore art thou Coageo?
I think the meta arguments on Kush are overblown. If he's got a clear town meta and scum meta, and then is clearly told the difference between those two, then the whole thing flies out the window slightly. Unless he's got oodles and oodles of games where he's clearly town or scum, he can just play like he normally would with less f bombs and know he'll look townie on meta. So I don't give them too much credence.
that leaves out a whole lotta players. Some, like BKE/Talismania were active early on and then completely absent. And why are you so focused on the Janitor role and Node? Sorry I just picked up on that on this read through of your filter. Since this happened + Show Spoiler +On October 02 2012 09:00 austinmcc wrote:Another interesting mention of Shady: Show nested quote +On October 01 2012 17:40 Node wrote: I don't think Shady Sands is scum -- at least, not given what we've seen so far. His "trolling" antics were silly, but they weren't scummy. If he were scum, I don't think he would've dropped the trolling pretext so quickly, and I certainly don't think he would be willing to reappear and start pushing targets. These feel like incredibly bad reasons for a townread. I don't see how NoT coNtINUinG TYpINg LIKe tHIs and throwing a bunch of obscenities around is townie. I don't see Shady pushing other targets. I'm interested in BC's thoughts on Shady. I think Node's thoughts, already given, make Node look scummy. Your only posts have been about Node and Janitors. Why tunnel so much, you are better than this. Oh never mind, I see Hapa is claiming scum with his actions after the day post. ##Vote: hapa. Die Scum, and think this through you could have fought for yourself way to fold up and die (you are as bad as i was last time we played together). Dont post while drunk Austin is dead. How do your reads change?
I know, I was catching up on the thread and writing that as I caught up, by the time I had it all written I got to the point where Austin was dead and Hapa was confirmed scum. I should have just deleted it and said
Oh never mind, I see Hapa is claiming scum with his actions after the day post.
but well, yeah, I wasn't in my right mind.
I still think Risk, Matt and VE look really suspicious, Risk most of all. The problem is how much of that is based on the clear don't-give-a-fuckness of their play and this game is hard to give a fuck about because of the foregone conclusion of the lynch two cycles in a row. My theories on why scum are giving up once they have been fingered for death by our dt/medics+ Show Spoiler +I assume that the scum strat is, when caught by the paramedic role, to give up without a fight and ruin the cycle for us. That is the only explanation I can think of for two strong wifom users just giving up immediately when they get called out as scum by the paramedics. We won't get anything from this vote count since everyone will be on Hapa and we won't get anything from this cycle cause hapa will shit up the thread and make discussion hard just like Marv did.
@Risk, the kills have come through, where is that case you are no longer too lazy to make?
@Hapa, your medic claim is worse than mine was. Which is saying something.
@Everyone, I propose we each come forward with a case on not Hapa during this cycle. We have two filters of interactions between scum and unkown players, we have day one voting patterns and we have our own skills. Don't let this cycle go to waste.
|
On October 07 2012 03:15 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2012 03:10 kushm4sta wrote: @promethelax What else can they do but give up?? The paramedic leaves zero doubt.
Of course it leaves doubt. Both of those breadcrumbs were anything but subtle. If scum saw fuba's (especially after losing their godfather and being paranoid about paramedic), they could have potentially shot him to frame Hapa. The problem is, you still lynch Hapa anyways. There's just too much chance that the paramedic died using his ability rather than being shot. So, there's plausible doubt, but not enough to get out of a lynch.
I would argue that the first bread crumb was pretty subtle since no one knew about the role. The second one was more subtle as a claim because the role was known but easier to decipher because the role was known.
If my math is right though scum has two kp and the third townie death was Fuba by targeting Hapa. Also if hapa was town this would never be his response.
Kier, you aren't dumb (believe me I know, you called my ass out when I was scum) but this post is just introducing doubt where there is none, you don't consider the actions of the players being accused. You have successfully posted while adding nothing to the thread; why did you post this?
|
On October 07 2012 03:37 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2012 03:23 Promethelax wrote:On October 07 2012 03:15 Keirathi wrote:On October 07 2012 03:10 kushm4sta wrote: @promethelax What else can they do but give up?? The paramedic leaves zero doubt.
