Ah, the collective sigh of ten million erect penises wilting.
Or maybe not. After all, we all should know by now, somewhere in the backs of our minds, that industries like pornography and prostitution, for better or for worse, often cater to (for employment, not for consumption) the more desperate among us, and that despite how the workers might act for the camera, they rarely enjoy themselves. Does having it written up really make a difference to you?
Either way, it is an interesting article.
Resonate United Kingdom. March 23 2006 08:07. Posts 8386
I don't really have any pity for this girl, she's clearly a retard and she blundered into this whole thing not thinking properly. If she'd thought about this situation for even a moment she'd have been able to sort another way out of it without resorting to porn. even if she was resorting to it it's retarded to think that noone would see it but that she'd still get paid $1200 for nothing...
She's just another dumbass who got fucked (both ways) by some porn company... There's one born every minute so it'll go on indefintely.
it pisses me off that people are manipulated like this, don't get me wrong, but some people make some seriously stupid decisions when they're desperate.
Memory lane in nice
EvilTeletubby Baltimore, USA. March 23 2006 08:18. Posts 21081
immediate reactions 1) pissed off for instant porn->demeans women thing 2) chuckles at phrase "partially on stifled tears" 3) blah blah bangbus, porn is getting increasingly naughty and apparently is easy to make 4) slag i mean unfortunate gets preggie at 22 (wow bit old?) and breaks up with bf woot 5) about 6 uninteresting paragraphs 6) Donnie chuckles and trades high fives with Sanchez. lol 7) oh god okay i gave it my best shot. so basically this dumb bitch gets knocked up and signs up to a porn shoot at bangbus without knowing what it was, complains about "abuse" when the acting starts (she doesn't actually complain she goes along with it) and then complains when, when what? she either has a legally binding contract or not, i mean wtf is she whining about "uh as soon as they mentioned 50k i thought...wow ....wow 50k....and then like hung up and hung my head in yet another failure but hey SOMEONE MIGHT BUY THIS" lol?
IF YOU DONT THINK IM COOL THEN LEAVE THE TABLE
Chibi[OWNS] United Kingdom. March 23 2006 08:19. Posts 10598
Her boyfriend hustled her and her stuff was up for more then 2 weeks. If she wanted that taken down after 2 weeks she should have aranged it in the contract.
Pimp boyfriend + no contraceptives + fucked up brain = pRon. Shit happens nothing the law can do. All she can do is yell scream and cry. If she didn't see it comming then no-one can help you. For someone studying psychology she shows great insight.
Haemonculus United States. March 23 2006 09:12. Posts 6046
wow. See I've devised a system which I think should be immediately instated into law. The system involves 4 levels of intelligence. The 2nd group is 90% of the public, people who aren't too smart or too stupid. The first group are people who are fucking brilliant, they get extra rights or something. The third group are people who are pretty stupid, (this girl for instance). In this system, they are allowed to live, but the law does not protect them. If you kill a category 3, nothing bad happens to you. The 4th catagory is for people who are just flaming faiulres at life. Upon being designated a 4th category person, you are killed immediately.
An example of a category 4: At lunch one day I witnessed a group of football neanderthals trying to stick pickels to the wall in the shape of a penis. (These are kids in college mind you). While failing to do so, one of them said these exact words: "The wieght ray-sho to stick ray-sho is not good enough". (ray-sho is a primitive attempt to say "ratio", but this species will be unable to correctly pronouce such a word for at least several hundred more generations)
Law officers upon hearing something THAT retarded, would shoot them on sight.
Tell me I'm a fool with my feet off the ground! The way that I see it, it's the other way around! Say that I'm a dreamer who's walking on air! Might as well be water, why should I care!
Just because you can now store where everyone was and is, what they like, what they fear who they talk to and who they love. It does not mean we should so spy upon our fellow man in a dystopia far worse then 1984
Chibi[OWNS] United Kingdom. March 23 2006 09:59. Posts 10598
woooooah Haemonculus i totally support this idea except you're kinda wrong with the 90% in category B there. oh also i disagree about shooting i think it should be more limitations to our privileges in society eg need a license and certain vigerous training and precommitment and stable relationship and economic sustainence before being allowed to give birth. you dont like it this isn't a fucking democracy you get the fuck out of my society , where maybe the rules are nicer and you can get paid for splooging infront of someones splooge you hopeless worthless mass. this of course is an ever significant disucssion as we trundle towards the age of total electronic tagging, permanent inescapable ID....what "freedoms" "need we, should we" "relenquish" for a goal . i think perhaps in order to improve our relationships with one another we need to consider REmoving our relationships with one another. this is one of possibly two or more contrasting directions people like to take when confronted with problems like this. it needs to be handled properly sometime cause all we have is a mishmash of social/ethical contradictions and nothing ever gets done. so...a camera on every sidewalk, or a gun for every man? very old issue that (freedom vs security for those in tier 3). the less we are free, the more we expect freedom (or desire it). how is this balanced with security, the threat of danger, the risk of 'freedom'? (or even the "COST" of freedom). how will it be in 200 years time (lol?) how do we expect to see the human race to pursue security vs freedom, and how will our expectations be fulfilled? what expectations (why expectations)? hum
hmm i used to advocate that people who test below a certain level on an IQ test should be castrated, then people told me i was a "nazi"
they don't understand because they aren't smart enough. i don't advocate it anymore, but secretly, i still believe in it. especially since stupid people propagate much faster than smart people do.
on the article, i feel no pity for her either. she is an idiot. when she found up she was knocked up, she could have called her parents (if she's in college her parents were probably available to help), her brother, or her friends, and if she still couldn't get the money (an abortion is what? 500 bucks?) then go to an external party and ask for help or something, there are TONS of resources for this in the US
she was just too big of a pussy to deal with the societal consequences of her irresponsible actions. she didn't want to tell her parents, her friends, and she couldn't bear doing a couple of semesters with a preggy belly.
so she went into porn, only to find out that there would be more embarassment there than she would have gotten with the pregnancy.
big fucking whoop. some women actually like being in pornography. not all of them are exploited. but of those that are, most are fucking idiots anyway who could have easily avoided the situation (omg i need money for meth!!)