Of course it leaves doubt. Both of those breadcrumbs were anything but subtle. If scum saw fuba's (especially after losing their godfather and being paranoid about paramedic), they could have potentially shot him to frame Hapa. The problem is, you still lynch Hapa anyways. There's just too much chance that the paramedic died using his ability rather than being shot. So, there's plausible doubt, but not enough to get out of a lynch. I would argue that the first bread crumb was pretty subtle since no one knew about the role. The second one was more subtle as a claim because the role was known but easier to decipher because the role was known. If my math is right though scum has two kp and the third townie death was Fuba by targeting Hapa. Also if hapa was town this would never be his response. Kier, you aren't dumb (believe me I know, you called my ass out when I was scum) but this post is just introducing doubt where there is none, you don't consider the actions of the players being accused. You have successfully posted while adding nothing to the thread; why did you post this? What math? Where does it say anything about how much KP the mafia has? Or, how many mafia there are? How can you do math when you don't know the variables? About the last part, I was talking purely from a hypothetical standpoint. Hapa is 100% confirmed scum, because his actions aren't consistent with what a framed townie would do. They're what a caught scum does. The fact that you asked him to fight instead of give up, then calling me out for saying the reason that he COULD have fought (even if we wouldn't have believed him) is hypocritical as fuck.
Sorry, that isn't clear, I use "if my math is right" to mean based on what I think I've figured out. It seems like there have been caimed vig shots/death by being a paramedic which encompass all the kills but two each night. If your understanding is different I'd love to hear it.
Sorry I miss understood you, you are right he could have fought and (I think) should have fought. You are right, hypothetically the paramedic death doesn't give us confirmed scum. Scum is giving us confirmed scum after they are probable scum based on the paramedic role.
Kush:
On October 07 2012 03:44 kushm4sta wrote: This pseudo fight between coag and prometh..why are you nitpicking each other so hard? Hapa is confirmed scum. This is agreed upon by everyone. Keirathi was saying why it's possible HYPOTHETICALLY that he could be framed.
I'm trying to assume you aren't an idiot but all you are doing is reiterating what everyone else says and than claiming that it is obvious. If it is obvious why are you saying it? Can you tell me why Risk, Kier and Coag seem guilty to you. Not why they seem guilty to me or to VE or to anyone else. Why are they guilty to you?
@Coag and VE, I don't think that is a scum slip it seems like a read posted on impulse into the thread with no back-up. However coag's reaction to being called out for it makes me think of him as scummy, he is focused on, and angry about, this scum slip. He hasn't talked about the rest of the (minimal) case that VE presented. I am always very angry when I am scum and someone calls something I don't view as a slip a slip because they have caught me by 'being lucky/dumb' which sucks. Coag, if you are town please present a defense of the accusation instead of an attack on the slip. I get it, you aren't happy that this is being a scum slip. But your reaction is to spam up the thread with one liners which add nothing to the thread. Give me something that is a case or a response to the case on you.
|
On October 07 2012 04:37 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2012 04:29 Promethelax wrote:On October 07 2012 03:37 Keirathi wrote:On October 07 2012 03:23 Promethelax wrote:On October 07 2012 03:15 Keirathi wrote:On October 07 2012 03:10 kushm4sta wrote: @promethelax What else can they do but give up?? The paramedic leaves zero doubt.
Of course it leaves doubt. Both of those breadcrumbs were anything but subtle. If scum saw fuba's (especially after losing their godfather and being paranoid about paramedic), they could have potentially shot him to frame Hapa. The problem is, you still lynch Hapa anyways. There's just too much chance that the paramedic died using his ability rather than being shot. So, there's plausible doubt, but not enough to get out of a lynch. I would argue that the first bread crumb was pretty subtle since no one knew about the role. The second one was more subtle as a claim because the role was known but easier to decipher because the role was known. If my math is right though scum has two kp and the third townie death was Fuba by targeting Hapa. Also if hapa was town this would never be his response. Kier, you aren't dumb (believe me I know, you called my ass out when I was scum) but this post is just introducing doubt where there is none, you don't consider the actions of the players being accused. You have successfully posted while adding nothing to the thread; why did you post this? What math? Where does it say anything about how much KP the mafia has? Or, how many mafia there are? How can you do math when you don't know the variables? About the last part, I was talking purely from a hypothetical standpoint. Hapa is 100% confirmed scum, because his actions aren't consistent with what a framed townie would do. They're what a caught scum does. The fact that you asked him to fight instead of give up, then calling me out for saying the reason that he COULD have fought (even if we wouldn't have believed him) is hypocritical as fuck. Sorry, that isn't clear, I use "if my math is right" to mean based on what I think I've figured out. It seems like there have been caimed vig shots/death by being a paramedic which encompass all the kills but two each night. If your understanding is different I'd love to hear it. So, lets think about night 1 a bit. 3 people died: Risen (paramedic, who died from targetting scum), Annul (who you claimed your predecessor shot), and kingjames01 (scum shot? a secong vig? doesn't really matter). Then, on the second night, 3 people still died. A paramedic, again assumed to have targetted scum. Tout, who was being pretty pro-town and therefor a probable scum shot, and austin whom no one has claimed shooting, and therefor probably a scum shot. You can see why I'm screwy on your guessing game math. Because supposedly we had a vig shot, night 1, and not one on night 2, but still the same amount of kills. Yea, its possible that there was a medic save night 1, or any number of things, but I think any kind of extrapolation of scum numbers and KP at this point is EXTREMELY speculative. To suggest otherwise makes me question if you have extra information that I don't.
On October 03 2012 23:18 austinmcc wrote: Okay I was definitely hit last night. Thanks for the prot.
|
The information I have that you don't is reading the goddamn thread.
|
On October 07 2012 04:53 kushm4sta wrote: @prome your reasons became my reasons when i read them
Kush, why are you sheeping me? Do you have a town read on me? If not what the hell are you doing and if you do great, help me by doing some work of your own instead of spamming as much as the confirmed scum.
Your play makes me sad.
|
On October 07 2012 05:14 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2012 04:48 Promethelax wrote: The information I have that you don't is reading the goddamn thread. Touche. So, care to comment on anything that is pertinent to this game or are you scum?
On October 07 2012 05:45 slOosh wrote: Keir you still haven't commented on VE vs Coag
slOosh, just so I can be sure: you think that VE is scum based on his case on Coag. Is this true? Yes or no?
|
On October 07 2012 06:08 BroodKingEXE wrote:This is Coag's reaction to being on austin's list. + Show Spoiler [Austin's post] + Coagulation - On October 02 2012 12:17 Coagulation wrote: Everyone keep your votes on shady sands. Node bandwagon looked scummy as fuck and only makes shady look even scummier. Wagon looks scummy. No substantive thoughts on Node. Show nested quote +On October 06 2012 04:51 Coagulation wrote: why the fuck am I on the list? Im sorry but I have done nothing to look scummy at all. Maybe im not the most active player here but that sure as fuck doesnt indicate that im scum in any way. This reaction is totally different, but the accusations behind them are virtually the same. Austin's a townie so I feel its some sort of weird distancing strat on Coag's part. + Show Spoiler [Shiao's post] +On October 06 2012 03:40 ShiaoPi wrote: LoL, you will just call me out for not doing cases again if I drop reads without reasoning, whatever the fuck here comes:
scummy as hell: VE, Coag and Matt, various reasons for each, but mainly for being vets their impact has been close to zero in this game.
scumleaning: BC, Sloosh and whoever replaces for Node, I know I had him more on the townieside but fuck it no reason at all to go MIA like this.
kind of wary off: Sharrant, risk, fuba, boson and kush
Es-tu satisfait de mon travail, mon ami?
Interesting. I hadn't noticed this. So do you feel that both Coag and Shio are scum? How about VE who Coag is also reacting to poorly when called out by.
Matt and Risk, where in the bloody hells are you? You have only come back to the thread to write off my questioning of you and summarily vanished again. What are your reads, what has changed for you after the Night Kills?
|
On October 07 2012 07:03 slOosh wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2012 06:07 Promethelax wrote: slOosh, just so I can be sure: you think that VE is scum based on his case on Coag. Is this true? Yes or no?
I believe it is very scummy, but my reads on VE tend to be less reliable than those on other players (cf. my day 1 case against him in LIII, where he flipped jailkeeper), so I'm taking this one slowly. Do you agree with my analysis / have input on VE himself?
I think your analysis has merit, VE is not playing a good town game. Which means he is either bad townie or scum(anti-town). I think he is slightly more likely to be bad town just because other people are scummier (Kier, Coag, Matt, Risk) but my issue with this game is the huge number of people playing like scum; it makes me distrust my own reads.
I feel that Coag's reaction to the pressure from VE is that of a scum and not a townie though, his actions are scummy and his response to being called out on that is to say "oh yeah, don't worry guys, that is just how I play"
So Coag, great, that is your meta. What does town gain by you freaking out and spamming in all caps about how that totes wasn't a scumslip?
Risk and Matt. If I had more shots you would both be dead. Play the fucking game.
|
On October 07 2012 07:44 kushm4sta wrote: @prom Why is mattchew scummy? Did I miss a case you made on him?
It isn't a case so much as an understanding I have with Matt. Matt is scummy because he is an incredible player who loves to make massive plays on his own. When he is mafia he lurks and gives not a single fuck. In my first game of mafia ever I had a town meta read on him because of his lurkiness which I learned after he murdered me and the rest of town that I was totally wrong about; when he doesn't give a fuck he is scum.
|
Well, I'm off to work. I'll be back in some hours. I swear if you guys manage to not talk I will find you all and pistol whip you with my empty gun.
hf gl.
|
Home from work, catching up. DP, I love playing games with you no one else is awake when I come home.
|
|
|
|